Comments by "Matt Foley" (@mattfoley6082) on "" video.

Mueller absolutely destroyed Repubs' attempts to discredit him. None of their tricks worked. The facts of the report speak clearly: Trump attempted several times to derail the investigation. The law is clear: a failed attempt to obstruct is a crime. Nothing changes this: not Mueller's political party, not whether his team are Democratic members, not whether they hate Trump, not whether Trump walks on water, not whether Hillary is a criminal. Sorry Trumpsters, you lost and you lost YUGE. P.S. Congrats on that no collusion thingy.
2
@GamingWithNikolas That's what you say. There WAS Russian interference in Trump's favor. Cui bono.
2
@GamingWithNikolas Way to move those goalposts again! Or maybe you just forgot this key point: Your Obstructor in chief can be charged after he leaves office.
2
@GamingWithNikolas Way to move those goalposts. We are talking about there being reason enough to investigate Trump. Your entire argument has been there was no reason to investigate him.
1
@GamingWithNikolas Q: Did Trump do all of the following? "I hope you can let this go." (said to Comey) "Tell Sessions to limit the investigation to future elections." (said to Corey Lewandowski) "Reverse your recusal so you can investigate Hillary." (said to Sessions) "Tell Sessions to resign." (said to Reince Preibus) "Fire Mueller." (said to Don McGahn) Hinted in a public interview that Cohen's father-in-law could face legal problems (attempt to intimidate witness Michael Cohen) A: Yes. Q: Were these attempts to interfere successful in ending the investigation? A: No, the investigation finished. Q: Is attempting to influence an investigation still considered obstruction of justice, even if that attempt is unsuccessful? A: Yes. Q: Is the lack of a suspected crime (in this case ""collusion") a legal justification for that person trying to influence or interfere with the investigation into that suspected crime? A: No.
1