Comments by "A T" (@AT-bq1kg) on "History Debunked" channel.

  1.  @cmdrreggit  What has the Bolsheviks got to do with it? False analogy fallacy. You're oversimplifying and distorting the complexities involved in these two completely different situations. You're also committing the slippery slope fallacy by suggesting that growing immigration will somehow destabilise an entire country and fail to give any reason or justification for such a claim
    2
  2.  @Harry_FlashmanVC  Ok. You want to debate. Where is the evidence for your claim that "the country is deeply upset"? You don't need to give me citations, just an argument or summary of the evidence.
    2
  3. So all asylum seekers are criminals even though we are signed up to 6 conventions that all state that asylum seekers have a legal right to be here? Makes total sense 😂 They are just criminals in your mind because you don't really accept facts. Why don't you accept facts?
    1
  4.  @Jeremy-Ludlow  Why do you think you have the authority to decide who is illegal and who isn't? That is the governments job. We have processes and procedures to understand who is entitled to asylum and who isn't
    1
  5.  @mikeoglen6848  Why would we even want to? A majority of these people are genuine asylum seekers so what does it say about you that you want to deprive them of safety?
    1
  6.  @MushMushMuscovaMush  If you think it's wrong then provide arguments against it. Just saying it was "concocted" is an ad hominem or more specifically, ad hominem circumstantial. This fallacy occurs when someone attacks the character or circumstances of the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself. In this case, by claiming that the work was "merely concocted," the individual is dismissing the argument by questioning the integrity or motives of the person who presented it, rather than engaging with the actual points raised. This tactic can divert the discussion and prevent a meaningful dialogue about the content of the argument. Another related fallacy could be straw man, where one misrepresents or oversimplifies the argument to make it easier to attack, rather than addressing the actual points made. Both fallacies undermine constructive debate and can lead to misunderstandings or mischaracterizations of the original argument.
    1
  7.  @MushMushMuscovaMush  But you're not engaging with the material I posted. You're merely trying to frame it in a negative light. This is not a reasoned argument against the material.
    1
  8.  @jonathanj.7344  Cultural hegemony contributes to social inequality perpetuating existing power dynamics, the dominant group maintains power over resources, institutions and social norms. It's marginalising. On the other hand multiculturalism has been found to increase social cohesion and tolerance, reduce prejudice, xenophobia and discrimination, global competence in an increasingly globalised economy, economic growth.
    1
  9.  @jonathanj.7344  You understand that cultural hegemony was imposed on us too right? As humanity passes through paradigm shifts the old systems are abandoned for better ones. It's just evolution.
    1
  10.  @peterwillson1355  Can you be more specific?
    1
  11. Fascists are usually anti immigration. Are you claiming Labour are against immigration now? 😂
    1
  12.  @williamthurl2607  Now they are anti immigration? 😂
    1
  13.  @kerryburns-k8i  I'm just passing on a summary of the research. Your opinion is important but let's not forget it's just an opinion. An uninformed one by the looks of it too. To claim that there are no actions associated with beliefs/attitudes is a clear sign of intellectual dishonesty.
    1
  14.  @richardshortall5987  The classification of misandry as terrorism is a complex and nuanced issue. Misandry refers to the dislike of, contempt for, or prejudice against men, and while it can manifest in harmful attitudes and behaviors, whether it constitutes terrorism depends on specific contexts and actions. Definition of Terrorism: Terrorism is typically defined as the use of violence or intimidation, especially against civilians, to achieve political or ideological goals. For an action to be classified as terrorism, it typically involves instilling fear or coercion on a broader scale. Forms of Misandry: Misandry can manifest in various ways, including derogatory language, social exclusion, or even violence against men. However, the majority of misandric attitudes do not result in organized campaigns of violence or intimidation akin to terrorism. Impact of Misandry: While misandry can contribute to a culture of hostility and may lead to harmful behaviors, it is generally not organized or systemic in the way that terrorism is. Acts of misandry may be harmful on an individual level but may not reach the scale or intent typically associated with terrorist acts. Context Matters: In specific contexts, such as organized groups promoting violence against men based on misandric beliefs, there may be arguments for classifying those actions as terrorism. However, this would depend on the scale, intent, and methods used. Counterproductive Labeling: Classifying misandry as terrorism could detract from the serious issues surrounding gender-based violence and discrimination. It is important to address all forms of gender-based prejudice without equating them to terrorism, which has specific legal and moral implications. Broader Discussions on Gender: Engaging in discussions about misogyny, misandry, and their impacts on society is essential. Focusing on mutual respect, understanding, and addressing the root causes of gender-based violence can lead to more constructive outcomes. In summary, while misandry can be harmful and contribute to societal issues, classifying it as terrorism may not be appropriate. It is essential to approach discussions about gender-based prejudice with nuance and care, recognizing the complexities involved.
