Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "CBN News" channel.

And so is 90% of everyone else in Hollywood and far worse.
10
@mathisnotforthefaintofheart Clearly that is not the case as we can go back to over 2000+ manuscripts and artifacts and verify. Far less the countless quotes in early church father writings of scriptures.
2
Wow now that is absolutely sick twisting barbie like that to groom little kids.
2
Eveangelicals wouldn't consider them heretics they aren't a Christian cult. Just like Catholics brothers and sisters in Christ. They believe Jesus is God and the work of the cross gave us salvation through Jesus and that is all that is needed to be a Christian to have a relationship with Jesus.
1
Considering Christians have died by torture by the hundreds of thousands rather than deny Jesus as their God. And Muslims have killed by the hundreds of thousands for Allah I would think there is pretty good incentive on both part to go with what they believe.
1
No Christians have not killed in the hundreds of thousands in the name of Jesus. Jesus himself said his kingdom is not of this earth saying his followers were no threat to Rome they wouldn't take up arms for him for Christianity when talking to Pilate. Jesus also made it clear in the garden when his disciples took up arms when he was betrayed, Jesus told them to stop. The message is clear Christians are not to take up arms for Jesus for Christianity. So you don't know what you are saying. No the bible does not tell anyone to kill non-Christians. It's called reading comprehension. There is a difference between narrative and instruction. It's called context, we know the context in many ways the easiest is cross referencing. No Jesus said the law still stands that doesn't mean we follow the old testament covenants. The newest covenant always supercedes the last look at the other 6 in the old testament this is how it works. Furthermore the bible states the law in the old testament was given for righteousness. The work of Jesus means we now obtain righteousness through him because HE fullfilled the law because he was perfect and we are not and he paid the price. We don't need to perform works and follow the law for righteousness. So no you are wrong again. Also that was in reference to the ceremonial law and moral law not civil law of the nation of Israel which has nothing to do with the Church it was how the day to day workings of the nation worked to prevent it from being destroyed and preserve the bloodline of Eve to bring about Jesus. The civil law has nothing to do with the Christian it was for ancient Jews. Christians only have to commandments and they were given by Jesus God himself. Love God and love thy neighbor. So no everything you wrote was not factual. You were also equating Israel and the Church which are two entirely different entities of which God has a different plan for and deals with differently.
1
Was there a point there? I already explain those very scriptures. Christ fulfilled the law so we may have righteousness through him not the law. There is a difference between narrative and instruction. The Crusades were to defeat the Muslims who were conquering all of Europe.
1
@mathisnotforthefaintofheart Given you can't even properly read my comment thinking 2000+ is in reference to years and not the word manuscript right beside it it's not a shock you clearly make up whatever sounds good in your head.
1