Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Moth Light Media" channel.

lmao what evolution? The fossil record doesn't show speciation. It's 2020 and macro evolution/speciation is still science myth. The fossil record actually contradicts the concept of macro evolution as we see extensively in the Cambrian Explosion to such a massive extent it destroys the whole notion... Evolution fantasy doesn't need to be invoked to discuss extinct ecology. I know crazy concept lol.
2
@richardsavolainen944 You can't ignore what doesn't exist Richard. Nothing I said rang any bells in your head? If not then you clearly are extremely ignorant of the subject.
2
Where is the mechanism that produces all this new coding that gives this evolution instead of causing the extinction of the species at such a high rate of mutation? How can it evolve the building blocks for these traits that didn't prior exist thus had no evolutionary pressure? How can one claim evolution as an answer without the evidence or science of the evolution ever occurring... It's mind boggling. All these claims of evolution aren't established they are conjecture and speculation. You can see this time and time again in these kind of evolution focused pieces. The science just isn't there. It's a mythology of magic that rationality came from irrationality. Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code aka a form of language, that's information an immaterial concept. Such a thing does not have a naturalistic material origin. The concept of darwinian evolution goes against the paradigm of reality. If one wants to claim it as rational, real world concept, and functional science then proof needs to be demonstrated rationality came come from irrationality. That can't be done because that's a reality breaking dues ex machina mechanism that will never exist. It's akin to the claim of the multiverse which is why it's such nonsense. If you can get rationality from irrationality that invalidates all human achievement and personhood because the universe did it all at that point. The whole notion of naturalism is self defeating all the way to the scientists claim of their own rationality to do the science being a product of mindless unguided process. Whole thing is nonsense and frankly egregious to pair with science. There is a reason intelligent design birthed modern science, because it actually works. Mind>magic
2
Nothing evolves. Code can't manifest itself from mindless matter. The whole thing is pseudo science.
2
Ya it's amazing how darwinian evolution is still being peddled like it's sound proven theory when it's pseudo science. Mindless matter can't produce code. There is zero evolutionary pressure to create parts to a something that has yet to exist. The whole thing is nonsense. Mutation statistically can only degrade not produce.
1
@milansvancara Says the person who clearly has never taken a university level science course in their life. Honey natural selection and evolution are two different things. One is a real world process the other is akin to flat earth theory. Maybe look up renowned Atheist biologist Denis Nobles statements on how absurd evolutionary theory is.
1
@milansvancara Since you are such a lazy dum dum yourself. I'll spoon feed you the state of evolution in academia which he sums up. Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity."
1
@milansvancara Since you are such a lazy dum dum yourself. I'll spoon feed you the state of evolution in academia which he sums up. "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity."
1
@milansvancara Since you are such a dum dum yourself. I'll spoon feed you the state of evolution in academia which he sums up. "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate..."
1
@milansvancara Since you are such a dum dum I'll spoon feed you. "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate..." in other words the theory is toast in academia
1
@milansvancara Since you are such a dum dum I'll spoon feed you the quote. "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate..."
1