    1
  15.  @richardshortall5987  Misandry has already been researched and there is no reason to classify it as terrorism.
    1
  16.  @kerryburns-k8i  Misogyny can manifest in various forms of action that have significant impacts on individuals and society. These actions can range from subtle behaviors to overt violence and systemic discrimination Verbal Abuse and Harassment: This includes derogatory comments, insults, and threats directed at women. It can occur in person, online, or in various social settings, contributing to a culture of fear and intimidation. Physical Violence: Misogyny can lead to acts of violence against women, including domestic violence, sexual assault, and femicide. Such actions are often rooted in a desire to exert control or express disdain for women. Sexual Objectification: This involves treating women primarily as objects for sexual pleasure, often seen in media portrayals, advertising, and entertainment. This objectification can lead to harmful stereotypes and reinforce gender inequality. Discrimination: Misogyny can manifest in systemic discrimination in workplaces, educational institutions, and other areas, where women may face unequal treatment, pay gaps, and fewer opportunities for advancement. Exclusion from Leadership: Women may be systematically excluded from leadership roles and decision-making positions due to misogynistic attitudes that question their abilities or authority. Belittling and Dismissive Attitudes: Actions that involve undermining women's opinions, contributions, or capabilities in both personal and professional contexts reflect misogynistic attitudes. Cultural Practices: In some cultures, misogyny is perpetuated through traditions or practices that limit women's rights and freedoms, such as forced marriage, honor-based violence, or restrictions on education and employment. Online Harassment: The rise of digital communication has led to increased instances of misogynistic trolling and harassment against women, particularly in social media contexts. Legal and Policy Restrictions: In some regions, laws and policies may reflect misogynistic attitudes, limiting women's rights, reproductive choices, or access to services. These actions associated with misogyny have profound effects on individuals and society, perpetuating gender inequality and contributing to a culture of violence and discrimination against women. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach that includes education, advocacy, and legal reforms to promote gender equality and respect for all individuals, regardless of gender.
    1
  17.  @reasonablespeculation3893  What I think you should do is research Misandry and terrorism yourself so you understand that it is also being researched by experts (not armchair experts like yourself and others here commenting) and it's been found that it's not appropriate to categorise Misandry as a form of terrorism.
    1
  18.  @richardshortall5987  The reason for cut and paste is to show you that even though you think you're well informed on certain matters it's really isn't reasonable to assume the government is always going to listen to you or take you seriously. You're entitled to your opinions on everything, but just don't make the error in thinking that because you have an opinion that it's shared by the rest of the country and or that the government should automatically be representing you all the time. Government have at their disposal plenty of experts to advise them on policy, and this is clearly one of them
    1
  19.  @reasonablespeculation3893  Here is a summary of the research so far: The classification of misandry as terrorism is a complex and nuanced issue. Misandry refers to the dislike of, contempt for, or prejudice against men, and while it can manifest in harmful attitudes and behaviors, whether it constitutes terrorism depends on specific contexts and actions. Definition of Terrorism: Terrorism is typically defined as the use of violence or intimidation, especially against civilians, to achieve political or ideological goals. For an action to be classified as terrorism, it typically involves instilling fear or coercion on a broader scale. Forms of Misandry: Misandry can manifest in various ways, including derogatory language, social exclusion, or even violence against men. However, the majority of misandric attitudes do not result in organized campaigns of violence or intimidation akin to terrorism. Impact of Misandry: While misandry can contribute to a culture of hostility and may lead to harmful behaviors, it is generally not organized or systemic in the way that terrorism is. Acts of misandry may be harmful on an individual level but may not reach the scale or intent typically associated with terrorist acts. Context Matters: In specific contexts, such as organized groups promoting violence against men based on misandric beliefs, there may be arguments for classifying those actions as terrorism. However, this would depend on the scale, intent, and methods used. Counterproductive Labeling: Classifying misandry as terrorism could detract from the serious issues surrounding gender-based violence and discrimination. It is important to address all forms of gender-based prejudice without equating them to terrorism, which has specific legal and moral implications. Broader Discussions on Gender: Engaging in discussions about misogyny, misandry, and their impacts on society is essential. Focusing on mutual respect, understanding, and addressing the root causes of gender-based violence can lead to more constructive outcomes. In summary, while misandry can be harmful and contribute to societal issues, classifying it as terrorism may not be appropriate. It is essential to approach discussions about gender-based prejudice with nuance and care, recognizing the complexities involved.
