General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
Lex Clips
comments

Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Lex Clips" channel.

Previous
2
Next
...
All

@LisaMaeSV650S It's because being a Christian is not blind faith but a real personal relationship with Jesus. The promise of the Holy Spirit is to reveal and make real Jesus to you. More real than if you saw Jesus in the flesh and do miracle seeing he is God, as the bible establishes would still not be enough for you or me to give our lives to Jesus because it wasn't for the disciples as they all denied Jesus on the cross. But after Pentecost with the Holy Spirit those same disciples would rather give their lives than deny Jesus and did and so did hundreds of thousands willingly in the Colosseum.
1
To posit humans evolved one needs to first establish evolution is even possible. That hasn't even been done in the academic field, not only that biologists have been trying to replace the theory completely for over a decade because it does not work, and even worse than both of those the natural record like the fossil record completely contradicts the predicted evolutionary timeline with phyla coming first not last and the majority showing up hundreds of millions of years ago and decreasing over time to now. Along with it being logically and scientifically nonsense
1
Our universe require a mind thus creator. Life is based on an immaterial concept, information. Information requires a mind at it's source. The fine tuning argument has thousands of scientific evidences at this point, and the big bang and space time theorems tell us the universe requires a first cause aka God. So science tells us the universe requires an intelligent and caring God, which fits this narrative? Well which gives us the big bang, fine tuned universe, and an intelligent caring God? Christianity, nothing else comes close. The sole purpose of life is to know the creator of life, Jesus who made you solely for that relationship. We were born into this universe not from it. We are a mind/spirit not the matter that contains it. The transmitter is not the information.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Look up what common descent is pseudo science. Science and logic does not support the theory itself which shouldn't even be called a theory as it's not falsifiable but ironically fits the criteria of mythology. Beyond that the natural record does not display the theory it completely refutes it showing the opposite with phyla coming first. So much so we had almost double the phyla hundreds of millions of years ago!!!
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Look up what common descent is pseudo science. Beyond that the natural record does not display the theory it completely refutes it showing the opposite with phyla coming first. So much so we had almost double the phyla hundreds of millions of years ago!!!
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Look up what common descent is pseudo science.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw cont.. Science and logic does not support the theory itself which shouldn't even be called a theory as it's not falsifiable but ironically fits the criteria of mythology. Beyond that the natural record does not display the theory it completely refutes it showing the opposite with phyla coming first. So much so we had almost double the phyla hundreds of millions of years ago!!!
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Science and logic does not support the theory itself which shouldn't even be called a theory as it's not falsifiable but ironically fits the criteria of mythology.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Beyond that the natural record does not display the theory it completely refutes it showing the opposite with phyla coming first. So much so we had almost double the phyla hundreds of millions of years ago!!!
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Beyond that the natural record not agreeing but flat out refuting showing the reverse, phyla coming first. So much so we had almost double the phyla hundreds of millions of years ago!!!
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Correct, variation allowed within the genome. Natural selection. Not magic(probability producing consistently rational outcomes, like consistent divine providence of evolution stopping at the desired outcome in order to function as a theory).
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Correct, variation allowed within the genome. Natural selection. Not magic(probability producing consistently rational outcomes) which evolution requires.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Mindless matter can't manifest code. The basis of all life is an immaterial concept, information stored in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information. Down stream evolution requires foresight and the ability to stop at a desired outcome. What it proposes is nonsensical. It was derived from ancient pagan Greek myth, Darwin never originated the concept. Just like the prebiotic pool as origin of life was taken from a ancient babylonian myth.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Mindless matter can't manifest code. The basis of all life is an immaterial concept, information stored in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information. Down stream evolution requires foresight and the ability to stop at a desired outcome. What it proposes is nonsensical.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Mindless matter can't manifest code. The basis of all life is an immaterial concept, information stored in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information. Down stream evolution requires foresight and the ability to stop at a desired outcome.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Mindless matter can't manifest code. The basis of all life is an immaterial concept, information stored in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw The basis of all life is an immaterial concept, information stored in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Mindless matter can't manifest code. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can create such communicative information.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Of course they are, that's called extinction, or reductive evolution a benefit from a loss of information. That's what the long term ecoli experiment was with partial citrate metabolism, and how bacteria get antibiotic resistance. It's a far cry from creating information in a higher state.
