Comments by "" (@Green__one) on "Insider" channel.

  1. Instead they covered "gravity" which put a lot of work into being as scientifically INACCURATE as possible. Gravity is not an example of space movies done well, they got pretty much every single piece of the physics wrong, not to mention completely messing up how astronauts are selected and trained. It really was one of the worst movies I've ever endured.
    21
  2.  @k1productions87  so you either didn't watch it or don't understand physics.
    6
  3. Why mention the one that got every single aspect of space completely wrong? Gravity was less realistic than the movies from 80 years earlier.
    1
  4.  @sulkysays  I'm assuming that you, like the director of gravity, have no concept of physics whatsoever.
    1
  5.  @sulkysays  your right on that part, but that's not what gravity showed. They showed things like 2 astronauts tethered together stationary, with a force pulling them apart. I've seen physicists specifically discussing gravity, they don't have anything positive to say about what is portrayed.
    1
  6. And still managed to be one of the worst movies I've ever endured. They could have at least pretended to care about physics.
    1
  7. And yet still look more realistic than the garbage that was "Gravity", they could have at least pretended to care about physics.
    1