Comments by "Actual Facts" (@actualfacts1055) on "ICAC will not release its findings until after March state election" video.

  1. Will ICAC get sued by all of the people that it has defamed ?
    4
  2.  @johnwoodrow8769  I listen to facts, they name and shame and then start looking for evidence, oops there is none.
    1
  3.  @johnwoodrow8769  They should call an inquiry without naming who they are inquiring into, it's not a court of law, no one has been charged with anything. Dan Andrews and Palaszczuk haven't had to put up with this garbage when they were under investigation.
    1
  4.  @johnwoodrow8769  Gladys hasn't been charged with anything but has been named and shamed by these arse holes.
    1
  5.  @johnwoodrow8769  It's only your opinion that Gladys betrayed public trust, maybe you should work for ICAC.
    1
  6.  @johnwoodrow8769  There is still no reason to name and shame, any evidence obtained can be given to the police for possible charges.
    1
  7.  @johnwoodrow8769  Now we are getting somewhere, ICAC are the moral police, naming and shaming based on their opinion of what is corrupt but not illegal behaviour. Whether someone is your colleague, friend, romantic interest or enemy is a matter of opinion of both involved and changes by the day based on a whim of either party. We are paying for this garbage. Maguire has not been found guilty of anything apart from carrying on his personal business activities in his spare time at work. Government grants to public projects is the right of any Government and is in plain view for all to see. Do we want this waste of tax payers money in Federal politics too ?
    1
  8.  @johnwoodrow8769  We are paying for the opinion of a bunch of self interested lawyers out to justify their existence.
    1
  9.  @johnwoodrow8769  They were charged by the police and had their day in court, no problem with that. That would have happened without naming and shaming.
    1
  10.  @johnwoodrow8769 Gladys funding a public project in the electorate of McGuire was in plain view of the public and not illegal, Maguire carrying on his personal business in his spare time at work is his business and is done by everyone else in the workforce.
    1
  11.  @johnwoodrow8769  ICAC doesn't need to publically name who they are investigating, they can just publicly call people to answer questions in regard to an investigation that they are holding. The end result will be the same without naming and shaming someone upfront.
    1
  12. @@dickdastardly7112 Has she been charged with anything no, she has moved on to a better career, Labor politicians never resign because their best career opportunity is to stay in politics.
    1
  13. @@dickdastardly7112 Guilty of a poor choice of boy friend and not wanting to disadvantage the party for the upcoming election. She now has a better future without all of the bullshit involved in politics, you can keep being a grubby left wing jealous gutter crawler, that's what you are good at.
    1