    1
  20.  @ChimpingBulldog  How do you know advice was dismissed because the government didn't want to hear it? Or is that just a story you made up? Sounds very difficult to prove and is likely implausible. Maybe it's YOU who dismisses evidence because it's not what you want to hear? Now THAT is highly likely because it's how humans naturally think, especially if they don't understand cognitive biases. I'm not saying politicians understand logic, but the scientists they employ do and would have screened evidence and would have some methodology for screening evidence as it comes to them from many different sources.
    1
  21.  @kerryburns-k8i  You made the claim that there is no action accociated with misogyny. I'm not really sure how you could have come to that conclusion except through intellectual dishonesty when we have a large body of research that suggests otherwise. What you could do is give the reasons for why you think there are no actions associated with it. I'm assuming that you don't think attitudes drive behaviour? If so that is an absurd position to take because it's well established that attitudes and ideologies drive behaviours.
    1
  22.  @kerryburns-k8i  You made the claim that your understanding of misogyny comes from your experience as a Samaritan and this is in relation to questioning academic research. So you are making the claim that your qualifications for being able talk about misogyny comes from your experience as a Samaritan. Now are you now trying to suggest that your experience as a Samaritan does not give you credibility to challenge this body of research? Are you making the claim that you have never seen misogyny manifest in negative behaviour towards women? If that's what you're trying to say (I'm reading between the lines here because you're not giving me a direct answer) then is it not a fallacy to assume that just because you have not witnessed this yourself that it does not happen at all?
    1
  23.  @kerryburns-k8i  Ok, so if you have good will then please explain what you mean by: "It is simply a prejudice, it is passive, there is no action associated with it" Then I will address it
    1
  24.  @kerryburns-k8i  Misogyny is often associated with a range of actions and behaviors that reflect hatred, contempt, or prejudice against women. These actions can manifest in various ways, including: Verbal Abuse: Insulting or belittling women through derogatory language, slurs, or harassment. Physical Violence: Acts of violence against women, including domestic violence, sexual assault, and other forms of physical aggression. Sexual Harassment: Unwanted sexual advances, comments, or conduct in various settings, such as workplaces or public spaces. Discrimination: Unequal treatment of women in areas like employment, education, and healthcare, often based on gender stereotypes. Objectification: Treating women as objects for sexual gratification rather than as individuals with their own rights and autonomy. Online Abuse: Cyberbullying, threats, and harassment directed at women on social media and other online platforms. These actions contribute to a culture that devalues and marginalises women, perpetuating gender inequality and reinforcing harmful stereotypes. Addressing misogyny involves both challenging these actions and promoting respect and equality for all.
    1
  25.  @kerryburns-k8i  Misogyny can manifest in both active and passive forms. Active Misogyny: This includes overt actions and behaviors that express hatred or contempt for women, such as verbal abuse, physical violence, and harassment. These are clear, intentional acts aimed at undermining or harming women. Passive Misogyny: This refers to more subtle forms of misogyny that may not involve direct aggression but still contribute to a culture of discrimination and inequality. Examples include: Silence or Indifference: Failing to speak out against misogynistic behavior or dismissing it as unimportant. Normalization of Sexism: Accepting or perpetuating stereotypes about women that may not seem overtly hostile but reinforce traditional gender roles and inequality. Inaction: Not supporting women in leadership roles or failing to challenge discriminatory practices in workplaces or communities. Both active and passive forms of misogyny contribute to a societal environment that can be harmful to women and perpetuate gender inequality. Addressing misogyny requires recognising and confronting both its overt and subtle expressions.
