Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "DW News" channel.

This never proved not established evolution despite the mention of the word. Look up his contribution. It's a very note worthy discovery on understanding human genetics. They are making it out to be more than what it is.
2
@G_Demolished What is mythological? The big bang and space time theorems tell us the universe required a causal agent aka God. The inherent coherent nature of our universe requires a God. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. Any advanced society comes to the realization a God is required. We see this consistently throughout all of human history lol.
2
Or a "great flood" in the world of man wiping them out and the hybrids leaving only small remnants of their genetics in humans. Fascinating thought isn't it.
2
Stop you are making Margaret Sanger wet.
2
Superior Airsoft There was a study done showing vegan men have 2/3 less sperm count than men that had meat in their diet. Having children is one of the most important functions of the body, if something is harming it by 66% then it can't be good.
1
***** And body development.
1
@adamkaczmarek4751 Nah common designer. The missing links are still missing. This by no means is a discovery for evolution despite the mention of the word.
1
Ya lets blame global warming and humans. It's totally not the sun that heats the planet and has weather and solar cycles that affect it's output and thus the weather on earth. That's crazy talk! Now give me a carbon tax and do what I say, it's for the planet.
1
Or a hybrid species slave race with upgrade intelligence of an animal. Basically bestiality. Noah get the ark.
1
@G_Demolished It never has been. It's 2022 and the theory is still not functional nor worked out. Even worse than that, it's predicated on a mechanism that does not exist. Additionally it's primary evidence is wholly absent. So no.
1
@Censored Opinions lmao what are you even talking about "entire fields of study being ignored?" That on it's face doesn't even make sense as a reply to my objection of the status and inherent nature of the theory itself. Speciation, and DNA of transitional speices is wholly absent from the fossil record. It lacks primary evidence, the evidence that if the theory was true would be wide spread and the easiest to fine. Secondly it is not a functional nor worked out theory. With the later discovery of DNA we learned all life is based on a immaterial concept, information found in DNA. There is no physical process or natural phenomenon that can produce information. Darwinian evolution lacks the mechanism to produce information. At it's core it is not functional. Doesn't work, no evidence. It's comical you want to talk about ignorance while your world view is completely predicated on functioning based on faith not science, nor does it even have any science to predict such fundamental function could ever exist. You are running on hopes and tears buddy that you'll have no ultimate accountability.
1
It's time for Canada to start investing in industry in their own country, they have access to cheap hydro power and oil to fuel it. And the largest oil reserve in the world, time to utilize it. Time to start removing environmental restrictions preventing development of utilization of it's resources too, they belong to the Canadian people.
1
@torstenjunker2332 You are correct in a singular aspect. The start. However this is the reason I further defined said "causal agent" "God" if you will. Because the universe being inherently coherent, the fine tuning argument further defines this causal agent as a person God given they are intelligent and caring in how said universe was created. So overall, no. God quite literally is the only possible answer. You can't get rationality from irrationality, even if you have a infinite probability of a infinite multiverse. It can't give you what it can't give you. You don't need to think of it as "advanced" civilization, just any civilization in general because of higher human cognitive function they can all see the order in the world and thus need for God to provide said order. This is advanced biological cognitive function to conceptualize such a thing, and independently all human civilizations have come to said consensus. It's highly backwards to view such an ability unique to humans and such a unique shared abstract ideology as a regressive and primitive trait when it is exactly the opposite and one of the many things that sets humans distinctly apart from all other life. Mind you also far beyond what is naturalistically required for survival and what can naturalistically be accounted for. Now that science has advanced we see the gaps closing for ID and the gaps widening and new ones forming greatly for naturalism. The god of the gaps is on the naturalists part. As I already pointed out it's based on a mechanism that does not exist. It's worse than any argument a naturalist could say about the religious. Because the naturalist is invoking "magic" but at least when the religious are there is a mind behind it. ID is not saying we don't know thus God, it is saying we do know thus God. Information requires a mind as it's source. Naturalism cannot produce it.
1
Atheos B. Sapien Not true one is evolution the other is not. One is a mythological gaining of new information. The other has said information. No information vs information. There is no material process or natural phenomenon that can create information an immaterial concept for which we know all life is based on.
1