Comments by "Spartas Edge" (@SpartasEdge) on "NRA delegates reject calls for stricter gun controls as Trump speaks at convention" video.

@iosis2009 Unlike cars, guns are made for one purpose, to main and kill, and they make it easy and convenient, it's their very function; cars are made for transportation. The gun death's in north America speaks itself. Its a problem that created itself when it didn't have to be that day.
3
@james2091991 A rubbish argument. Cars are transportation andcserve that purpose, while guns are made and designed for one purpose only, to maim and kill. It's a lot easier to stop someone with a knife than it is someone with a gun, and cars aren't great for it, they'd be too damaged quite quicklly, they're not designed for killing,,unlikr guns, and you're limited in where you can go with them, while guns are portable and kill very effectively and clinically, after all, that is the very thing and sole purpose they are designed to do as i say Do you have the statistics for avarage ammount of deaths in a single car rampage vs single gun rampage? How many car ramages has there even BEEN vs gun rampages in North America? And how many people have been killed by deliberate gun deaths vs deliberate car kills in the USA? You have to question the moral mindet of someone that defends the ownership of guns, items that are soley designed and serve no other purpose other than to maim and kill.
3
@bants1385 Yawn.. 🙄 Very different things, and a terrible and tired argument. Cars are made for transportation and serve that purpose, while guns are made and designed for one purpose only, to maim and kill. Unlike guns, you're limited in where you can go with a car and not ideal for killing en-masse, while guns are portable and kill very effectively, clinically and reliably,, after all, that is the very thing and sole purpose they are designed to do as i say Do you have the statistics for avarage amount of deaths in single car rampages vs single gun rampages? How many car rampages has there even BEEN vs gun rampages in North America? And how many people have been killed by deliberate gun deaths vs deliberate car kills in the USA? You have to question the moral mindet of someone that defends the ownership of guns, items that are soley designed and serve no other purpose other than to maim and kill.
3
@imaresifreak It's not as terrible as your argument. How many poison killing sprees has there been? How many poison deaths vs gun related deaths has there been in the USA?
2
@grimnir8872 You say the 'misuse' of guns, what other purpose is there for guns other than to maim and kill? they are made for one purpose only, to be a lethal weapon. As for guns being for self defence. If nobody had guns, they would not be needed for self defence in the first place, it's a problem that has created itself by letting everyone have guns, and everyone being allowed guns is clearly worse than no-one being allowed them, the gun death statistics in the US show this all to vividly. The solution to this, is to outlaw the sale guns and ammo, sooner or later gun ownership would die out, guns will be seized over time, and ammo expires.
2
@TheFakeNewsFrog You didn't address it all Lol My point is, which seemed to escape you in your vague and bizzarre reference about tyranny lol is nobody's going to invade a nuclear power. We have free speech in here thanks, and I often hear about the USA increasingly becoming a police state in how it treats it's citizens. Lastly, when i asked you to name the last time a militia was needed and saw action, i meant in the USA (Ukraine isn't a nuclear power, which illustrates what i was saying about being a nuclear power).
2
@TheFakeNewsFrog 1. I completely disagree with you, and so far from the fact it hasn't been invaded, the facts point in my favour. 2. Provide evidence of the things you describe. 3. It's the job of the police to stop public disorder. Provide evidence they were militias and not vigilantes.
2
To that idiot at 0:42 No, people WITH guns kill people far more easier. Guns makes killing easy, effectivr and accessible, killing and maiming is they very thing they are designed for, otherwise what is the point of them? They're killing tools. Let me ask you a question Mr 0:42 How many people would that nutter have been able to kill in that high school if he DIDN'T have a gun?..
1
@lenroddis5933 Both can result in killing people that's their point.
1
@Veil Crystal Production It's a lot easier to stop someone with a knife than it is someone with a gun, and cars aren't great for it, they'd be too damaged quite quicklly, and you're limitedin where you can go with them. Do you have the statistics for avarage ammount of deaths from single gun rampages vs single knives and car rampages? And knife and car ranpage death numbers in China vs gun deaths in North America? People like you, who condone guns and defend gun ownership, are part of the problem, not the solution.
1
@iosis2009 You seem awfully fixated on defending guns, which say's a lot about you. Of all the things to defend..lol Tell me smartass, what other uses do guns have? Also show me the statistics, and by that i mean deliberate kills with cars, not accidental deaths, vs deliberate kills with guns. Also, how many deaths do you think could have been caused in the highschool attack if he didn't have access to a gun? If he would have even done it at all.
1
@eraldorh Guns are made for killing, they make it clinical, easy and impersonal, it's not like getting in close with your hands. More gun=more gun deaths, it's not rocket science.. Also, someone with mental illness with a gun, is far more dangerous than somone with mental illess without one. How many people do you think would have been killed in that recent high school massacre if he hadn't have access to a gun? He may well have decided against doing it at all, without a gun.
1
@iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii7738 In fact guns make killing clinical and easier. The gun death figures don't lie.
