Comments by "Spiritual Psychotherapy Services" (@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices) on "Dr. Lisa Strohman: Screen Time Can Be As Addictive As Gambling" video.

  1. 10:50 HOMOSEXUAL acts are legitimate solely within polygamous marriages, as defined in Chapter 27 of “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity” (“F.I.S.H”). Read Chapter 12 and the Glossary entry under “slippery slope”, to learn the reason for homosexuality being detrimental to society, and therefore, other homosexual acts being unlawful. Whereas heterosexual unions are normal, natural, and necessary for a prosperous society, homosexuality is abnormal, unnatural, and unnecessary, and is destructive to individuals, to families, to society, and of course, to the very survival of the Homo sapiens species itself! Leading neuroscientists of the current century have demonstrated that same-sex attraction and gender dysphoria can be attributed to certain parts of the brain being formed similarly to the person’s (biological) gender OPPOSITE. There are other physiological determinants for homosexual attraction, such as genetic and hormonal, and to a far lesser degree, environmental causes. As demonstrated in Chapter 11, this phenomenon was preordained in eternity, but so too were all unbeneficial traits such as criminality and addictive personality disorders, and does not negate the obvious requirement for society to punish perpetrators of homosexual acts. Again, read Chapter 12 to understand metaethics, applied ethics, and the reason for homosexual unions being objectively evil by nature. Of all the concepts put forward in this Holiest of Holy Scriptures, this condemnation of homosexual acts is, perhaps, the teaching that elicits the most vitriolic responses from individuals, because over the past few decades of writing this treatise, homosexuality has become widely acceptable within most societies throughout the world, and even glorified in some cases! However, the obvious fact of its pernicious nature MUST be proclaimed if human society is to endure and prosper. It ought to be emphasized that homosexual acts themselves are unlawful, and not simply being predisposed to same-sex attraction. In other words, homosexual individuals can not be prosecuted simply for being attracted to members of the same gender, but only for engaging in unlawful sexual acts such as sodomy, just as heterosexuals should not be punished merely for being attracted to members of the opposite sex, but for fornicating with them (that is, engaging in extra-marital sexual activity). (From Chapter 12): It may be misconstrued that a slippery slope argument is being made in regards to homosexual acts, but if one critically scrutinizes the relevant passage, that is not at all what is being posited. Even a single act of homosexual behaviour is necessarily evil. The only possible exception to this rule is in the case of same-sex acts within a polygamous marriage (as defined in Chapter 27 of this Holy Scripture), and in such a marriage, morally-permissible only whilst the husband is collectively-engaged in sex acts with his wives. What is NOT fallacious, is to compare the state of affairs at either extreme of the sexual dichotomy, to discern the outcomes if either practice was to be taken to their ultimate conclusions. Thus, if every competent, heterosexual adult was to marry (and obviously, by “marry”, I am here referring to actual marriage, as defined in Chapter 27, and not to any other notion of marriage as conceived by a large proportion of the populace, particularly the leftists who seem to dominate public life in most all Western and Westernized countries), it would be objectively-moral, since every heterosexual man would be able to gratify his inordinately-voracious libido in a legitimate and non-harmful fashion, every heterosexual woman would be able to satisfy her romantic and sexual needs, and the union would usually result in progeny, which would not only benefit the parents, but also assure the continuation of the species. On the other hand, if every adult was to engage in a homosexual relationship, it would be objectively-immoral, because, apart from the psychological harm (and physiological injury, in the case of male homosexuals) it would cause each and every individual, it would obviously lead to the consummate destruction of human society and to the extinction of humanity. So, just as a single cancerous cell degrades a person’s body to a miniscule degree, even a single extramarital homosexual act debases human society, even if it is to a very small extent. Therefore, the so-called ‘slippery-slope’ argument is superfluous to any of my moral proclamations. N.B. In case one may believe that the reason for this author being opposed to homosexuality (more specifically, homosexual acts) is due to the fact that I, the author, am wholly heterosexual and simply hold an instinctive hatred for homosexuals, the following should be noted: Firstly, as already explained in more than a couple of passages of “FISH”, there is a highly-rational basis for denouncing homosexual acts. Secondly, I fully understand that I could easily have been born with the genes that govern same-sex attraction, or could have been conditioned by parents, friends, teachers, and society to have homosexual inclinations. If that were the case, I would simply do what I am now doing – living a chaste life, since BOTH homosexual acts and heterosexual acts without marriage are, by definition, immoral, and in the case of penetrative acts, worthy of the death penalty. So, the reader is assured that I have absolutely no animosity whatsoever towards anybody born with homosexual tendencies. After all, an enormous percentage (I would say most) of the population is bisexual to a certain degree. Yet, to act on same-sex desires is very detrimental to individuals and to society as a whole, and homosexual offenders must be appropriately punished by an authority.
    1