Youtube comments of Dennis (@Dennis-nc3vw).
-
7400
-
4500
-
4100
-
3900
-
2300
-
1000
-
833
-
832
-
791
-
786
-
674
-
666
-
655
-
646
-
644
-
618
-
614
-
608
-
587
-
585
-
551
-
531
-
433
-
407
-
385
-
377
-
376
-
372
-
362
-
349
-
347
-
340
-
337
-
334
-
324
-
322
-
310
-
307
-
302
-
297
-
290
-
288
-
278
-
276
-
276
-
276
-
248
-
243
-
238
-
237
-
235
-
229
-
225
-
219
-
218
-
214
-
203
-
196
-
193
-
192
-
189
-
172
-
171
-
169
-
167
-
167
-
166
-
154
-
150
-
148
-
147
-
147
-
146
-
145
-
143
-
143
-
142
-
136
-
134
-
132
-
126
-
124
-
122
-
118
-
116
-
111
-
110
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
105
-
104
-
104
-
104
-
103
-
102
-
100
-
100
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
96
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
90
-
87
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
80
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
For Chrissakes, if less hairy women were not always considered more attractive, why have women been evolving to lose body hair faster than men? The fact is since the beginning of time, men have been selecting for less hairy women. Men are generally taller, more muscular, and have deeper voices than women. Thus the most attractive men are unusually tall, muscular, and baritone. Exaggerating your sexual dimorphism is almost always the way to become more attractive, this is just rudimentary common sense. Look at older paintings of, let's say, Venus, and show me one where she is hairy.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
"The way the elite does this is by teaching our children, starting with the very young, that rational and moral thought is an act of bigotry; that no matter how sincerely you may seek to gather the facts, no matter how earnestly you may look at the evidence, no matter how disciplined you may try to be in your reasoning, your conclusion is going to be so tainted by your personal bigotries, by your upbringing, by your religion, by the color of your skin, by the nation of your great-great-great-great-great grandfather's birth; that no matter what your conclusion, it is useless. It is nothing other than the reflection of your bigotries, and the only way to eliminate bigotry is to eliminate rational thought." - Evan Sayet
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
"The Modern Liberal will invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success. [...]What I discovered is that the Modern Liberal looks back on 50,000 years, 100,000 years of human civilization, and knows only one thing for sure: that none of the ideas that mankind has come up with--none of the religions, none of the philosophies, none of the ideologies, none of the forms of government--have succeeded in creating a world devoid of war, poverty, crime, and injustice. So they're convinced that since all of these ideas of man have proved to be wrong, the real cause of war, poverty, crime, and injustice must be found--can only be found--in the attempt to be right. [...] It's a utopian vision, and all that's required to usher in this utopia is the rejection of all fact, reason, evidence, logic, truth, morality, and decency--" - Evan Sayet
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
Wow, I looked up Douglas Axe. Rather than any intelligent refutation to his work, all I found were progressives throwing temper tantrums. Case in point:
"Axe is a molecular biologist, and is, as such, one of the
relatively few people affiliated with the intelligent design movement
with credentials the least bit relevant to the issue at hand — not counting the numerous supporters who rely entirely on fake or trumped-up credentials, as opposed to "merely" out-of-context credentials.
Drawing on his knowledge of biology, Axe has authored a few
relatively mundane papers, at least some of which have been published in
low-tier, although genuine, journals.
Although none of these papers contain – or even attempts to mount – any refutation of evolution, much less evidence for intelligent design. He has published extensively in the Biologic Institute’s house journal BIO-Complexity, but that obviously does not count towards anything meaningful.
"
-RationalWiki
Yes, a website acting this childish calls themselves Rational Wiki.
I'm on the fence about God but dang...Prager really checkmated you here, atheists.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Sadly I can only conclude most blacks today seem to see compassion as a sign of weakness and respect cruelty as a sign of strength. Nick Cannon called white people "savages" and "closer to animals" after whites came out in the millions to protest the death of a black man even as we've chronically ignored their own people killed by cops (Thomas Kelly, Joseph Hutcheson, Gil Collar, etc.), but had nothing to say about the Libyan slave trade. Mohammed Ali dropped his original name, the name of white abolitionist who almost died twice for his belief and founded the South first multi-racial college, in favor of a slave holder who called black people raisin-heads.
So perverse, backwards, and disgusting. The West is seeing the biggest inversion of karma in human history, as our compassion, tolerance, egilitarianism, and self-depreciation is leading to our downfall.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
A white man entered a safe space. A black man said: "Only people of color are allowed here." The white man man stood up and turned around saying: "Listen sir... when I was born, I was pink. When I grew up, I was white. When I'm sick, I'm green. When I go in the sun, I turn red. When I'm cold, I'm blue. When I die, I turn purple. But you sir... When you're born, you're black. When you grow up, you're black. When you're sick, you're black. When you go to the sun, you're black. When you're cold, you're black. When you die, you're black. And you have the nerve to say I'm not a person of color?!"
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
There's nothing "woke" about saying the Civil War was about slavery. 10 years ago, before their hatred of the South eclipsed their hatred of America, the far left was spewing the same talking points as Confederate apologists.
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@kimobrien. No, fascists, who were proud anti-capitalists, started the Second World War. And the deaths from the atom bombs were a drop in the bucket compared to how many the fascists killed. Why on God's green Earth would capitalists want people unemployed!? You can't make many off an unemployed man's labor and an unemployed man has nothing to lose by destroying your business. Why the hell would capitalists want you to pay more for education!? Educated employees make the best workers! Are you even trying to make sense here?
Business owners want to make as much money as possible, but they can't disregard the wants of customers and employees or they lose one or both to the competition. Walmart, the most evil greedy corporation ever, runs a profit margin of a whopping 1.1%. When workers are paid minimum wage, its because consumers like you demand cheaper prices on their goods, and since mega-corporations run very slim profit margins the cost of production is tied almost perfectly to the cost of labor. State owned businesses don't have to worry about this, because they'll get their money no matter what through taxation.
You judge business owners for being self-interested, yet I doubt you've ever given a cent to the barefoot Africans desiring clean drinking water and basic vaccinations for their children. I've donated thousands to charity during my life time. But I had to cut back because the rage I felt at the hypocrisy of Western progressives/socialists started to consume me.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Oh please, my dad worked as much as much as 300 hours a month and then when he was home was just as much of a parent as my mother. He even tried to get away from the hustle and bustle by moving to Ohio (I was born and raised in Connecticut), but then my mom made him move back because she didn't want to live among hicks. Women stayed in the house and watched children while men worked from dawn to dusk doing backbreaking, monotonous work. Women couldn't have even taken these roles because 90% of jobs for 99% of human history were very physically intensive and women constantly had to be pregnant to maintain the population in a world where 2/3 children died before their 4th birthday.
Women are not independent now, you've just married the state. Men still provide for women and children, but its at the point of a gun via the government, with things like welfare, public education, and even Social Security: men die five years earlier and retire later, not to mention men pay about twice as much in taxes over their life time, meaning Social Security leads to a HUGE net transfer of wealth from men to women.
Yes, most men are CEOs. CEOs typically work at least 70 hours a week. Their wife gets to stay home, basking in luxuries their salary bought but they barely get to touch, doing light chores and watching Sesame Street with the kids. Poor, poor oppressed wimmenz.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The left thinks it cute little black girls are being taught racial tribalism before their ABCs. And don't you dare give me that "It's different because they never see themselves on screen" crap. A study reported no less than NPR showed African Americans are already over-represented on TV. Even when I was growing up we had That's So Raven, The Famous Jet Jackson, Little Bill, Reading Rainbow, Smart Guy, etc. The last 6 Disney female leads (Jasmine, Mulan, Mirabel, Mei, Raya, Jasmine, and Moana) have all been POCs but if little white girl were rejoicing that the next princess "looked like them" you'd puke your guts out and then use the video to justify CRT.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
What a lovely orgy of anti-Americanism.
"To essentially cover up what the US military represents to all countries abroad."
Last time Pew Research did a poll, the most pro-American countries in the world were South Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Israel. All 4 of those have a history strongly intertwined with the US military. Grenada literally has a holiday dedicated to America's intervention in their country, and according to an ABC poll Panamanians supported America's invasion of their homeland by a margin of 92% to 8%. Not to mention the tremendous humanitarian relief provided to Haiti after the quakes, Pakistan after the floods, Asia after the tsunami, etc. Even the Iraqis said, in an April 2004 poll, that they believed America's invasion of their country was "worth it" by a margin of more than 2 to 1. It wasn't until they decided to mass murder each other in sectarian warfare and then blame America that they changed their tune.
