Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Science Time" channel.

This is the guy that doesn't believe in the finite start to the universe that mankinds most proven knowledge the spacetime theorems have established IN HIS OWN FIELD OF SCIENCE. Solely because he is an Atheist and that evidence points towards God. He puts his apriori belief before science, logic, and reason.
3
This is the guy that doesn't believe in the finite start to the universe that mankinds most proven knowledge the spacetime theorems have established IN HIS OWN FIELD OF SCIENCE. Solely because he is an Atheist and that evidence points towards God. He puts his apriori belief before science, logic, and reason. Why are you interviewing someone like that...
2
@ Mistake is a ridiculous observation. It's anything but, the correct descriptor is not a mistake, life appears distinctly purposed. As many have said in cosmology such as Dyson. Pulling from another dimension is like saying the multiverse, which is just as nonsensical of a proposition if not more as it's actually self refuting.
2
@ what makes you so sure? blind faith?
2
@ can only explain it to you, can't understand it for you
2
This is the guy that doesn't believe in the finite start to the universe that mankinds most proven knowledge the spacetime theorems have established IN HIS OWN FIELD OF SCIENCE. Solely because he is an Atheist and that evidence points towards God. He puts his apriori belief before science, logic, and reason. Why are you interviewing someone like that...
2
There is no rational theory to assume life is out there in the universe as there isn't one that life happened on earth without a God. Renaming magic probability doesn't mean a mechanism has been discovered to do so, it's just pandering to atheists.
2
@ But there can't be, science has advanced to the point we know of hundreds of cosmic requirements of life. We are in a very special space between the spiral arms low in radiation that allows for life. And our galaxy is the only one known to exist that has such a unique feature, not one galaxy in the universe has been seen to date that has this feature thus can support life. And there are so many more requirements beyond that, effectively we can rule out life in the universe at this point beyond earth. In other words also say it was not a mistake.
1
@paulpaul9914 How? Science has hundreds of cosmic requirements for life. We are in a very special space between the spiral arms low in radiation that allows for life. And our galaxy is the only one known to exist that has such a unique feature, not one galaxy in the universe has been seen to date that has this feature thus can support life. There are so many more requirements, effectively we can rule out life in the universe at this point beyond earth, and say it was not a mistake.
1
@petrruzicka9815 Alien means foreign and unknowable the opposite of what is presented. Your description is wrong. And Jesus is not 3 persons to the Christian, God is, Jesus is one of the three. But the Jewish text shows the exact same thing God as three persons in Isaiah and several other passages.
1
@ Alien means foreign and unknowable the opposite of what is presented. Your description is wrong. And Jesus is not 3 persons to the Christian, God is, Jesus is one of the three. But the Jewish text shows the exact same thing God as three persons in Isaiah and several other passages.
1
@ There are hundreds of cosmic requirements for life. We exist in a special region between spiral arms in our galaxy low in radiation that allows us to exist. There isn't possibility for life all over the galaxy and there is no other galaxy known like ours that can do this thus support life. We can basically rule out the universe with this and many other requirements and state life was not a mistake because of it.
1
@phelaar Yup he literally ignores mankinds most proven knowledge the spacetime theorems from his own field of science because of the implications against his Atheistic worldview so he puts his Atheism before science. Nuts he gets interviewed.
1
true but basic reasoning and modern science tells us there isn't anything out there, in fact ignoring origin of life issue for naturalism cosmology has established we are essentially the earliest advanced life can even exist in this universe. The universe is actually extremely young from a cosmological perspective yet naturalists ignore that fact. It's ironic because before the big bang discovery naturalists estimated the universe had to be hundreds of billions if not trillions of years old for a naturalistic explanation. Someone should remind them.
1
He missing a lot, he puts his Atheism before his science which leads to a host of problems for him. I really don't know why he is even interviewed with such a lack of integrity.
1