Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "DW News" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @torstenjunker2332  You are correct in a singular aspect. The start. However this is the reason I further defined said "causal agent" "God" if you will. Because the universe being inherently coherent, the fine tuning argument further defines this causal agent as a person God given they are intelligent and caring in how said universe was created. So overall, no. God quite literally is the only possible answer. You can't get rationality from irrationality, even if you have a infinite probability of a infinite multiverse. It can't give you what it can't give you. You don't need to think of it as "advanced" civilization, just any civilization in general because of higher human cognitive function they can all see the order in the world and thus need for God to provide said order. This is advanced biological cognitive function to conceptualize such a thing, and independently all human civilizations have come to said consensus. It's highly backwards to view such an ability unique to humans and such a unique shared abstract ideology as a regressive and primitive trait when it is exactly the opposite and one of the many things that sets humans distinctly apart from all other life. Mind you also far beyond what is naturalistically required for survival and what can naturalistically be accounted for. Now that science has advanced we see the gaps closing for ID and the gaps widening and new ones forming greatly for naturalism. The god of the gaps is on the naturalists part. As I already pointed out it's based on a mechanism that does not exist. It's worse than any argument a naturalist could say about the religious. Because the naturalist is invoking "magic" but at least when the religious are there is a mind behind it. ID is not saying we don't know thus God, it is saying we do know thus God. Information requires a mind as it's source. Naturalism cannot produce it.
    1
  14. 1