And yes, the US does care about human rights. How do we know? Because if we didn't, looking after our interests abroad would be 100X easier. Imagine how much smoother the Iraq war could have gone if we just put in a pro-American despot instead of letting the Iraqis vote Sadrists into parliament.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@cmlkhf "In contrast to gender dysphoria, homosexual attraction doesn't cause any discomfort or pain in people who experience it, unless they are told they shouldn't feel that way. In a society where homosexuality is not seen as wrong, gay and bi people are just as happy and mentally healthy as everyone else."
Then explain the suicide rates. A study in Canada showed gay and bisexual suicide rates have been stagnant, actually slightly increasing, over the past 20 years. This is while homosexual acceptance has skyrocketed.
Tell me, does it not get to you you cannot have a natural child with your partner? My sister spent tens of thousands of dollars to correct this problem. 99.9% of people are not gonna kill themselves just because they can't have kids, but 99.9% of people are not going to kill themselves because they have ADHD. That doesn't change the fact its a mental disorder.
Fine, fair point about bisexuals, they actually have a larger dating pool. Maybe that's not it. But the suicide rates speak for themselves. Again, if it's all about peer acceptance, why has the suicide rate remained stagnant while homosexual acceptance has drastically increased?
Just because you don't think your condition, whatever that may be, decreasing your happiness, doesn't mean it doesn't. Many things that bring us suffering are extremely counter-intuitive. For example, most people think paradise would be eternal relaxation, but in fact study after study after study confirms work is a key ingredient to happiness.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
It was the "freedom fighters" you were rooting for who caused the vast majority of those deaths, in large part because they knew you'd blame their American/British enemies for their atrocities and thus made every drop of blood they spilled a propaganda victory.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
"Sadly only one explanation fits, anti-Semitism."
No. As Evan Sayet, a Jew himself said, "The modern liberal will invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those which lead to success." If Israel was another fail state in the Middle East, the left would love it. But because it's good, right, and successful, in a sea of failure and violence misery, they hate it. The alt-right hates Israel because of anti-Semitism. The left hates Israel because it is successful.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Fuert Neigt
"Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but 'to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER' and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth." - Thomas Paine
"He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed again the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another." - Thomas Jefferson
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I love how scared you unemployed malcontents are of Prager U. You have facebook, Google, Cartoon Network, Vox, Vice, Slate, MSNBC, CNN, Hollywood, MTV, etc. but you had to make a whole new channeld 'The Gravel Institute' just because Prager U made you pee your pants.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
"OMG WHY ARE YOU CALLING PEOPLE WHO DEFENDED THEIR HOME TERRORISTS!!!111"
We're not. We're calling people who gouge women's eyes out for wearing make up, kill boys for wearing emo hair cuts, carbomb crowded markets, and cut power lines just out of pure meanness terrorists. All the insurgents in Iraq were either A) complicit in these activities B) shooting our boys while they were trying to kill and capture those who were complicit in these activities. It doesn't matter of Ali Al-Fulani doesn't support Al Qaeda, if he's fighting as their ally in battle he's just as useful to them as someone who does.
Iraq was at its most violent years in 2006 and 2007. When Iraqis FINALLY admitted who was really killing them, and half the insurgents switched to our side during the Anbar Awakening, and Muqtada Al-Sadr declared a cease fire, American soldiers, Iraqi soldiers, and Iraqi police were finally able to do their jobs, and Iraqi deaths fell by about 80%.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@firstlast-wg2on "Harmless things"
Christ alive, trans people have a 40% attempted suicide rate and even though you pretend to believe that's because of discrimination, you know its not true. Homosexuals never had that suicide rate and homophobia was way worse 20 or 30 years ago than transphobia is today. People are happiest when they are at peace with their biological sex, but thanks to people like you, trans-identifiers are 10X more common in Gen-Z than previous generations. People like you are the reason pree pew bess sent children get put on hormone blockers and get surgery that ruin their bodies, when studies (actual studies, not the empty words you keep screaming about with no actual reference points) show most kids get over gender dysphoria when they go through pew ber tee.
If people choosing to identify as women is "harmless", even if its erroneous, why bother having a man/woman dichotomy in society at all? Why bother with women's sports, women's prisons, etc?
4
-
4
-
Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately Raven of the saintly days of yore;
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door—
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door—
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.
Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
“Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,” I said, “art sure no craven,
Ghastly grim and ancient Raven wandering from the Nightly shore—
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night’s Plutonian shore!”
Quoth the Raven “Hello."
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Some of these comments really make me despair, I worry we may be trapped in a cycle here. Yes, the left's corruption of children is disgusting, but overzealous parenting breeds cynicism, distrust of society/authority, and a mindless desire to rebel in any way shape or form. I remember working with a 16 year old kid whose parents were Holy Rollers who considered "darn" and "heck" swear words. He was very nice and seemed reasonably intelligent. But he had already been having hookups on tinder, dealt drugs, and, by the time he had to leave the job, been arrested for speeding.
I think a lot of the reason I have been a conservative since a young age is that my parents did NOT impose many rules on me, thus I lacked the cynicism and resentment that turns people towards a "Satanic" path in an effort to rebel. I put Satanic in quotes because I'm also an atheist, yet probably turned out closer to the Christian ideal than most of the kids raised in ultra-strict religious household.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Traditionally men provided resources while women provided their bodies. For most of human history, the right to one's own body and one's own property were considered equally sacrosanct. If you set up a business, you could run it how you wanted. If you were taxed for anything, it was something you'd be expected to provide your body for as well (like the military). Even the early fire department relied on "civil conscription". However, in the 20th century, we decided the right to property meant nothing. We have no qualms about robbing Peter to pay Paul(a). We have no qualms about telling someone how to run a business they built. So naturally men became victims of a lopsided world. We can't force women to gestate our children, but they can force us to be pay for children they gestate. We can't tell a woman whether or not to use birth control, but we can be forced to pay for it. We can't tell a woman to work for us, but we can be forced to hire her if we set up our own business. Etc.
If women had TRUE independence, TRUE autonomy, which is to say full rights COUPLED WITH FULL RESPONSIBILITIES, they would be much more humble.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The Iraq War was a horrible mistake, but never, never forget who took the vast majority of innocent life in that country:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 vs 122,000. It was the people these veterans were there to kill and capture.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If you are a rape victim, don't take people in these comments as a representative sample. The people who search out videos like this are those who have had particular trouble healing. Rape is a very personal thing and trauma is highly variable. The people you are seeing here are those suffering the worst. You are not necessarily doomed to that. I have heard people kill themselves because their baby daddy left them, I've heard of a man who was rejected by a girl he loved in High School, and spent the next two decades as a zombie, doing nothing with life but working, eating, and sleeping. Does that mean all people who are left by a lover or rejected suffer that trauma? No.
Yes, rape victims need sypmathy, but melodrama is poison. To quote rape survivor Wendy McElroy:
"For my part, I have always thought the PC line on rape damages rape victims. That line: women never recover from it [...]. I mentioned in the talk that I was raped many years ago. I recovered although some attitudes changed. I recovered by dealing with the situation myself because feminism would have left me a wreck, a victim who defined herself by something done to her by a vicious person rather than by my strengths and accomplishments. [...] I see these shattered women being paraded as 'trophy victims' and it breaks my heart. They need to move on from the experience. Not forget it, not deny it...but not let some vicious SOB define the rest of their lives."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
Those are the first three paragraphs of Prager's article. I'm sure TYT loved every word of it, except for the endorsement of marriage.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@patrickcleburneuczjsxpmp9558 Let me put it this way. Could Lincoln have amassed the army he did to wage a war solely to abolish slavery? No. Could Lincoln have amassed the army he did to stop states from going their own way over an issue no one in the Union cared about? No.
It's a constant Noam-Chomsky-fan-boy-flag-burner fallacy (not saying that's you, but its who you sound like, which is what impassions me to speak out against Neo-Confederates) that if a war has economic or national security or nationalist grounds, it can't have humanitarian grounds as well.
For example, on the eve of what we called "Operation Iraqi Freedom", 51% of Americans supported the invasion. Would 51% of Americans have supported invading Iraq if it were just a random tyranny that posed no security threat to the US? Of course not. But on the flip side, would 51% of Americans have supported the invasion if Iraq was a free and prosperous paradise, and/or the US planned to install its own Orwellian despot in place of Saddam? Of course not. Maybe then only 25% would have supported it, or 49%, or 33%. Whatever the percentage, any reasonable person agrees it would be less than 51%. The same is true of Lincoln and his Union Army.
tl;dr Wars can be both humanitarian and nationalistic.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@q9c9pilrandagio5 There is no truth according to CRT:
In Robin DiAngelo's (along with Sensoy, Kendi, etc are movers and shakers in CRT) book "Is Everyone Really Equal?", DiAngelo posited: 1.) "All knowledge is taught from a particular perspective; the power of dominant knowledge depends in large part on its presentation as neutral and universal (Kincheloe, 2008)...*all knowledge* understood by humans is framed by the ideologies, language, beliefs, and and customs of human societies. Even the field of science is subjective” (p. 15). 2.) "Our analysis of social justice is based on a school of thought know as Critical Theory. Critical Theory refers to a body of scholarship that examines how society works, and is a tradition that emerged in the early part of the 20th century from a group of scholars at the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany [taught there by Marxists]” (p. 25) 3.) "One of the key contributions of critical theorists concerns the production of knowledge…. These scholars argue that a key element of social injustice involves the claim that particular knowledge is objective, neutral, and universal. An approach based on critical theory calls into question the idea that objectivity is desirable or even possible. The term used to describe this way of thinking about knowledge is that knowledge is socially constructed." (p. 29).