1
@laza6141 Variation allowed within the genome is not being able to get dog breeds the size of a elephant. Expression within set limits. Sure mutations can be part of natural selection but it's the exception not the rule and on top of it we are talking reductive evolution a chance benefit from loss of genetic information that isn't critical enough to cause extinction. Although it's called evolution it does not help but hurt the case for the argument establishing information degrading not progressing to a higher state. Evolution is about as far from being a fact as humanly possible. It's an archaic belief in magic behind the diversity of life essentially. It has it's origins from ancient pagan Greek belief, just like the prebiotic pool for life myth taken from ancient Babylonians.
1
@laza6141 Variation allowed within the genome is not being able to get dog breeds the size of a elephant. Expression within set limits. Sure mutations can be part of natural selection but it's the exception not the rule and on top of it we are talking reductive evolution a chance benefit from loss of genetic information that isn't critical enough to cause extinction. Although it's called evolution it does not help but hurt the case for the argument establishing information degrading not progressing to a higher state.
1
@laza6141 Variation allowed within the genome is not being able to get dog breeds the size of a elephant. Expression within set limits. Sure mutations can be part of natural selection but it's the exception not the rule and on top of it we are talking reductive evolution a chance benefit from loss of genetic information that isn't critical enough to cause extinction.
1
@laza6141 cont. Although it's called evolution it does not help but hurt the case for the argument establishing information degrading not progressing to a higher state. Evolution is about as far from being a fact as humanly possible. It's an archaic belief in magic behind the diversity of life essentially. It has it's origins from ancient pagan Greek belief, just like the prebiotic pool for life myth taken from ancient Babylonians.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw It's not about the mutations being stable but adding something of value. It's a statistical issue. There are random number generator studies creating language that tackle this. One mutation is within the realm of reason the problem is many are needed to create anything. That's like needing to hit the lottery back to back many times over. It's just not a functional theory to base how we got anything.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Sure but that's not evolution at that point it's intelligent design. Even still there would be issues given we flat out don't see it in the fossil record like with the Cambrian explosion. There is no evolutionary progression, phyla come first and much more.
1
 @MikeJones-mf2fw Sure but that's not evolution at that point it's intelligent design. There is still no evolutionary progression, phyla come first and much more.
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw Divine guidance of evolution is not evolution then it's just intelligent design. The problem is we still see something different in the fossil record like the reverse of phyla coming first.
1
@FPSIreland2 Mind>magic. Information requires a mind at it's source thus God. You propose magic(probability manifesting consistently rational outcomes). Does an author write a book or throw it into a bin with a jar of ink?
1
@MikeJones-mf2fw I don't want to drag this on but there really is significant evidence of mass direct creation. During the Cambrian explosion for example From 50 to 80 percent of the animal phyla known to have existed at any time in Earth’s history appeared within no more than a few million years of one another, as the Cambrian geological era began. Of the 182 animal skeletal designs theoretically permitted by the laws of physics, 146 appear in the Cambrian explosion fossils. The Cambrian explosion marks the first appearance of animals with skeletons, bilateral symmetry, appendages, brains, eyes, and digestive tracts that include mouths and anuses. Virtually every eye design that has ever existed appears simultaneously in the Cambrian explosion. The moment oxygen levels in Earth’s atmosphere and oceans permit the existence of Cambrian animals, they suddenly appear. The Cambrian explosion occurs simultaneously with the drastic change in sea chemistry known as the Great Unconformity. The Cambrian explosion includes the most advanced of the animal phyla, chordates, including vertebrate chordates. Both bottom-dwellers and open ocean swimmers appear simultaneously in the Cambrian explosion. Optimization of the ecological relationships among the Cambrian animals, including predator-prey relationships, occurred without any measurable delay.
1
@jimbob8992 Evolution is logically and statistically impossible. Information decays it doesn't progress to a higher state. Random number generator studies on creation of language prove words far less sentences can't be produced by probability in any meaningful way thus evolution is impossible as it's a direct correlation to the proposed creation of information in evolution as no mind is involved it's pure chance.
1
As I get older almost all that matters to me first and foremost is an engaging story. Otherwise I just end up not playing the game after a few attempts. I'm over dead worlds with good graphics.
1
You need trillions and trillions of years multiple universes of time just for the theoretical time need for even the most basic fundamental molecules of life to even be produced. That's without them even doing anything together. Far less a single cell of life. Life is clearly the product of a top down creation from a God, not bottom up from molecules going to a higher state. These molecules are all structured and tent pole components that all are chicken and the egg type issues that need to exist altogether at the same time. Think proteins that have to be folded many times in specific ways yet there are no enzymes coded to do it and the enzymes are made from proteins so... even the most simple molecule glucose has trillions of ways the molecules can be linked yet only one way that is compatible for life. Dr James Tour has gone over these issues extensively. Origin of life research is a scam.
