Comments by "Spiritual Psychotherapy Services" (@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
3
-
2
-
Respected British anthropology professor, Dr. Edward Dutton, has demonstrated that âLEFTISMâ is due to genetic mutations, caused by poor breeding strategies.
đ€Ą
To put it simply, in recent decades, those persons who exhibit leftist traits such as egalitarianism, feminism, gynocentrism, socialism, multiculturalism, transvestism, homosexuality, perverse morality, and laziness, have been reproducing at rates far exceeding the previous norm, leading to an explosion of insane, narcissistic SOCIOPATHS in (mostly) Western societies.
1
-
1
-
dharma:
a Sanskrit term (from the root âdhr-â, which means âto holdâ, or âto supportâ), for any human function or concept, that is considered to be holy and righteous, based on the maxim ânon-harm is the greatest lawâ, or ânon-violence is the epitome of religionâ (âahiáčsÄ paramo dharmaáž„â, in Sanskrit). The term â(moral) lawâ simply refers to how any voluntary, intentional human action, contravenes the principle of avoiding harm to oneself, to another living creature, and avoiding undue harm to even the non-organic environment.
So, for example, since unnecessarily consuming any animal product, is harmful to both the consumer and to the exploited animal, it is considered to be unlawful (âadharmaâ, in Sanskrit). Therefore, it is a moral imperative for every human being to become VEGAN. Dharma also refers to societal duties. For example, as the current World Teacher Himself, it is the sacred duty of this author to teach the world how to live according to dharma itself (see Chapter 20), whereas the dharma of any (human) female, for example, is to serve her masters (that is, any adult male in her nuclear family, as well as any adult male within her extended family, clan or tribe).
Dharma is undoubtedly the most important concept of all, for a peaceful, successful and thriving society, depends on adherence to the law. There is no assurance that anybody will become a self-realized sage by studying this âDharmaĆÄstraâ (law book), but at least one will understand life as it is, and be able to distinguish between holiness and wickedness, even if one refuses to accept the truths explicated here. That is the main reason why the lengthiest chapter of âA Final Instruction Sheet for Humanityâ, deals with morality.
âDharma eva hato hanti dharmo rakáčŁati rakáčŁitaáž„ à„€ tasmÄd dharmo na hantavyo mÄ no dharmo hatoâvadhÄ«tâ (Manusmriti 8.15) states that when righteousness is destroyed, it destroys, but when the law is protected, it protects. Therefore, morality ought not be destroyed, lest its absence destroys us. Unfortunately, most persons (that is, leftists) are unable to comprehend this obvious truism.
N.B. Obviously, based on the
definition of the term, given above, dharma is not a sectarian concept. All religious traditions embody genuine dharma/law/morality to varying degrees. The explication of morality provided in this Holiest of All Holy Scriptures (or to be even more blunt, the ONLY truly holy and righteous work of literature ever composed), especially in the all-important twelfth chapter, is the topmost understanding of dharma. However, in BhÄrata (the Indian subcontinent), the terms âHindu Dharmaâ and âBuddhist Dharmaâ are not uncommon, and refer more so to the distinctive sectarian teachings of those two spiritual traditions.
dhamma:
the PÄli cognate of âdharmaâ. However, in this case, it invariably refers to the teachings of Gautama Buddha, rather than the eternal law (âsanÄtana dharmaâ, in Sanskrit). In this book, it is used in the former sense, that is, of âholy and righteous concepts and deedsâ. Therefore, the term âBuddhist dhamma/dharmaâ is somewhat nonsensical, since dhamma/dharma is fundamentally non-sectarian.
Despite being the most atheistic human being to have ever existed, I often PRAY that I am not in the process of consuming a meal whenever I hear a Buddhist monk or lay teacher referring to his or her lecture as being a âdhamma talkâ. If you have carefully read the entirety of this Holy Scripture, âF.I.S.Hâ, and you have listened to many Buddhist sermons, you may have already guessed the reason for my fervent prayer. This is because the assertion that the overwhelming majority of Buddhist monks are teaching authentic dharma, is so excruciatingly cringe-worthy and laughable, I am genuinely fearful of choking on my food upon hearing such silly claims!
