Comments by "LordVader1094" (@LordVader1094) on "The Vile Eye" channel.

  1. People may use the book to say this interpretation wrong, but I feep like movie and book Bateman are two separate characters.
    56
  2.  @eurekasevenwave2297  Nobody seems to consider that he killed Paul Allen, but it actually isn't Paul Allen because he confused them for someone else like everyone else does.
    22
  3.  @jsfyxzuf117  Because it does nothing to solve problems and only creates more suffering and trauma.
    13
  4. I doubt it. She's mentally unstable, and let her adoptive son get abused. I wouldn't doubt that she'd think Wayne was the father as her mental state deteriorates. I don't doubt that they had an affair due to the photo in the film, but I doubt Arthur is his son
    7
  5. Well I disagree. It's a brilliant film BECAUSE of it questioning reality.
    5
  6. They're not even remotely the same kind of movie. Even the characters aren't similar lol
    4
  7.  @voicelessglottalfricative6567  A vegetable is someone with no brain function. Corpus is smart but physically deformed
    2
  8.  @bryansong2607  lol cope
    2
  9. I feel like the "hates aliens" thing was just made up by the author for the RotS novelization to make him more evil. That literally never comes up in any other material regarding Dooku, not even in 2008 Clone Wars where he was portrayed at his most evil 24/7.
    1
  10.  @kingorange7739  It was pretty unnecessary to be honest.
    1
  11.  @gulleyfoyle6859  It's not implied, it's a story his mother tells. And she clearly isn't very trustworthy given that she let Arthur get abused and thought he was "happy" being ties up to a radiator and beaten. Wayne clearly had an affair with her, but Arthur is not their offspring.
    1
  12.  @justinbowers2749  Police aren't heroes either. They're thugs with badges who protect the state and not the people. That doesn't make criminals good guys.
    1
  13. Roy Batty isn't even evil tbh
    1