Comments by "Len" (@Len-jk4zi) on "Ana Kasparian Calls Out Anti White Nonsense" video.

@Alritealritealrite They're patient so long as they can take away your bodily rights with impunity.
5
@BoogerlyPlops If it's okay to force people to give birth, it's okay to forcibly vaccinate them. If the government can force you to sacrifice your bodily autonomy for the safety of a single fetus, it can force you to sacrifice your bodily autonomy for the general public and force you to take vaccines you don't want. I don't think either are moral. Bodily autonomy is more important than vaccination and a lot more important than fetuses.
3
@Ashigeru47 If you want to offend the "right", tell them women are people with the right to bodily autonomy.
3
@TheMaxKids The both of you have got L takes. Patience is like a gun. It's not always good in every context, and some may exercise it with ill intent in mind.
2
@neil_mch It's about someone else's body when you're forcibly vaccinated against your will. No, you should not have to make concessions on your bodily autonomy for someone else's body. That's the point of bodily autonomy.
2
@Whickedlee I'll plan when I'm going to have either of those things, thanks.
2
@maxheadman59 Re-read my comment, little buddy.
1
@skylerarndt3179 As long as no-one forces her to remain pregnant, I have no issue. Either women have the right to abort and you have the right to decline unwanted vaccines, or neither of you have any bodily rights.
1
@jesseporter3397 Read the other replies to my comments. Republicans only care about control.
1
@Alritealritealrite I'm not sure what you're replying to. The threat is over 100 comments long and your @mention doesn't supply any additional information.
1
@SD_Says Forgive me for considering the wellbeing of women.
1
@_Vengeance_ If the woman is not consenting to continue her pregnancy, she has the right to terminate it. You don't have to allow shit, that's what the 2nd amendment is for.
1
@verindictus3639 And the right to bodily autonomy does not include being inside of somebody else's body without their consent. Checkmate.
1
@skylerarndt3179 If she's changing her mind 8 months down the line, something has changed it for her. I'm less concerned about "murder" as I am about the wellbeing of women. Sounds good, men should be given two months to decide after conception or two weeks after notification of pregnancy or childbirth to opt out of paternity. No, I want to do with my cake as I please.
1
@maxheadman59 meme
1
@ajclarke9189 Oh, gladly. "Abortion is murder."
1
@thoth81 That's simply not going to happen. What's more feasible is signing up members of both sexes for selective service, this however has negative effects on the quality of our military. Women are objectively weaker than men. I would not want a woman on my combat unit if I were to serve in the military. Still, their bodily autonomy is not to be infringed upon, and if the best argument you've got is *war*, well... Oof.
1
@MidlifeCrisisJoe Why are you in an echo chamber?
1
@BigHamm What about them? It does not have the right to violate the woman for its' own survival.
1
@_Vengeance_ Consent to sex ends with sex, pregnancy must be handled separately as it is serious issue. I will let women decide if they consent to their pregnancies when they decide, and I will add my might to theirs to ensure they can end their pregnancies safely regardless of the law. Abortion is a consequence that we can choose. Women are free to consent to that particular consequence, too.
1
@_Vengeance_ Nope, sex is an act of intimacy, pregnancy is something that partners must consider separately as the consequences are far greater. Doctors won't provide vasectomies or hysterectomies to people under the age of 30, abortion also has no permanent consequences. I laughed out loud when you said "don't have sex at all". This will never happen.
1
@BigHamm She consented all the way through.
1
@egobrain6826 Faults don't matter. You may not violate other's right to bodily autonomy simply because you need to in order to survive.
1
@mattdiehl83 You mean what you want? What's right for me isn't what you want for me.
1
@egobrain6826 Good thing behind inside of her body isn't a part of the invader's autonomy. The invader will be removed, and then if it survives, good for it. Bodily autonomy protects our autonomy, more than just our lives.
1
@rustyshack2349 I don't think anybody here has even mentioned infanticide!
1
@_Vengeance_ That's just what you think, other people have different purposes for it. "Purpose" is subjective. Abortion has no permanent consequences. If someone aborted me, there would be no permanent consequence. Generally speaking, women are able to have children after obtaining an abortion. If you're going to be sad about people that don't exist, you've got an infinite amount of tears to cry in your lifetime. We all take actions that prevent people from existing. I see no harm in doing this for the greater good.
1
@_Vengeance_ Since when have we been discussing murder? I'm talking about abortion. None of us begin our journeys prior to the day we're born, we don't become sentient until a short amount of time after birth. You cannot empathize with lost life, you're still alive. I empathize with those that have lost people they loved, but even then, I'm not saying "how dare you" for that. Abortion is a medical procedure that makes our world a better place. Get out of here if you think "lost life" isn't an adequate price for violating someone in the most intimate of ways.
1
@frankstallone3864 It's hard to get true respect from anyone when you're trans. They'll play polite but be uncomfortable behind close doors.
1
@blubirdhill2608 Can't even see what you're responding to here. I'm a conservative, by the way. Abortion is a right to be conserved.
1
@egobrain6826 Nope, if she intentionally put it there, I'll need to hear that from her. She has plenty of autonomy to make personal choices, and that includes abortion. Responsibility means making the correct choice for yourself and those around you; abortion is typically correct in this day and age. If she's getting an abortion, she does not consent.
1
@egobrain6826 No, that isn't full consent. Full consent is ongoing consent. If she consents to sex but not to pregnancy, she's going to handle pregnancy differently than she handles sex. i.e., putting a stop to it. Her autonomy is the right to abort, and all I hear from you is the sound of your wet flapping lips as the righteous ignore your laws. This argument is pointless and you're wasting your time. Consent is not valid if it comes from you. I am just a man, fighting other man, for the human right to bodily autonomy.
1
@egobrain6826 Nope, she can withdraw consent at any point she pleases, and if she never consents to pregnancy in the first place, I am not going to take anyone else's word but hers. Unless she signs a document in advance for the medical decision that is giving birth, consent cannot be assumed, let alone full consent. Her autonomy includes all of her medical decisions, and her decision to have sex (not a medical decision) cannot be interpreted as consent to anything that is a medical decision. I'm sorry, I hard disagree. It is right to end another person when they are violating your right to bodily autonomy. Luckily, fetuses are not people. You're the one saying she consented, not her. I'll need a written statement from her, because you cannot consent in place of another human being. I will assist her in aborting, regardless of law. This is because law does not equal right.
1
@egobrain6826 Thanks for the quote, ego-brain. Didn't I already tell you that I don't care about your laws? Abortion is a human right, and I will defend it.
1
@egobrain6826 Thanks, dwight. We're talking about a fetus, something that isn't sentient and cannot comprehend what it means to be born, or not to be. Consent was never given if she says it was never given. Consent can be taken back at any time and you must immediately stop should it be revoked. If you cannot, you are the one that will pay the price. " Allowing the ending of humans, which is the law now, is the law overstepping its function and is not just. " Therefore, police should not have firearms. THerefore, the 2nd amendment is unjust. You're a joke, little buddy. I would happily be a "baby murder" before a violator of women.
1
@egobrain6826 Ego Brain doesn't get to decide when others consent. What's what the 2nd amendment is for.
1