Comments by "LordVader1094" (@LordVader1094) on "PragerU" channel.

  1. Lol wut? Jesus literally taught against eye for an eye. Learn the Bible before trying to use it as propoganda.
    596
  2. SunnyFysh World view? It's a fact that Germany is struggling with refugees both culturally and economically, no matter which part of the political spectrum you're on. You sound like the baby in this case.
    100
  3. +Unruly Mile High Lol, if two words are enough to make you discredit an entire video regardless of good points, you have skin so thin it's translucent. Grow some thicker skin and listen rationally to opinions that you disagree with instead of dismissing all of it off of two words.
    17
  4. TopFiveVideos And yet it's still better than 70% of the rest of the world.
    10
  5. rich unggoy South Korea strongly disagrees.
    9
  6. Connor McGinn "who wanted Communism" Tell that to all the people who were either murdered by or fled from the communists.
    7
  7. +Stephen Keaton Exactly my point. Jesus was against the practice.
    5
  8. +JEM GamingHD "Our founding fathers were not Christians and were deists," Oof, that historical revisionism though...
    4
  9. woolloomooloop Oh, so you're an antisemitic scumball, too? That says it all.
    2
  10. woolloomooloop Hence, anti-semitic. Also, the palestinians haven't exactly been sitting around doing nothing to provoke a counter-attack from Israel. 
    2
  11. +indian2012 Uhh... yes. Since Islam perpetuates such a barbaric culture.
    2
  12. dayat4r I definitely feel sorry for you. Lol
    2
  13. Chris Nelvin How can you assume what nation he bloody well comes from? Besides, one does not have to be from a nation that wasn't involved in WW2 to give an unbiased opinion. Even if that WAS the case you'd have a difficult time finding anyone who could say anything, as almost every nation on earth was involved in WW2.
    1
  14. Chris Nelvin That makes zero bloody sense you inane moron.
    1
  15. Chris Nelvin Soldiers are just civilians with a uniform and a gun, or they were back then. The long and short of it is that many, MANY more would've died if the nukes hadn't been dropped, and the Japanese people as a whole would've nearly gone extinct.
    1
  16. woolloomooloop Seeking to surrender? Not at all. Even after the peace agreement was signed, the populace tried to overthrow the Emperor. That kind of is an obvious sign that they didn't want to surrender, it was just the Emperor and a few officials.
    1
  17. Chris Nelvin Excuse me? That makes no sense.
    1
  18. indian2012 Every age until the Ottoman Empire fell in World War 1?
    1
  19. dayat4r Keep telling yourself that mate. Islam either needs to be reformed or destroyed.
    1
  20. Don Corleone Your argument is bloody savage, in a good way. Lol
    1
  21. dayat4r I don't think everyone had intercourse with 9 year olds in that day and age.
    1
  22. ***** "depriving terrorism" Then why are so many terrorists able to easily cite the Quran as a reason for why they commit acts of terror?
    1
  23. ***** Speak English, please.
    1
  24. It worked pretty well for Christianity.
    1
  25. Nolan Cummings That's true.
    1
  26. +Stephen Keaton Except that Jesus wanted all people to live under said standard, if possible. It's still out of place for them to posit that Christ was for such a practice.
    1
  27. +jonas k It doesn't make sense.
    1
  28. +WizTryHard That's literally the whole point. Eye for an eye means you aren't unconditionally loving someone. Everything you said is agreeing with that very argument: that he taught people to love unconditionally, not to pursue "eye for an eye". Not sure how you could possibly misconstrue what I said as somehow not saying that Jesus taught people to forgive unconditionally.
    1
  29. +herichimoify He did teach to forgive people unconditionally, but not inside legal standards. God HAS forgiven all of us, but that doesn't mean everyone would get salvation if they don't accept Christ. Calling unconditional forgiveness potentially heretical is saying that Jesus teaching to forgive endlessly (forgive someone seventy times seven in a day) is potentially heretical.
    1
  30. +herichimoify How is forgiving someone unconditionally (aka all the time) and forgiving someone a lot (all the time) not the same? Sounds like you're just pulling semantics at this point without proper explanation. And how is salvation not just about accepting Christ as your lord and living a Christ-like life (which includes forgiving people all the time)?
    1
  31. +nemesis408 Unconditional love, at least as stated in the bible, would apply to both unconditional forgiveness in a singular instance, and as often as possible. Your theology seems very odd considering that you're acting as if unconditional love is a "one time get out of jail free card" type of deal. That's not actually unconditional love, if there's a condition that it only happens rarely. "but not nearly as useful if it had the condition that you have to be 250 years old to be able to use them" what are you even talking about here?
    1
  32. +nemesis408 "His forgiveness of sin is not unconditional however. The wages of sin is death." Lol what? That's entirely false! Even after you accept Jesus as your lord, you're going to commit sins. The only way to fix that is to ask for forgiveness sincerely. The wages of sin are death; if unrepented. Are you trying to say there's some sort of "limit" on what God can forgive? Genuinely curious. Some verses for reference are Matthew 5:43-48, Mark 12:31, and Romans 3:23.
    1
  33. +nemesis408 Honestly at this point I'm not sure if you're saying you can't be forgiven for sins that you commit after becoming a Christian and having all prior sins washed away or not. All I can say is that I believe you can be forgiven of your sins by repenting of them after you've realized you've committed them, even after having become a Christian, and you are forgiven. God's love is not finite, nor is his forgiveness. Thus, I believe unconditional and endless forgiveness is core to Christianity based off of many verses pertaining to Jesus' teachings. That does not mean that legally it should be practiced, as in this world you must be punished for crimes you commit, but it does not change that one should try to forgive someone who has done wrong in their heart even if said person must be punished if you are to act like a Christian. And in regards to your other comment, Jesus didn't teach against eye for an eye in a judicial system, but he most CERTAINLY didn't speak in support of it. So when putting together the fact that he was against eye for an eye on an interpersonal level and didn't speak in support of it for a judicial system, you can't say he taught in support of it. That was my entire point from the start. The verses in the bible on unconditional love are plentiful, and a few of which I mentioned. It seems like you're purposefully attempting to avoid the uncomfortable business of loving and forgiving unconditionally despite all the verses stating how God loves us without end and how we should act the same towards others. Forgiveness on an interpersonal level has to be unconditional, otherwise you're not going to be able to free yourself from hatefulness as easily. Unconditional love and forgiveness is literally demonstrated in the fact that Jesus was crucified and still asked forgiveness for those that murdered him.
    1
  34. Bionic Beer Gut Except many of those 3.6 billion people don't live under capitalist economies.
    1
  35. This seems like an oddly specific speech for every high school principal to give.
    1