Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "Anti-Feminist Professor | Janice Fiamengo | WOMEN | Rubin Report" video.

27:10 Patriarchy: Women are weak and men are strong. Therefore men must never cry, never complain, and think only of how to protect and serve women. University feminism: Women are oppressed and men are privileged. Therefore men must never cry, never complain, and think only of how to protect and serve women.
6
What makes it systemic?
3
Men don't have to worry about getting raped because feminist Mary Koss invented the euphemism "made to penetrate."
1
Anything with a penis is bad!? Transphobic!
1
Uh, no, they don't want to go to universities because they're told they're born with original sin and must pay penance. Bars would not have Lady's Nights if men didn't like to be outnumbered by women.
1
Please tell me again how oppressed women were when they had to keep their legs closed long enough to save up $30 for a bottle of pills.
1
Women were educated long before feminism. There were female intellectuals and writers long before Seneca Falls. Olympe de Gouges, Anne Louise Germaine de Staël-Holstein, and Mary Joseph Hale to name a few. Besides, just because feminism abolished some injustices in society doesn't mean we owe it fealty any more than we owe fealty to Communism for getting rid of the Russian Czars.
1
Just posted a list of pre-feminism female authors/intellectuals, of course Google's so called "anti-spam" filter blocked me.
1
@l.c.8183 Actually factophobe you can read 3 of the names in my response to EL, 2 comments below yours.
1
@johntech282 Yes, there was no law against women leaving the house, it was simply dangerous for women to travel alone back then.
1
@TheThelenita Men were legally obligated to provide for their wives, or they would charged with "abandonment." One person is legally obligated to work to provide for another, and yet you call the person provided for the slave and the person forced to work the master?
1
@TheThelenita Yes, men were legally financially responsible for their wives just as much as their own children. Look up Mark Wilks, the man who went to jail because he didn't pay his wife's income tax.
1
@TheThelenita Doesn't matter, she still had law to prosecute him under.
1
@TheThelenita Right because it was a stupid thing to be thrown in jail for, but the fact remains men were held legally, financially responsible for their wives. I'm not trying to argue what happened to Mark Wilks was typical, but I am demonstrating men had legal financial obligations to their wives.
1
@TheThelenita Right, this stupid law that burdened men was written by men. So tell again how men ruled society to benefit themselves at women's expense.
1
@TheThelenita Right, that source is written by extremely biased women who don't realize how they disprove their own thesis. That same source talks about coverture, which protected a woman's rights to property she brought into the marriage, which a non-person would not have. It makes as much as saying "If not for the $15 an hour I make, I might as well be an unpaid laborer." Further it ignores things like the fact that women were allowed to divorce their husbands, which a non-person would never be allowed to do. Literally the only thing women lacked was financial rights, which was balanced by a lack of financial responsibility. Third, why did women have no means of economic survival outside of marriage? There was no law against women working. Are you saying women were too weak to provide for themselves and therefore men should have provided for them, without expecting anything in return? It sounds like feminism is just another word for chivalry.
1
@TheThelenita I have not lied once or ignored any questions, you are simply a willfully blind piece of shit.
1
@TheThelenita 1) You said women were the legal equivalent of slaves in marriage, I showed you men were obligated to provide for their women 2) If a man was obligated to pay his wife's debts, why wouldn't gambling debts apply? 3) You didn't ask a question about the draft, you must wrote "I bet you are not the one drafting, civil conscriptioning or coal mining." No shit, I'm not the government. What does that have to do with anything? 4) You accused me of lying, ignoring a valid question, none of which I did. That's called slander. It's an insult + an objective lie.
1
@TheThelenita Feminism exploits men's protective instincts towards women while simultaneously feigning ignorance towards them. Feminism exploits society's instinct that women are "sugar and spice and everything nice" while simultaneously calling that idea 'patriarchal'. Feminists know that if a man hits a woman every guy in the room will mob him, while if a woman hits a man people will laugh. Yet feminism still claims that society normalizes violence against women when it clearly does the opposite. Feminists claim women "aren't getting their healthcare" even while women have 4X as much funding for their diseases while men die 5 years earlier. Feminism calls it "misogyny" when society doesn't want to pay for women's birth control, yet 10 years after Obamacare forced us all to do just that, no one pays for my vasectomies. Feminist Mary Koss invented the term "made to penetrate" to hide male victims of female rapists. Feminists cry about "rape culture" yet yucked it up when Amy Schumer told the Ms. Foundation for Women’s Gloria Awards and Gala about how she raw dogged with a guy so drunk he was passing out multiple times during the encounter. Feminism tries to portray children denied education as a female issue, when almost 50% of children denied education around the world are boys. Etc.
1
"Every Muslim, from the moment they realize the distinction in their hearts, hates Americans, *hates Jews and hates Christians.*" - Osama Bin Laden Right, I'm sure all the 2 billion Christians in the world had a hand in the 'decades of American terror campaign in the Middle East.'
1
@blader45bc The left seems to believe in Genesis more than the right: original sin, the glorification of humanity that doesn't know the difference between good and evil, etc.
1