Comments by "A T" (@AT-bq1kg) on "History Debunked" channel.

@cmdrreggit My point was it's not necessarily immigrants that cause crime rates to rise. You need to provide better arguments if you want to be taken seriously by a reasonable person
1
@cmdrreggit When an opponent in a debate primarily asks questions rather than presenting arguments, several issues can arise: Lack of Engagement: The opponent may not be engaging with the topic or providing their own perspective, which can make the debate feel unbalanced. A debate typically requires both sides to present arguments and counterarguments. Deflection: Constantly asking questions can be a strategy to deflect attention from their own lack of substantive content or to avoid addressing the main points you are presenting. Control of the Narrative: If your opponent is asking questions, they may be trying to control the flow of the debate. This can put you in a position where you're forced to defend your points rather than advancing your own arguments. Questionable Depth: Relying on questions can indicate a lack of depth in understanding the topic. It may suggest that the opponent is not well-informed or is struggling to formulate coherent arguments. Time Consumption: If the opponent spends a significant amount of time asking questions, it can consume valuable debate time that could be used for presenting arguments and rebuttals. Perception of Weakness: An opponent who resorts to questioning may be perceived as lacking confidence in their own arguments, which can influence how the audience views their credibility. In a debate, it's generally more effective for both participants to present their viewpoints, support them with evidence, and engage directly with each other's arguments. If your opponent is primarily asking questions, it may be beneficial to redirect the conversation by asserting your own arguments and addressing the questions in the context of your points.
1
@cmdrreggit Why are you asking me about something the police and CPS are responsible for?
1
@GR1000 The text you posted seems to imply a fallacy related to Appeal to Authority. This fallacy occurs when someone argues that a claim is true simply because an authority figure (in this case, Professor Matt Goodwin) endorses it, without providing further evidence or reasoning to support the claim. While it's valid to reference experts in discussions, relying solely on their authority without critically engaging with the argument or evidence they provide can undermine the strength of the position being taken. It’s important to assess the validity of the claims based on evidence, rather than solely on who is making them.
1
@cmdrreggit When a participant in a debate primarily poses questions instead of presenting their own arguments, several issues may arise: Limited Engagement: The individual may not actively engage with the topic or share their perspective, leading to an imbalance in the debate. Effective debates typically involve both sides articulating arguments and counterarguments. Avoidance Tactics: Consistently asking questions can serve as a tactic to divert attention from a lack of substantial content or to sidestep key points being discussed. Narrative Control: By focusing on questions, the opponent may attempt to dictate the direction of the debate, which could force the other participant to defend their positions rather than advancing their own viewpoints. Doubtful Understanding: A heavy reliance on questioning might suggest a limited grasp of the topic, indicating that the opponent may not be well-informed or is finding it challenging to construct coherent arguments. Inefficient Use of Time: If the other participant spends a considerable amount of time asking questions, it can take away from the valuable time available for making arguments and countering claims. Impression of Insecurity: An opponent who frequently resorts to questioning may be viewed as lacking confidence in their own positions, which could affect how the audience perceives their credibility. In a debate setting, it is generally more productive for both sides to present their viewpoints, back them up with evidence, and engage directly with each other's arguments. If one participant primarily asks questions, it can be advantageous to steer the conversation back by asserting one's own arguments and addressing the questions within the framework of those points.
1