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@crimsonair8890 Dude, would you listen to yourself?
"However, you can’t then say that trans women aren’t women, since according to their definition, they are. Definitions aren’t wrong, concepts are. And conceptually speaking, AND LOGICALLY speaking, trans people are valid according to what ascribe themselves to, since their definitions aren’t contradictory with reality."
What you really just said is that anyone can create my own definition of words whenever they want and then use that to make anything they say fact.
Is there life on Jupiter? Yes, because my definition of Jupiter is Eugene, Oregon.
Did a WWI start in Africa? Yes, because my definition of Africa is a city in Bosnia.
Can butterflies reach six feet tall? Yes, because my definition of a foot is the width of a penny.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
For Pete's sake, how do those "unpaid laborers" raising children have access to food, clothing, housing, internet, TV, etc.? Their husband pays them FFS. What is your vision of equality, exactly? Instead of the husband going to work and then putting his earnings in a joint account that both spouses can access and take from, he puts half in the joint account, and the other half goes to her? Then what does she do with it? Put it in the joint account, which puts us back at square 1? Or does she put the money she earned in her own private bank account that only she can access: ie "What's mine is mine what's yours is ours"?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
Those are the first three paragraphs of Prager's article.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
In blaming America for what happen you appease the ones who brought most of the destruction.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807. Why did they kill so many civilians? In part because they knew people like you would blame America for every death. You encouraged all this violence. How else do you explain bizarre events like the July Soccer Bombings that seemed to target no particular sect and were just to "get attention."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The US didn't destroy Iraq, people like you did. According to Iraq Body Count, about 88% of civilians killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for the atrocities of people our troops were there to kill and capture, you created a perverse incentive and a self-perpetuating snowball effect. Insurgent factions committed so much senseless violence in large part because they knew people like you would blame their Western enemies, and make their atrocities propaganda victories. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which by the media's own admission seem to target no particular group and were just to "get attention"?
Terrorists would blow up Iraqi civilians. Iraqis would blame America, take up arms against Americans and the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police, which of course made it more difficult for these groups to do their job. Then terrorists would blow up more people. The cycle would repeat ad infinitum. The cycle of violence only stopped during the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqi people finally admitted who was really killing them and started fighting the likes of Al Qaeda instead of just blaming Americans for all the death and destruction.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Imagine a human heart. It's covered in maggots, flesh blackened with decay, festering with sores, and yet it still beats. THAT is Marxism. It's a philosophy that thrives on endless rage, bitterness, self-pity, despair, envy, and anger. It is every blight of human nature rolled into one. For most of human history, the typical person worked 6 or 7 days a week, and had little more to show for it than a one room, dirt floor hut and a loaf of bread a day. Now people living 1000 square foot apartments, with internet access, air conditioning, clean running water, refrigerators, big screen TVs, Netflix etc. tell us how they have just enough to survive on. Because they live for self-pity and rage.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I don't care what Tom Cotton has to say. The 1619 Project was cooked up by people with filthy, diseased hearts and serves no purpose other than to cultivate rage, bitterness, and seperatism in black Americans. What is the point of telling hideous anti-American lies like "The American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery"!? And yes, that's a lie. Every famous Founding Father, even the ones who owned slaves, spoke out against slavery. Why on God's Green Earth would they do that if the revolution was fought to preserve slavery!?
“You know that nobody wishes more ardently to see an abolition not only of the trade but of the condition of slavery: and certainly nobody will be more willing to encounter every sacrifice for that object.” -Thomas Jefferson
"[King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither." - Thomas Jefferson
"I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - George Washington
"Not only do I pray for it, on the score of human dignity, but I can clearly forsee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our union, by consolidating it in a common bond of principle." - George Washington
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nonyabidness5454 You willfully blind piece of shit, PATRIARCHAL WARS!? Historical studies show female leaders were MORE LIKELY to lead their people into wars than male leaders, and more likely to annex territory for their empires. Xenobia, Queen Victoria, Indira Ghandi, Catherine the Great, Indira Ghandi ALL LED THEIR PEOPLE IN WAR.
And how the living FUCK are men responsible for pollution more than women!? Because we invented the technologies that both sexes use to pollute the world? Technology you are using right now you cowardly, hypocritical sack of shit? If you believe technology is evil, put your money where your mouth and go live like the Amish. All the pioneers of environmentalism have been men, from John Rushkin to Theodore Roosevelt to Bill Gates. The only political movements women have spearheaded has been temperance (leading to the disasterous prohibition and drug war resulting in thousands of dead males), feminism (female self-interest), getting coffee shops banned in Europe, and Randism (the idea you shouldn't give a shit about anyone but yourself).
Today, the vast majority of government spending is consumed by women, while the vast majority of taxes are paid for by men. Many countries still have mandatory conscription and in all those countries its only mandatory form men, and the majority female electorate keeps it that way. Men are forced to labor on women's behalf, and told we are "misogynist" or "incompassionate" if we say no. Who sees who as the slave you disingenuous sack of shit. Women retire 2 earlier than men while dying 5 years later. That means in America women spend SEVEN FUCKING YEARS living off of mostly men's labor, both social programs paid overwhelmingly by male tax dollars (social security, medicare) or money they got from a marriage which was mostly earned by their husbands.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As someone of modest income who finally got his life together I cannot describe the rage I feel at Bernie. I work as an independent contractor. When I see I put in a solid day at work and made $120, I feel happy. Then I remember according to Bernie Sanders what I'm making is so meager it doesn't even count as a "living wage" and my happiness and gratitude can only go to two places: despair and self-pity, or rage at the ingratitude he breeds. Because I'm not spoiled and know 3 billion people are living on less than $2.50 a day, it goes to the latter.
I can't imagine the kind of 24/7 euphoria most Americans would be experiencing if people like AOC and Bernie Sanders didn't exist to fill them with rage, bitterness, and despair. 100 years ago our ancestors lived in 400 square foot houses, and had a life expectancy of 50 years old. Today we live in 2400 square foot houses, and live until 80. But thanks to people like Bernie all human progress is worth nothing, because he'll be their to make us feel even when was unimaginable luxury 50 years ago is "just enough."
Of course, if I lived in a Blue State, where the dollar has as much as 25% less purchasing power, I might feel different. And that's what the Democrats want to turn America into, one big blue state.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Howard Zinn was the messiah of anti-Americanism, and here's what he said:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn
Show them that statement without saying who its from, and Neo-Confederates cream their pants at those words. I'm speaking from experience. Try it yourself.
I don't know if there are any Southern Republicans who are backwards enough to believe teaching the Civil War was about slavery is "hating America" but if they are that just shows what a sick, confused world Trump has given us.
With the North getting more and more unAmerican and dysfunctional by the day, the South has a real chance to carry the torch of the American experiment, and establish a city on the hill. But that can only happen if we completely divorce ourselves from our Democrat past.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I will never, ever, ever cease to be floored by the ignorance and lack of patriotism from my country men. Everybody who followed the war closely knows the vast majority of innocent Iraqis were killed by the people these soldiers were there to kill and capture. Every day there would be a report of a suicide bombing, car bombing, roadside bombs, etc. killing innocent Iraqi civilians.
The murder of hundreds of thousands of people by the likes of the Mahdi Army, and the Islamic State of Iraq (percusors to ISIS), is being wiped off their hands and put upon our countrymen and we have nothing to say but "🤷♂ don't blame their soldiers, they were young and niave." NO, stop letting people who hate you rewrite history and set the record straight. Our soldiers went their to stem the tide of violence in Iraq. 2006 and 2007 were the bloodiest years for Iraqi civilians by a wide margin, and that bloodshed only ended because the main Shia warlord (Muqtada Al-Sadr) declared a cease fire, and half of the Sunni insurgents switched sides and started working with the US in what was called the Anbar Awakening.
