Comments by "Anne Walden" (@annewalden3795) on "King Charles won't live at Buckingham Palace, despite £369 million refurbishment | The Royals" video.

  1. John no joke .
    6
  2. ​ @JayArgonauts Please don't flatter him as he cant understand irony .
    3
  3. ​ @nicolawood9534 Well said .These people are so short sighted and impractical.
    3
  4. Pattison Buckingham Palace is used as offices and for important State occasions but it is far too large for 2 Senior Citizens.
    3
  5.  @susangunn5866  Susan the rich can do better than Buckingham Palace .
    2
  6.  @drumclean9384  Where you live is very important and I am happy for the King to stay in Clarence House.
    2
  7.  @barbaraaimson2100  Buckingham Palace is perfectly fine being used as Offices and for State occasions . I do not think it should be opened to the public free of charge .
    2
  8.  @barbaraaimson2100  I was born and brought up in Yorkshire and had family in London. Many of my childhood holidays were spent in London .
    2
  9.  @JayArgonauts  You make a valid point .
    1
  10.  @monikabrachetti8585 What is crazy ? What does the charge of 14 Euros per person have to do with anything ?
    1
  11.  @monikabrachetti8585  I think you must live a very sheltered life if you think my reply was aggressive .
    1
  12.  @minui8758  Buckingham Palace is not a home but it can be used as offices and for State occasions .
    1
  13. ​ @GaladrielForever You are right .
    1
  14. Gary Buckingham Palace is used and it would be very expensive to convert it into accommodation.
    1