Comments by "Spartas Edge" (@SpartasEdge) on "First group of asylum seekers board the Bibby Stockholm barge | The Know" video.

  1.  @garethholman1050  Exactly; There is no such thing as a refugee from France 🙌
    3
  2. This isn't going to solve a bl**dy thing.. it's still costing the British taxpayer a absolute fortune, and and it's going to house a laughably insignificant ammount of these migrants compated to what is coming in; i mean like a couple of days worth of migrants pouring in across the channel on one of these barges!.. Make no mistake, this is a PR stunt by the govement, to try to 'appear' that it is doing something about this crisis when it really isn't, it's a red herring, nothing more, to try to appease their voters and critics. We could could put every single migrant onto a barge like this, and it wouldn't solve the problem, we'd STILL be taking them in, and they'd STILL be costing a fortune to the BRITISH taxpayer to house and feed etc these non-nationals who have no respect for the UK and it's immigration rules by coming here the way they are. What the Tories REALLY need to be focusing on, is the root of the problem, namely stopiing them from arriving to the UK and becoming our problem and responsibility in the first place, and forcing themselves onto the UK welfare system, and they should be deporting all those that arrive by small boat quickly and decisevly to where they arrived from France, with reprocussions for France if they refuse to take them back. The Tories must think people are stupid, with these ineffectual PR stunts like this and Rwanda; but we all see straight through it, in that they solve or change absolutely nothing; and this is why they are behind so much in the polls, and this is why they will be gone at the next general election, because they have completely and utterly failed their electorate, and the British taxpayer.
    2
  3. Yep Lol Suddenly it's "Well.. not on my doorstep". We should fo a national vote, where you have to go in to voting stations to tick if you want to (as an individual) pay for these migrants; Anyone who votes to not pay for them doesn't have to do so, and anyone who doesn't turn up, count them as an 'I'd like to contribute in paying for them' and spread the costs of these migrants between those who voted to contribute and those who didn't turn up to vote. I'd be interested to see how many of these bleeding heart liberals turn up to vote for 'i want to contribute to their costs' when they have to pay for it all themselves.. 🤔
    1
  4.  @rorysmith2415  You're missing the point, like a lot of people like you often tend to do.. Let me ask you something... Taking into account how strained the system already is in the UK, and by that i mean social housing, the NHS, Jobs, GP's, NHS Dentist places, school placments, benefits system, the road networks etc etc do you think that taking in migrants like this is sustainable for the UK? Another question i woud like to ask you is this: If there was a national vote, where everyone who is willing to fund these channel migrants needed to go and sign to the effect that they would like to contribute to these costs, divided up among (and only among) those who voted to fund them, would you sign to be a contributer and share that cost among yourselves?
    1
  5.  @rorysmith2415  You didn't tag me in your posts, so i am going to assume they were addressed to me; (I have to wonder if that was so you could stealthily reply and i wouldn't get a notification, so that i might not see you had replied, and therefore not answer?).. You have moved the goalposts of what i said in order to try to get out of answering the questions i ACTUALLY put to you. I asked you if there was a hypothetical (do you know what hypothetical means?) vote, to opt in on all you migrant sympathisers to pay for them among YOURSELVES, would you? I wasn't talking about you covering the cost among every tax payer in the UK, which we already do, if i did mean that, it wouldn't be a hypothetical question would it Lol; You said so yourself that taxes are not optional, people HAVE to pay for these migrants whether they want to or not, and this is EXACTLY why i am asking you this hypothetical question of if it WAS optional, and it WAS a choice, would you, and people like you, be willing to pay it among YOURSELVES and yourserlves only, these channel migrants? It's easy to convince yourself you're so benevolent and stroke your own ego when you expect and know every other bugger has to chip in also to help with these costs. so my (very specific) point, question and scenario to you is, and do try to answer the question i actually asked this time, is if (and i stress, hypothetically) you migrant huggers had to opt in to finance these migrants between yourselves 'only', probably meaning significantly more to pay for you than what is going towards it out of your taxes right now; would you opt in and cover theese costs yourselves with the others who voted the same way? (I repeat, I'm not talking about how it is now, I'm talking in the hypothetical situation i mentioned). You also didn't answer my question of if the UK can sustain all these migrants, are you goiung that question also?
    1