Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "SmarterEveryDay" channel.

@PedroCavalcanteNE Naturalism is predicated on a deus ex, that probability manifests rational outcomes, aka magic. It's a thin veneer of science on top of mythology. It has no functional mechanism at the core.
1
@PedroCavalcanteNE That is just the point Naturalism can be tested and failed. It has no mechanism at it's core. To have a functional mechanism that produces rational outcomes from probability means the universe becomes the ONLY source of everything created meaning no free will or human achievement exists. It's a self defeating notion. This applies to the multiverse and likewise evolution. They don't work and can't. It's a veneer of science covering mythology. Just a reminder quantum also has this issue and has already failed, more matter that pops into existence faster it pops back out. Big bang+rational universe implies a causal agent with a mind, it defines a God. Fine tuning evidence further defines that into a personal God as care was taken.
1
Time isn't a magic ingredient that can manifest rational outcomes from chaos. In fact time is the enemy of biological chemistry. There is no evolution.
1
@VariantAEC naturalism selects for survival not truth. naturalism cannot account for the rational mind thus how can one rationalize the concept in the first place is the condensed version.
1
@dsdsspp7130 Complexity isn't the argument. Rational product is. If you want to claim something rational can come from the irrational, the burden of proof is on you. Garbage in garbage out as computer engineers say. Such a thing is not possible unless you want to forfeit free will and all human achievement because then the universe did everything. You can't have your cake and eat it too. What the naturalist has blind faith in is magic called science(probability producing rational outcomes).
1
@mwoods8988 Evolution is not possible. Take basic cellular mechanisms. They are not singular in nature they are made up of many parts, meaning there needs to be evolutionary pressure to create every single part, yet that's impossible as there can only be pressure for the mechanism not the parts. Evolution has mind to have a plan. Evolution cannot know how to stop at the desired outcome yet biology requires it.
1
@dsdsspp7130 Complexity isn't the argument. Rational product is. If you want to claim something rational can come from the irrational, the burden of proof is on you. Garbage in garbage out as computer engineers say. Such a thing is not possible unless you want to forfeit free will and all human achievement because then the universe did everything. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
1
@mwoods8988 Evolution is not logically possible for many many reasons. One of which is how can it know when to stop at the desired outcome? It can't yet biology requires it do have done so. Case in point cellular machines like this one are not singular but made up of parts, there can't be evolutionary pressure to select for parts to a machine that doesn't even exist. Evolution has no plan or mind.
1
@mwoods8988 Evolution is not logically possible. One of which is how can it know when to stop at the needed outcome? It can't yet biology requires it to have done so. Case in point cellular mechanisms like this one are not singular but made up of parts, there can't be evolutionary pressure to select for parts to a mechanism that doesn't even exist. Nature has no blueprint or mind.
1
@mwoods8988 Evolution can't occur. How can it know when to stop at the needed outcome? It can't yet biology requires it to have done so. Case in point cellular mechanisms like this one are not singular but made up of parts, there can't be naturalistic pressure to select for building blocks to a mechanism that doesn't even exist. Nature has no blueprint or mind.
1
@mwoods8988 Evolution is like a veneer of science overtop of a deus ex that doesn't exist. It can't work. Case in point evolution requires it to stop at a desired outcome yet it can't it has no mind. Like this motor mechanism it is made up of parts not singular in nature. You can't get environmental pressure to create each individual building block and stop evolving at each desired outcome so they all fit together to create a motor. The whole concept is nonsense not science.
1
@durg8909 Why do they hurt to read? An evolutionary explanation is nothing short of pseudo science. There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks to a mechanism that doesn't even exist yet.
1
Exactly that is reductive evolution and still utter nonsense as an explanation for origin. There is no evolutionary pressure to create mechanisms because they are made up of many parts that can't magically all come about all at once. This is why evolutionary theory has always failed and quite literally is a pseudo science that is allowed in mainstream science because naturalists have nothing else.
1
@MrBLions14 The universe is anything but infinite, it had a finite start.
1
 @abel3557 My statement is based in reason and science unlike yours. Naturalism cannot account for a rational mind hence my comment you couldn't grasp.
1
Ya it's a deus ex, utter pseudo science as an explanation. There is no evolutionary pressure to create mechanisms as they are made up of many parts and would require pressure for each part to be created which is nonsense as evolution has to plan no mind.
1