Comments by "José Veinte Genario -NISU" (@joseveintegenario-nisu1928) on "Imperial War Museums" channel.

  1. Probably, Gloster Meteor was never a good airplane, be it just for the centrifugal compressor in its turbines. As a matter of fact, Gloster Meteor pilots were instructed to run away upon sighting any German Jet Aircraft.
    2
  2. The advantages of swept back wing were described in a High-Speed Aerodynamics congress held in Italy in 1937. Théodore von Karman attended this congress, but it was not until he had a look at German Wartime research after war concluded that he made a call to his company headquarters to change the design of a bomber they were working in. The result of that phone call was the B-47. 'When you are dumb, you are an asshole', or 'What Nature does not provide, Yale does not lend'
    2
  3. ​ @gort8203 Wrong! The swept back in Me-262 did result in improved performance; if you look at its wing with an unbiased sight, you'll see Schwalbe Wing Planform is roughly same as in modern jet airliners.
    2
  4. Edward Shackelton terminated the TSR-2 project, a very beautiful aircraft. But this Supersonic Nuclear Bomber was aimed at dropping bombs where? The wasp saved the 1917 revolution https://youtu.be/SRyELKGLGag?si=sLlNUIeEHTvwY8dZ and saved Stalin, their 'sudden' discovery of abuses inside soviet system, the Cold war, came soon. In 21th century, a Bristol Olympus supersonic turbine, coming from TSR-2, having been in exhibition at an airport, was offered to purchase for some 22'000 Sterling. No TSR-2 flew more than 200 h. This turbine was a derivative of those in Delta Bomber 'Avro Vulcan', the TSR-2 turbines similar to those installed in Concorde SST.
    1
  5. ​ @michaelwright2986 Having some kind of Wing leading edge swept ruined the Airbus A-400 M STOL features, the C-130 Hercules with a straight wing leading edge is much better in this respect.
    1