Our men went over there to fight someone of the most evil people in human history. People who are being glorified in these very comments. They got the better of us for a long time. That's why so many innocent people died. You can't tell me you really care about these vets, or truth, or human life until you stand up to this hideous slander.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Socialism is based on Nirvanna Fallacy, pure and simple. For 99% of human history, the life expectancy was about 35 years old, most people lived in one room huts with dirt floors, people were several inches shorter due to poorer nutrition, and people worked 6 or 7 days a week. Yet today, obese keyboard warriors living in 1,000 square foot water tight, air conditioned apartments, with internet access, Netflix, refrigerators, etc. can't imagine a world where they had even a smidgen less, so they assume any other system must be better. "We have nothing to lose but our chains", they say, while living in luxury their great grandparents and everyone who came before never even dreamed of.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Tulin730 sigh Okay, I think what you are saying is trans-women are not technically women, but they are practically women, so they should be treated as such. But that's simply not true. Anyone who identifies is a woman according to the progressive orthodoxy, no matter the context, which would be like treating anyone who calls themselves an adult as an adult.
Prisons, public school locker rooms, etc. are examples where men and women have different legal standings. Also, if you can sue someone from not baking a gay wedding cake, you can obviously sue someone for not accepting the politically correct definition of "man" and "woman" and "boy" and "girl" so now all private clubs (like the Free Masons, Sororities, etc.) are forced to allow people entrance they otherwise wouldn't.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Regarding people belittling stay at home mothers, I'm thinking back to Bill Burr's bit on "The Hardest Job In The World." I think most people are just sick of hearing stay at home mothers say they have it hard. People need to distinguish between a task being important and being hard. Study after study shows, for instance, that one of the biggest keys to happiness is having friends. That means being someone's friend is more important than being their gardener, or their chef, or their chauffer, or their plumber, etc. Does that mean being their friend is harder than those things? If someone said "Being your friend is the hardest job in the world", what would you say? Anyone who believes the same about being home with their own flesh and blood is someone who had no business being a parent in the first place.
I watch my parents care for my nephew and all I see is transcendental joy. The last thing I'd think is "Wow, those poor people, if only they could be working in a 37 Degree Fahrenheit factory chopping off the heads of an endless batch of Zucchini like I used to."
Being a stay at home mother is a privilege, and frankly I'd rather sterilize myself then have to deal with the indignity of coming home after mashing buttons over florescent lights for 9 hours a day with a boss breathing down my neck, only to be told by the person who got to stay home and watch Sesame Street and playi games with my child that she has it worse.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
EDIT: Look, you drooling lobotomized monkeys. I am literally echoing the sentiments of the very first person in the video said. I'm literally expressing the exact same sentiments as the very first person who replied to me, who said "rape is one of the worst things" that happened to him (meaning there were other comparably traumatic events in his life). I'm literally echoing the sentiments of rape survivor Wendy McElroy who said, "For my part, I have always thought the PC line on rape damages rape victims. That line: women never recover from it [...]I see these shattered women being paraded as 'trophy victims' and it breaks my heart. They need to move on from the experience. Not forget it, not deny it...but not let some vicious SOB define the rest of their lives." - Wendy McElroy
Rape is a traumatic event, but its not the be all and end all of human trauma. People like you pretend it is so you can virtue signal, nevermind how many rape victims you may be convincing to commit suicide or give up on life with your charade.
None of you cowards really care about rape victims. When rape is genuinely trivialized, like in Stuebenville, none of you are anywhere to be seen.
-------------------------
The politically correct narrative is that they never do. The political correctness tells us to pretend rape is a fate worse than death and that its victims become broken, quivering husks of their former selves, even though that makes no logical sense and doesn't ring intuitively for anyone. No one wants to be the big, mean, rape apologist downplaying the severity of rape. Even if they're speaking true. Even if the narrative that rape is a fate worse than death is the reason people don't believe rape is nearly as common as it is. Even if this false narrative would make it more likely for a rape victim to commit suicide.
The fact is, rape is a temporary hijacking of your genitals. Yes, its horrible and traumatic, but if that's really the worst thing you can imagine happening to you...worse than losing a son, worse than being abandoned by everyone you love, you are an incredibly shallow and egocentric person.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, remember how after we defeated the Japanese, we put our government in charge and said "Japan, destroy our auto-industry"?
Or how after we toppled Saddam we put our government in charge of Iraq, put a gun to the Iraqi people's heads, and said "Iraqis, elect a religious Shiite into office instead of our man Allawi, deny us the right to keep any combat troops in your country in the 2008 SOFA, and let Russia use your airspace"?
Or how after we got rid of the Taliban, we put our government in charge of Afghanistan and said "Hey Afghans, write Islam into your constitution and make it illegal to convert to Christianity"?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Now I'm not saying that a white, Asian, or Hispanic person can't wear box braids, locs, or whatever else you want to wear. No, that's not what I'm saying and that's not what they're saying either"
Many of them literally are saying that. Also you baselessly assume white people are never ridiculed for adopting "black culture" when I have seen this plenty of times myself even before this bruhaha about cultural appropriation. And if black epople were never "praised, credited, and put on a pedestal" for enacting their own culture, then how do we have so many black rappers, who are 110% stereotypes, worth hundreds of millions of dollars?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Every society in recorded history had women living longer than men, even despite the dangers of child birth, and yet you believe men created societies where women were simply "used for men's needs."
It used to be men had more rights but also more responsibilities. Now women have more rights but men still have more responsibilities. A woman can chose to have an abortion in most states, but men are still held responsible for her "reproductive decisions" via child support, or via a welfare state that men pay drastically more into. Women are free to use birth control, but men are forced to pay for it (while of course there's no law that requires insurance agencies to cover vasectomies). Women are now free to join the military, but only men get conscripted, etc.
By the way, who do you think gave women the right to vote? We did, purely out of the goodness of our hearts and for no benefit to ourselves. Yet you talk like you won a coup.
Oh yeah, and women got the vote over 100 years ago, not 50.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
According to CRT, there is no reality:
In Robin DiAngelo's (along with Sensoy, Kendi, etc are movers and shakers in CRT) book "Is Everyone Really Equal?", DiAngelo posited: 1.) "All knowledge is taught from a particular perspective; the power of dominant knowledge depends in large part on its presentation as neutral and universal (Kincheloe, 2008)...*all knowledge* understood by humans is framed by the ideologies, language, beliefs, and and customs of human societies. Even the field of science is subjective” (p. 15). 2.) "Our analysis of social justice is based on a school of thought know as Critical Theory. Critical Theory refers to a body of scholarship that examines how society works, and is a tradition that emerged in the early part of the 20th century from a group of scholars at the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany [taught there by Marxists]” (p. 25) 3.) "One of the key contributions of critical theorists concerns the production of knowledge…. These scholars argue that a key element of social injustice involves the claim that particular knowledge is objective, neutral, and universal. An approach based on critical theory calls into question the idea that objectivity is desirable or even possible. The term used to describe this way of thinking about knowledge is that knowledge is socially constructed." (p. 29).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@saadx7724 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
Read it and weep, hate lover.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What this guy did was wrong and deserves more punishment, but news outlets should be focused on accurate and clear dissemination of the truth, not virtue signaling. From what I understand this was a seduction, statutory rape, and while that's still very wrong, its a lot less psychotic than violent rape. If you are running a story about someone being forgiven for a crime, it's very important to get across whether they committed crime x or a crime worse than x. Yet every outlet is just calling it "rape" in the headlines.
Using language that makes a story more ambiguous, for the sake of showing how wrong you thought an act was, is virtue signaling. If it's not virtue signalling, there's not a thing in the universe that is virtue signalling. You cannot logically dispute this, so save me your irrational, emotional responses.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn
Put your Che Guevera shirt back on, pinko.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Whenever I see the hatred the US has earned for overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I always feel like I'm living in an Orwellian, dystopian alternate timeline. Young people may never be able to understand it, but Saddam Hussein was the Kim Jung Un of his time, a leader who was just...objectively evil from the world's perspective. Imagine how you'd feel if you saw your President overthrow Kim Jung Un, and give North Koreans the right to vote, and 20 years later he became one of the most despised men in the world because of it.
When you live through that, it shifts your entire world. It's hard to believe in anything, not to be a total nihilist when it comes to foreign policy. So I have to say no, the US should not have intervened in Syria. I think, looking at history, we should pursue a policy of dealing with tyranny/genocide/terrorist the same way we dealt with Communism: containment. Don't squash it were it lives, just prevent it from crossing the borders. We did the right thing by containing Saddam when he invaded Kuwait. We messed up when we tried to squash him in his homeland.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As someone who makes just over $30,000 a year I cannot describe how much I hate people like Bernie Sanders, because people like him rob my ability to be grateful. 80% of the world makes $10 or less a day, that's measured in Purchasing Power Parity. For every four square feet of living space the average European has, the average POOR American has FIVE. 40% of all children in Asia and Africa suffer stunted growth due to malnutrition, while less than 1% of American children living under the poverty line do. If it wasn't for people like Bernie Sanders, AOC, etc. Americans would be in a constant state of euphoria. But people like him fill us with rage, bitterness, entitlement, and ingratitude for personal gain.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn
Put your Che Guevera shirt back on, pinko.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This wasn't a leftwing viewpoint at the time the video was released. You can see Bill Whittle saying the same thing in his video about three myths of the Republican Party, which was on PJTV's channel but has been reposted by a user named Jimi Goethe under the title: "Bill Whittle - Racism - Democrats and Republicans switch sides?". Steven Crowder said the same thing in his video "War Helps - A Lot."