First of all, the founder of Buddhism himself, SiddhÄrtha Gautama was hardly a paragon of virtue, having abandoned his family in order to become a mendicant monk, being an animal-abusing carnist, and encouraging females to become loose women (so-called ânunsâ). In my half a century of life, I have only ever encountered one or two Buddhists who adhered to (actual) dharma, so in that sense, they were factually SUPERIOR to Gautama himself! For instance, the abbot of the largest Buddhist society in my homeland, Australia, believes that it is dharmic (legitimate) for men to insert their reproductive organs inside the faeces holes of other men, and of course, like his idol, Gautama, he is a murderer of poor, innocent, defenceless animals, and a filthy feminist. Furthermore, despite being an indigenous Englishman, and a graduate of one of the most prestigious universities on earth, University of Cambridge, he is entirely unable to coherently speak his native tongue! Should not a supposed âspiritual leaderâ be an exemplar in at least his own language?
Of course, no human being (including so-called âAvatarsâ) who has ever lived was morally perfect, but those who claim to be spiritual masters ought to be beyond reproach in respect to their own ethical practices. In the aforementioned case, Gautama should have returned to his family as soon as he understood the immorality of his actions, just as I, when I began adhering to dharma, repaid two persons from whom I had stolen goods and cash. Furthermore, assuming that Gautama was really a carnist (and knowing the typical diet of BhÄrata, it would be safe to assume that he was at LEAST a lacto-vegetarian, and therefore an animal-abusing criminal), he was certainly sufficiently intelligent to understand that it is unnatural for an adult human to suckle the teats of a cow or a goat, and that human beings are fully herbivorous. Otherwise, how could he possibly be considered a member of the priestly class of society (âbrÄhmaáčaâ, in Sanskrit) if he was not able to even comprehend some of the most basic facts of life? Make no mistake, carnism (see that entry in this Glossary) is a truly abominable, horrendous, wicked, hateful, evil, immoral, sinful, demonic ideology, as is feminism and unlawful divorce (in the case of Prince Gautama, the abandonment of his wife and son would be considered an act of divorce).
When a so-called Zen Buddhist priest asks another MALE so-called Zen Buddhist priest (as occurred in a video interview I just watched on the Internet), "Do you and your husband have any kids?â, one can be fully assured that the lowest point in the history of humanity has been reached. The fact that both the aforementioned so-called priests are American men, is not coincidental, since the most decadent religionists seem to be of Western/first-world origin. I don't believe I have come across a single Western Buddhist monastic who is not at least slightly left-leaning (âleftismâ being a common term in the English-speaking world for âadharmicâ).
If even 0.00001% of all Buddhists who have ever lived, were strict adherents to the teachings of the so-called âBuddhaâ, this would establish serious doubts regarding the holiness of Gautamaâs precepts, because truth be told, hardly a single soul in human history has adhered to proper dharma/dhamma.
đ à€žà€€à„à€Żà€źà„à€” à€à€Żà€€à„! đ
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
leftism:
Otherwise known as âprogressivismâ, and even more inaccurately as âliberalismâ, âleftismâ is a designation originating from the French Revolution of 1789, in reference to the political faction that opposed the French (so-called) king. However, the term is currently used in common discourse to describe those criminals who actively support (or at least tacitly condone) a host of OBJECTIVELY-WICKED ideologies and practices that contravene dharma, such as non-monarchical governances and corrupt economic systems (particularly socialism, communism, fascism, and liberal democracies), egalitarianism, feminism, perverse sexuality (especially homosexuality, bestiality, and transvestism), multiculturalism, and the illegitimate abortion of innocent, defenceless, unborn children. Cf. âdharmaâ.
In a vain attempt to legitimize their objectively-immoral propensities, crooked leftists invariably replace accurate terms with blatant EUPHEMISMS, such as âgayâ, âsex workerâ, âpro-choiceâ, and âqueerâ, and of course, coin novel words for notions that cannot exist, particularly the nonsensical term, âtransgenderâ. Furthermore, leftists are always inventing truly inane, vacuous words in order to demonize conservatives, such as âhomophobiaâ andâtransphobiaâ (which literally mean âfear of samenessâ and âfear of changeâ).
In the past decade or two (of this treatise being composed), the mass media, especially the motion picture industry and television production companies, has been aggressively promoting all the above CRIMINAL ideologies and practices, helping to expedite the destruction of human civilization. Recently, large corporations have jumped on the leftist bandwagon (so to speak), in order to profit.
