Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Bibles Undamaged After Fire Rips Through Church" video.

@snakeeye209 Then why you here dumdum?
75
@Cooke125 God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
40
@EbikeAdventuresSD God is morally justified in killing anyone he wants as his creation. Secondly beyond that all man is corrupt and has sinned and separated themself from God. The wages of sin is death. The ethics of your argument is extremely weak and so absurd it doesn't even get brought up in debates.
24
@leoortiiiz Reading comprehension is a skill worth developing. It has nothing to do with the physical books themselves but the life and truth they hold. Yes Jesus saw the suffering of man and child and cared so much he became a part of that suffering and died on the cross so we don't have to suffer for eternity. Seems like a good God to me.
17
@leoortiiiz Jesus is God. His very name means God who saves by water. He is the Word, the living water. Life came from only him. He was God made flesh. Only the sacrifice of both man and God could be sufficient to pay the price of sin. Only the sacrifice of Jesus being perfect fully God and man, only his blood could then raise him from the dead. The purpose of this universe is the destruction of sin forever. Man has free will and left God and received the consequences and then you attribute those to God. Quite some flawed logic there.
13
Akari Why you here then dumdum?
11
Akari God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
9
@CrazanityOfficial Actually we do. Reality demands the existence of a God because it requires a mind behind it.
7
@evanharkey7100 That assertion isn't even coherent. To say the bible came from men makes no sense based on it;s content, continuity, 100% fullfilled prophecy and so on and so on.
6
@Mazikeen If the mother created the child then find me a biology paper that discovered how a zygote knows how to differentiate into an organism. The spark of life still comes from God. Even for arguments sake ignoring everything I just said, the use of the word create between the two is universes apart. Secondly is the mother perfect and sinless along with every other attribute of God? You might want to pull of a theological debate where that has been referenced to know why I said it's almost never even argued. It's a very weak argument.
5
@mrcontroversy222 No, Lucifer was the first to sin. The redemption of humanity was a plan the trinity set in motion before the creation of the universe. The Son of God is God. God being good, and just means he is required to judge evil for ultimate justice to be done otherwise he is not good. That is why all sin must be judged. Lucifer instigated the fall of man. Lucifer did it because the biblical text says he was once King and Priest over the earth before his fall. He had that position revoked and it was transferred to man, to Adam. He wanted it back. And so on and so on without writing a book to explain the whole of Christianity.
4
@leoortiiiz Yes Jesus saw the suffering of man and child and cared so much he became a part of that suffering and died on the cross so we don't have to suffer for eternity. Seems like a good God to me. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Everyone deserves death.
4
@leoortiiiz The very name Son of God denotes Jesus is God dumdum. That is why Jesus is called Son of God and son of man to denote he is God and man. Jesus himself professed to be God, that is why he was crucified remember? The secular account of the Talmud verifies this even. God knowing doesn't mean he is responsible for your own agency. Otherwise who am I talking to then? You may as well be God. Your logic is absurd.
4
Someone isn't bitter at all.
4
@snakeeye209 Why you here then dumdum?
4
@Danny451 God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. The burden of proof is on the one purposing a model that goes against the status quo, in other words atheism and naturalism.
4
Akari God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
4
@Danny451 "Why would an omnipotent god SLAUGHTER his son? " lol what? Jesus is the Word, the Word is God. Difference in relationship does not denote difference in nature. The trinity made a covenant before the creation of the universe to accomplish the work of the cross. The blood shed had to be of man and God to be on behalf of mankind and be both perfect and sufficent to pay the price of sin for all humanity forever. The blood of man dies. The blood of God lives forever. The bible says the blood Jesus shed was taken up to a fountain in heaven, the sacrifice is still active which is why people can still have their sins cleansed. The blood held no power till the sacrifice was made. Jesus also had to go to hell to defeat Satan on behalf of humanity. Why? Because the bible says Satan was once King and Priest of the earth before his fall to which then God gave that authority to Adam, which is why Satan tempted Adam and caused his fall and stole back his position thus requiring the work of Christ. The sacrifice also needed to be made so the blood would have power to resurrect Christ. And so on and so on. It is all about the destruction of sin in this universe so it isn't an issue in the future.