Until recently the idea the US army could ever do anything noble was a rightwing view. That's why Steven Crowder made a video praising the marines in Haiti while the leftwing's darling Hugo Chavez was accusing the US of causing the Earthquake with a sonic weapons test. Until about ten years ago if you asked a leftist about any war the US fought they'd either side with our enemies or talk like Noam Chomsky does when interviewed about Ukraine (derail the conversation into an endless chains of whataboutisms and whining about our motives).
Here's a quote from Howard Zinn, which Runstedt1 will accuse me of misrepresenting but refuse to back up his assertion with any quotes of his own:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It was people like him who were the reason so many people died in Iraq in the first place. Iraq Body Count reports about 88% of people killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for their atrocities, every murder insurgent factions committed become their propaganda victory. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which seemed to target no one in particular and were just to "get attention."
Terrorists would blow up Iraqis. Iraqis would blame America, the Iraqi Army, and the Iraqi Police. These groups, who were meant to hunt and kill terrorists, now had a much more difficult job because people were shooting at them. This made it easier for the terrorists to terrorize, so they'd blow up more Iraqis. Which meant more Iraqis angry at Americans. And the cycle would repeat ad infinitum.
That's why peace never came to Iraq until the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqis finally admitted who was really killing them and turn their guns on them, rather than blaming America for all the violence like GDF is doing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
- Howard Zinn
Put your Che Guevara t-shirt back on, pinko. Sanitizing America's enemies and vilifying the men on our money is what's "woke", not the other way around.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
10 - 20 years ago, it was the far left who spread the kind of lies and talking points we see amongst Confederate apologists:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn, the leftist author of the most popular and anti-American textbook in universities today
Why? Because Lincoln was just another American hero for them to rob glory from, just like Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Christopher Columbus, etc. And the Confederacy was just another enemy for them to sanitize (just like the Veit Cong, Iraqi insurgents, etc.)
I despise those who take the name of conservatism in vain and call this "woke."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Trump recruited all the worst of the Democrat Party to build his base. The people who used to scream "GLOBALIST" and "ZIONIST" and "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB" were pretty much, without exception, Democrats. Van Jone and Rosie O'Donnell were well known Truthers, and as for the other two buzzwords:
“Not only do I think [a Muslim-leftist alliance is] possible, but I think it is vitally necessary and I think it is happening already. It is possible because the progressive movement around the world and the Muslims have the same enemies. Their enemies are the Zionist occupation, American occupation, British occupation of poor countries, mainly Muslim countries. They have the same interest in opposing savage capitalist *globalization*, which is intent upon homogenizing the entire world, turning us basically into factory chickens which can be force-fed the American diet of everything from food to Coca-Cola to movies and TV culture and whose only role in life is to consume the things produced endlessly by the multinational corporations.” - George Galloway
This branch of terrorist hugging, flag burning, dictator worshipping, tin-foil hat leftists is still alive and well in the party. In fact recent studies show the Truther movement still leans slightly Democrat, but they've done a mind blowingly good job of hiding it since Trump took office. Still, people like Ami Horowitz can still fundraise for the Taliban or wave an ISIS flag and get these people to show themselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's frustrating because Trump's Presidency has recruited a lot of young, niave youth who have no idea who's really steering their ship and mask the stench of what they truly are. If you made this video during the Bush or to a lesser extent Obama administration, the comments would not be filled with people saying "No, the right is like the Taliban, we have nothing in common, blah blah blah." It would be full liberals embracing the analogy, painting the Taliban has helpless victims of American Imperialism, saying how the US brought 9/11 on itself or that 9/11 was an inside job, etc.
The left has done such an incredible job masking its true colors in the last few years. But never forget which side called the victims of 9/11 "Little Eichmans", whose political career started out in the living room of terrorist bomber Bill Ayers and whose pastor said "Goddamn America, we brought this on ourselves" on 9/11. Never forget which side had high profile Truthers like Van Jones and Rosie O'Donnell serving openly in their ranks. Never forget which side, who now claims they want democracy in everything, even in the work place, was telling us democracy is just an arbitrary Western choice of lifestyle and if you believe people who don't already have it want it you are a Nazi and Imperialist.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The simple truth is, people support socialism because they're spoiled. While barefoot mothers in Sri Lanka are living corrigated tin shacks with dirt floors, washing clothing in the nearby river, they simply can't comprehend their life in their 1,000 square foot apartment, with air conditioning, clean water, internet access, Netflix, a water tight door, refrigeration, etc. could get any worse. So they cry "We have nothing to lose but our chains" and blindly follow any alternative to the current system.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TroubleinZION Oh please. First off, the average man transfers $250,000 to the average woman over his life time because men pay more income tax and women are the primary recipients of social assistance. The NFL raises money for breast cancer, what women's organization raises money for prostate cancer? Infact women's diseases get twice as much funding while men die five years earlier. And you want to talk about warring? First off, historical studies show female leaders are more likely to lead their people into war and by a significant margin. Second, women have always enjoyed special protections in war and times of violence. Look at Hamas. They released the women and children hostages almost immediately, while the men are still prisoners a year later, or dead. Boko Haram kidnapped 10,000 boys for conscription as child soldiers, and the world barely noticed. Boko Haram burned 100+ boys alive in their dormitories while leaving girls alone, the world barely noticed. Boko Haram kidnaps 250 girls, though, and the world loses its mind.
Oh by the way, you want to talk about sexual abuse. Look up the words "made to penetrate" and see how the CDC hides male rape victims of female perpetrators.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1) Matt was 23 when he said those things and claims they were never an endorsement of impregnating teenagers.
2) All the countries you love so much and want the US to emulate, like Canada, Sweden, Denmark, have ages of consent 16 or lower and people like you never make a peep about that.
3) Pedophilia is sexualizing of prepubescent children, not teenagers. You want to see what Matt is talking about? Look up Dalton First Grade Sex Ed, look up the All Ages Sex Shop, look up Sexy Summer Camp, look up BDSM teddy bears, etc. So even if Matt Walsh did support marrying teenage girls, he still wouldn't be a hypocrite.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nathanielalgernon975 they can get other jobs, and if they can’t they need disability benefits, not Social Security. Further, as Matt said, many people on SS are millionaires. Like I said, the fact that in a world where hundreds of millions go without food, clean water, medical care, and shelter, a 15 year paid vacation is the one human entitlement you are not allowed to question, the one sacred cow, the one thing we’d let destroy society rather than the other way around, is just amazing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@oh.s
"Black, Red, Yellow, and White, all are precious in Jesus' sight." - Jesus Loves the Little Children
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. Let all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen! Say Amen! And Amen!" - Joseph Lowery, Obama's Inauguration 2008
If it was "solidified" as racist this was a very recent thing and something the "Asian American" community decided for themselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No, but the vast majority of them were killed by the side you were rooting for:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists." - John Slobeda, Iraq Body Count
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Its just surreal to think the most hated man in the world is the one who helped overthrow Saddam Hussein. It's like we're living in some kind of dystopian, Orwellian, alternate timeline. Saddam was the Kim Jung Un of his time, a leader 90% of people considered unambiguously evil. Imagine if someone overthrew Kim Jung Un, gave North Koreans the right to vote, and then became the most hated man on Earth 20 years later.
I wish Blair would come to America. He deserves better than his homeland. You throw your leaders under the bus to appease those who hate your country, rather than waste a molecule of effort on true patriotism, and then are shocked when the refugees you let in hate your country too.
The Iraq War was a mistake, but it was an understandable one. Think about it this way: If the Iraqis had tried to launch a democratic revolution of their own, and Tony Blair had intervened on behalf of Saddam Hussein on the basis that Iraq was better off with him in power, or Iraqis didn't want democracy, or whatever else the "anti-war" crowd told us, he would go down as history's greatest monster. But why? If those things were really true, he'd have done nothing wrong. But we live in a world of absolute moral delusion. No one cares about having a coherent ethical philosophy any more. They just take the easy route and appease those who hate them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
🤮
If you make over $45,000 a year, you are in the one percent of the world economy. You've never been within a hundred miles of true poverty in your life. Yet here you are pretending to be a starving proletariat, rallying the masses. And you want to label someone else an "insufferable, whiggish little prick".
