Comments by "Limrasson" (@Limrasson) on "Asmongold Clips"
channel.
-
693
-
502
-
461
-
403
-
305
-
283
-
273
-
273
-
246
-
241
-
216
-
193
-
111
-
99
-
92
-
87
-
86
-
67
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
62
-
59
-
55
-
52
-
46
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@ModjoConCarne I have no reason to know what "London production" is, either way I doubt a "local theathre" production would make the headlines, which drives it back to the point where the cast members were deliberately chosen.
And at this point no, the burden of proof is no longer held by us. What I mean by that is that the last few years were full with this type of racism or feminism or just in general the "woke agenda"
So yes it's entirely possible that you are in fact correct and this casting was done in good faith.
But the community can no longer give any benefit of the doubt, because how often this "take white character paint it black and make her ugly too" has taken place.
Unfortunately for me, none of this changes the fact that you are right in this. A correct argument has to be made.
So if she wasn't diversity picked, it would mean that there was some other consideration, assuming she wasn't the only one trying for the role. And because the play already has a "starring" actor I would say it's safe to assume that casting wasn't from a small local group.
I cannot tell how good she is because her IMDb profile has 4 roles listed, but I also assume she plays on stage continously. Her profile does say she is more into sound/music however so maybe, assuming positively, that's a hint on how the actual play will be?
Either way if Tom Holland brings in his "star power" and acting then what does she bring? Was she picked for the role because she is talented and people want to put her into a big production or is she taken because she is just black?
Because it's sure as hell not her looks that got her the role.
Either way, be it a play or not, the case here isn't a "well who do we have who haven't played Julia yet?" but a "chose actors with deliberation" and I feel that it's reasonable to suspect racial motivation.
If it's not then it's actually a win for everyone, except racists I guess.
IF it is, then it's a big L, because then everyone will assume racism even harder.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I don't really consider allied races as a main feature. I think it should have been as a secondary feature used to integrate lore factions into the game better. Yes, most of them are just reskins but that was okey, because they had been in the world, interacting with players for a long time, even Kul'tirans and the Zandalari.
But instead it's all furry gonlins and robo gnomes and fuck else.
And the dragons are just, not sure what the english term would be, but "peasant blinders" so "you like dragons, yes? D&D has so many draconid races, so here, have scalies."
And that's that. I don't like it at all, but people will get hyped because "dRaGoNS"
And the dragon mount is cool, cool, but it ain't no swift flight form.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@djatlasmusik A - Well you are just objectively wrong and claiming I'm wrong and you are right is rather silly in this regard because oh so often the tool, the material or the style and their inventors or discoverers get way more credit than individual artists. Examples are organic (and sometimes synthetic) paints, mines (thing of gemstones, the location and their material is often more credited than the gemcutter), block printing, etc.
And I find your stance rather arrogant, you claim you are the artist and oh without the human the art isn't being created. Well If I took your photoshop, drawing tools, paper etc away, what would you do? All you could do is sing or perhaps homecraft your own tools. Without the tools, the art pieces created today wouldn't be created, definitely not in the form that they are being done with them.
And you say photographically and perfectly combining art is what the AI does, but...no? Have you seen those fingers yet? And you say "inspiration", but then again, can you explain how it works? No? Exactly.
The fact is that AI art is ruffling feathers because it's a tool that has significantly more autonomy in it's production. But you cannot tell where the terminator is, what tool you would consider "just a tool" and what would be "cheating"?
I say that AI art is in essence no different from any other digital tool, like the hundreds you have in photoshop.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Misskraehe Oh, let me answer then with a concept here, that wasn't brought up.
THe fetus is developing inside the womb right? But can you take out the "baby" from the mother at any time and just let it develop on it's own? Yeah, obviously not it's just going to die.
So objectively, without argument, the developing human is debendent on it's mother, up until a point after which it has a reasonable chance to survive. And to be specific I meant dependency other than basic needs, any baby dies if you just leave it out in the open.
So the fetus is upwards dependent on it's mother for survival up until a point in it's development. Until it reaches this point it's is effectively not it's own entity, but due to this dependency part of it's mother. And as long as the mother is considered a creature of free will, it should be able to decide what to do with it, including ejecting / getting rid of a symbiotic entity, which is the fetus in this case.
After the fetus passes the development stage where it can reasonably survive on it's own (assuming normal care, whatever that might entail) you can consider it it's own living being.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TuhljinTampergauge Sorry, haven't seen your second reply.
Right, I think I get it.
