Comments by "PiN" (@pierren___) on "Knowledgia" channel.

  1. "Why didnt France fight to the END" ? Well To not reach the end wtf
    88
  2. Natio.-Socialism in fact lol
    27
  3. France = hexagon
    15
  4. National* capitalism
    15
  5. Id like to have a precise account of the places and technics of the bolsheviks
    12
  6. They still capture berchetesgaden before him, lol
    12
  7. Luckily for him, It never happened, as they were further than him, entering Austria 🤡
    12
  8. France hold the door dumbass. More like "England be respectful and honest" No lol
    11
  9. Just didnt want another ww1. France lost the most proportionnaly of that war
    5
  10. It his actual first name Henri-Philippe Petain i think
    5
  11.  @bernardotorres2532  Thanks
    3
  12. @Metric Fern french was huge excellent and ready To win, but more so To a new world view that could have give sense To life, politics, and world; it could have been nzism. French politics were on the brink of collapse; germans would have push the revolution; animating historical tensions between french culture and britain, which could have permitted war that could be won.
    3
  13. Exactly what i thought, never noticed before
    3
  14. Un peu surévalué
    2
  15. And the politicians side too: all they did was yelling bout peace to everyone which obviously will not work
    2
  16. @Metric Fern because they were not numerous and in england. Plus a new state and culture emerging of revolution type nazism would have legitimized the war and england would be invade with x2 soldiers and planes than planned. Then no usa war and ussr destroyed i think yes
    2
  17.  @ThugShakers4Christ  libya* je next to Egypt in north africa, where it was fought the second world war between british and axis. Yes because it was easy To confront ussr in the state of weakness it was than the strong german army. Remember France 40m against G 80m and the british runaway because they wanted to shallow a direct war against germany (they will lose ) so Germans feel safe to go on operation barbarossa To skin both Russia and Germany, which happened in fact
    2
  18. True. Post-war "pacific" policies - which mean no plan policy- has totally separated the right wing nationalist realpolitik of strength and remembrance from the left forgetful disdainers moralist pacifist which is responsible for the mess of the post-war. Lesson learned: NEVER BE IN THE CENTER.
    2
  19. They lost 1,4 millions during ww1 + 3millions injured : on the ww1 generations, only 1/3 will have childrens. The british wanted to weakened europe but the French refuse to disappear but they were pacifist and refuse the new german mentality so ideally they should have fight with germany against the uk and destroy their bankers
    2
  20.  @thierrydesu  oui oui c'est un peu exagéré, lol
    1
  21. Understand why collaboration wasnt surprising
    1
  22.  @clementl.9566  im sure life as prisoner was better than english life lol
    1
  23.  @karstenschoenberg9736  Royan is controversial
    1
  24.  @watchman835  after ww1 only 1/3 of generation male had children
    1
  25.  @SWiftxFuRY  Its a war video not showing other aspects
    1
  26.  @SWiftxFuRY  because To understand an event you must have presupposely understand history. He should explore behind the lines
    1
  27.  @SWiftxFuRY  he didnt have recoil focusing on military tactic rather than strategy or even civil-politic-diplomatic nodes of the French relations, while omitting britain strategy To fuck France sending hell on them again and rescuing again, all that for the classical divide europe = no concurrents like against Napoleon, that Mister H. Talked about very well in his last will; which ultimately led to the cold war europe and today. 😁
    1
  28.  @WillmobilePlus  Yeah lol Nice theory
    1
  29.  @luisfernandosantosn  I never noticed the 19century occupation mentality. Might explain Why they accepted To collaborate but not lose their primar position
    1
  30. Yes and Uk wanted France to do surreal things and suffer everything
    1
  31.  @sebastianlodge7549  did germany had colonies?
    1
  32.  @sebastianlodge7549  all? Didnt know. So i undesrtand why collaboration was accepted. As they knew France was man-vacuum and angry because the république hate the french they just had To take money and send their armies against usa and uk. In my opinion France had opportunity To déclare war against allies and germany would really have win
    1
  33. Remember germany was 80 millions war industry ready against 40 millions middle age mourning their dead. France shouldnt have any regret for refusing uk trick wars and enter collaboration
    1
  34. France should have send its army against britain. Never understood Why France didnt declare war against them
    1
  35.  @belsayshootingground  Yes so they should have declared war on britain, since britain attacked french army
    1
  36.  @belsayshootingground  because ou principle is that France is now ally in 3rd reich. So i dont understand Why they didnt resist more. Actually i know Pétain wanted double game and kinda failed. And the french déclaration would be formality, and crédible BECAUSE they were already under hands of germany, so war against uk is in exchange of partial autonomy.
    1
  37.  @belsayshootingground  well you are the one with very strange ideas. N-soc Germany is not capitalist nor pro-capitalism. Then they go in the west because they were in war against poland BEFORE going To ussr. If not against both ideologies they had no reason To go To russia; thats how english think: just let the other do the work and suffer, and thats what the germans wanted To escape
    1
  38.  @belsayshootingground  Not at all bruh maybe feodalism at that point but no international bankery for germany thats for sure lol
    1
  39.  @belsayshootingground  yeah i dont think so, however id like To read more about that, furthermore they werent socialist lol😊 And uh both says they right i think so no this war had sense and it couldnt be solved by phrases like this
    1
  40.  @belsayshootingground  i guess you are american
    1
  41.  @belsayshootingground  well explain me before we on suit eachother lol
    1
  42.  @belsayshootingground  thats not an argument anyway lol in what way is it bad ???
    1
  43.  @belsayshootingground  plus the army wasnt prisonered in germany; it was autonomous in France and limited To 100000, and officialy defensive and charged of collaboration.
    1
  44. Points faibles d'abord Points forts après
    1
  45. Légal d'abord Lethal après
    1
  46. Impossible
    1
  47.  @Chungus581  not at all since the Vichy government was ruling all of France outside of Alsace, France was consider neutral and all the allies reconized it with their ambassies. We never lost the war since both sides helped us, so for me its whatever. And the us allies killed more frenchmans than germans ever did, so their victory isnt a problem since its equal for us.
    1
  48.  @keramidasnicolas2079  what are the flying saucers
    1
  49.  @keramidasnicolas2079  lol wtf
    1
  50.  @simapark  there was one hence why France won ww2 its called resistance. Your cliches are not the truth.
    1