Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Bizarre Beasts" channel.

  1. I mean everything is an "evolutionary mystery" given virtually every phyla that ever existed came about in a geological instant the start of the cambrian, showing top down not bottom up biological progression, the opposite of evolutionary scenario.
    4
  2. What most get wrong with evolution is thinking it exists in the first place. Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That would be magic, rationality from irrationality. Evolution is a mythology of magic.
    2
  3. Did anything really evolve? How does evolution know when to stop at the desired outcome?
    2
  4.  @seasonallyferal1439  Clearly you are oblivious to the state of evolution in academia. Your advice I suggest you take for yourself as I was quoting the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. Yet here you are. Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity."
    2
  5. ​ @seasonallyferal1439  Clearly you are oblivious to the state of evolution in academia. Your advice I suggest you take for yourself as I was quoting the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 /asdfasdfdsa/ mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly. sdfds This shouldn't be a shock, /asdfasde as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. Yet here you are. asf adsff/ renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the fgdhg explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism gscdg doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced adsfd because it's completely asfefs inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity asdfdsf way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like hdgdfgd epigenetic complexity asdfsd." It's sad to see evolutionary theory basically become a religion for people.
    2
  6. ​ @seasonallyferal1439  Good advice I suggest you take it as the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller and renowned biologist Denis Noble are from where my comments are based.
    2
  7.  @feuerling  If there is no desired outcome and it doesn't stop then how come virtually every eye design in nature and skeletal design allowed by physics showed up in a geological instant during the Cambrian and stuck around since? Checkmate.
    2
  8.  @feuerling  Woooosh you missed the whole premise, desired outcome, and change stopping aka evolution which I substantiated unlike your claim. Or maybe you didn't and are trying to obfuscate dunno.
    2
  9.  @feuerling  Consider my original comment again and now consider cellular biology. Countless different microscopic machines, how do you propose evolution can produce them? There is no scientific explanation because it's impossible, there is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks for a machine that does not exist. Take a moment and consider that, evolution has no foresight. It only gets more absurd on the macro scale, people are willfully in denial accepting their time of the gaps can magically produce the impossible without considering the implications required for that outcome. Darwinian evolution quite literally is pseudo science, it's a belief in magic. Rationality from irrationality. It's a deus ex machina machine.
    2
  10.  @feuerling  Furthermore multiple scientific studies have found species are not and have not evolved like with the h1n1, and most importantly human beings with the encode project over 100 fold more mutations than the limit for evolution to be happening instead of progression to extinction. And beyond that the only evidence of evolution is of reductive evolution a benefit from loss of information degradation of genomes, that's where bacteria get antibiotic resistance from, how the famous ecoli experiment had them partially metabolize citrate and so on. Genomes aka information doesn't magically progress to a higher state information degrades over time
    2
  11.  @keithfaulkner6319  oh please, naturalism is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality). mindless matter can't code DNA. naturalism is predicated on a deus ex machina mechanism that doesn't exist. lmao stop
    2
  12.  @keithfaulkner6319  Ironic given you have blind faith in probability manifesting rationality aka you believe in magic to do away with the requirement of a God. Rational isn't a word a naturalist understands.
    2
  13. There is a lot of conjecture and speculation about product of evolution here. It's 2023 and Darwinian evolution is still not a functional nor worked out theory. No primary evidence(no speciation in the fossil record, no transitional dna), no primary mechanism(no way to produce new communicative information, only mutate aka degrade pre-existing information), it's not even falsifiable(all results explainable and not reproducible) so really shouldn't even be called a scientific theory. It fits the criteria for being defined as mythology. It failed Darwins own predictions. It defies entropy and information theory, creating information in a higher state than it previously was rather than degrading. It doesn't work and never has. Natural selection is variation allowed within the genome, it is not a mechanism for evolution it's creating nothing. Swapping genes around, and on and off isn't creating new ones. It's not creation, it's modification. And on top of all of that even if micro evolution was solidified and established extensively tomorrow it's a gulf the size of the universe to translate that into coherently compounding into macro evolution being a real world process which is almost of the entirety of the stated evolution we ever hear about in these type of videos or articles.
    2
  14. Evolution isn't real. What evolution? Bro it's 2023 not 1923 evolution is not a real world process it doesn't exist lol. Mindless matter and mutation can't produce code. Mind is the paradigm of creation in reality, not magic. Evolutionary theory is a mythology of magic, rationality from irrationality. Mind>magic Biologists have been trying to replace evolutionary theory for awhile not not because it works because it doesn't. The only evolution we ever see is reductive evolution like the famous ecoli citrate experiment or bacteria that get antibiotic resistance. They aren't adapting they are genetically degrading and get a benefit from that.
    2
  15. It's an assumption the plant evolved for the ants, and an assumption it never evolved for the spider. Hell it's an assumption it evolved for the two animals at all lol.
    2
  16. I still don't get why a train would stop for some bugs on the tracks...
    1
  17. It is strange it is still taught. It's 2022 and it's still not a worked out, nor functional theory. It's primary mechanism missing(new information production), primary evidence missing(no speciation, no transitional DNA) missing links still missing, it really shouldn't even be called a theory it's not falsifiable, it ironically fits the criteria for mythology. It's failed it's own creators predictions. It's like a flat earth of modern science. Most of it is speculation.
    1
  18.  @feuerling  Yet biology establishes there is a desired outcome and it does stop because nothing is changing. Take the gingko tree that has been the same for hundreds of millions of years. Or what about virtually every eye design in nature coming into existence in a geological instant during the Cambrian, or mouths/anus and almost every skeletal design allowed by physics. Clearly we can say there are desired outcomes because they never changed they stopped. The concept behind darwinian evolution is nonsensical it is quite literally pseudo science. Biologists have been trying to replace the theory for over a decade now. Not modify but fully replace it because it does not and can not work. Denis Noble has gone into great detail on this. Genomes dont improve over time they degrade like John Sanfords virus study on H1N1 showed and the ENCODE project showed for the human genome and other studies of difference species. Evolution has been without saying it low key a defunct theory in academia for awhile now. It's essentially a religious worldview for many so no one wants to flat out spell it out.
