Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Joe Scott" channel.

  1. ​ @squirlmy  "Magnesium increases the phagocytic capacity of the scavenging white blood cells in combatting infections, and vitamin C can attack pathogens directly via up regulation of the Fenton reaction inside the cells, increasing their internal oxidative stress to the point of pathogen rupture (Vilchèze et al., 2013; Levy, 2013). These anti-pathogen mechanisms can be very synergistic in treating infectious diseases. Furthermore, vitamin C enhances the capacity of all of the scavenger immune cells by concentrating inside them and allowing them to supply a greater immediate antioxidant delivery when the natural immune response summons them to areas of focal infection and inflammation that are always acutely and severely depleted of antioxidant capacity. However, a review of some older literature reveals, somewhat surprisingly, that magnesium chloride alone, given orally several times daily, has cured acute polio, even when significant paralysis had already developed (Neveu, 1961; Rodale, 1968). Dr. Frederick Klenner had also reported that high doses of vitamin C completely cured all of the 60 cases of polio that he saw in his practice. This result is likely achieved because both magnesium and vitamin C, as independent agents, can promptly normalize the pathology of increased intracellular oxidative stress seen in toxin exposures of any origin." If you are interested why haven't you looked at all instead of saying my comment is disingenuously phrased then proceeding to insinuate I'm a fringe nut job? You already sound medically illiterate if you have zero concept of the potential mechanisms of vitamin C and magnesium in biology right from the start. Far less your absurd comment saying millions would have been made from selling vitamin C and magnesium chloride which is literally mineral oil(magnesium chloride dissolved in water. You appear to be highly ignorant in the most basic of these concepts far less the subject itself. Vitamin C polio http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/2007/pdf/2007-v22n01-p031.pdf Magnesium Polio http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v15n09.shtml Even for the most recent world wide pandemic vitamin C has been chosen as a treatment for covid19. But you are highly ignorant of medicine, world news, and how the medical systems drug approval process is highly biased in the type of drug that can proceed. Cheap chemicals that can't be patented like vitamin C aren't getting a billion+ dollars go through phase 1/2/3 fda trials because that money can't be recovered in a product that can't be patented for use. Right off the bat feb 2020 50 tonns of vitamin C was shipped to Wuhan. http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n13.shtml The next month march 2020 the capitol officially recommends vitamin C as a covid treatment. http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v16n16.shtml
    3
  2. Not to diminish the great contribution of HeLa cells but simple magnesium chloride and also ascorbic acid (vitamin c) also cured every case of polio it was used on. But in the case of magnesium chloride it could even reverse most if not all the damage done by polio. One case study found a 90% reversal of full body paralysis on a patient treated with magnesium chloride one month after getting over the virus. Polio is largely theorized to have been so bad largely because of major micro nutrient deficiencies like magnesium, which aloud the virus to take hold.
    2
  3. Not to diminish the great contribution of HeLa cells but simple magnesium chloride and also ascorbic acid (vitamin c) also cured every case of polio it was used on. But in the case of magnesium chloride it could even reverse most if not all the damage done by polio. One case study found a 90% reversal of full body paralysis on a patient treated with magnesium chloride one month after getting over the virus. Polio is largely theorized to have been so bad largely because of major micro nutrient deficiencies like magnesium, which aloud the virus to take hold.
    2
  4. Not to diminish the great contribution of HeLa cells but simple magnesium chloride and also ascorbic acid (vitamin c) also cured every case of polio it was used on basically is what the studies on polio showed. But in the case of magnesium chloride it could even reverse most if not all the damage done by polio. One case study found a 90% reversal of full body paralysis on a patient treated with magnesium chloride one month after getting over the virus. Polio is largely theorized to have been so bad largely because of major micro nutrient deficiencies like magnesium, which allowed the virus to take hold. There really wasn't a need for a vaccine, and I believe there were major issues around the polio vaccines being unethically used and killing people or causing serious injury.
    1
  5. "likes to paint his fingernails black and dye his hair purple." clearly not a wack job.
    1
  6.  @squirlmy  No comment? Fascinating.
    1
  7. I don't get how someone can run a science based channel yet completely ignore how everything they are explaining is clearly fine tuned and designed and pretend naturalism can produce it while flat out knowing there is no mechanism or logic that can. Mindless unguided process can't magically code information based life. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does the naturalist. Natural selection is variation allowed within the genome. It's not a mechanism for evolution, it can't create anything. Turning genes on and off and swapping them isn't creating the genes to start with. No new information is being created. Entropy and information theory all point towards information decaying over time not the reverse. The statistical probability and logistics alone make evolutionary theory patently absurd. Whole thing is ridiculous to even entertain.
    1
  8.  @douglascutler1037  Actually it does. An intelligence behind it is the only logical answer. That describes a "God." Even the absurd multiverse theory with infinite probability cannot produce infinite results and what we have and even a multiverse we already know is scientifically bound by the requirement of a causal agent aka God. Mankinds most proven knowledge the space time theorems have told us there must be a God. Borde and Vilenkin took Hawking and Penrose work on classic general relativity and expanded it as far as possible with 5 papers in an attempt to disprove the Big Bang and it's Christian implications and concluded "all reasonable cosmic models are subject to the relentless grip of the space-time theorems." They gave examples where you wouldn't need an absolute beginning to space and time but in such models you wouldn't have life. So there has to be a causal agent(God) beyond space and time. But are they a personal "God"(intelligent, caring) or "something else." Fine tuning argument tells us the causal agent is a personal God. So we logically have God, that is a personal God. So an easy test is which faith gives us the big bang, and fine tuning implications of an intelligent caring God. Only Christianity nothing else comes close. Science has advanced to a point we know now life is based on an immaterial concept, information, found in DNA. There is no physical process or naturalistic phenomenon that can produce such communicative information. A mind is required. Life requires God. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. The universe is inherently coherent. Christianity claims God the Word created everything by transfer of information.
    1
  9. Your comment is ironic given what he talks about. I don't get how someone can run a science based channel yet completely ignore how everything they are explaining is clearly fine tuned and designed and pretend naturalism can produce it while flat out knowing there is no mechanism or logic that can. Mindless unguided process can't magically code information based life. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information. It's an immaterial concept to start with information. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does the naturalist. Natural selection is variation allowed within the genome. It's not a mechanism for evolution, it can't create anything. Turning genes on and off and swapping them isn't creating the genes to start with. No new information is being created. Entropy and information theory all point towards information decaying over time not the reverse. The statistical probability and logistics alone make evolutionary theory patently absurd. Whole thing is ridiculous to even entertain. It's all predicated on a mechanism that does not exist and logically can not exist.
    1