Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Animal Origins" channel.

Here is a paper you might find interesting. It went over 5000 species of mammals and found evolutionary process cannot produce mammals over 3kg, 7 lbs. Marcel Cardillo et al., Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species
5
@mokarokas-1727 The biologists’ study of 4,000 land mammal species spanning a body mass range from 2 grams to 4,000 kilograms showed that the slope of extinction risk against six established predictors of extinction becomes steeper with increasing body mass. In particular, a sharp increase in extinction risk occurs at a body mass of three kilograms. Above this size body mass “extinction risk begins to be compounded by the cumulative effects of multiple threatening factors,” the authors note. The team’s study establishes that land mammals with large body sizes possess extinction rates that are orders of magnitude larger than the most optimistic speciation rates. Consequently, mammals with large body sizes cannot be the product of natural process evolution.
2
Just a reminder similar traits does not necessitate evolution it also can mean similar creator. Almost all claims of darwinian evolution are speculation. The fact of the matter is the theory is still not functional in the year 2022. Even worse it's missing it's primary mechanism and primary evidence. The missing links are still missing.
1
Marcel Cardillo et al., “Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species You'll find that paper interesting then. They went over 5000 mammal species and found evolutionary process cannot produce mammals over 3kg/7lbs.
1
You realize there was a paper published that went over 5000 mammal species and found evolution cannot produce mammals over 3kg. There isn't any evolution in the first place. We don't see it. The missing links are still missing.
1
There is no evidence mammals came from anything or evolved. The missing links are still missing. Darwinian evolution isn't even a functional theory in the year 2022. It's primary mechanism is also missing. It shouldn't even be called a theory, it's not falsifiable. It should be called mythology as it fits all the criteria for mythology.
1
I hope it was on how evolution cannot account for mammals. There was a paper published that went over 5000 mammal species and found evolutionary process cannot produce mammals over 3kg, 7lbs. Marcel Cardillo et al., Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species
1
@mokarokas-1727 Do you have trouble reading? The quote is from an organization of Christian scientists posting implications of science as it's published. Pathetic you call it propaganda. In other words spoon feeding the implications of the study for you. It says exactly as stated. Once again can you read? It isn't just "more risks." "Intrinsic factors predict extinction risk only in species weighing more than 3 kg; above this size, susceptibility to both intrinsic and external threats increases sharply. This may represent the approximate body mass above which extinction risk begins to be compounded by the cumulative effects of multiple threatening factors. " That means no evolution. What part do you not understand?
1