    1
  26.  @kerryburns-k8i  Misogyny can manifest in both passive and active forms. Active Misogyny: This includes overt behaviors and actions that express hatred or contempt for women, such as verbal abuse, physical violence, and sexual harassment. These acts are clear and intentional. Passive Misogyny: This refers to more subtle and indirect forms of misogyny that may not involve direct aggression but still contribute to a culture of discrimination and inequality. Examples include: Silence or Indifference: Not speaking out against misogynistic behavior or dismissing it as unimportant. Normalization of Sexism: Accepting or perpetuating stereotypes about women that reinforce traditional gender roles. Inaction: Failing to support women in leadership roles or not challenging discriminatory practices in various settings. Both active and passive forms of misogyny contribute to a societal environment that can be harmful to women and perpetuate gender inequality. Passive misogyny can harm women in several significant ways, often contributing to an environment that perpetuates inequality and discrimination. Reinforcement of Stereotypes: Passive misogyny often involves the acceptance of harmful stereotypes about women, such as the belief that they are less competent in certain roles. This can limit opportunities for women in the workplace and other areas of life. Normalisation of Discrimination: When passive misogyny is left unchallenged, it normalises discriminatory attitudes and behaviours, making it seem acceptable to treat women as inferior or to dismiss their contributions. Undermining Women's Voices: By failing to support or amplify women's voices, passive misogyny can create an environment where women's opinions and experiences are overlooked or devalued. This can lead to feelings of isolation and disempowerment. Inaction Against Harassment: Indifference or silence in the face of misogynistic behaviour allows such actions to continue unchecked, creating a culture where women may feel unsafe or unwelcome. Impact on Mental Health: Witnessing or experiencing passive forms of misogyny can contribute to stress, anxiety, and lower self-esteem among women, as they may internalise the negative messages they receive from society. Limitations on Progress: When passive misogyny goes unaddressed, it can hinder social progress towards gender equality. This can affect policies, workplace cultures, and societal attitudes, perpetuating systemic inequality. Cultural Acceptance: Passive misogyny can lead to a broader cultural acceptance of gender inequality, making it harder to implement meaningful change and diminishing efforts toward gender equity.
    1
  27.  @kerryburns-k8i  The Equality Act 2010 in the UK provides a legal framework to protect individuals from discrimination and prejudice in various areas of life. Protected Characteristics: The Act outlines nine protected characteristics, including age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. Discrimination based on these characteristics is prohibited. Types of Discrimination: The Act defines various forms of discrimination, including direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation. This helps to identify and address different ways in which prejudice can manifest. Public Sector Equality Duty: The Act requires public authorities to consider how their policies and decisions affect people with protected characteristics. This duty promotes equality and helps ensure that public services are accessible and fair. Reasonable Adjustments: For individuals with disabilities, the Act mandates that employers and service providers make reasonable adjustments to accommodate their needs, helping to reduce barriers and promote inclusion. Equal Pay and Employment Rights: The Act addresses issues of pay equality and provides protections against unfair treatment in the workplace, thereby promoting fairness and reducing systemic prejudice. Access to Services: The Act prohibits discrimination in the provision of services, ensuring that individuals can access goods and services without facing prejudice based on their protected characteristics. By establishing these regulations, the Equality Act aims to create a fairer society and combat various forms of prejudice and discrimination.
    1
  28.  @kerryburns-k8i  The Race Relations Act (RRA) in the UK, first enacted in 1965 and subsequently amended, aims to prevent racial discrimination and promote equality. Here are some key ways it regulates prejudice: Prohibition of Discrimination: The RRA makes it unlawful to discriminate against individuals on the grounds of race, colour, nationality, or ethnic or national origin in various areas, including employment, education, and the provision of goods and services. Equal Opportunities: The Act encourages organisations to adopt equal opportunity policies, ensuring fair treatment and aiming to eliminate discriminatory practices. Public Sector Duty: The Act places a duty on public authorities to promote equality of opportunity and eliminate unlawful discrimination. This requires them to actively consider race equality in their policies and practices. Legal Redress: Individuals who believe they have been discriminated against can seek legal remedies through tribunals or courts, providing an avenue for addressing grievances and holding offenders accountable. Education and Awareness: The Act promotes awareness and understanding of racial equality issues, encouraging educational initiatives that foster respect and tolerance among different racial and ethnic groups. Monitoring and Reporting: The Act requires certain organisations to monitor and report on their race equality policies and practices, ensuring transparency and accountability in dealing with race-related issues. Through these measures, the Race Relations Act seeks to create a more inclusive society by addressing and reducing racial prejudice and discrimination.