Back when "there used to be important common resources which communities could use to satisfy their needs in a sustainable manner", the life expectancy was about 25 years old. People like you have the nerve to cry that healthcare is a human rights yet then paint idyllic pictures of stone age societies that didn't even have penicillin. You call housing a human right but then want to take us back to the days everyone lived in tents. You say "overall health is decreasing even as medicine improves" but YOU don't even know what you mean by that. People are longer lived than ever before in history, and are several inches taller than their ancestors centuries back due to better nutrition.
If a 40 hour work week was the norm, explain the Sabbath. The Jews took one day off a week, not two, and this was considered controversial. For example, the Romans thought this was debauchery and encouraged idleness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ShnoogleMan It's the entire left, but its many on the left. The idea white people, and only white people, are born with evil DNA, although never stated outright, is a common theme among leftist thought. Whether its Slate writing an article saying "The White Men Must Be Stopped, The Future of Mankind Depends on It" or Nick Cannon saying white people have less compassion, less of a soul, and are closure to animals, but then only getting cancelled for "Anti-Semitism."
When you believe certain people are born with sin, it hardens your heart and makes justifying discrimination against them easier. Do you think anyone could deny a disabled farmer COVID relief in good conscience, based the fact he was white, if they didn't believe white people were born with sin?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
From now on whenever I see someone on the streets, I'm going to greet them with "Hello, bonjour, hola, nǐ hǎo, salve, goddag, konnichiwa, shikamoo, goedendag, shalom, selemat siang, merhaba, privet, bziara umaz, halo, anouho, pranam, assalaam 'alaikum, bula, nnọọ, vidza olannyd, sabaidi, kia ora, namastē, hallo, buna ziau, ia ora na, cześć, xin chào, helo, mwaramutse, ciao, pẹlẹ o, sawubona" to avoid being racist by making assumptions.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@alexrockstone9035 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Although I'm not fond of the idea of impregnating 16 year olds, and I'm sure Matt Walsh isn't today if he ever was, society needs to have a serious conversation about how it treats those we used to call "young adults." Youth suicide, 13 - 25, is at an all time high. "Teenage angst" is starting to extend into the early 20s and for 99% of human history, teenage angst was not a thing. Teenagers were stereotyped as happy-go-lucky, in fact. Why? Because nature wanted them to be adults, and that's how they were treated. For all of human history until K-12 was introduced, adolescence was adulthood. Pre-industrial societies like tribal societies in the Amazon still operate this way.
We need to recognize adolescence is, at best, a necessary evil. Instead, we're expanding this evil more and more. I'm passionate about this because I grew up a pampered rich kid who didn't get his first job until 23. When I met another guy with an identical upbringing, it was like a meeting of kindred spirits. We both felt the same way: our upbringing held us back, made us immature for our age, and seriously impeded our development as members of adult society.
If you treat someone as a child, they'll be a child indefinitely.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, America is such a cesspit of imperialism. Remember when we won WWII and put a gun to the heads of the Japanese people, put our government in charge, and said "Japan, destroy our auto-industry?" Or when we toppled Saddam Hussein, we put our government in charge, put a gun to the heads of the Iraqi people said "Iraqis, elect Sadrists into parlaiment, deny us the right to leave any combat troops in your country in the 2008 SOFA, and let Russia use your airspace. Oh and make sure our preferred candidate, Allawi, barely has his candidacy register on the ballot."
Yes, America is such a cesspit of racism. Remember how we made the most powerful man in the world (Barack Obama) and the richest woman in the world (Oprah Winfrey) out of a black man and black woman.
Yes, America is such a cesspit of exploitation. Just ignore the median household income, measured in purchasing power parity, is higher than all but five nations, one of which is a micro-state (Luxembourg), and that for every four square feet of living space the average Western European has, the average American under the poverty line has FIVE.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Just an hour ago I read an article on Ed Weekly that said white teachers should be forced "to take classes such as African studies, African-American studies, Latinx studies, Caribbean studies, Chicana/o studies, Asian and Southeast Asian studies, and Native American studies" before teaching 'students of color.'
So the races are so fundamentally different we need to take college courses before interacting with each other? This implies the difference between black people and white people are on par with the differences between teaching 15 year olds and 5 years olds. How can you accept the premises of these woke people and not support segregation!?
The article then goes on to say:
"There also needs to be a push to recruit future teachers of color as early as high school, pay for their college education, and mentor them when they enter the classroom. Research consistently shows that teachers of color have higher expectations of students of color, which leads to more students of color referred to gifted programs. Moreover, having a teacher of color helps students confront issues of racism."
If it's so significant when the race of the teacher matches the race of the student, why not repeal Brown vs. Board of Education? Have blacks teach blacks, and whites teach whites, like the good old days.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The West 1940: "We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender. And even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."
The West 2023: "4 month stalemate? Lol I give up."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MeinungMann Sorry to burst your hate-bubble, but the overwhelming majority of civilians were killed by the people those marines were here to kill and capture.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists." - John Slobeda, Iraq Body Count
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You don't know that. If we intervened in Rwanda, one of two things would have happened.
1) We would have stopped the genocide, but the Noam Chomskies of the world would say genocide was a false pretext and never would have happened on a large scale and we were just there to defend American corporate interests (and yes, you can spin literally anything the US does that way. Afghanistan was one of the most resource poor countries on Earth and people still said we were there for Cobalt or some nonsense).
2) US interventionism would have just delayed the inevitable, and generated more anger at the Tutsis we were intervening on behalf of. Once the US pulled out, the massacres would happen anyway. Far worse, people would spin it as America's fault, being unaware of what happened in the current timeline we inhabit where America didn't intervene.
If the US can't even overthrow Saddam, who was basically the Kim Jung Un of his time (a leader considered unambiguously evil by 90% of the world), it's hard to imagine we could ever do anything that would earn the world's gratitude. The world's going to suck no matter what, at least if we stay out of it, people can't blame us for their problems.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheIsPurple The wage gap has been debunked 1000 times, it doesn't control for things like commutes, hours worked, experience, and it groups people pediatricians and neuro-surgeons toghether as "doctors". It doesn't even apply to non-married women, and if you're married, your wage is his wage so who cares who makes more? Women don't want autonomy, autonomy is full rights WITH FULL RESPONSIBILITY! Autonomy would mean no maternity leave, no one pays for your birth control, no one pays your child support, no one pays your welfare, etc. Even Social Security is just another way to make men take care of women. Men die much earlier and retire slightly later than women. We pay much more into the system and take much less out, so SS alone causes a huge transfer of wealth from men to women.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Niobesnuppa There is no other context where we bring up this "power imbalance" boogeyman. When two people commit a crime, you don't charge the younger person differently based on the relative age of his accomplice. People manipulate people. Some people are very good at it, others aren't, age has very little to do with it.
Not to mention, older people are more moral and less likely to be abusive. Statistics show a guy is most likely to hit his girlfriend at age 16 (yes, you read that right), and the probability decreases consistently from that point onwards.
Then there's the obvious benefits of having an older, wiser partner. If your daughter was an airhead, and brought home the class Valedictorian for dinner, would you say "Oh noes, he's smarter than her! He'll manipulate her!!!" No, you'd say "Phew, she found someone mature and well put together who will keep her out of trouble."
The only defense I see for being more worried about an older partner is 1) stats show relationships with age gaps are less likely to last, and its a stark correlation 2) I don't want my daughter's husband dying 15 years before her.
1
-
@davidparry5310 Teenagers are not "niave, impressionable, and easily manipulated." Have you worked with teenagers? They're stubborn and arrogant asf. They have little to no sense of respect for elders or authority. That's why they're such a nightmare to parent.
This whole argument about "power imbalances" makes my blood boil. I dated a woman who was 8 years older than me and I could read her like a book. On other hand, when I was in Middle School, I had a "friend" (similar age to me, obviously) who played me and another friend of mine like a fiddle for his sadistic pleasure. My sister was in an emotionally abusive relationship, but that was with someone close to her age. And the one time I was scammed out of thousands of dollars, I was 26 years old.
I was involved heavily in online communities with adults as a teenager. Never ever do I feel like they had some mind control powers over me as a "niave and innocent" teenager, even looking back. If anything, my stubbornness was the problem, and made me many enemies.
