Comments by "Classical LP Vault" (@classicallpvault8251) on "Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins" channel.

  1. 155
  2. 84
  3. 80
  4. 58
  5. 54
  6. 42
  7. 30
  8. No they don't. The US pays around 5 billion dollars annually to Israel and that's not welfare. It's a payment for policing the Middle East. If the US had to do this themselves they'd have to spend 3-4x that amount, mostly due to logistical issues stemming from being located 1000s of miles away, and be less good at it. After all, fighting for abstract geopolitical goals is harder to motivate oneself for than fighting for one's own country. US military aid to Israel amounts to less than 1% of its GDP or 4% of its government expenditure. Cutting this aid (which would be incredibly stupid) would be a problem, but not an insurmountable one, for Israel to deal with. Also, the Israeli welfare population isn't like the welfare population in Western countries. They're not hordes and hordes of low IQ people with employment resistant personalities. Ultra-Orthodox Jews have a strongly intellectually oriented culture and also a far higher degree of rule following, devout religious communities like that also demand high levels of in-group loyalty and pro-sociality. Meanwhile, the precariat in the West largely consist of the dumbest and most antisocial elements of society. Ultra Orthodox people with characteristics like the typical Western welfare recipient will either have low status within the community or end up leaving it because they're not pro-social enough to conform to the very strict social norms within. Tapping into the huge economic and social potential is a matter of necessity just like accomodation of the ultra Orthodox in the IDF and this will occur. Just as they're now serving in the Army they'll re-join the workforce just like their ancestors living in Eastern Europe before WWII held their own trousers up economically speaking. That their government is unstable is correct, thanks to proportional representation and a fractured unicameral parliament, but this also means that the Ultra-Orthodox can't expect to take over the country since all the social democrats, national-Zionists, and even secular right wingers (many secular Jews from the former USSR and their families are very right-wing but so secularised that Russian shops sell pork products) will just form a coalition to prevent this. Israeli politics is also becoming less fractured as even the secular population is steadily moving to the right and one of the biggest dividing issues, the Palestinian problem, is becoming less divisive now even the most naive peace advocates are realising that the Palestinians don't want a two-state solution but the Final Solution.
    14
  9.  @MA-gu2up  That's all completely wrong. Being hypoglycemic suppresses IQ scores and this hasn't been controversial for ages. Why do you think people taking an IQ test are advised to not take it on an empty stomach. Intermittent fasting while stuffing down calorie-rich fatty and sugary food when you are eating (twice a day) is very unhealthy. Not only because of fluctuating blood glucose but also because they increase the risk of excessive caloric intake. You'll eat twice a day, and especially during the evening you'll eat while being very hungry. This is just a recipe for overindulgence and that's a separate issue from the very unhealthy food generally consumed during iftar celebrations. Moderate caloric deficits (10-15%) with a high protein diet including tons of leafy vegetables are healthy for weight loss without losing muscle fibre but that has nothing to do with what Muslims eat during Ramadan. Also, going thirsty will mess up the electrolyte balance and this leads to further problems, like ineffective excretion of waste materials that the body gets rid of via urine. Dehydration even causes hallucinations and if you're slightly dehydrated you won't experience hallucinations but do experience a drop in mental clarity. Ergo: taking part in Ramadan suppresses intelligence. Diabetes and obesity rates among Muslim populations who have easy access to food are sky high. The same diet that causes you to be metabolically unhealthy also suppresses IQ. Also, you're wrong about the second issue. Per capita major innovation levels peaked in Victorian Britain around 1870 at a time when almost everyone was a member of the Anglican Church, and the theory of evolution, which is directly contrary to the creation myth in the Bible, was thought up during this period as well and quickly gained mainstream support even from people who were themselves practicing Christians. The track record of islam is far worse: Muslim fanatics destroyed the library of Alexandria in the 7th century, ordered by Caliph Umar. The Catholic Church censored books but, by and large, didn't have them destroyed. They even kept copies of censored books themselves, and copies of the Greek classics were maintained and studied by monks and theologians. Both Judaism and Christianity allow any part of the Bible except those which are explicitly about God giving laws to His adherents, to be seen as proverbial or mythical in nature rather than literally true. Except for a few groups (like the Old Order Amish) Christian and Jewish populations are all technophilic. Nobel Prize winners skew heavily towards Ashkenazi Jews, even though this trend has been declining. Arab and other major Muslim populations are heavily underrepresented among Nobel Prize winners.
    12
  10. 12
  11. 8
  12. 7
  13. 7
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1