    1
  29.  @kerryburns-k8i  No, they specifically regulate prejudices.
    1
  30.  @richardshortall5987  If you want to debate on a different platform which will allow me to give you all of the information I have unobstructed without shadow banning and algorithm issues then let me know and we can set it up
    1
  31.  @richardshortall5987  When you bring up "projecting" during a debate this is called ad hominem and ad hominem cirucumsantial. I urge anyone to learn critical thinking in order to innoculate themselves from being manipulated by intellectually dishonest online armchair experts who clearly are bad faith actors
    1
  32.  @richardshortall5987  . Accusing someone of projecting can be a form of manipulation, depending on the context and intent behind the accusation. Deflection: By accusing someone of projecting, a person may be attempting to deflect attention away from their own behavior or arguments. This can serve to shift the focus and avoid accountability. Diminishing Valid Concerns: If the accusation is used to invalidate the other person's feelings or experiences, it can manipulate the conversation by making the accuser appear more credible while undermining the other person’s perspective. Creating Doubt: Such accusations can cause the accused to second-guess their thoughts or feelings, leading to confusion and self-doubt. This can be a tactic to gain control over the narrative in the discussion. Avoiding Engagement: Accusing someone of projecting can serve as a way to shut down a conversation without addressing the actual points being made, thus preventing meaningful dialogue.
    1
  33.  @reasonablespeculation3893  Let's see if this one sticks Misandry, or the hatred of men, is generally understood as a societal attitude or belief rather than a form of terrorism. However, the implications of misandry can lead to harmful behaviors and attitudes that may contribute to violence or discrimination against men: Definition of Terrorism: Terrorism typically involves the use of violence or threats of violence to intimidate or coerce a population or government. Misandry itself does not inherently include these actions but can manifest in discriminatory practices or social attitudes. Harmful Impact: While misandry can be damaging and perpetuate negative stereotypes about men, it is important to differentiate between attitudes and actions. Misandry can contribute to a culture of hostility, but unless it results in organized violence or coercion, it may not meet the criteria for terrorism. Contextual Factors: Discussions about misandry often occur within broader conversations about gender dynamics, power imbalances, and societal structures. It's crucial to consider these factors when evaluating the implications of misandry and its potential effects on individuals and society. Comparison with Other Forms of Discrimination: Just as misogyny can lead to systemic violence against women, misandry can also lead to negative consequences for men. However, both should be understood within the context of societal power dynamics.
    1
  34.  @richardshortall5987  If you truly believe that these laws (some of them going back to the 1970's) selectively regulate some people's alleged prejudices while ignoring the most prejudicial among us provide arguments as to why you think this is so. Where are your citations? If you refuse to but expect me to provide references then this is clearly a double standard. You made a positive claim without any reasoning behind it or citations to support it yet demand that I provide you with citations despite me going into much more detail in the thread.
    1
  35.  @richardshortall5987  The appeal to authority is when I cannot provide the evidence but you use that as a reason to reject my claims despite me giving some reasonable arguments and making valid point. I didn't not say that simply asking for evidence is an appeal to authority. You made that claim, not me.