1
@eraldorh A gun is not a tool, it's a weapon. Re: Guns don't people, people do. What a terrbile argument. People couldn't shoot people with gun, if they didn't HAVE guns could they?! Lol People with guns, can kill people withour guns so much easier, that is what they are designed for, to kill, and they are good at it. No, guns do not cure mental health and i never claimed they did, and if anything the existence of mental health iss ues is more of a reason NOT sell guns than sell them, so yo uare making my argument for me, and if no-one had guns, they wouldn't be needed for first defence in the first place, it's a problem that's created itself. Youu never answered me question. How many people wuld have died in the recent high school massacre had he not been able to get a gun? if he had done itt at all without one.
1
@markfernandes2467 It's alot easier and clinical to kill people with a gun than all the things you listed, and a lot easier to conceal and carry around too. It's illegal to carry fixed bladed weapons and baseball bats unless you are playing a game with them anyway in the UK, so your argument is moot.
1
@TheFakeNewsFrog Len had a good point. cars are not designed to kill, this is not what they are designed for, they have a multitude of useful uses. I'll tell you what Fake news, you list to me the positve and useful uses a gun has in day to day society, and i will list to you the positive and useful uses cars have in dayvto day society, and we'll compare notes on what we both came up with. Car's are not the death machines you imply them to be. How many people do you think you could run over before it became unusable? and it's not like you go go into a high school with a car, so i'm guessing not many,, because that is not what cars are designed for. If you had enough ammo, you could kill untold people with a single gun. How many deaths has there beem through intentional death with a car vs intentional deaths via guns in the USA? Also, ho wmany people do you think would have died in the recent high school massacre if he hadn't been able to get hold of a gun? would he had gone on his rampage at all if he didn't have one, you have to wonder.. Re@ what you said to the other guy. Of course guns need somone to aim and pull the trigger, that's how guns work! Lol The problem is, they allow killing to be easier and more effecient, that is what they are made for, and they allow people to kill more easily and effectively, and the problem is, people DO take aim and pull the trigger, which is why they are dangerous to have around. People with guns is more dangerous than people without guns, it's not rocket science. I have to wonder at the mentality of people who argue to be able to carry murder devices around..
1
@TheFakeNewsFrog Militia? This isn't colonial times Lol. There is no need for a militia in the modern age for a country that is a nuclear power, no-one is invading the USA or an other nuclear power. Tell the last time a militia was needed to fight invaders? It's just a flimsy excuse from gun nuts like the one's that stormed congess not long back to own guns, but one that doesn't hold any water in terms of real valid justification. The only people that are getting killed with guns in America, is Americans, the gun death figure's say's it all.
1
@TheFakeNewsFrog See my previous comment about nuclear power. Regarding your comment ro Len. The UK has freedom, as do many other countries that don't need or use guns and militias, so your reasoning is extremely flawed to say the least. You never answered my question. When was the last timeva militia was actually needed and saw action?
1
@TheFakeNewsFrog 1. No, it's you who you doesn't understand the point I was making. 2. How so? elaborate. 3. It's a very valid point, we're talking about the USA here in this thread and theargumentfor guns in the USA. You mentioned militita's have a need, so i asked you when a militia, in the USA was last needed and saw action in the country this whole thread is about, you know.. the one i mentioned was a nuclear power.
1
@TheFakeNewsFrog 1. It hasn't happened yet, so 'so far' you're wrong and 'so far' I'm right, and if that ever changes THEN come back to me and I'll tell you you're right, but until that happens, I'm right 👍 I argue that to let your population arm themselves with lethal weapons is a high price to pay in a society, especially for something (that you admit yourself) is unlikely to happen, in fact I'd argue it's utter stupidity given the vast number and ongoing American gunshot deaths as a result of this, and if you disagree with this, then that makes your line of thinking and logic questionable as well. Tell me Fake News, how long has nuclear armed countries been around? And how many nuclear armed countries have been invaded, or attempted to be invaded, EVER in that time? To arm a population with firearms on what you admitted yourseif was a small chance, is stupidity. 2. What crime did the person you mentioned commit exactly? What did he do EXAXTLY that he was fined for? I live in the the UK also, and have never heard of a single case of anyone being punished for disagreeing with sexuality or sexual identity. Punishing people that are harsssing others for their sexuality, identity, race is not a bad thing, that is a good thing the way i see it, discrimination=bad you see. If you don't like it that people can't be hateful and persecute other people for their race, sexual identity, sexuality etc in the UK (as you claimed), or carry firearms and are able to shoot each others in the UK, then why haven't you moved from the UK to the US then?... 3. It's not my job to substantiate YOUR statement that's YOUR job Lol and if you don't, i will consider your claim exactly that, unsubstantiated. So again, provide proof of militias involved in BLM. Show me to any official information that refers to militias, let alone sanctioned militias. Also, tell me why that's not a job for the police. 4. Do you know the percentage of gunshot deaths in the USA to % of gunshot deaths in the UK, proportionate to population size?
1
@lenroddis5933 It's good to see I guess that politicians are starting to be be held accountable if they lie, and being investigated, such as Boris Johnson and Kier Starmer breaking covid restrictions (though Nicola Sturgeon seems to have gotten away with breaking them, twice). I d do feel that other parties and some media outlets are talking it too far though, and using minor things to try to completely cancel people in high positions. Boris and his party were investigated and fined accordingly, it's time to move on.
1
@lenroddis5933 What i don't like in the MSM generally is their bias. They drag on things that one party does, while say little or nothing when other party's do it, and are politically very selective in what they actually report.
1