Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "Skinwalker Ranch owner reacts to Post reporting, calls skeptics \"pigs\" | The Basement Office Extras" video.

  1. UFOs are orbs.
    8
  2. How do you know Brandon just didn’t misremember Lacatski’s account? His misrecollection could have been influenced by the reports about strange happenings in the other room.
    7
  3. What is "real data"? They are constantly getting strange readings, video footage of anomalies, etc.
    6
  4.  @kevinc.798  Oh please, you believe what you believe that based on nothing but Greenstreet's reporting. You have no real intellectual curiosity.
    5
  5. Thank you, I think that's the creepiest moment in the entire series and one of the things I keep pointing people towards. Number 2 is the malfunction with the OSIRIS machine two episodes prior.
    2
  6. No. If you actually watch the show you know this is grossly biased. Even just the first 10 minutes of the very first episode show that.
    2
  7.  @Wolf-Spirit_Alpha-Sigma  It may well be fake, but don't mock them for being unable to provide evidence if you set impossible standards for evidence. However, I think the fact that outside experts constantly come onto the show and see their equipment malfunction in unprecedented ways is proof there is something going on.
    2
  8.  @thedinobeaver  Then admit that instead of mocking them for not being able to provide "real evidence". You're literally mocking them for not being able to do the impossible. Why does Greenstreet's investigation even matter if you have this attitude? The conclusion was pre-ordained.
    2
  9. If you found this convincing you haven't been following the show.
    1
  10.  @thedinobeaver  Says someone who's never watched a single episode.
    1
  11. 🤮 Just watch the first ten minutes of the first episode if you think this is "unfiltered truth." There's a lot more to the Ranch than "blurry bug things."
    1
  12.  @voxvesper4617  I wish I could express myself half as well as you do.
    1
  13. ​ @thedinobeaver  What is "just enough" is extremely subjective. It's clear from interviews that there are plenty of anomalies that don't make it onto the show because they're not exciting enough, like a time they had to recharge Winterton's microphone 8 times in a day because it kept draining for no apparent reason. They chose the most interesting ones.
    1
  14.  @thedinobeaver  You will continue to disbelieve anything as long as it makes you feel like a cynical badass who's playing stick-it-to-the-man. None of what you say as any substance, you just throw around empty phrases like "real evidence" and "credible witness" and "just enough" when even you don't know what you mean by any of it. I believe there was likely a lot of embellishment in the Bigelow era. That doesn't mean it's all fake. As Dragon said, "The ranch doesn't tap dance on command". It's possible when things were slow, Bigelow's employees invented stories to keep their jobs. But that doesn't mean it's all lies. If I lie about getting mugged in Detroit, that doesn't mean mugging never happens in Detroit.
    1
  15.  @Wolf-Spirit_Alpha-Sigma  Because the have way more on record than "blurry bug things." Watch the first ten minutes of the first episode and you've already got 1) the Mesa illuminating out of nowhere 2) a really bright UFO that is clearly NOT a bug and was not transponding like a legal aircraft should 3) unnatural microwave readings. That's the first ten minutes.
    1
  16. Very first episode: -Illuminated mesa -Giant, bright UFO above the mesa, moving too slowly to be a bug, not transponding like aircraft are legally required to do. -Unnatural microwave readings There, within the first twenty-minutes of the show to ever air, they provided better evidence of wonky happenings at the ranch than Greenstreet shows here.
    1
  17. So are all the outsiders they bring onto the property who witness strange things paid off by the History Channel?
    1
  18.  @thedinobeaver  You've never watched 10 seconds of the show and yet judge it based on a hit piece.
    1
  19.  @thedinobeaver  I'll ask again. What episode did you watch and what happened.
    1
  20. Such as?
    1
  21. It's not an "underwhelming reality." It's very easy to dismiss it as such if you just watch Greenstreet's reporting and don't watch the show. But if you want to see some of the best evidence something strange is happening on the ranch, I recommend Season 3, episode 2 & 4.
    1
  22.  @JeffreyNColeman  Okay, explain what happened in Season 3, Episode 4 with the telescope.
    1
  23.  @JeffreyNColeman  If he got the raw data, what would stop you from saying the data was fudged? You're already saying that about the footage from the show.
    1
  24.  @JeffreyNColeman  Hardly. Anyone can alter the numbers on an Excel table.
    1
  25.  @thedinobeaver  Yes, the constantly show instrument reading and GPS reading on the show. Are you going to tell me that's fudged? If it is, what would stop you from saying the same thing if they showed you "raw data"?
    1
  26.  @thedinobeaver  You tell me what's a credible witness. I'd assume it's someone outside the cast of the show who don't chose to remain anonymous. The show is constantly bringing on outside parties, most recently the crew of Sky Elements, who see their equipment act strangely and sometimes even witness UFOs.
    1
  27. No, nobody who really follows the show would you believe this proves anything.
    1
  28. You only say that because you aren't following the show. If all I knew about Skinwalker Ranch was Greenstreet's hit piece, I'd think Brandon was a fraud too. But waaaay too much weird stuff happens on that ranch and is witnessed by outsiders. Sky Elements was the most recent outside party they brought onto the ranch who saw their equipment fail in ways they had never witnessed before. There were countless others, like the Salt Lake Astronomical Society, who even witnessed a UFO with them.
    1
  29.  @16nowhereman  Any intelligent person can see your comment is meaningless, psuedo intellectual word salad.
    1