1
@ronsnow402 You misunderstood. I made a different point entirely. The mind like information is not a material construct, just like language isn't or love. However you are wrong in assuming immaterial cannot interact with the material. Information can physically manifest an effect in reality. Look up Luc Montagnier study materializing phantom DNA in water. That however is not an assertion I made about the mind. It could very well be. We are learning about the quantum holography of DNA by Peter Gariaev who should win the Nobel Prize for such a profound discovery. But such science is at least publicly, in infancy level.
1
@ronsnow402 Information is not physical. It's an immaterial concept. Information requires a transmitter, that doesn't equate to it being the information itself. Same thing with language so think of language in this way to understand the concept.
1
@ChumX100 A cable is wire. They had metalwork. Power plant is the same as battery. Battery was a urn with acidic solution and electrodes.
1
what's hilarious is they haven't the vaguest clue and never will in their life time or even their students lifetimes. Yet make outrageous claims like they are close and will produce life in 2-5 years and they have figured it out and it completely fits into darwinian evolution and so on while lying through their teeth and they have nothing NOTHING. They can't even produce the fundamental molecules in a early earth setting. Far less said molecules the form required by biology.
1
@Rabaikal 3 didn't feel like 3, they set it up for more games with indoctrination of Shepard all along then magically they tell us it's all in our head and pull the cosmic child and reapers are actually trying to preserve the memory of life bs. It was totally nonsensical. It's like they retconned their whole universe.
1
Same thing is done in regards to biological research being greatly hindered because of the evolution narrative which is even more of a threat. It's 2021 now and macro evolution is still science myth because speciation isn't found in the fossil record among everything else. This is a completely anti-science mindset that isn't even based on ethics or morality but the threat to the secular perspective away from naturalism which logically should not be involved in the scientific process at all but be a byproduct of it's findings.
1
@mcmanustony In other words a year later and your view of science is just as ignorant as it was before. Nice progress.
1
@Dark-Light_Ascendin "we all know" lmao who? Ignorant Satanists that fabricate their own fantasy about what the biblical text says sure.
1
@Dark-Light_Ascendin Cross reference for me the context of what "made in the image of God" is defined as. I'll be waiting along with your other claim on his law broken you also couldn't substantiate.
1
The sole purpose of life is to know the creator of life, Jesus who made you solely for that relationship.
1
@thereignofthezero225 Jesus is eternity itself. The universes existence was created out of nothing by him and is sustained within his very being. Jesus becoming flesh is the story of him becoming a part of our suffering to redeem us(a covenant the trinity agree'd to accomplish before the creation of the universe the redemption of man and destruction of sin). The only reason the work of the cross was sufficient is because Jesus is God and that sinless blood he shed is from both fully man and God thus the sacrifice is eternal the blood cannot die the sacrifice is eternally active. The bible says that blood shed was transferred to a fountain in heaven. There was no power in the blood till the act of the sacrifice, the payment for the justice God requires for sin was accomplished
1
Bob probably has said everything there is to say on Rogan anyways. Nothing else to get out of him except for theorizing which would be fun talks.
1
@joshuawoolridge8378 As I just demonstrated I act like it didn't because it can't. Natural selection does not select for truth it selects for survival, it cant account for rationality that would be circular reasoning and is self destroying concept. How can you trust your brain if it was produced by random unguided process? Would you trust a computer made in such a way or the data it gives? Get it yet?
1
@joshuawoolridge8378 @joshuawoolridge8378 As I just demonstrated I act like it didn't because it can't. Natural selection does not select for truth it selects for survival, it cant account for rationality that would be circular reasoning and is self destroying concept.
1
@joshuawoolridge8378 Ironic, as I already demonstrated evolution can't produce a mind. It's self refuting.
1
@joshuawoolridge8378 Naturalism selects for survival not truth. Would you trust a computer produced from random process? How can you trust what your brain tells you? It's circular reasoning it's self refuting.
1
@joshuawoolridge8378 It's circular reasoning it's self refuting. How can you trust what your brain tells you given it was made from unguided process? nature selects for survival not truth.
1
@newmonkmusicproject8336 All rulers, that's what "king OF kings" means. In other words the supreme authority of all.
1

Previous
2
Next
...
All