Well both sides are right, because from their perspective, morality, values, etc. they are in the right. However as you've said, their ideas contradict. It's all subjective of course, but objectivity doesn't give goals, nor values.
As they would occupy the same area, this means conflict. Imho the most likely scenario is that this conflict will keep on going until only one side is left. This is how the world works.
1
-
1
-
@leahnzastrzelecki5217 I see your point, yet, but it's a bit of an overstatement to call a chihuahua a dog and honestly only pugs are more revolting.
And at the end of the day you can either manage to be threathening or you don't.
I actually met a woman, online, who I interacted with for a time and even through I don't know how she looks like she gave out this small dog energy, impossible to really get mad at her, because indeed she is mostly harmless.
Back on topic, we are humans, our personalities are our responsibilities, but when you are tiny and your idea of "rage" is...less than satisfactory then the only one you are a threat to is yourself. I'll put you on top of a shelf if you become too annoying.
But to clear it up a bit, wrath/anger has other sides, the screaming and property destruction is one, but for instance there is the silent, put purposefully moving one, which is the "aquiring targets" phase for instance.
Also anektode, but when I was in elementary, playing outside during recess, it was "rugby" I guess (it wasn't, but we tried, okey?) and I decided that the best thing to play rugby would be a train, so I played I was a train, But you know what trains can't do? Get off the tracks, so I went one direction, turned around and another.
One girl who stayed in the back kinda took that personally (all she had to do was move to the side) and I think one guy thought I was targeting the girl. So I was held by the guy from behind and the girl in front decided to kick me.
...
The next thing I remember is me holding her head up, preparing to smash her head into the asphalt a second (or third) time.
Anyway sorry if this seems ranty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You need a third party auditor with measured and standardized blindfold (or just turned off monitor would do I guess?), on site of course. Actual full validation is done beyond any reasonable doubt and therefore the set needs to be verified, the blindfold needs to be verified, the environment needs to be verified, etc.
Obviously nobody should care that much.
For me, the "this is fake" is more believeable, because of, just based on these snippets, her surprized, I dare to say sensationalist attitude towards it.
I mean what is she surprised about, she either knew what was happening, due to audio clues or she didn't, in which case the boss is either so easy (in the given circumstance) that literally my cat could beat it (and she doesn't have opposeable thumbs) or she've gotten incredibly lucky / doesn't actually know what she did.
Neither of which I find particularly interesting.
What would be interesting for me in a handicapped run, is the mentioned clues. But if someone is listening those, they are likely on focus mode and not ":O :O :O" mode.
Meaning that for me it's fake and even if it's not fake I do not care.
/rant off
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jahile I find it disturbing if youtube censors comments like that, that is very bad.
In general? Well you can get a very long list even here. BLM, Black History Month, media in general is used to "diversify" which is mostly forced for some agenda I'm not sure I understand.
Well I understand that BLM is used to loot on the streets and steal money so the leader can have her own mansion, but I don't get the politics behind it.
And the main theme is that it tends to be just african / black.
Let's be honest if we go on a global scale and mimic population then most characters would be asian. But history channel isn't spreading that cleopatra was japanese because someone's grandma said so, right?
So specifically at this point I cannot tell for sure, because it is entirely possible that she was cast for a valid reason. But at this point I might not even bother double-checking. "Yeah, looks like it, probably is, good bye"
I could go on and on with examples of crap social fuckery that grew everywhere, but it's more than enough to watch asmon reading "news" to see how bad it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AstraI1 Well, now that we are on a generic field, I can point these out and answer the questions.
It is corrupt because the idea of democracy is that the voters invest their powers into the elected to represent them at the governing body, right?
They aren't doing that, now are they?
Very rarely do you have a group of idealists, that aren't raging lunatics, take control. And even then time might paint the picture rose-tinted.
In the US lobbying would be a very good example of why the system it's fucked. But a very, very long list could be complied I'm pretty sure on stuff that is being affected or severely affected by corruption.
And corruption here of course means the misuse of said invested power.
And sure there might be "no evidence", but you don't have evidence that the sun is in the sky, now have you?
Same thing with politics, politicians and their courts. For instance it's a pretty safe bet to say that the US is essentially torn into a red vs blue/them vs us/republicans vs democrats
It's either due to malice or incompetence, both justified the noose is my book.
And no, I don't really have an aswer for it, that's the most annoying part. That doesn't mean it's all right as it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'll just pick this apart, good brain activity starter, good content for real:
# "Fit women are more attractive than fat women" - no definition, no context, subjective topic. What's the point of this again? To rage bait? Or is brainrot this prevalent today?
