Youtube comments of Koko (@kokoyaro).
-
632
-
573
-
549
-
510
-
470
-
409
-
290
-
271
-
229
-
207
-
183
-
95
-
81
-
71
-
68
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
59
-
49
-
47
-
47
-
44
-
38
-
38
-
35
-
As usual, the "childhood trauma" excuse. I don't think there's anyone on earth who had as bad a childhood as I did - abandoned by mom, raised by another woman who hated me, poisoned multiple times near death, left to cross a busy road alone at 4 years old, knocked 11 ft to a concrete floor by a speeding car (woke up in hospital to see many adult faces looking down at me), mauled multiple times to the brink of life by 3 of 4 bigger brothers using all types of metal rods to beat on me as a child, molested by "uncle" and abused into my teens, sent to boarding camp for more punishment that lasted 6 more years and eventually had to run away to find my own life, got involved in so much trouble in the process but NEVER decided to unalive anyone.
Upon all I've been through + diseases caused by irresponsible adults, I don't have any childhood trauma because children forget bad things easily. I can bearly remember the so-called "abuse". Spare me with the childhood trauma crap. You got angry and snapped or whatever, own it and bear the consequences. Your past didn't make any decision for you. You made the decision to unalive others. So, shut up and accept your own unaliving
35
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
In general human moral psychology, the supplier in the criminal dynamic is more tied to causation than the demander. So, the law attributes both the cause and effect of the crime to them, just like in drug cases, assault cases, human trafficking cases, arms smuggling cases, embezzlement cases, etc.
Rationally, this perspective is one-sided, flawed and unbalanced just like the entire human wisdom is. But unfortunately it has come to be the standard that hyperagency (supplier/giver) carries more guilt than hypoagency (demander/receiver) and so they're punished more harshly.
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@catbertevil750 I think you're stuck in the early 90s/2000s rise of the manufacturing sector as China's main source of GDP. China's economy evolved beyond that in efforts to reduce reliance on foreign demand, a lesson they learned harder from the effect of the 2009 global financial crisis. In fact, there's a trend of their manufacturing moving to South East Asia and other parts of the world due to the rising cost within China. I was a researcher in Beijing throughout their economic reform period when this country created the strongest middle-class and became the world's largest markets for most commodities, including real estate.
You mentioned luxury apartments in Shanghai, that hints me that you also know of the Evergrande story, a company that handled almost 1400 construction projects in almost 300 cities in China. What most people don't know is that Evergrande is just one in hundreds of realestate conglomerates and sub-contractors with big portfolios in China and beyond. When you're outside China it's easy to think these numbers are exaggerated. But when you're in the country stumbling upon ginormous ghost cities like I did, built on billions of $$ debt money, then you begin to see how the real estate is a huge slice of the economic pie and why a sign of its collapse is a big deal.
If you don't trust the CCP data, search western sources like Time, Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, etc... They all say the same thing: "Real Estate contributes about 30% of China's GDP, making it the single biggest contributor to China's economy."
P.S. There's a long standing policy in China that the property market is closed to foreign entities, so the Shanghai lux apartments is a far fetched fantasy if you don't hold Chinese citizenship let alone a Shanghai "hukou". Will this real-estate-induced economic crisis become severe enough to cause the CCP to relax the rules against foreign demand? That remains to be seen but highly unlikely
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertw1800 "Israel hasn't occupied Gaza since 2005" and that's supposed to be celebrated by the Palestinians while the other "78%" of their country is still occupied and controlled by the Jews? Come'on it's becoming apparent that you're either misled or simply being disingenuous on this issue, hence you ask "in the present day" as if that's all there is.
1. The deeds that enabled the illegal occupation of Palestinian land by Jewish invaders happened over a hundred years ago. The adoption of Resolution 181 that laid the foundation for apartheid against the Palestinians happened 76 years ago. So, if you're unable/unwilling to understand current events in historical context, you're simply unqualified for an argument on this topic.
2. You asking me for specific instances of oppression is a waste of time because I could give you a hundred examples yet you'd still choose to ask for specifics of specifics until you'd find meager stuff like a mere typos that you could use for some cheap gaslighting which never works. Yes, I've dealt with your type numerous times and that's how predictable you are.
3. Instead of enlightening you on how Israel's decades long Gaza blockade is negatively affecting ordinary Palestinians, instead of pointing out the obvious that each time Palestinians peacefully protest against Israeli policies the military might is unleashed against them, instead of reminding you that Israel recently warning over a million Palestinians to flee their homes in Northern Gaza is a form of oppression even by pro-israel UN standards; You should rather arouse your own common sense in a different way: Ask the Palestinians to choose between having their land back and/or having Israel's electricity, indoctrination (AKA "education"), supermarkets, and all these other silly things you mentioned; I guarantee you 100% they'd chose to simply recover their land rid of the Jews.
