Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "" video.

  1.  @evaisnotavailable  So? That's because they were coworkers. The fact he knew her beforehand makes his consent more valid, not less. Would an 18 year old's vote be more valid if he knew nothing about politics prior to 18? Of course not.
    2
  2. Because they were coworkers.
    1
  3. What does that even mean? That she manipulated him in some way? That can happen at any age. And if she were to use psychological tactics only a minor would fall for, he'd have realized the roost when he became an adult. You are the same people who scream yourself hoarse that gay conversion therapy doesn't work, yet some random old lady can brainwash a random 15 year old into being a gentrophile? Give me a break.
    1
  4. Stop spouting the g-word. It is so hard to believe every single person using the word doesn't realize its an incoherent moral objection. The fact he knew her beforehand makes his consent more valid, not less. Is an 18 year olds vote only valid if he knew nothing about politics prior to 18? Of course not, the opposite is true. Are you accusing her of manipulating him somehow? That can happen at any age, and if she used tactics a minor would be particularly susceptible too, he'd realize it when he became an adult. You are the same people who scream yourselves hoarse gay conversion therapy doesn't work on teens, yet you think some random old lady can turn a 15 year old boy into a gentrophile just by being his coworker?
    1
  5. Ess tee eff yew. What do you even mean by "groomed"? That she manipulated him? This can happen at any age, and if she were to use psychological tactics minors were particularly susceptible, he'd realize the roost when he became 18. You are the same people who scream yourselves hoarse that gay conversion therapy doesn't work on teens, yet you think some random old lady can just turn a 15 year old boy into a gentrophile like its magic?
    1
  6. No one can honestly believe this "grooming" nonsense is a morally coherent objection. The fact that he knew her before he turned 18 makes him more capable of an informed decision, and by extension, consent, not less. I can't stand today's society. You hatemongers always find a way to move the goal post. First its "If you love her you can wait until she's 18", then that goes out the window because you discovered the g-word. I've even heard people say age gaps aren't consensual if the younger partner is under 25. Christ.
    1
  7. Just stop. This is so disingenuous. What are you accusing her with "grooming" exactly? Some form of manipulation? That can happen at any age. You are the same people who scream yourself hoarse gay conversion therapy doesn't work on teens, but you think some random old lady can just open up a 15 year olds cranium and reprogram him into a gentrophile? The fact he knew her before he became 18 makes his consent more valid, not less. The fact that we consider it more valid for an 18 year old to jump into bed with a person he/she knows nothing about than someone whose character he's had years to assess is just madness. How insane would it sound to apply this logic anywhere else? Are 18 year old's votes only valid if they knew absolutely nothing about politics prior to 18, because otherwise that means they were "groomed" politically?
    1
  8. Stop saying "groomed". What exactly are you accusing her of? Manipulation? You are the same people who scream yourself horse that gay conversion therapy doesn't work on teens, yet you think some random old lady can just open up a 15 year old boy's cranium and reprogram into a gentrophile? Parents can't even control their 15 years for God's sake.
    1