Comments by "Len" (@Len-jk4zi) on "WARNING -- DISTURBING VIDEO: Sheriff Releases Bodycam Footage Of Tiger Killing At Naples Zoo" video.

  1. The cop made the right decision.
    9
  2.  @snugnemongoo8635  If you were the officer, you'd be conditioned to protect human life. This officer already hesitated too much. When humans do things they're not supposed to do, we do not let them die for it. We bail them out before they get hurt even worse. We don't ask questions, we save them first. If you ever get shot, how would you feel if people asked questions before getting you medical care?
    8
  3.  @Mr.BigBadWolf  Actually, it is. The only mistake he made was trusting the creature. Humans with kindness tend to trust.
    3
  4. you're crazy, bud.
    3
  5.  @Sarah-sj6lj  This man was kind. He trusted a creature that he should not have. I will defend him, because kindness deserves to be defended. Unless of course, you want me to be cruel to you.
    2
  6. ​ @Pawlak8771  Then we humans did what human instinct tells us to do: protect human life. The tiger was shot for a reason.
    2
  7. That's how you get fired lol
    2
  8. Nope, the officer fired in the correct location.
    2
  9. He's dumb, but his actions resulted in a wonderful thing happening.
    2
  10. That could simply get the victim killed.
    1
  11.  @Sarah-sj6lj  No, he was being kind. It's a very kind thing to trust an animal not to attack you. It was reckless, but it was not arrogant. It was kind, and stupid. But the tiger still had to die.
    1
  12.  @thecityofsauce5965  I'm not interested in talking to sexual predators such as yourself.
    1
  13.  @blushingviolet5928  good to know.
    1
  14.  @judilynn9569  I do have sympathy for this man. You'd have sympathy for your child if your child was that stupid.
    1
  15.  @jayronthompson2562  A great chess player and wholesome person is called Eric Rosen. Please don't associate people because their names sound similar!
    1
  16. You wouldn't? Okay, if you're getting your arm ripped off by a tiger, I'll let it.
    1
  17. Because the tiger is violent, not the arsehole.
    1
  18. Your "baby tiger" would kill you, too.
    1
  19. Yeah, and the human should have been your family instead of someone else's.
    1
  20. Nope, the cop did the right thing. VIOLENT animals that attack humans need to die.
    1
  21.  @MurkedClipz  Nope, the tiger lost its' life because it attacked a human. If you want to protect tigers, idiot-proof cages, because humans are always going to put human life first.
    1
  22.  @MurkedClipz  Alright, but we still have to put human life first. The officer did the right thing by putting the violent animal down. I wish he had done it faster, though.
    1
  23. Nope. The goal isn't to save the tiger, but to save the human.
    1
  24. He did the right thing.
    1
  25. Nope, you don't use less lethals against a creature that has already attacked someone.
    1
  26. That human was irreplaceable, too. If it were your family, you wouldn't be saying this. They should not have attempted to scare the tiger, they did the right thing by killing it.
    1
  27. ​ @stephwiller9089  A tiger is not human life. Human life comes first, kiddo.
    1
  28.  @stephwiller9089  And that's why you need mental help.
    1
  29. Nope, it's the park's responsibility to make sure there isn't a gap large enough for them to stick their arms through. What he did was negligent but not criminally so. If you had shot the floor, you would have instantaneously lost your career in law enforcement. You MUST shoot to preserve human life at the first opportunity, as quickly as possible.
    1
  30. You must shoot to kill when an animal attacks a human.
    1
  31. It's just a caged monster that needed to die. As soon as an animal learns to attack humans, that should be the moment it is put down.
    1
  32. are you insane, bud?
    1
  33. You should be thanking him. I know the tiger would.
    1
  34. There's nothing to charge the park with. You could just build an idiot-proof fence.
    1
  35. You're a creature of empathy; a rare thing here.
    1
  36. It's called fight or flight instinct for a reason. What do you think an apex predator would choose if spooked?
    1
  37. They're police. Not animal control. Their job is to preserve human life.
    1
  38. Humans are animals too. Some animals will be violent, some animals will be stupid. We only kill the violent ones, though.
    1
  39. Because you would want the tiger shot with a real gun if it was your arm being rendered useless for the remainder of your life.
    1
  40. No. When an animal injures a human, you shoot to kill, as fast as possible.
    1
  41. It being shot in captivity was one of the best things to happen to it.
    1
  42. That was not an innocent tiger.
    1
  43. You need help.
    1
  44. There's not much you can hit him with if he had permission to be on the property.
    1
  45.  @lighthousesociety.  Honestly, if the guy had a better family life he probably wouldn't have done something so stupid
    1
  46. They don't work.
    1
  47. Nope, pepper spray would have gotten him fired. Pepper spray isn't even a reliable way to stop human attackers.
    1
  48. He can't be charged, and I hope he didn't lose anything.
    1
  49. No.
    1
  50. The tiger caused its' own death.
    1
  51. As we can see, that tiger was not a good tiger. It was a killer.
    1
  52. They likely wouldn't succeed.
    1
  53.  @anlu3365  The fence has holes large enough to stick your arm through.