P.S. I speak 12 languages fluently including English. And though you've likely been monolingual in English your whole life, I still have a wider vocab in the language than you do and highly likely speak more clearly than you do, orally. Show some respect
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@inthegutterstaringathestars First of all, most, if not all, the people travelling to the Mediterranean sea obtain passports from their countries which is clearance to leave, meaning not illegal to emigrate. Those passports are often collected by the agents they pay heavy sums to get them to Europe.
Secondly, by your own perfect logic, whites/caucasians of Australia, Canada, USA, South American countries, South Africa, Namibia, New Zealand, etc are all "illegal immigrants"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Lyuba999 If it's a betrayal then why not just call it that? a betrayal.
Cheating is officially defined by Oxford as : 'acting dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage'. In a relationship, this can range from baiting one's self for external attention, to manipulating their own "partner" for some type of edge. (A range of acts that are mostly committed by women).
However, today the word is used synonymously with "infidelity" and/or "adultery", and there's a reason for this switch. Women innately understood that the aforementioned acts were more serious when committed by women, not only because their sexuality has always been their biggest asset but also because they're instinctively monogamous in their loyalty. Men are not biologically wired like this that's why the word "adultery" has historically connoted some type of female sin, not the male.
The other morality you explained made a lot of sense until it devolved into femicentric advice/solutions that you CANNOT apply to both parties : "talk to your partner", "communicate", "get a sex councellor", "break up", etc. Men don't need to do any of that.
Again, this is the mindset that unwittingly/subconsciously ignores our differences and superimposes feminine 'non-solutions' on everyone else's psychology. It has to stop. We must start by banning words like "cheating" and force everyone to use the appropriate words
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vnewen2157 "Westerner" in the imagination of most Asians, refers to Caucasians. I'm not saying it's a bad thing but it's just that the first foreign people that came in contact with Asians were Whites, so the default description of them became the normalized word for "foreigner". "Falang" (in Thai and Laotian first meant "French" and later became "Foreigner"), Barang (in Malay and Indonesian and Cambodian), LaoWai (in Chinese), etc.
I have no problem with it. I'm just saying that this video didn't clarify that in the context of what the 304s in Thailand often say, it doesn't refer to all foreigners, like you rightly pointed out. For example: In the same way they don't imagine an African man as a falang, they also do not imagine an African American man as falang. They have another specific word for black people: "Khun Dam" (in Thai and Laotian), "hei ren" (in Chinese), etc. So the Asian words for foreigner ALWAYS have a racial connotation. Again, I'm not saying it's a bad thing. It's just the way their languages naturally evolved. So people who do documentaries like this video are misleading at best.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@4evertrue830 There's a reason you always had something you were better at than everyone else around you, since your childhood. That one thing got you into and out of trouble. No matter what it is, your true purpose in life aligns with that thing.
For me, it was creative writing - poems, rhymes, proses, stories and songs since I was 9. I abandoned it while growing up because my family didn't see any economic value in such theoretical stuff and neither did I. I was rather steered into learning more popularly demanded skills like Business IT and International Relations. I wasted my life being an IT Staff,.... Software Project Manager, IT Manager, International business man etc... for the money. Just like the man in this video, I totally disregarded what I was actually good at, and did everything else just for the money. But none of these things I did was permanent and neither did any of such vocations give me fulfilment. And then I decided to revive my writing talent and find a way back to my true purpose. From that point on, anything I did had to align with that purpose. I started including my creative writing into my profession. At that time, my last position held as a corporate slave was "Business Development Manager" in a foreign country. I became the best report writer they ever had and they adopted my detailed report writing style as mandatory for all staff according to new company policy. I ended up doing more writing than my actual job description. All business proposals, contracts, policies and project documentation would be written by me, no one else could do the writings as meticulously as I did in a very short space of time. Meanwhile, I also made a personal journal/story of daily events of the company.
By the time I finally said goodbye to corporate slavery, I was already making money from writing articles online (though it's not what I'm best at but it's still some form of writing). I made websites and wrote multiple entries to generate ad income and that grew higher than my highest ever salary back when I was Software Project Manager. Gradually, one thing led to another and I was introduced to a producer for song writing. I got paid much higher for each song that took me no more than 15 minutes to conceptualize, compose and scribble out (of course I didn't tell them how easy it was for me). Some of the artists are still well-known although I'm not credited as the writer due to contract terms. I'm also writing 4 books for my passive income stream. In addition to these, my personal poetry writings include prophesies and predictions that have NEVER been wrong since my childhood.
And one more thing. Some times your purpose in life does not even align with your physical appearance. Just like I'm 6'3 18 stone muscled guy with a tough face and strong voice looking like an arrogant MMA fighter, yet if you read my poetry stories they sound like written by a woman, leaving out no detail. When I was a teenager, I rejected my purpose as I thought that talent wasn't manly enough. But now when I look back at my archive of 3,655 poems most of which are 12 to 36 stanzas long (the ones in English), over 200 proses, hundreds of songs, stories, etc written since childhood, I realize that whatever is productive is indeed manly. After all, after I'm gone those words will still make money for those I leave behind. That's my real purpose. To fight and warn the world through those creative words that will outlast all generations after me
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1