    1
  36.  @richardshortall5987  Argument from ignorance (or appeal to ignorance). This fallacy occurs when someone dismisses a claim simply because the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence or citations to support it, rather than engaging with the claim itself or the reasoning behind it. Focus on Evidence: This fallacy emphasises the absence of evidence or citations rather than addressing the validity or soundness of the claim being made. Dismissal of Reasoning: Instead of considering the reasoning, logic, or context behind the claim, the argument is rejected based on the lack of formal citations. Ignoring Reasonable Overview: A reasonable overview that provides context or logical reasoning may be overlooked in favor of strict adherence to citation requirements. Example: - If you say, "I believe that regular exercise improves mental health based on various studies I’ve read," and the other person responds, "I don't accept that claim unless you provide specific citations," they may be committing the argument from ignorance fallacy by ignoring the general reasonableness of your claim. Related Fallacies: Burden of Proof: This fallacy may also be related to the shifting of the burden of proof. In a debate, the person making a claim typically has the responsibility to provide evidence. However, if the opponent completely dismisses a reasonable claim without engaging with it, they may unfairly shift the burden back onto the claimant. Cherry-Picking: If the other person only accepts claims that are heavily cited or backed by evidence while disregarding valid but less formally supported statements, they may be cherry-picking their criteria for acceptable arguments. Conclusion: While providing evidence and citations is often important in supporting claims, dismissing a well-reasoned argument solely based on the lack of formal citations can undermine constructive dialogue and understanding. Engaging with the reasoning behind claims is essential for meaningful debate and discussion.
    1
  37. Are you envious that you can't get free travel?
    1
  38.  @Marthawendy-sz2mk  So God is a communist? 😂 Excuse the dismissive response but don't expect a reasonable reply when you bring bible verses into the discussion
    1
  39.  @SteeeveO  Sorry I'm not sure what you're referring to
    1
  40.  @musthaveacamel2157  Not only is the comment racist and a crime it's also illogical. Just so you know and have the opportunity to reflect The comment contains several logical fallacies and problematic assumptions. Here are some of the key fallacies present: Hasty Generalization: The comment makes a broad generalization about "Blacks and Browns" by asserting that there is "always drama" associated with these groups. This conclusion is based on insufficient evidence and overlooks the diversity and individuality within these communities. Stereotyping: This fallacy involves attributing specific characteristics or behaviors to an entire group based on the actions of a few individuals. The comment suggests that all individuals of certain racial backgrounds are prone to "drama," which is an unfair and inaccurate stereotype. Ad Hominem: The comment attacks a group based on their racial identity rather than addressing any specific behavior or issue. This personal attack detracts from rational discourse and focuses on identity rather than evidence or reasoning. False Cause (Post Hoc): The implication that "drama" is a "trick" and "intentional" suggests a causal relationship without evidence. It assumes that the actions of individuals from these racial groups are deliberately harmful or disruptive, which is a flawed assumption. Appeal to Prejudice: The comment appeals to existing prejudices and biases against certain racial groups. By framing the behavior of these groups as inherently problematic, it seeks to provoke a negative emotional response rather than engage in constructive discussion. Slippery Slope: Although not explicitly stated, the suggestion that there is a consistent pattern of "drama" associated with these groups can lead to the slippery slope fallacy, implying that such behavior will inevitably lead to more significant societal problems without substantiated evidence.
    1
  41.  @musthaveacamel2157  The comment raises significant ethical concerns due to its content and implications. Here are several reasons why it may be considered unethical: Promotion of Stereotypes: The comment perpetuates harmful stereotypes about racial and ethnic groups, suggesting that individuals from these backgrounds are inherently prone to "drama." This kind of generalization can contribute to societal prejudice and discrimination. Racial Insensitivity: The language used in the comment is dismissive and derogatory. It lacks sensitivity to the experiences of individuals within those racial groups and can be seen as dehumanizing. Incitement to Division: By framing the behavior of certain racial groups in a negative light and suggesting intentionality behind their actions, the comment can foster division and hostility. Ethically, it's important to promote understanding and dialogue rather than perpetuating animosity. Lack of Evidence: The comment makes bold assertions without providing evidence or context. Ethically, it is crucial to base statements on facts and to consider the impact of one's words on others. Encouragement of Prejudice: The comment appeals to existing biases and prejudices, potentially encouraging others to adopt similar attitudes. This can contribute to a culture of intolerance and discrimination, which is ethically problematic. Impact on Social Cohesion: Comments like this can undermine social cohesion and harmony by reinforcing negative perceptions of certain groups. Ethically, individuals have a responsibility to contribute positively to societal discourse. In summary, the comment is ethically questionable because it promotes stereotypes, lacks sensitivity, and can incite division and prejudice. Engaging in respectful and thoughtful discourse is essential for fostering understanding and social harmony.