So throughout my life I've seen people manipulate others, and never once did it fit this "niave teenager, predatory adult" model.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You need to look up accounts of North African and Ottoman slavery:
"At the office all the morning. At noon to the Exchange to meet Mr. Warren the timber merchant, but could not meet with him. Here I met with many sea commanders, and among others Captain Cuttle, and Curtis, and Mootham, and I, went to the Fleece Tavern to drink; and there we spent till four o’clock, telling stories of Algiers, and the manner of the life of slaves there! And truly Captn. Mootham and Mr. Dawes (who have been both slaves there) did make me fully acquainted with their condition there: as, how they eat nothing but bread and water. At their redemption they pay so much for the water they drink at the public fountaynes, during their being slaves. How they are beat upon the soles of their feet and bellies at the liberty of their padron. How they are all, at night, called into their master’s Bagnard; and there they lie."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because we protect free speech, because we are the greatest humanitarian force in all of human history (10 million Africans have been saved by PEPFAR in the last 15 years), because we keep tyranny around the world at bay, because for every four square feet of living space the average Western European has, the average poor American has five, because our median household income (measured in Purchasing Power Parity) is one of the top five in the world, because our people ranked in the top 2 most charitable countries on Earth in all four surveys conducted by The World Giving Index, because we are the world leader in technology, because our corporations have lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty via their evil, greedy outsourcing, and some other things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hi4806 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
Who killed most of the Muslims, sir? Crunch the numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jesus Christ...
1) Richard is a leftist so of course he doesn't mention proven grading biases against male students.
2) Women work harder? Every statistic shows the opposite. Women take more sick days and work fewer hours, work less inconvenient shifts, work less dangerous jobs, etc.
3) Unpaid labor in families? Give me a f***ing break. It's a joint account. What would "paid labor" look like exactly? Does a man put half his earnings in the joint account, and then give half to a special bank account just for you? Is that equality?
Yes, men are over-represented at the top of society, but we are also over-represented at the bottom. But society shames us for both facts. When women can't make it to the top, people cry sexism, even if there's no proof of that (for example, women make up only a small minority of politicians, but when they chose to run they are just as likely to win as men). When men wallow at the bottom (homelessness, drug addiction, prisons), we're called losers, even when there's proven sexism against us (like the significantly longer sentences men get for the same crimes).
The playing field is not level. Teachers are biased against boys. All gender specific scholarships are for women. Women have the reproductive rights, and men get raped by the family courts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cariwaldick4898 How much clearer can I make it? It costs trillions of dollars to support these retirement pensions. That money could be going to curing cancer patients, sending kids to college, supporting those who are genuinely incapable of working (which is what disability benefits are for, not retirement pensions), *or letting people currently busting their asses in the work force keep more of what they earn*. Yet it goes to people who simply don't feel like working anymore instead? What kind of moral nihilism is that? Of all the things that could be human rights, why should that be one?
Don't give me that crap about "Oh, but they paid into the system, they deserve that money back!!!" First off, with life expectancy increasing, people will be getting MORE than they paid into the system if the retirement age isn't raised, at the next generation's expense. Second, every Social Program creates this kind of injustice, and you leftists never ever are bothered by it in the slightest in any other case. A doctor or lawyer will contribute 10X as much to France's pension funds as anyone else, yet still not be able to take out any more than anyone else. They'll pay hundreds of thousands into the system they never get back but this doesn't bother you.
it's just moral common sense retirement should not be the governments business. If someone is literally incapable of working, that's what disability benefits are for. But if you can't eliminate this ponzi scheme entirely we should at least erode it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"The corporations are running things now, so it's not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He's a warmonger. He's a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush." - Kurt Vonnegat
"The fact he wants to keep us in wars in the Middle East for 100 years, that's not a good thing. I give Obama credit, he seems to have stuck to his guns as far as pulling the troops out of Iraq. He's a very intelligent man, an excellent speaker and has charisma. John McCain offers none of that." - Michael Moore
"Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for [...]capitalist exploitation, [...] basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush." - Noam Chomsky
All of those are real quotes, just said by Tom Metzger, Eric Gleibe, Rocky Suhayda respectively. The left likes to feign ignorance the fact the alt-right/Neo-Nazis/KKK were their best friends until they started coming after Confederate statues.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blackknightjack3850 Yes, and they were either wishy-washy or anti-slavery.
“You know that nobody wishes more ardently to see an abolition not only of the trade but of the condition of slavery: and certainly nobody will be more willing to encounter every sacrifice for that object.” -Thomas Jefferson to Brissot de Warville, February 11, 1788
"[King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither." - Thomas Jefferson, deleted passage from the Declaration of Independence
"I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - George Washington
"Not only do I pray for it, on the score of human dignity, but I can clearly forsee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our union, by consolidating it in a common bond of principle." - George Washington
"I am the master of slaves of my own purchase. I am drawn along by the general inconvenience of living here without them. I will not, I cannot justify it." - Patrick Henry
Yes, they ironically owned slaves. Make of that what you will. But their political position was against slavery. And why would they lie about this if the revolution was fought to preserve slavery?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stumpy32 "Are you literally arguing for all citizens to work a full-time job until the day they die? Are you a fking idiot? OK let me break down your moronic comment:"
I would ask if you're an idiot but we already know the answer is yes. I'm not arguing people should be forced to do anything, but they shouldn't have the government steal their money so it can set their life on a predetermined path. I should be able to decide to save that money for my retirement or not, instead of having it taken from me and being given no choice. If people end up working full time jobs until they day they croak, so what? If we can say working full time is an unthinkable horror at 63, why not at 33?
"I really don't understand how you think that the government is funding retirement. All of these sources of retirement funding belong to THE WORKER. The worker paid into it during their career, they are entitled to it."
For God's sake, by this logic the government doesn't fund anything. Where do you think the government gets its tax dollars for.
"There's nothing to 'justify', it's the workers' own money. It's really very simple."
1) With life expectancy increasing, everyone who retires gets more into the system than they take out of. If you worked from 20 - 65, during that time period, the average person might have lived the retired life for ten years and you paid for that. Then you retire and live 20. Where does the funding for that extra 10 come from? It's not from you.
2) When have you leftists ever cared about workers getting back what they contribute into the system? Isn't the whole point of Social Programs is to ensure this kind of injustice happens? What's the point of giving the government $10 just to get $10 back? The reason things like Social Security exist is precisely so people who didn't contribute to the system can still take money out of it, and those who contributed little can still take out a disproportionate amount.
"Everyone on earth ages and loses physical functioning"
Then cover this with disability benefits. Also why are the French losing this functionality so much quicker than everyone else? A retirement age of 62 or younger is unheard of almost anywhere in the world.
"or you force those people to work full-time jobs to support themselves until the day they die (which would literally be impossible for the many jobs that require heavy physical labor)."
And many jobs don't. Why can't someone work a physically intensive job until they're fifty, and then move to a less physically demanding role?
"If you support this, you are a very cruel person (and stupid, because that path is NOT SUSTAINABLE)."
Lol, because its totally sustainable for French people to spend literally half their lives as dependents, first as minors, then as retirees. Also, again, France's retirement age is unusually low. Why is it sustainable for Canadians to retire at 65 but the French can't retire at 64?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not against gay marriage, I just wish it wasn't such a sacred cow. Our world has lips surgically glued to gay people's asses. We can openly disparage relationships with age gaps, but dare express that you disagree with homosexual relationships and you're crucified. Homosexuals and bisexuals have 2X the suicide rate of heterosexuals, and this has been stagnant for 20 years, even as gay acceptance has skyrocketed. That suggests these relationships could be psychologically damaging.
People need to stop ignoring the natural order of things. Does anyone truly believe pedophilia (I'm talking about sex acts with prepubescent children) is so damaging simply because kids are stupid? Animals are dumber than pre-schoolers, but they're not traumatized by mating. No, I think its intuitive it's not just that, especially when pedophilia leads to psychological abnormalities such as victims being pedophiles (people with a strong and exclusive attraction to prepubescent children) themselves.
Similarly, look at teenage angst. For 99% of human history, teenagers were adults, but we treat them like kids. As a result, they are miserable. This is the price we pay for ignoring the natural order of things. Maybe adolescence is a necessary evil, but its still an evil, and yet people only seem to want to extend it, ignoring the trauma and dysfunction caused by this unnatural system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yet you literally said I was "Judgemental, dumb, ignorant, unknowing, vindictive, selfish, cruel, unkind, alarming, foolish words, and every paragraph an opinionated dictum to mistruth. There is plenty to endure well after a Sexual Assault. Plenty. & on & on it can & does go" for saying people could ever recover from rape and weren't left, and I quote "broken, quivering husks of their former selves."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"What makes [nation] unique,' [politician] said, 'is the diversity of our peoples. One of [nation's] goal is to preserve and enhance this unity in diversity, which has always been our strength and remains our best hope for the future.'
If [politician] is serious about achieving that goal, a long look in the mirror might be in order first. Despite the government's new catchphrase, racial and religious tensions are higher today than when [politician] took office in 2009. Indeed, they are worse than at any time since 1969, when at least 200 people died in racial clashes between the [race] and [race]. The recent deterioration is due to the troubling fact that the country's leadership is tolerating, and in some cases provoking, ethnic factionalism through words and actions."
