Comments by "A T" (@AT-bq1kg) on "Nick Buckley MBE"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maryminty5876
Here are some ways racist comments can suppress the rights of others:
Chilling Effect: Racist comments can create a hostile environment that discourages individuals from expressing their opinions or participating in discussions. This chilling effect can limit free speech and the exchange of ideas, particularly for those from marginalised communities.
Psychological Impact: Racism can lead to psychological harm for its targets, affecting their mental health and well-being. This can hinder their ability to engage fully in society, thereby limiting their rights to participate in public life.
Discrimination: Racist comments can perpetuate discrimination and reinforce systemic inequalities. When such views are accepted or normalised, they can lead to policies and practices that deny individuals their rights, such as equal access to education, employment, and housing.
Violence and Intimidation: Racist rhetoric can incite violence or intimidation against individuals or groups, which can infringe on their rights to safety and security.
Social Division: Racism can contribute to social divisions and conflict, undermining community cohesion and the collective rights of all individuals to live in a harmonious society.
Racist comments not only harm people but also erode the rights and freedoms of entire communities.
If any of you believe in democracy and rights then you will do whatever you can to discourage racism, sexism, discrimination and other forms of hate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TripsandFeasts1
Radicalized individuals may often refuse to consider opposing evidence and views, but this behavior can vary significantly based on individual circumstances and the context of their beliefs. Here are some factors to consider:
1. Cognitive Dissonance: When individuals hold strong beliefs, especially those that are radical or extreme, they may experience cognitive dissonance when confronted with opposing evidence. To resolve this discomfort, they might reject or dismiss conflicting information rather than reevaluate their beliefs.
2. Echo Chambers: Radicalized individuals may exist within echo chambers—environments where they are primarily exposed to information that reinforces their beliefs. This can lead to a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives, making it harder for them to consider opposing views.
3. Identity and Belonging: For many, radical beliefs can become a core part of their identity. Challenging these beliefs may feel like a threat to their sense of self and belonging, leading them to resist contrary evidence or viewpoints.
4. Fear and Distrust: Radicalized individuals might develop a deep mistrust of outside sources of information, viewing opposing evidence as propaganda or misinformation. This distrust can further entrench their views and make them less open to dialogue.
5. Emotional Investment: Strong emotional ties to certain beliefs or ideologies can also make individuals resistant to considering opposing evidence. When beliefs are tied to personal experiences or trauma, it can be particularly challenging for individuals to engage with differing perspectives.
6. Social and Community Reinforcement: Radical views may be reinforced by social circles or communities that share similar beliefs. This reinforcement can create a culture where questioning or considering opposing views is discouraged.
7. Potential for Change: While many radicalized individuals may initially resist opposing evidence, this does not mean change is impossible. Personal experiences, significant life events, or exposure to new ideas can sometimes lead individuals to reevaluate their beliefs over time.
In summary, while radicalized individuals may be less likely to consider opposing evidence and views due to psychological, emotional, and social factors, there is always the potential for change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The idea that "common sense" is a myth can be understood from several perspectives:
Subjectivity: What one person considers common sense may not be viewed the same way by someone else. People come from diverse backgrounds, cultures, and experiences, leading to varying interpretations of what is "common" knowledge or reasoning.
Cultural Differences: Common sense can differ significantly across cultures. Practices or beliefs that seem logical in one culture may be completely foreign or nonsensical in another, highlighting that there is no universal standard for common sense.
Context Dependence: Common sense is often context-dependent. Situations that require specific knowledge or expertise might not align with what is generally perceived as common sense. For example, technical subjects like science or mathematics may seem illogical to those without training in those areas.
Evolution of Knowledge: What was once considered common sense can change over time as new information and understanding develop. Scientific discoveries and societal changes can shift perceptions, rendering previous beliefs outdated.
Logical Fallacies: The reliance on common sense can sometimes lead to logical fallacies. People may make assumptions based on intuition or gut feelings rather than evidence or reasoning, which can result in incorrect conclusions or beliefs.