    1
  42.  @musthaveacamel2157  In the UK, several pieces of legislation address hate speech and criminalize comments that incite racial hatred or discrimination. Here are the key laws that could apply to comments like the one you shared: Public Order Act 1986: This act includes provisions against inciting racial hatred. Section 18 specifically makes it an offense to use threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behavior that are intended to stir up racial hatred. If a comment is deemed to incite hatred against individuals based on their race or ethnicity, it could fall under this law. Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: This legislation extends protections against hate speech to include religious hatred. It makes it an offense to use threatening words or behavior intended to incite hatred against a person or group based on their religious belief or lack thereof. Although the focus is on religion, it also intersects with racial issues, particularly in a multicultural society. Equality Act 2010: While primarily focused on preventing discrimination in various areas such as employment, education, and public services, this act promotes equality and prohibits harassment related to race, ethnicity, and other protected characteristics. Comments that contribute to a hostile environment may be addressed under this legislation. Malicious Communications Act 1988: This act makes it an offense to send messages that are indecent, offensive, or threatening with the intent to cause distress or anxiety to the recipient. While this law is broader, it can apply to online comments that are deemed harmful or abusive. Communications Act 2003: Section 127 of this act makes it an offense to send electronic communications that are grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene, or menacing character. This can apply to social media posts and online comments. These laws are designed to protect individuals and communities from hate speech and discrimination, promoting a more inclusive and respectful society. If someone believes that a comment violates these laws, they can report it to the police or relevant authorities for investigation.
    1
  43. @musthaveacamel2157  The fallacy present in the claim that copying and pasting responses automatically invalidates them is known as the "genetic fallacy." This fallacy occurs when an argument is dismissed or accepted based solely on its origin rather than its actual content or merits. Here are some key points about this fallacy in the context of your situation: Focus on Origin Rather than Content: The genetic fallacy ignores the substance of the arguments or information provided in the copied text. Just because something is quoted or referenced does not inherently make it invalid; the validity should be assessed based on the arguments and evidence presented. Overgeneralization: The claim generalizes that all copied material is invalid without considering the context or the quality of the information. This is an oversimplification that fails to engage with the actual reasoning or evidence. Avoidance of Engagement: By focusing on the act of copying and pasting, the individual making the claim may be avoiding a substantive discussion about the content itself. This can be a tactic to divert attention from the argument being made. In summary, dismissing information solely because it has been copied and pasted is an example of the genetic fallacy, as it disregards the actual content and validity of the information in favor of its source or method of presentation.
    1
  44.  @musthaveacamel2157  The fallacy present when someone assumes that you don't understand the material you've copied and pasted is known as "argument from ignorance" or potentially "hasty generalization." Argument from Ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam): This fallacy occurs when someone asserts that a claim is true (or false) simply because it has not been proven otherwise. In this case, the assumption that you don't understand the material may stem from a lack of evidence or knowledge about your comprehension, implying that because they perceive it a certain way, it must be true. Hasty Generalization: This fallacy involves making a broad conclusion based on insufficient evidence. If someone concludes that you don't understand the material simply because you have copied and pasted it, they are making a hasty generalization about your understanding based on limited information. Ad Hominem: If the assumption about your understanding is used to attack your credibility or competence rather than engaging with the content itself, it can also be considered an ad hominem fallacy, as it shifts focus from the argument to the person. In summary, assuming that you don't understand the material based solely on the fact that you copied and pasted it can involve these fallacies, as it relies on unwarranted assumptions about your knowledge or comprehension.
    1
  45.  @musthaveacamel2157  The fallacy present in the assertion that copying and pasting responses automatically renders them invalid is referred to as the "genetic fallacy." This fallacy occurs when the validity of an argument is judged solely based on its origin rather than the actual content or merits. Here are some key points regarding this fallacy in this context: Emphasis on Source Over Substance: The genetic fallacy overlooks the importance of the arguments or information contained in the copied text. Just because something is quoted or referenced does not automatically invalidate it; the validity should be evaluated based on the arguments and evidence provided. Overgeneralization: The claim makes a sweeping generalization that all copied material is invalid without taking into account the context or quality of the information. This simplification fails to engage with the actual reasoning or evidence. Evading Engagement: By concentrating on the act of copying and pasting, the person making the assertion may be sidestepping a meaningful discussion about the content itself. This can serve as a tactic to shift attention away from the actual argument being presented. In conclusion, dismissing information solely based on the fact that it has been copied and pasted exemplifies the genetic fallacy, as it neglects the actual content and validity of the information in favor of its source or method of presentation.