# "My having this body shows that I can commit to something." Yes, the same way as a fat body does. Also at the end of the day it's highly likely this is just rationalizing how she likes to look at herself in the mirror. Nothing wrong with that. But what Asmon said. After all eating 100 burritos a day is more difficult than working out.
# "Can we bring in the disagreers?" <--- He should have added "But not all at once", lucky they were on the ground floor. I wonder if this is all fake, it's almost comedic how only one of the fit girls stepped foward but all the ogresses went into battle immediately.
# "Personality wise..." Oh shut it. Looks actually tend to match personality. Oh look, the of the fat girls teleported back and didn't say anything, how curious.
# Thank you, girl in red.
If you aren't some grotesque malformed abomination then you can learn to play your hand right and be attractive. This goes both ways.
Good morning.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hated Asmongold back in the WoW days because I was playing wow, had no interest in watching someone else play wow, yet the moment I dared to watch anything wow related this fucking dude shows up on the feed, I go to the kitchen sink, want some water BRRR Asmongold flows from the fucking tap. GET OUT OF THE TAPWATER, ASMONGOLD, GIT.
But now that those days are over I like his content. And I mostly agree. Although even if this type of clickbait bullshit what works, just because being a fools' clown pays the bills, doesn't change that you are a fools' clown. Integrity rarely pays for itself, that's why we respect it.
Anyway people love to go to the extremes, DIV had it's open beta and now it seems like most of everyone is either "this is the best game ever if you disagree I'll go apeshit" vs "this is the worst game ever if you disagree I'll go apeshit"
Complete lack of critical thinking. Noticed that with the "No preorders" crew as well. At least some of them are people who jumped on the hypetrain one too many types and now look at preorders like a recovering alcoholic looks at cheap beer. They don't realize that not being able to make a reasonable decision over a purchase with uncertain outcomes is kind of a skill that's important if you ever want to purchase anything with complexity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When this xpack came out I was still so fucking mad at Shadowlands I had no intention of playing it. But ppl said the story isn't bad. Based on what I've seen, cinematics like this (cinematic is a strong word), I didn't like it, but couldn't get the full picture (which requires completing all quests and such), so I could only confidently dislike the artstyle (What is that ice/chrystal lady? So silly looking. But now the others look off too.)
But this...what the fuck?
And it's not like this theme is new, not even for WarCraft, hell "working together through our differences" is the go-to theme for the world, since every other thursday there is an ancient evil rising you need our powers combined.
But I don't think I've ever seen it played off this bad. Not to mention that a wounded, perhaps even dying, Azeroth for whom we are getting 3 expansions to deal with the sword just straigh up gives aspect powers to characters even through at the end of Cataclysm it was a huge deal and very final-sounding event when they lost it. They literally made a grand sacrafice to save the world which is now retroactively shat on.
But what the fuck can we expect, I met people who even defended shadowlands and I've also met people who got so upset at someone liking the story of that aberration, to be legit upset. This last one is me of course. IF you eat shit, you gonna get shit, I guess.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Now for reference, imagine if the US was invaded and Trump decided to take the L and lose a few states here or there, just to "make the bullets stop flying". Now in effect it's true that if you fold immediately, then you'll have the least amout of losses, but then you'll also not have a country to begin with very soon, no?
It's also clear that the conflict is about resources and wealth.
Which Trump is playing for, obviously. And evil as that might be, that's the correct step, after all he is, supposedly, enacting the interests of the US and her people and not anybody else's.
Just as Zelenszkij is, again supposed to, his position however is rather tight, stuck between like 3 rocks and a hard place and I'm pretty sure at least one of the rocks is radio active. I think he has many reasons to be upset, but also has to realize that thematic spiels "your ocean protects you, what you think will happen in the future" or moral/emotional tracks will not work on Trump.
Well, either way, this is going to be interesting. On related note, anyone knows from how far can a human detect (without aid of equipment) a nuclear strike?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Null_Experis Aide from the guy pulling you on, even from across the world it's obvious that the USA is suffering from some serious issues. And you are correct, the idea that those who are in power, by any source or key, use that power to give themselves more isn't anything new. And you could argue that the US is still better than let's say Russia or China, at least US tanks work and the crew only rarery (and as a mistake) drink the jet's cooling fluid.
