Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "“Male Abortion” Is Now Being Considered" video.

  1. We don't care about the trauma of the man whose child is aborted against his will, so why should we care about the trauma of a woman who's forced to abort because the father isn't supportive? Screw her. If it's fully her choice, and I'm not saying it should be, it should be fully her responsibility. She was the one who decided to make the child "alive."
    21
  2. Progressivism is the belief that it's wrong to tell a woman she can't have sex until she can afford her own birth control, but fine to tell a man he can't have sex until he can afford his own child.
    17
  3.  @hgiles7280  Or better yet, if you care so much about children, why don't you STFU and go adopt a foster child? That's what pro-choicers used to tell me when I'd tell them to take some responsibility for their decision to have sex.
    10
  4.  @hgiles7280  Just shift the burden to the tax payers if you care so much. The man didn't chose to bring the child into this world. True, he's more responsible than the tax payer for what happened, but the same is true if you are a victim of a crime: does that mean we should charge people who have been raped, murdered, or robbed to get their crime investigated by the state?
    8
  5.  @ngxoxo  I guess getting a taste of your own medicine triggers you, you entitled, delicate, prissy little princess.
    7
  6.  @BosisofSweden  No. It was "her body, her choice" which created the child.
    6
  7.  @acorn9134  LOL! Women can't afford $400 abortions but men can afford $100,000 child support!
    6
  8. I'm guessing this didn't pass. Progressives only say they support "male abortion" to cover their asses.
    5
  9. Why should men have a sense of compassion and personal responsibility when women have none? When John Andrew Weldon slipped his girlfriends an abortion pill it was called an "unspeakable crime." Yet women regularly commit this unspeakable crime against their partners to avoid sore feet and stretch marks.
    3
  10.  @BosisofSweden  There's no such thing as a one-pronged choice you moron. If abortion is a woman's choice, then birthing baby must be her choice too.
    3
  11. Then it should be illegal to be a "single mother by choice."
    3
  12.  @acorn9134  The only arguments you can make that a man should be forced to pay child support appeal to compassion or personal responsibility. These words are meaningless to liberal women. When John Andrew Weldon slipped his girlfriend an abortion pill it was called an "unspeakable crime" by a female reporter, yet progressive women commit this crime against their partners to avoid sore feet and stretch marks.
    3
  13. Men are still going to be forced into (financial) fatherhood. It's just those men will be tax payers rather than biological fathers.
    3
  14. You support this like the feminists who marched to get women drafted before the 19th amendment and then stopped doing so immediately afterwards.
    2
  15. How the hell does that solve anything? Men's reproductive rights (or lack there of) are no different in wedlock. His wife can still lie about being on the pill and then abort his child out of spite if she pleases.
    2
  16. Liberals are fine with forcing people to be parents, as long as those people are tax payers and not the men/women who chose to have sex.
    2
  17.  @Kendychickentendy  The poverty rate has not changed one bit since the advent of LBJ's Great Society. This is statistical fact. Welfare does not reduce poverty, it only enables laziness and parasitism and broken families.
    2
  18. One man will be able to choose, another tax paying man won't.
    1
  19.  @chaosd7038  When John Andrew Weldon slipped his girlfriend an abortion pill it was called an "unspeakable crime" by a female reporter. You're pretty flippant about women committing this same unspeakable crime against their partner.
    1
  20.  @themisvespucci9894  Liberals are 100% in favor of men paying for children they don't want, as long as those men are tax payers, and not biological fathers.
    1
  21.  @laurs5551  LOL wow, your argument is literally Stage 1 of Kholberg's Moral Development.
    1
  22. Only one party decided to turn the zygote into a baby.
    1
  23.  @BosisofSweden  You just said a child has the right to "mum and dad."
    1
  24. These cowards are just going to pass the financial burden onto the tax payer, so women will still be telling men what to do with their finances.
    1
  25.  @ImmortalFabrizio  If men and women pay into the system but only women get cash, there's a net transfer of wealth from men to women.
    1
  26.    There is not a single fact in the world to back that idea up. People like you are responsible for China's horrible one child policy.
    1
  27. Reproductive rights would be allowing us to stop a woman from gestating our baby if we didn't want it. This is simply relieving men of responsibilities, since we have no rights.
    1
  28.  @Ashley-bm9gc  You're right, it is different. A vasectomy just effects the man's body, where as an abortion effects a fetus with both your genes.
    1
  29. It's easy to agree when you know a mostly male tax base will cover for what you don't get in child support.
    1
  30.  @nicolevose3066  These are the same people who say a woman can't "keep it in her pants" long enough to save up for a $30 bottle of pills.
    1
  31. One man will walk away from responsibility, another man (a tax payer) will pick up the slack. There will no be no justice as long as women can unilaterally abort, but who ever thought the left wanted justice anyway?
    1
  32.  @ImmortalFabrizio  LOL! Yeah sure. The "pro-choice" movement is in its death throws. Liberals are in the 3rd stage of grief. Bargaining.
    1
  33.  @ImmortalFabrizio  Giving women rights without responsibilities has always failed. That's what liberals are trying to do, it's just now women's slaves are not the biological fathers but random tax payers.
    1