Comments by "Dennis" (@Dennis-nc3vw) on "GDF" channel.

  1. That's not true, it's just when there's no mayhem, there's no news. Prior to Iraq, every invasion had been a resounding success in nation and building that was well received by the people. Germany, Japan, Italy, Panama, Grenada. Grenada even a has a holiday commemorating the US invasion of their country. Even regime change in Afghanistan had looked slick and clean at this time.
    10
  2. There is truly no force on the human psyche than anti-Americanism. Even though half the insurgents themselves switched sides during the Anbar Awakening after seeing what horrors their victories left behind, people still insist Americans were the bad guys. If America said 2 + 2 was 4, the world would say it's 5.
    8
  3. Toppled a dictator and restored our elections? No, I wouldn't be pissed at all. Nor were most Iraqis when we did it to them. An April 2004 Gallup poll showed Iraqis thought the invasion was "worth it" for toppling Saddam by a margin of 2 to 1. And Gallup is the same company that reported 90+% of Crimeans felt Russia's 2014 Crimea referendum was fair so don't you dare accuse them of having a pro-American bias. The problem is that in 2006 sectarian violence kicked into high gear, they mass murdered and blamed Americans and then pretended they never wanted to be liberated.
    4
  4. So are you disgusted by the insurgents who switched sides during the Anbar Awakening to fight for the Americans too, after seeing the horrors their victories left behind.
    4
  5. Who's side did they take during the Anbar Awakening.
    3
  6. The US didn't destroy Iraq, people like you did. According to Iraq Body Count, about 88% of civilians killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for the atrocities of people our troops were there to kill and capture, you created a perverse incentive and a self-perpetuating snowball effect. Insurgent factions committed so much senseless violence in large part because they knew people like you would blame their Western enemies, and make their atrocities propaganda victories. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which by the media's own admission seem to target no particular group and were just to "get attention"? Terrorists would blow up Iraqi civilians. Iraqis would blame America, take up arms against Americans and the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police, which of course made it more difficult for these groups to do their job. Then terrorists would blow up more people. The cycle would repeat ad infinitum. The cycle of violence only stopped during the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqi people finally admitted who was really killing them and started fighting the likes of Al Qaeda instead of just blaming Americans for all the death and destruction.
    3
  7. We were trying to save Iraq from the horrors that finally instigated the "Anbar Awakening", when Iraqis finally realized the horrors insurgent victories left behind and half the insurgents switched sides to the US.
    2
  8. Nobody thinks the Iraqis are horrible monsters. Nobody. We think the terrorists we tried to kill and capture were horrible monsters, the people gouging women's eyes out for wearing make up, murder boys for emo haircuts, car bombing public markets, etc.
    2
  9. If the US had the intention to kill civilians, we could have killed that two million number you made up in two days. We could have leveled Iraq from the sky and never taken a single casualty.
    2
  10. So then why did half the insurgents themselves change sides during the Anbar Awakening? Were they in the wrong too?
    2
  11. It was people like him who were the reason so many people died in Iraq in the first place. Iraq Body Count reports about 88% of people killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for their atrocities, every murder insurgent factions committed become their propaganda victory. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which seemed to target no one in particular and were just to "get attention." Terrorists would blow up Iraqis. Iraqis would blame America, the Iraqi Army, and the Iraqi Police. These groups, who were meant to hunt and kill terrorists, now had a much more difficult job because people were shooting at them. This made it easier for the terrorists to terrorize, so they'd blow up more Iraqis. Which meant more Iraqis angry at Americans. And the cycle would repeat ad infinitum. That's why peace never came to Iraq until the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqis finally admitted who was really killing them and turn their guns on them, rather than blaming America for all the violence like GDF is doing.
    2
  12. About 88% of civilian casualties in Iraq were at the hands of "insurgents, militia, and terrorists" according to John Sloboda of Iraq Body Count. Compare that to the Syrian Civil War where 91% of civilian casualties are at the hands of government forces. That should give you an idea of just how gentle America was in dealing with the insurgency in Iraq.
    1
  13. To avoid the likes of the Islamic State of Iraq (pregenitors to ISIS) and the Mahdi Army from taking over the country? Even the insurgents themselves eventually realized the legitimacy of your cause, that's why so many of them switched sides during the Anbar Awakening.
    1
  14. Christ alive, do you even know what you mean by "just defending themselves"? Defending themselves from what? Elections? If the insurgents were fighting a good fight, why did half of them switch sides during the Anbar Awakening?
    1
  15. Stop making up numbers.
    1
  16. No, we let them vote so they could make their own law and order. Crying that someone is forcing their lifestyle on you by giving you democracy is like crying someone is forcing their diet on you by giving a choice of what to have for lunch. When the war began, Iraqis believed overthrowing Saddam was worth by a margin of 2 to 1 (src: Gallup April 2004 poll), and only 17% approved of attacks on coalition forces (src: Gallup April 2004 poll), and most Iraqis wanted the US to stay until elections were established (src: Global Policy June 2004 survey). It wasn't until 2006, when sectarian violence started kicking into high gear that Iraqis changed their tune. They mass murdered each other, blamed Americans, and pretended they never wanted to be liberated. Of course, blaming America could only get them so far, and after two years of terrible violence they finally admitted it was the likes of Al Qaeda in Iraq killing them, not Americans, and half of the insurgents switched sides in an event called the Anbar Awakening, which, in addition to Shi'ite insurgent warlord's cease fire, FINALLY brought peace to Iraq and caused Iraqi deaths to fall by 80%.
    1
  17. Yes, because having the MIC (who only compose 3% of lobbying efforts in the US) donate slightly more to your re-election campaign is totally worth a failed war. What a brilliant election strategy.
    1
  18. The US didn't destroy Iraq, people like you did. According to Iraq Body Count, about 88% of civilians killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for the atrocities of people our troops were there to kill and capture, you created a perverse incentive and a self-perpetuating snowball effect. Insurgent factions committed so much senseless violence in large part because they knew people like you would blame their Western enemies, and make their atrocities propaganda victories. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which by the media's own admission seem to target no particular group and were just to "get attention"? Terrorists would blow up Iraqi civilians. Iraqis would blame America, take up arms against Americans and the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police, which of course made it more difficult for these groups to do their job. Then terrorists would blow up more people. The cycle would repeat ad infinitum. The cycle of violence only stopped during the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqi people finally admitted who was really killing them and started fighting the likes of Al Qaeda instead of just blaming Americans for all the death and destruction.
    1