    1
  46.  @musthaveacamel2157  The fallacy present in the assertion that copying and pasting responses automatically renders them invalid is referred to as the "genetic fallacy." This fallacy occurs when the validity of an argument is judged solely based on its origin rather than the actual content or merits. Here are some key points regarding this fallacy in this context: Emphasis on Source Over Substance: The genetic fallacy overlooks the importance of the arguments or information contained in the copied text. Just because something is quoted or referenced does not automatically invalidate it; the validity should be evaluated based on the arguments and evidence provided. Overgeneralization: The claim makes a sweeping generalization that all copied material is invalid without taking into account the context or quality of the information. This simplification fails to engage with the actual reasoning or evidence. Evading Engagement: By concentrating on the act of copying and pasting, the person making the assertion may be sidestepping a meaningful discussion about the content itself. This can serve as a tactic to shift attention away from the actual argument being presented. In conclusion, dismissing information solely based on the fact that it has been copied and pasted exemplifies the genetic fallacy, as it neglects the actual content and validity of the information in favor of its source or method of presentation.
    1
  47.  @musthaveacamel2157  The fallacy present in the assertion that copying and pasting responses automatically renders them invalid is referred to as the "genetic fallacy." This fallacy occurs when the validity of an argument is judged solely based on its origin rather than the actual content or merits. Here are some key points regarding this fallacy in this context: Emphasis on Source Over Substance: The genetic fallacy overlooks the importance of the arguments or information contained in the copied text. Just because something is quoted or referenced does not automatically invalidate it; the validity should be evaluated based on the arguments and evidence provided. Overgeneralization: The claim makes a sweeping generalization that all copied material is invalid without taking into account the context or quality of the information. This simplification fails to engage with the actual reasoning or evidence. Evading Engagement: By concentrating on the act of copying and pasting, the person making the assertion may be sidestepping a meaningful discussion about the content itself. This can serve as a tactic to shift attention away from the actual argument being presented. In conclusion, dismissing information solely based on the fact that it has been copied and pasted exemplifies the genetic fallacy, as it neglects the actual content and validity of the information in favor of its source or method of presentation.
    1
  48. ​ @monteceitomoocher  The classification of misandry as terrorism is a complex and nuanced issue. Misandry refers to the dislike of, contempt for, or prejudice against men, and while it can manifest in harmful attitudes and behaviors, whether it constitutes terrorism depends on specific contexts and actions. Definition of Terrorism: Terrorism is typically defined as the use of violence or intimidation, especially against civilians, to achieve political or ideological goals. For an action to be classified as terrorism, it typically involves instilling fear or coercion on a broader scale. Forms of Misandry: Misandry can manifest in various ways, including derogatory language, social exclusion, or even violence against men. However, the majority of misandric attitudes do not result in organized campaigns of violence or intimidation akin to terrorism. Impact of Misandry: While misandry can contribute to a culture of hostility and may lead to harmful behaviors, it is generally not organized or systemic in the way that terrorism is. Acts of misandry may be harmful on an individual level but may not reach the scale or intent typically associated with terrorist acts. Context Matters: In specific contexts, such as organized groups promoting violence against men based on misandric beliefs, there may be arguments for classifying those actions as terrorism. However, this would depend on the scale, intent, and methods used. Counterproductive Labeling: Classifying misandry as terrorism could detract from the serious issues surrounding gender-based violence and discrimination. It is important to address all forms of gender-based prejudice without equating them to terrorism, which has specific legal and moral implications. Broader Discussions on Gender: Engaging in discussions about misogyny, misandry, and their impacts on society is essential. Focusing on mutual respect, understanding, and addressing the root causes of gender-based violence can lead to more constructive outcomes. While misandry can be harmful and contribute to societal issues, classifying it as terrorism may not be appropriate.
    1
  49. Imagine an anti-muticultural movement weaponising multiculturalism in order to advance their anti Muslim agenda
    1
  50. Since when were the far right suddenly concerned with compatibility with other cultures?
    1