However the issues are still there and should be a concern. Hell the US as a global power has so much influence that when some asshats there figure they have issues with a quirk of their language, I have to listen to people repeating that here, across the entire world, with a language that can't do jack with the concept.
To be very specific here, the issue is that medicine is, in the most literal way, vital to people and therefore the country / society. The goal of the system should be to have the highest quality and highest avaiability overal (the two of course are at odds). Dead men pay no taxes after all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnheifner5813 I was thinking about this, but $90k still sounds incredibly expensive, any time you have something like this, an investigation should be taken, audit if you will, to see if it's reasonable. (I work capacity/performance) if it is, then all is well, we are happy (even if our wallets are empty).
Two types of problems can exist here, one is that the price is valid, but it could be improved upon (and I mean real improvement, not corner cutting) in which case we do so and we happy again.
Alternatively it could be that prices are hiked up to feed some sort of corruption. In which case we happy'nt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kubka4 Are you for real? Well, very simple then, point out where they said it, verbatim.
Otherwise you are just inserting your own ideas into the topic, which is foolish at best.
But anyway, you completely miss the point here.
A - There might be one point to the article, but the "2 sentences next to each other" are 2 independent statements.
B - The point here is that OP takes these statements and creates his own narrative by again, inserting his own reading of the article into it. The counter argument to mock the IGN journalist is factually wrong. A - The article never explicitly states that it considers realism and in fact uses positive examples that are also not realistic (but all of you completely ignore this). Second OP bases his mockery on the idea that body scan used = real, which is just a brainlet move.
C - All of this is for no point other than potentially not understanding why the journalist fails at journalism. The second statement, trying to say "haha, devman is pathetic horny loser" is again incorrect in every way and even if it wasn't the insult itself would look weak/lame as an insult here in this comment section, let alone in an article you get paid for to write. And yes it does call credibility into question a statement which I did not contest (and you might have imagined that I do)
So not only is "horny loser" a pathetically weak insult, it's also incorrect and very easily researched. (and in fact devman seems to be a horny winner instead)
And the fact that like 50% of the replies to my comments are brainlet insults isn't very encouraging either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheGreatKatulu I agree that it looks like such bodies exist irl, but to be 100% nitpicky, you would have to show that, and by showing I meant actual measurements, to be objective.
You likely know this, but academia is funny like this.
A morepractical argument would be that why would journalist disagree with the assesment of the character modell, on one side we have "actual actress was used to produce the model" and "eyeball measurement checks out"
I haven't actually read any of the articles, but now I wonder if there is any basis of these claims (if they were made).
For instance I would make the argument that perfect "anime" body, specifically the face, doesn't really fit the post apocalyptic theme, but this is a thematic choice to begin with.
Utawarerumono is one of my favourites after all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just because I'm replaying the Dragon Age series (I'm playing inquisition for the first time, but I've replayed the previous titles to create saves / world states), I'll use that as an example because it's very good in this situation.
The games introduce good (Awakening) midling (return to ostogar, Legacy, etc) and crap dlcs (mage item pack 2) and most of them, like osogar, gives out loot like free candy. item packs for dragon age 2 are just simply power boosts for a single-player title. And the items inside these all look special, are statted like bis / endgame gear too or level up with you. Else they are very good on the level.
What they do like this is completely ruin the difficulty curve and reward system of the game and it's really one of the worst part of these games. EA shenanigans in this case, but I hate them.
People defend it like "oh, you can get all these ingame, they don't matter, they don't do anything!" Well, neither does gay incest.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@baxland2539
You see, difficult grinds, challanges, etc have reasons to exist aside from wasting time. Yes it IS wasting time, that's the point of games in a fashion.
But it also gives your RPG structure, allows players to have, albeit virtual, value for achievements and items.
I don't remember the high level gear I've got in BFA from M+
I remember even green items that I had luck with or I had to use them for a longer peiord or have any other history with them. (In fact I have at least one such item on my main since 2005)
Catch-up mechanics were introduced since a while and having players catch up was something guilds and players did back then. It was a good way of building some community (the fresh guild member would interact with veterans during catch-up runs)
And later on there were of course simplifications as patches went by so to have a condensed version of said content, still itneresting but not too long.
Offering a way to paid-skip it is just straight betraying that it's shit now, Blizzard doesn't care, you are right in that it's all there to gatekeep and for Blizzard to profit.
Back when level boost was introduced I was certain that at that price tag it was only there for exceptional circumstances, like an option for a rare occasion.
But now I'm pretty sure it's just another rip-off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1