3
@Danny451 If you weren't illiterate you would grasp that meant if any were left and wouldn't leave. That doesn't mean there were any to kill. They were evil and warranted killing secondly. Third they sacrificed infants to their gods. Ignorance is a sad thing Danny.
3
@Danny451 SLAVES, educate yourself on what that word meant 2000 years ago dumdum
3
@yutosakaki4764 All have sinned and deserve death. God owes you nothing.
3
@leoncraftmc God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
3
@leoncraftmc God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. Science does tell us there must be a God. You new to science?
3
@arandomguy46 God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
2
@billybobby7607 good argument lol
2
@resilientultimate6869 Science doesn't.
2
What about it? Everyone is happy no one was hurt.
2
The girl gets to be in heaven while the bible can lead more there. Win win.
2
@samuelbeatsminecraft2049 You seem to be confused what the biblical text says of heaven. But lets be real you aren't confused you just made up whatever sounds good because you hate Christians and Christianity that much. Bitter much?
2
@visariosorino8034 God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
2
@BigtimeBigA This God knows everything unlike you who can't comprehend the full extent of reality. What a ignorant statement.
2
@Rust_Rust_Rust God has to be real. The fabric of the universe and life itself requires it. Naturalism is pseudo science it's predicated on a non-existant mechanism. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does.
2
@hiyo9144 Here is a two for one answer. Which creator? Intelligent Design? Or Naturalism? Intelligent Design creator doesn't warrant a creatore because he isn't bound by his creation and must exist in dimensions superior to it in the first place to create it. Thus more than one dimension of time. Two dimensions of time, one with a length and one with a width makes that creator uncreated. The naturalists creator, the universe. Who is that creators creator? That is the actual relevant question. We know now by the space time theorems the big bang is it, the universe had a full start, no eternal cyclical universe. Thus the requirement for the first cause remains and the naturalists creator requires a creator. Multiverse is also bound by this.
1
It's like God left it to say it was his time and he is with him not to worry. We all have our time some sooner than others. Sometimes an early death is an act of mercy for something yet to come.
1
Arson is a sign? lmao what else do the voices tell you
1
@eyonc5602 Christianity is not based on faith. Jesus never said seek faith, he said seek me and I'll give you faith. Christianity is based on a real tangible relationship. You can know, one can test what their religion says. Example, Hinduism says the universe goes through endless cycles of death and rebirth. Christianity is the only one that got the creation account right, you know the big bang theory is wholly derived from the bible is a biblical concept and was published by a Christian right? We know the universe is not eternal and needed a full start now. Ones religion can be tested.
1
@voss1019 There isn't flaws, your statement was flawed. Christianity does not say God created sin or even elude to it. Then you have the audacity after being called out to say one does not live in a bubble lmao. Unreal the cognitive dissonance.
1
@billybobby7607 what do you mean bible nonsense? you realize the bible is the only source that got the creation account of the universe correct right? the big bang theory is wholly a christian concept, published by a christian who set out to prove it was real and did and published it. Do you not know the history of how Atheists contested it for almost 50 years because of it's Christian implications? It wasn't till 2009 that it was basically solidified. I think the creator of the universe knows better than you how it will end.
1
@moonshoes11 "the god of slavery." Am I supposed to know what you mean? Because the God of the bible is the antithesis of slavery, he offers true freedom in every sense of the word. Do you even know where the phrase the truth will set you free comes from? lol
1
@ya2604 You mean like your intelligence?
1
@samuelbeatsminecraft2049 It's just the objective reality of it. The statement is true. Everyone if they could choose right this second would rather be in heaven
1
@Danny451 lmao let me get this straight you can't comprehend a God that creates the universe, all life, reality itself to being able to feed an event(miracle) into that open system known as this universe he created? And only a handful over thousands of years which you then cherry pick and largely misconstrue. Fascinating.
1