As explicated in Chapter 11 of this âA Final Instruction Sheet for Humanityâ, the state of being of any particular human (or any other animal, for that matter) is due entirely to his or her genetic sequencing and his or her conditioning. Therefore, the explosion of the leftist/liberal mentality in recent decades, particularly in Western countries, has been caused by poor breeding strategies overtaking the more conservative tradition of mate-selection of previous centuries (and indeed, millennia), as well as the concerted effort of Marxists to spread their fiendish ideology throughout the school system and via folk culture. In other words, due to the fact that criminal behaviour (especially the deviant sexual acts mentioned above) has become increasingly more tolerated, condoned, and even GLORIFIED in most countries, there has been a proliferation of corrupt genetic codes within the wider human population.
According to genealogists, for (almost) the entire history of humanity, most women have successfully reproduced, whilst a far far smaller percentage of males have bequeathed their genetic sequence to proceeding generations. Due to the gradual phasing-out of polygamous marriages in even the most conservative societies, as well as the eradication of poverty in most every country, more and more men (as well as women) have been producing offspring. Thus, the human genome has rapidly become adulterated by inferior genetic material (that is, DNA from truly pathetic, uxorious beta-males, bisexuals, and even homosexual couples who engage surrogate mothers or sperm donors in order to conceive children â something of a rare occurrence in previous centuries/millennia).
For centuries, breeders of elite animals such as horses, cattle, and dogs, have understood that, by selecting the finest examples of a particular breed of animal for propagation, it will result in offspring with desirable characteristics. For example, present day thoroughbred horses boast a pedigree of the best-available horses from the seventeenth century. Such breeders are willing to pay enormous sums of money, merely to hire the fastest stallions on earth, in order for them to mate with their mares. In the case of we humans, women have traditionally chosen the most competent and masculine men with whom to bear children, and in general, have totally eschewed those males who displayed effeminate traits, and who showed themselves incapable of properly supporting a nuclear family. This phenomenon is known as âhypergamyâ in the field of sociology. Unfortunately, due to rapid moral decay over the past few decades, Western women, especially, have become extremely sexually promiscuous, resulting in a multiplication of unwanted progeny (and, of course, an escalation of abortions). Boys born to single mothers often lack proper male role models and invariably become feminized, unable (and often unwilling) to continue a strong lineage of progenitors. The solution to this problem is simply to ensure that society adheres to the principles of DHARMA (see the Glossary definition of that term, as well as Chapter 12).
As a general rule, it seems (at least anecdotally) that the farther left-leaning is a human being, the more physically (and of course, psychologically) UGLY is that person. Unfortunately, that does not seem to prevent leftists from propagating their mutant genes.
British anthropology professor, Dr. Edward Duttonâs evaluation of leftists being âSpiteful Mutantsâ, seems to be factually correct.
Before 1800, only about half of children survived to adulthood. Those who did, tended to be those with the fewest harmful genetic mutations. Then, within the course of a few generations, childhood mortality fell beneath one percent in most advanced countries. This meant that Darwinian natural selection ceased to operate. Children with harmful mutations began surviving to adulthood and transferring their unfavourable traits to offspring, a phenomenon known as âdysgenic fertilityâ. Since about 84 percent of the human genome relates to brain development, increased mutational load means that humans, in general, began to think and behave in maladaptive ways. Compounding the problem, such individuals influence those around them (who might still be genetically healthy), to behave in similarly maladaptive ways. Their behaviour is âspitefulâ because it damages others, without bringing any advantage to themselves. On a purely personal level, I cannot abide the typical leftist fool, since leftist âmenâ invariably are emasculated pansies, whilst leftist âwomenâ are, in virtually every instance, nasty, bossy individuals, unworthy of even a moment of my precious time.
Unsurprisingly, the majority of leftists find it difficult to accept the fact that their criminal mentality is largely inherited (and of course, they are unwilling to acknowledge the blatantly-obvious fact that their ideologies and practices are intrinsically sinful, wicked, evil and immoral in the first place!). It seems the consensus amongst leftist âintellectualsâ is that every human mental trait is due entirely to oneâs environmental conditioning and social milieu, rather than as a consequence of BOTH oneâs genotype and oneâs life-long conditioning â a fundamentally-flawed assertion that cannot be scientifically supported. Personally, I would not be surprised if the typical leftist would believe that, if the parents of the twentieth century communist tyrant, Joseph Stalin, and the parents of the Divine Incarnation, Lord Jesus Christ, had somehow crossed the time barrier, and exchanged their baby boys shortly after their births, that Stalin would have grown to become a Prophet for God, whilst Christ would have become a murderous, left-wing tyrant!
