Comments by "mombaassa" (@mombaassa) on "DW News"
channel.
-
19
-
@DieForMetalcore Australia led the world in call for an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19. The Australian navy has also continued to freely navigate the international waters of the South China Sea, against the protests of the CCP.
In retaliation, China has:
1. Detained/urrested Australian citizens, who are currently in China, without stating what the charges are.
2. Cancelled the importation of Australian barley.
3. Blocked the importation of Australian wine (with unsubstantiated claims of dumping)
4. Cancelled the importation of Australian beef.
5. Blocked the importation of Australian wheat (with unsubstantiated claims of contamination).
The spokesman for Chinese Foreign Affairs, rebuffed Australia's actions by describing the latter as, "... the chewing gum on the sole of China's shoe."
These actions are not typical of a relationship between puppet and master.
Furthermore, militarily speaking, Australia remains firmly in the American camp. Joint naval, army and air force exercises with the USA, are a norm for Australia and have occurred within the last 12 months. These include exercises in the South China Sea.
Your assertion that Australia is a puppet of China, needs considerable substantiation.
14
-
14
-
JerryMetal claims just 60,000. Russia has not been counting, non-Russians, serving them: Chechens, Dagestanis, Syrians, Ossetian, Tartars... etc. Nor have they been counting Wagner Group, mercenaries. This often accounts for discrepancies between the number of troops that Ukrainians say they have face, in a given area, and the much smaller figure of troops that the Russian's say they have stationed, there.
The point is covered in part of a video, on the Channel "Perun". The video is titled, "All metal, no manpower - Russian infantry shortages and mobilisation in Ukraine". If I include the URL, my comment may be removed.
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@EMP1RE917 Declaring war would be an admission that the previous strategy, was inadequate and a failure. Putin may be reluctant to do that.
Russia is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO). Other members are Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia. If a country declares war on Russia, invades it, or attacks targets within Russia, the other members are obliged to support Russia. If Russia declares war though, she's on her own. That could be the reason, for calling the first phase a, Special Military Operation. Putin does not want to be seen as the first one to have declared war.
It's just my theory/suggestion. There are numerous holes in it, but it could be something along those lines.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Dept246 The court did rule in favour of the Philippines , on most points. You can check, point by point, if you like and count them up. I never said that the Philippines, owns Scarborough Shoal, as you seem to imply. You have rebutted a point, that I did not make. I said that China is the only nation, that rejects the final ruling. That is a fact. It's what we expect from a country where most people were raised, as an only child. The court did not rule in favour of China, on any points, at all. The rest was deemed to be part of international waters.
As I stated earlier, PCA declared there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources, hence there was "no legal basis for China to claim historic rights" over the nine-dash line. That ruling, encompasses all of China’s bogus claims, over atolls in the South China Sea, that it has built facilities on, in the last 50 years… and that, absolutely includes, Scarborough Shoal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Clem Fandango When I asked for the source, the question was sarcastic. It states, China Ministry of Commerce. It's your choice, to regard that as trustworthy information. Get it?
Furthermore:
1. That is a figure for the 1st quarter. We're already into the 3rd quarter. So, it doesn't take into account, the impact of recent events, like the lockdowns.
2. The figure is comparative. The rise is measured against the same period last year (i.e., the 1st quarter of 2021). Comparing the performance to a period when things were even worse, Covid wise (especially for trade, travel, & manufacturing), one should expect things to improve.
3. It's not a net figure. No measure was given on the amount of money, leaving China, in the same period. The Minustry of Commerce (that you choose to trust), is currently, very quiet on that subject. 😉
You failed again, Wumao.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@peekaboopeekaboo1165 @peekaboo peekaboo Again, you are pretending to be be ignorant and hoping that others are, likewise.
You just completely ignored what was said earlier. The generals were about to lose their reserved, political powers because Syu Kyi's party had won sufficient electoral support, to effect constitutional change. So, if the generals wanted to hold on to their power, they had to use force and act quickly. China continues to shield these criminals, to keep their oil ang gas supply, flowing (among other things).
This evil, is in turn, firmly supported by people like you.
So, something good has come out of this conversation - you have learned what type of person, you really are.
2
-
@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Perhaps they just vote that way in the security council, so that Wumaus like you will have a job, defending those actions on line...LOL!
Tell me, what's it like to defend murderers, thieves, torcherers... etc? Do you get a kick out if it, or do you do it, just for the money, or are you acting under duress? Those are not, rhetorical questions. I genuinely want to know.
Does it annoy you in any way, to see China, behaving like the CIA, or does it make you feel proud? Judging by your earliest comment in this thread, it seems that you can call out the misdeeds of the latter, but remain silent, when the former does the same thing. That's racist.
You see, you are learning many things about yourself, in this chat.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dancotton13 I have not stated an opinion, on that subject. Once again, you have presumed an understanding of someone else's knowledge, without them stating any opinion on the matter. You did this with @rataranian. Now, you are repeating the error, with me.
Furthermore, you latest attempt to distract me, has been unsuccessful. You still cannot bring yourself to say, where and when @rataranian made reference to a declaration of war.
Predictably, you failed again.
PS: The use of the clown emoticon, was another, unsuccessful distraction.
You failed, again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Just want to say..." that Ukraine has many supporters, unaffected by the loss of Russian gas: Japan, Canada, Australia, USA, Korea, Colombia, Brazil... etc.
"Just want to say..." that Russia's allies have shown that they are useless. They did not support Russia 's proposal against Ukraine, two days ago in the UN. China abstained and India voted against it. Both of the have taken advantage of Russia's desperate need for new markets, to squeeze a 35% discount on Russian oil. Less than a week ago, Modi warned Putin that, "Today's era is not of war...".
Some countries have friends. Other nations, need to hire Syrian mercenaries, instead.
1