    1
  19. ​ @seasonallyferal1439  Clearly you are oblivious to the state of evolution in academia. Your advice I suggest you take for yourself as I was quoting the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 /asdfasdfdsa/ mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly. This shouldn't be a shock, /asdfasde as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. Yet here you are. asf adsff/ Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism gscdg doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely asfefs inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity asdfdsf way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity." It's sad to see evolutionary theory basically become a religion for people.
    1
  20. ​ @seasonallyferal1439  Clearly you are oblivious to the state of evolution in academia. Your advice I suggest you take for yourself as I was quoting the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 /asdfasdfdsa/ mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly. sdfds This shouldn't be a shock, /asdfasde as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. Yet here you are. asf adsff/ renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the fgdhg explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism gscdg doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced adsfd because it's completely asfefs inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity asdfdsf way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like hdgdfgd epigenetic complexity asdfsd." It's sad to see evolutionary theory basically become a religion for people.
    1
  21.  @seasonallyferal1439  Clearly you are oblivious to the state of evolution in academia. Your advice I suggest | /you take for yourself as I was quoting the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 /asdfasdfdsa/ mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity \ [/is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly. sdfds This shouldn't be a shock, /asdfasde as information theory states information degrades, and | ;information is the basis of life. Yet here you are. asf adsff/ renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the fgdhg explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo \ ]Darwinism gscdg doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced adsfd because it's completely asfefs inadequate. Why | <because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity asdfdsf way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like hdgdfgd epigenetic \ >complexity asdfsd." It's sad to see evolutionary theory basically become a religion for people.
    1
  22.  @seasonallyferal1439  Good advice I suggest you take it for the only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller, and renowned biologist Denis Noble are from which my comments are based.
    1
  23.  @feuerling  Furthermore there is no evolution happening. Genomes degrade over time, information does not magically progress to a higher state it degrades like information theory states. John Sanfords H1N1 studied shows this, ENCODE project shows this on the human genome over 100 fold more mutations that would be allowed for evolution, we are progressing to extinction there is no evolution the rate is too high. The very few examples of "evolution" are reduction evolution a benefit from loss of information or crippling of a function thats where antibiotic resistance in bacteria comes from. And so on and so on.
    1
  24.  @feuerling  There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight.
    1
  25.  @feuerling  Furthermore evolution is pseudo science, genomes only degrade, information only degrades as information theory states, multiple studies of different species show they aren't evolving including the encode project on humans over one hundred fold more mutations than would allow a evolution explanation.All examples of evolution are of reductive evolution a loss of information causing a benefit which is how bacteria get antibiotic resistance how the famous ecoli experiment they partially metabolized citrate.
    1
  26.  @nicholaslewis8594  literally irrelevant to the point I made and furthermore losing eyes is not evolution, it's reductive evolution a loss of genetic information like antibiotic resistance in bacteria.
    1
  27.  @keithfaulkner6319  Ironic given you have blind faith in your deus ex machina mechanism naturalism is based on, probability manifesting rationality aka magic. Rational is inherent only to a mind, intelligent design.
    1
  28.  @nicholaslewis8594  Irrelevant to the context I mentioned eyes. Furthermore losing eyes is not evolution, it's reductive evolution loss/degradation of genetic information.
    1
  29. ​ @keithfaulkner6319  Ironic given you have blind faith in your deus/ex/machina mechanism naturalism is predicated on, probability manifesting rationality aka you believe in magic to do away with the requirement of a God.Rational is inherent only to a mind, intelligent design.
    1
  30.  @demoncore5342  wow ironic given your position. hilarious evolution/naturalism is essentially the flat earth of modern science. a fantasy of magic (probability manifesting rational outcomes being the mechanism running the whole thing). pseudo science.
    1
  31.  @demoncore5342  evolution is the flat earth of modern science you are hilarious.
    1
  32.  @demoncore5342  cute, ignorance is having blind faith in magic that probability gives rational results
    1
  33. ​ @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent dues ex machina mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  34.  @demoncore5342  aka the dues ex machina mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  35.  @demoncore5342  aka the dues ex machina mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  36.  @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent dues/x/machina mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  37.  @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent magical mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  38.  @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent mechanism all of naturalism is predicated upon to remove the need for a mind a God.
    1
  39.  @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent mechanism all of naturalism is predicated upon
    1
  40.  @demoncore5342  aka the nonsense mechanism naturalism is predicated on
    1
  41.  @demoncore5342  aka the non-existent mechanism all of naturalism requires at it's core
    1
  42.  @demoncore5342  In other words a magic RNG Jesus all of naturalism is based on. utter nonsense and ignorance
    1
  43.  @demoncore5342  In other words a magic RNG Jesus all of naturalism is based on
    1
  44.  @demoncore5342  aka RNG Jesus all of naturalism is based on
    1
  45.  @BasiliskArt  Quite a conundrum you have then as it must to compile countless mutations into a new function.
    1
  46. Just a reminder it's 2022 and darwinian evolution is still not a functional nor worked out theory. Virtually everything said here about evolution is conjecture unless it's on natural selection and lumping that into evolution. Speciation is wholly absent from the fossil record, the missing links are still missing across every millenia of the fossil record. The pin for the month looks cute, I'm looking forward to it.
    1
  47.  @bigbearddahuzi1036  I miss apple snails some of them were pretty cool. I haven't seen any in forever myself.
    1