Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "JRE Clips" channel.

@PAGoldenglovechamp06 Yahshua isn't his name, it's not biblical, it's not found in the bible. Jesus is his name and we can trace the two roots of the name all the way back to Moses and the name of God given at the burning bush I AM which was Jesus. Also Jesus was the name nailed to the cross with Jesus not Yahshua or any other name.
1
@PAGoldenglovechamp06 J wasn't a letter because the letter i was used for both the letter j and i. J was invented and used to take away the dual use of the letter i. I'm sorry but you don;t know what you are talking about. Here is a good article to explain everything in great detail. http://whyapostolic.com/html/jesus.html
1
@PierzStyx No they really aren't. They are all completely different names. Here is an in depth article going over extensively pretty much all the details on the subject if you are interested. http://whyapostolic.com/html/jesus.html
1
@PAGoldenglovechamp06 But they clearly did, . Hebrew it's Jesha(s) the s is added for syntax and to denote masculinity. Greek it's Iesous. English Iesus then Jesus when the letter J came about.
1
@richarddunleavy3011 lmao what in the world are you talking about with Nick? Also no God does not need a creator. You are arguing from a point of view where you have redefined god into something else. God at least the God of the bible that exists beyond space and time. He doesn't need a creator because he created our space time thus already exists in more than one dimension of time, and if those two or more dimensions of time have a length and a width that means God is uncreated. Astrophycist Hugh Ross explained it well in a debate. Here is a 2 minute clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkD9BPTXKaM
1
We know that isn't true. Time had an absolute start point. Borde and Vilenkin took Hawking and Penrose work on classic general relativity and expanded it as far as possible with 5 papers and concluded "all reasonable cosmic models are subject to the relentless grip of the space-time theorems." They gave examples where you wouldn't need an absolute beginning to space and time but in such models you wouldn't have life.
1
Lucifer/Satan isn't in hell yet. After Armageddon he will be in the lake of fire forever. That hasn't happened yet.
1
It's one of the most validated. That's why Atheists hate it, the Christian implications are unavoidable.
1
@sagesarrazine6270 The point is no holy text gets the 12 major distinctions of the creation of the universe correct aside from the biblical text. The only one that got close was some babylonian religion that got 3 out of 12 correct is what one astrophysicist said in a talk. So sure some got something right here and there but nothing close.
1
@tylereby8309 Nah earth is earth, the heavens plural speaks of the rest of the universe and the third heaven which most think of as heaven the place of the righteous dead.
1
@ariancitaku2964 "There isn't a single similarity between the book of Gensis and the Big Bang." You can't actually be serious lol you clearly haven't even bothered to look. Authored by Astrophysicist Hugh Ross "While most people think of the big bang as an explosion in space, scientists use the term to describe the beginning of space, time, matter and energy. The Bible describes a few key characteristics of the universe that scientists now have the ability to measure. At least five biblical writers describe an expanding universe (e.g. Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; and Zechariah 12:1). Scripture also talks about the constancy of the laws of physics, most explicitly stated in Jeremiah 33:25. Genesis 1:1 and Hebrews 11:3 declare that the universe began to exist (thus required a Beginner). Romans 8:18-21 speaks of a pervasive law of decay. These four characteristics—a singular beginning, cosmic expansion, and constant laws of physics including the law of decay—define a big bang universe. The Bible leaves many details such as the expansion rate and the strengths of the laws for us to measure. This correspondence between the biblical description of the universe, authored thousands of years ago, and the best scientific understanding of the universe provides strong evidence for supernatural inspiration of the words of the Bible." https://reasons.org/explore/publications/rtb-101/big-bang
1
Still a baby. If the evil evolutionists had their way it would be trillions/quadrillions of years.
1
Creation theory is literally the only current valid scientific theory, you realize that right? Now that science has advanced, all of Atheists speculations are based on non-empirical arguments and that shows just how weak their case is. The Big Bang is unavoidable, we know there must be a causal agent beyond space and time that is both intelligent and caring(fine tuning argument tells us this). That's as much God as there could ever be lol.
1
Actually yes there had to be an absolute start. This holds true even for the ridiculous multiverse concept. So there is no escaping the reality of the causal agent beyond space and time that must both be intelligent and caring(fine tuning argument tells us this). Borde and Vilenkin took Hawking and Penrose work on classic general relativity and expanded it as far as possible with 5 papers and concluded "all reasonable cosmic models are subject to the relentless grip of the space-time theorems." They gave examples where you wouldn't need an absolute beginning to space and time but in such models you wouldn't have life.
1
Seems pretty ridiculous, it's about as relevant as a statue of Jesus being teleported from a star trek spaceship.
1
If they buried the whole site then obviously they never left it in a hurry and time had passed and they were that meticulous to bury it so it isnt a far stretch they would have cleaned out the place or packed up at least.
1
Lucifer doesn't mean morning star, morning star was another name given for Lucifer. Lucifer means light bearer. Two different names for same person, the names however aren't the same. Jesus is the morning star yet not light bearer he is the light. There is distinction between the two terms.
1
We have the science, the big bang is unavoidable now. Borde and Vilenkin took Hawking and Penrose work on classic general relativity and expanded it as far as possible with 5 papers and concluded "all reasonable cosmic models are subject to the relentless grip of the space-time theorems." They gave examples where you wouldn't need an absolute beginning to space and time but in such models you wouldn't have life.
