Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "On Boycott Culture, Gay Marriage, and Censorship (Pt. 3) | Dennis Prager | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

  1. When you redefine a union between a man and woman (marriage), why not redefine a singular man/woman?
    2
  2.  @free_siobhan  But if gender is a social construct why can't men and women all comfortably fit with the gender assigned for them at birth?
    2
  3.  Blue Skeptic  When was this?
    1
  4. Redefining a union between a man and woman led to redefining the concept of a singular man/woman. It's the slippery slope in action. I supported legal equality for same sex unions, and I thought the whole fight over the definition of the word was just silly virtue-signalling. Now I see their point.
    1
  5. Who actually said that, though? Prager said that if you redefine a union between a man and a woman (marriage), there's no reason not to redefine a singular man and a singular woman.
    1
  6. But then you get a situation where candidates can win just for being different. For example, if 19 normal Americans and 1 Nazi ran for President, the Nazi would probably win because all the Nazis would vote for him, while the normies would be evenly divided amongst the other 19.
    1
  7. Trans people are people with software that doesn't match their hardware, like gay people. Normally a man sexually desires women and a masculine persona. Gay men differ in the first part of that sentence, trans...penis-people differ in the second part.
    1
  8. What is the issue of homosexuality if not an issue of gender politics?
    1
  9. The question is better aimed at you, actually. If the litmus test for a Godly relationship is capacity for reproduction, then as long as the 12 year old girl is fertile it should be A-Okay.
    1
  10. But if you can redefine a union between a man and woman, you can redefine a singular man/woman.
    1