Variation in Education and Experience: Individuals have different levels of education and life experiences, which shape their understanding of various concepts. Thus, common sense may not be universally shared, as some people may lack exposure to certain ideas or information.
Overconfidence in Intuition: People often overestimate their ability to use common sense reasoning, leading to decisions based on intuition rather than critical thinking. This can result in poor judgment, emphasizing that what feels like common sense is not always reliable.
Dismissal of Expertise: The idea of common sense can sometimes lead to the undervaluation of expert knowledge. People may dismiss scientific or expert opinions in favor of their own intuition, which can be detrimental, especially in complex issues.
In summary, the notion of common sense is often mythologized as a universal guide for reasoning and decision-making. However, its subjectivity, cultural variability, context dependence, and potential for misjudgment highlight that it may not be as universally applicable or reliable as it is often portrayed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Isisbridge
Far-left extremism refers to a subset of far-left ideologies and movements that advocate for radical change through methods that may be considered extreme or violent. While not all far-left beliefs or groups are extremist, certain elements can be characterized as such. Here are some key points to consider:
1. Radical Methods: Far-left extremism may involve the use of direct action, civil disobedience, or even violence to achieve political goals. This can include protests that escalate into riots, property destruction, or targeted attacks against individuals or institutions perceived as oppressors.
2. Ideological Purity: Some far-left extremists may prioritize ideological purity and reject compromise or dialogue with those holding differing views. This can lead to an intolerance for dissenting opinions within their ranks and greater society.
3. Anti-Establishment Sentiments: Far-left extremism often includes strong anti-establishment sentiments, viewing existing political and economic systems as fundamentally corrupt and oppressive. This can lead to calls for revolutionary change rather than reform.
4. Historical Context: Throughout history, various far-left movements have engaged in extreme actions, such as the Russian Revolution, Maoist movements, and various guerrilla groups. These instances often involve significant violence and upheaval.
5. Mainstream vs. Extremist Views: It is essential to distinguish between mainstream far-left ideologies, such as democratic socialism, which may seek change through electoral politics and reform, and extremist factions that may pursue more radical and uncompromising approaches.
While far-left extremism exists, it's crucial to recognize that far-left ideologies encompass a broad spectrum, and not all individuals or groups identifying with leftist principles advocate for or engage in extremist actions. As with any political ideology, the context, methods, and beliefs of specific groups can vary significantly.
1
-
1
-
@Isisbridge
Far-left extremism refers to a specific segment of far-left ideologies and movements that seek significant change through methods that may be viewed as radical or aggressive. While not all far-left beliefs or groups fall into this category, certain aspects can be identified as extreme. Here are some important points to keep in mind:
1. Radical Approaches: Far-left extremism may include the use of direct action, civil disobedience, or even aggressive tactics to accomplish political objectives. This can involve protests that escalate into disorder, property damage, or targeted actions against individuals or organizations seen as oppressors.
2. Focus on Ideological Consistency: Some individuals within far-left extremist groups may emphasize strict adherence to their ideology, rejecting negotiation or dialogue with those who hold different views. This can create an environment of intolerance for differing opinions both within their groups and in broader society.
3. Anti-Establishment Views: Far-left extremism often features strong anti-establishment beliefs, seeing current political and economic systems as fundamentally flawed and unjust. This perspective can lead to demands for revolutionary change rather than gradual reform.
4. Historical Examples: Throughout history, various far-left movements have resorted to extreme actions, including notable events like the Russian Revolution, Maoist movements, and certain guerrilla organizations. These historical instances frequently involved considerable violence and upheaval.
5. Distinguishing Views: It is vital to differentiate between mainstream far-left ideologies, such as democratic socialism, which may pursue change through political processes and reforms, and more extreme factions that advocate for uncompromising approaches.
While far-left extremism is a reality, it's important to understand that far-left ideologies represent a wide range of beliefs, and not all individuals or groups identifying with leftist ideas engage in extreme actions. As with any political ideology, the specifics of context, methods, and beliefs can vary widely among different groups.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1