    1
  54.  @anlu3365  That's really not enough.
    1
  55. We did evolve.
    1
  56.  @LaceyR_FreeEricBrandt  Nope, we're still evolving. The funny thing is, the dumb ones just don't get to participate.
    1
  57. Nope, you've got to shoot anything that attacks humans.
    1
  58. The tiger had to die because it attacked a human, and was still attacking a human when help arrived. Tigers are not innocent animals, they attack humans on a regular basis in the wild. Human life comes first. Once a violent animal gets a taste for blood, it must be put down lest even its' handlers be in danger.
    1
  59.  @Sarah-sj6lj  What if it was your father, or brother? Or sister, or mother? You wouldn't be saying the same things then, and that guy has a family. Tigers are violent creatures and whether or not they do it maliciously or not, they still kill people.
    1
  60.  @Sarah-sj6lj  Yeah, because we protect one another. What if your family DID do something that stupid?
    1
  61.  @Sarah-sj6lj  I don't think you've ever seen human empathy prevail over hatred. Did he know his action would result in the tiger getting killed? No. It doesn't matter why, it was still an act of kindness towards a creature that is horrible and violent by nature.
    1
  62.  @Sarah-sj6lj  So, what was it? Is he smart enough to know what would happen and getting attacked is a part of some sort of grand conspiracy that we can't comprehend because he's that much smarter than us? Or was he just stupid and kind and thought he could befriend the big fluffy kitty, completely oblivious to the consequences of trying? Tigers don't respect boundaries, they're killing machines. They mete out death a lot better than any human ever should, and it should logically stand that they're prepared to die a lot better than we are as well. Tigers in particular are horrible and violent. They're as vile as any other species that kills indiscriminately.
    1
  63. It could have provoked a more violent attack. When your fellow humans are in danger, you do not have time to lose. Save them.
    1
  64. Tigers are not innocent.
    1
  65.  @rebelrouserr  They're not just any predator. They're one of the few predators that are extraordinarily violent towards humans. Considering how this particular species behaves, I think it's best for us if it disappears from the wild.
    1
  66.  @rebelrouserr  They're not evil, they're not innocent. They're just inherently violent and objectively a bad creature. When tigers aren't in a cage, they kill humans on a regular basis. In this regard, we don't need them to continue existing.
    1
  67.  @rebelrouserr  Nope, I just recognize violent killing machines when I see them.
    1
  68.  @rebelrouserr  A tiger's survival mechanism is called killing humans like a violent animal. This isn't the first video of a violent tiger I've seen; the other ones weren't caged and the other ones were not being harassed. This is NOT an animal you can coexist with. Stop calling it a fluffy creature, or some idiot might go put a hand in its' cage and get violently attacked again.
    1
  69. No, it attacked a human, it needed to die. Even if it survives the incident, it has tasted blood.
    1
  70.  @pigalow2002  Violent animals that taste human blood must be put down. If that animal weren't in a cage, it'd be hunting humans down and killing them, repeatedly.
    1
  71.  @pigalow2002  It isn't suddenly not a human-killing monster just because it's in a cage. If we're not going to do anything to thin out the stupid, we're going to have to stop keeping these monsters in cages where the stupid have access.
    1
  72.  @pigalow2002  Are you pro-choice?
    1
  73.  @pigalow2002  Yeah, this incident is a symptom of a greater problem.
    1
  74.  @pigalow2002  No, that's a symptom. You're tiger food, dude.
    1
  75. Nope, the human was worth more than that piece of trash tiger.
    1
  76. You could easily be one of them.
    1
  77. No sympathy. It is a creature of pure violence.
    1
  78. Nope, we need to preserve human life and risk as little injury to humans as possible. They could have done their job better by running as soon as they got out of the car.
    1
  79. Shooting something in the leg is typically fatal. Oftentimes non-lethal injures do not cause an animal to release their prey. Less lethals would risk the life of the human.
    1
  80. The police officer probably didn't want to lose their job by wasting time using less lethals on a violent animal.
    1
  81. He could press charges against the zoo for having a gap large enough for a tiger to pull his arm through.
    1
  82.  @SarahLynnFisk  Yeah, actually, he could.
    1
  83.  @SarahLynnFisk  Yeah, actually, he could.
    1
  84. It attacked a human, it needed to die. Big cats are tough, there's a park where you can pet lions, and their handlers pull their hair, smack them with cushions, and mess with them.
    1