1
The big bang literally tells us God always existed lol.
1
The way she talks makes her sound like a cult recruiter which is kinda creepy.
1
I think the point is using the word is in poor taste given it's connotation.
1
Correct the name Lucifer was defunct when Lucifer fucked up and thought he could take on his creator.
1
God knows.
1
Except it's also in poor taste given the context of the history following.
1
@Netero770 That's quite the way to say you are an absolute moron and made a fool of yourself and are ignorant of the subject you blowhardedly spoke with authority on.
1
Because he also was the first to sin, corrupted a third of the angels, introduced sin to the earth and corrupted the whole earth and it's inhabitants and the fall of a race(demons) which caused God to have to judge the whole earth, introduced sin and corrupted God's new creation man and thus caused the death of billions more. Maybe that's reason why.
1
Billions of years is a baby universe fyi. The evil evolutionists wanted it to be trillions/quadrillions of years since that's what's needed theoretically for even the possibility for evolution to give us all the life we have today on earth. Now you know.
1
The Big Bang is a Christian concept. It literally shows there must be a God... It's ridiculous how this is such a well kept fact. Clearly in part because of what we see here a disingenuous scientist that refuses to tell the whole truth because of it's implications.
1
@horsepower523 No because that's not what the biblical text says not even close. Anyone would think that's ridiculous. There is no beard, no man, no heaven during creation, no snap your fingers instant creation aside from the initiation of the big bang. The bible says the seven days are long periods of time, we are still in day seven lol... The cosmic creation, fossil record, and evidence all around us we've learned from the advance of science all point towards a God. You clearly don't understand the current paradigm is intelligent design not naturalism. It's ironic because Atheists used to always talk about the God of the gaps and how science was doing away with God, but the fact is it never did but it's becoming the opposite Atheism is barely hanging on. Now that science has advanced, all of Athiests speculations are based on non-empirical arguments and that shows just how weak their case is. The real travesty is for over a decade all this evidence and it's implications doesn't get discussed as much as it should so the general public is oblivious to just how much the tables have turned.
1
@horsepower523 Nope, no wonder you take such strong issue if you think that's what it says. Might want to read it yourself if you want to argue the topic. Here is what the bible says about the big bang for example a Christian concept fyi. Fyi nothing comes close to Christianity, it stands alone. The only other faith that comes close to getting the major events of the big bang correct is an ancient babylonian religion that got 3/12 correct, Christianity gets 12/12. While most people think of the big bang as an explosion in space, scientists use the term to describe the beginning of space, time, matter and energy. The Bible describes a few key characteristics of the universe that scientists now have the ability to measure. At least five biblical writers describe an expanding universe (e.g. Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; and Zechariah 12:1). Scripture also talks about the constancy of the laws of physics, most explicitly stated in Jeremiah 33:25. Genesis 1:1 and Hebrews 11:3 declare that the universe began to exist (thus required a Beginner). Romans 8:18-21 speaks of a pervasive law of decay. These four characteristics—a singular beginning, cosmic expansion, and constant laws of physics including the law of decay—define a big bang universe. The Bible leaves many details such as the expansion rate and the strengths of the laws for us to measure. This correspondence between the biblical description of the universe, authored thousands of years ago, and the best scientific understanding of the universe provides strong evidence for supernatural inspiration of the words of the Bible.
1
@horsepower523 No everything I've said is in line with the thought test it and see where the evidence leads. Christianity isn't about blind faith, in fact Paul says test everything and hold fast to that which is true. What's new age about proper reading comprehension? This is all in the KJV bible nothing new there. It only seems "new" to you because you are ignorant of what the text says. The big bang cosmic creation concept can be traced to biblical scholars hundreds of years ago, this isn't new. You realize the big bang was heavily contested for decades something like 40-50 years by largely Atheist academics because of it's Christian implications. It was only around 2009 when Borde and Vilenkin(both I believe atheists looking to refute the big bang and find a loophole where we don't need it, seeing where the evidence leads like I said earlier) took Hawking and Penrose work on classic general relativity and expanded it as far as possible with 5 papers and concluded "all reasonable cosmic models are subject to the relentless grip of the space-time theorems." They gave examples where you wouldn't need an absolute beginning to space and time but in such models you wouldn't have life. Which solidified the big bang theory and of course it's Christian implications. I didn't notice that question. It's an old question it's actually irrelevant. It's redifining god to be bound by our space time. So perhaps that argument is true for Hinduism or some other religions but the Christian claim like we see with the big bag is God or the causal agent is beyond our space time. Not in our linear time. That God since they created our singular linear one dimension of time must exist already in two or more dimensions of time. If one of those has a length and the other width that God or whatever is uncreated. Hugh Ross an astrophysicist explains this well in a debate, here is a 2 minute clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkD9BPTXKaM So in conclusion yes test the claims, and in regards to statements of science we can test Chrsitianity comes out on top(among alot else) and it's not even close. Which faith gives us the big bang, and fine tuning implications of an intelligent caring God. Well which has a personal caring God, and gets the claims of the start of the universe and big bang correct, Christianity nothing else comes close.
1