The chief personality trait of leftists (âadharma vÄdinâ, in Sanskrit) is SELFISHNESS. Leftists find it impossible to admit that the sole reason for them preferring lawlessness (e.g. favouring illegal abortion of innocent children, homosexuality, transvestism, thievery in the guise of economic equality, feminism, et cetera) is that it appeases their own self-centred desires. As impeccably demonstrated in the twelfth chapter of this Holiest Book of All, only by adhering to genuine morality, is it possible for human society to endure, but unfortunately, leftist criminals seem to be deaf, dumb and blind to the truth of the matter, no matter how thoroughly it is explained to them. âDharma eva hato hanti dharmo rakáčŁati rakáčŁitaáž„ à„€ tasmÄd dharmo na hantavyo mÄ no dharmo hatoâvadhÄ«tâ (Manusmáčiti 8:15) states that when righteousness (dharma) is destroyed, it destroys, but when the law (dharma) is protected, it protects. So, even though it is utterly beneficial for individuals and for society to adhere to the law, left-leaning persons are unable to grasp this truth.
Apart from wretched selfishness, probably the chief characteristic of leftists, is their willingness to sympathize with groups that are considered to be VICTIMIZED by more powerful groups. However, this support for the victimized rarely extends to the infant humans who are maliciously slaughtered by their mothers, so this tendency to fight on behalf of the oppressed seems to be highly selective. Because leftists are, by definition, supportive of communism (or at least, socialism, or at the very least, socialistic public policies), they consider the working class to be oppressed by the business class, darker-skinned human beings to be oppressed by members of European or European-origin races (even though some European nations have been colonized and/or enslaved by dark-skinned folk in the past), weaker nations oppressed by wealthy/powerful nations, women oppressed by men, disabled by the abled, et cetera.
In brief, the leftist mentality hinges on the desire to be the âsaviour of the downtroddenâ, which seems like an exceedingly noble aspiration, but in practically every instance, is grossly misguided, and thus channelled into objectively-immoral ideologies (Marxism).
Cont...
1
-
âLeftismâ was very reluctantly used in the chapter on feminism. I say âreluctantlyâ, because it is unlikely that the term will perdure for many decades longer. This is simple deductive logic, since, as clearly demonstrated in certain chapters of âF.I.S.Hâ, human civilization cannot survive with such leftist practices and ideologies in place. If you happen to be reading this Holy Scripture a century or more after its conception, you will probably be residing in a nation (as opposed to a country) ruled by a monarch, following the implosion of post-modern, decadent societies. So, either the term âleftismâ will eventually become redundant and obsolete, or else, human civilization will devolve into a decadent, diseased state of existence, similar to that of the prehistoric era, when the peoples of the world resided in caves or in shacks, subsisting on whatever food can be sourced from the surrounding bushland. I trust that you, who are reading these wise words, will endeavour to influence your social circles to adhere to right-leaning ideologies and practices, such as (above all) monarchical governance, an entirely free-market economy, sexual purity, veganism, and all other virtuous principles.
Fear not, for the truth will surely conquer (âsatyam-eva jayateâ, in Sanskrit)! Cf. âright-wingâ. See âmulticulturalismâ and âsocialismâ.
N.B. In order to clarify the notion of inheritability, it is not being claimed that an adharmic (far-left) couple will INVARIABLY produce leftist children, but merely that it is more PROBABLE that they will do so, considering their distinctive genotypes and the idiosyncratic/unique environmental conditioning that they are bound to impart to their children, just as two parents with a certain physiological disorder are more likely to generate offspring with that specific disease. In this regard, it is recommended to study introductory texts on genetics/epigenetics.
In my own particular case, I was raised by a staunch communist, and so, I was indoctrinated to believe that communism was the best course of action for a just society. Indeed, as a teenager, I even volunteered in the election campaign of a socialist politician, who eventually became the Premiere of the state of Western Australia. However, after studying dharma, I came to learn that I was misled by my father in this regard, and that the only system of governance that is dharmic (legitimate) is a divinely-sanctioned monarchy.
1