Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Woman Accidentally Uses Nail Glue Instead of Eye Drops" video.

It's a sin to use Gods name in vain.
11
@user-ys2ko2jt4y God has to exist. Universe had a start thus requires a causal agent, universe is fine tuned that requires a mind a God, life is based on the product of a mind information stored in DNA. A rational mind that humanity has requires a rational source a God. God is an absolute requirement of reality.
6
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Secondly the historicity of Jesus and his resurrection is long established. Far less the rest of the evidence solidifying Jesus the God of the bible to be the God science tells us exists.
4
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science would say otherwise. Abiogensis the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth not even remotely close to proven in fact virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible as time is the enemy of biologically chemistry. Far less the issue of getting the code the information for the life. Far less having the replicator for the DNA/RNA and so on.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science would say otherwise. Abiogensis the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth not even remotely close to proven in fact virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible as time is the enemy of biologically chemistry for starters.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science would say otherwise. Abiogensis the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth not even remotely close to proven. virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible. For starters time is the enemy of biological chemistry.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science would say otherwise. Abiogensis the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth not even remotely close to proven. virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science would say otherwise, the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian fairytale not even remotely close to proven. virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible. For starters time is the enemy of biological chemistry.
1
 @user-ys2ko2jt4y Abiogensis the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth. virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible. For starters time is the enemy of biological chemistry.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y The prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian tale. virtually everything in chemistry disproves it's possible. For starters time is the enemy of biological chemistry.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Science does not support the theories you just presented...
1
 @user-ys2ko2jt4y Abiogenesis like the prebiotic pool is from an babylonian myth which almost all of chemistry is in conflict with
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y abiogensis (prebiotic pool) is a babylonian myth, chemistry as a whole works AGAINST the premise
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y the prebiotic pool is a babylonian myth and almost all of chemistry is working against the premise
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y the prebiotic pool is a babylonian mythology fyi and chemistry works against the theory it does not support it
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y the prebiotic pool is a ancient babylonian myth fyi and chemistry refutes it
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y the prebiotic pool is ancient babylonian mythology fyi
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y the babylonian prebiotic pool concept is totally counter to what chemistry presents
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y prebiotic pool is ancient babylonian mythology
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y abiogensis is counter to what chemistry presents, none of it has been proven only disproven time and time again
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y chemistry does not support abiogenesis it's pseudo science like homeopathy same with evolution
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y chemistry refutes abiogenesis...
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y evolution has never worked and academia has been trying to replace it for over a decade. it shouldn't even be taught. you do realize the fossil record firmly refutes it with phyla coming first right?
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y evolution has never worked and academia has been trying to replace it for over a decade. the fossil record firmly refutes it with phyla coming first
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y evolution has never worked and biologists have said so and been trying to replace it for over a decade. Fossil record firmly refutes it with phyla coming first.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Fossil record refutes evolution with phyla coming first. Biologists say it does not work and it needs to be replaced.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Fossil record refutes evolution with phyla coming first.
1
 @user-ys2ko2jt4y Fossil record shows no evolution with phyla showing up first. Biologists say its nonfunctional and needs to be replaced.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Fossil record shows no evolution with phyla showing up first.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Biologists say its nonfunctional and needs to be replaced.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Look up renowned biologist denis nobles statements on evolution. It's never worked. It can't work. It can't explain what we know about biology. Fossil record completely refutes it with phyla coming first, the whole sequence of how life showed up is totally contradictory to how it would have to under evolution.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Look up renowned biologist denis nobles statements on evolution. It can't explain what we know about biology. Fossil record completely refutes it with phyla coming first, the whole sequence of how life showed up is totally contradictory to how it would have to under evolution.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Look up renowned biologist denis nobles statements on evolution. There is nothing to even argue about the theory is in the dumpster.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Look up renowned biologist denis nobles statements on evolution.
1
 @user-ys2ko2jt4y Fossil record completely refutes it with phyla coming first, the whole sequence of how life showed up is totally contradictory to how it would have to under evolution.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y water cycle 100% required a designer. In countless ways. From the fine tuning of the universe for mass, gravity, dark energy and so on. To the conditions that even allowed our planet to happen. To it not being a water world to allow for a water cycle which is infinitesimally rare. To the hundreds of times more uranium and thorium in the planets core that allows for continents to exist and move around for a water cycle to happen also extremely rare. To our one of a kind star in this extremely narrow 100 000 year widow for solar stability that drives the water cycle and so on and so on.
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y evolution is as far as a fact as possible because it's been proven impossible and the natural record shows the opposite we already went over this kid
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y evolution is flat earth it's proven false lol
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y Denis Noble "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. ...."
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y rationality does not come from irrationality. naturalism is quite literally a belief in magic(probability producing rational outcomes) Mind>magic creationism is the only scientifically viable model
1
@user-ys2ko2jt4y rationality does not come from irrationality. naturalism is quite literally a belief in magic(probability producing rational outcomes)
1
 @user-ys2ko2jt4y repeat after me mind over magic. Naturalism is pseudo science
1