Guess what country this excerpt from the Wall Street Journal is talking about. Here's a hint, it's not America.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ar71498
"Here I met with many sea commanders, and among others Captain Cuttle, and Curtis, and Mootham, and I, went to the Fleece Tavern to drink; and there we spent till four o’clock, telling stories of Algiers, and the manner of the life of slaves there! And truly Captn. Mootham and Mr. Dawes (who have been both slaves there) did make me fully acquainted with their condition there: as, how they eat nothing but bread and water. At their redemption they pay so much for the water they drink at the public fountaynes, during their being slaves. How they are beat upon the soles of their feet and bellies at the liberty of their padron. How they are all, at night, called into their master’s Bagnard; and there they lie. How the poorest men do use their slaves best. How some rogues do live well, if they do invent to bring their masters in so much a week by their industry or theft; and then they are put to no other work at all. And theft there is counted no great crime at all." - Samuel Pepys
Funny how 'everyone was nasty throughout history' is white supremacy. But 'white people's slavery must have been worse because white people are uniquely predisposed to evil' is equality.
1
-
1
-
@mhorworshipper7456 95% of domestic abuse is not perpetrated by men. Domestic violence charities just know they can tug on people's heart strings with female victims of male abuse, while the reverse just makes people laugh. Statistics show women are actually more likely to hit their partners, men are do more damage. Your statistics on the witch trials are also way off. Not only was it half that many, but that was over 150 years, not 1 year. The expectation for intercourse with your spouse went both ways. Women weren't allowed to open bank accounts because men were responsible for their debts, and this practice (men being held responsible for their wife's debts) actually lasted longer than women being unable to manage their own money (look up Mark Wilkes, the guy who went to jail for not paying his wife's taxes). Women are more likely to get injured in car crashes because they have weaker bones, and that'll be the case no matter which dummies you use. Also, men don't even have the option of taking birth control because none was made for us, and yet you are saying WOMEN are oppressed because they have the option of taking those risks?
For most of human history labor was very physically intensive, and women had to be constantly pregnant to maintain the population, because infant mortality was so high, and of course you can't do physically intensive labor when you're pregnant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Confederate states had slavery. The fact they fought and died to preserve it show they genuinely believed the system was righteous. That's an ugly thing, but still better than the alternative that the people of the Southern States were simply callous, amoral, greedy, selfish cowards who simply allowed slavery to continue because "Why not, lol." That latter narrative also wouldn't make sense because slavery was extremely harmful to non-slave holding whites, who couldn't compete with unpaid labor.
Slavery was just another social hysteria that gripped a culture and infiltrated religion and compelled them to do horrible things, like Aztec human sacrifice, the Indian caste system, Chinese footbinding, etc.
1
-
@Rundstedt1 Okay, somehow you don't have a problem with me labeling the Indian caste system and Aztec human sacrifice as "hysteria", that's interesting. Christianity was on both sides of the slavery debate, but it was Christian society that ultimately led the abolitionist movement, while it was anti-religious groups like the Nazis and the Communists that brought it into the 20th century, with hundreds of millions of people enslaved in China, Russia, Cambodia etc. to build Communist economies.
You don't even attempt to think about what words "cowardly" or "selfish" or "greedy" means. Greed and selfishness is sacrificing your principles for personal gain. Cowardess is refusing to let harm come to yourself. Someone who doesn't own slaves but dies for slavery is many things, but "selfish", "greedy", and "cowardly" are not any of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reviewreviewer1 Why should I believe "the majority doesn't want majority rule" any more eagerly than I should believe "slaves want to be slaves?" Why would they? If slaves like their masters, they can just go back to working for their masters after slavery is an abolished. If people believe their king is chosen by God, why can't they just re-elect their king? Granted, it's usually never that simple, but then that's not democracy that's the problem, it's something else (the structure of government specified in the constitution, for instance).
Yes, many people do not support democracy *in principle*, but the results of a democratic election would still better reflect the will of the people than lack there of. For example, there may be two kings vying for power. Every one of their supporters may be thinking "I will support my man no matter how many of my countrymen disagree", but the best way to placate the will of the greatest number of people in the country would still be a democratic election in between the two.
What does "imposing it through occupation" even mean? Why not say the French and Spanish were imposing themselves through occupation during the American Revolution? Their militaries were on our land, influencing our political destiny. Were we also forcing ourselves on Panama, even though polls show 91% of Panamanians approved of the US intervention in their country? We invaded and occupied their country, using our military to change their political destiny. Give me just one reason you think we shouldn't have assumed the Panamanians were content with Noriega the same way we are supposed to assume everyone else is content with their dictators.
You're basically working with the assumption that any government that already exists in a country, the people must want it. If people don't have democracy already, they don't want it. By then why do you support counter-revolutions against Communist governments? Isn't the fact the Communists are in power proof they are content with that system?
Further, if you read polls taken from Iraqis during the Iraq War, "democracy" was always the most popular form of government they would choose. But let's assume they didn't want democracy. You'd be deciding their future based on a vote to reject the notion that their future should be decided based on a vote. That's the political equivalent of "This statement is false."
You're arguing against majority rule based on appeal to majority, some part of you must realize how surreal this discussion is.
1
-
@reviewreviewer1 Okay, let me put it this way. If the overwhelming majority of people support the divine right of the king to rule, what have they lost with democracy? They just vote the king back into power.
The Founding Fathers believed the majority is not always right. They didn't oppose majority rule based on appeal to majority, which is exactly what you are doing.
I'm saying not "The majority is right unless they say the majority isn't right." I'm saying its always a safe assumption that majority rule is the best way to the will of a country's people expressed. You are making the ASSUMPTION that anyone who doesn't already have democracy doesn't want it, which is demonstrably false, and then using that assumption to argue against "forcing" democracy.
If you actually find yourself in a case where the majority doesn't want democracy, you find yourself in a mind-bending Cache-22 where you either support democracy by opposing democracy, or oppose democracy by supporting democracy. Since you can't give a correct answer to that question anymore than "This statement is false", it's best to just assume the people would want democracy.
Why didn't the US government overthrow Franco or Salazar? First off, I never said the US government has always been right. Nor do I think we should overthrow every undemocratic government, because we have our own interests to worry about and sometimes its not worth the bloodshed. But I would never ever assume that the people there "don't want democracy" and that if we could just wave a magic wand and bring them elections we shouldn't do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807
Stop writhing in your anti-American euphoria for one minute think about those numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So don't listen to facts, reason, or logic, because we live in a biased society and your conclusions therefore can't be trusted? That sounds like what you are saying.
Reminds me of a quote from Evan Sayet's famous 2007 speech:
"What happens is, they are indoctrinated into what I call a 'cult of indiscriminateness.' The way the elite does this is by teaching our children, starting with the very young, that rational and moral thought is an act of bigotry; that no matter how sincerely you may seek to gather the facts, no matter how earnestly you may look at the evidence, no matter how disciplined you may try to be in your reasoning, your conclusion is going to be so tainted by your personal bigotries, by your upbringing, by your religion, by the color of your skin, by the nation of your great-great-great-great-great grandfather's birth; that no matter what your conclusion, it is useless. It is nothing other than the reflection of your bigotries, and the only way to eliminate bigotry is to eliminate rational thought."
I will never forgive Trump for bringing all the worst of the Democrat Party over here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dear unspeakably despicable liberals,
If you are against this, why do you support ANY government programs that offer a specific resource? Why don't we get rid of medicaid, subsidized housing, and foodstamps and just give cash handouts. If someone spends all their food stamps allowance on a videogame...well, they must just really like videogames! Nothing to scammy going on here! Maybe they are willing to starve the rest of month because they just love COD so much! If someone spends money allotted to them for a life saving surgery on new sneakers, that's okay, right? Nothing to see here! If someone spends the aid the government gives them for rent on a trip to a five star spa, ensuring they will be homeless the next month, who cares? It must be their birthday, right!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bennie_x Christ alive, there is so much wrong with that second sentence. Stop bastardizing the term pedophile. Pedophiles don't care about "power dynamics". Was Jenny in Forest Gump a pedophile? Forest's brain was so underdeveloped his favorite book was Curious George. What about the woman in "The Shape of Water"? That fishman thing never, never spent a day outside capitivty, and may have been no more intelligent than a dog. Yet both movies were considered beautiful lover stories. Second, if pedophilia is about power, than does the reverse apply? If I have the hots for someone who looks like a 7 year old girl, but is actually a 700 year old immortal vampire, am I normal?
Second, that nonsense about power imbalance is just that. When I was in Middle School I had a "friend" who constantly manipulated me and everyone around him for his sick kicks. It messed me up so much I made me averse to friendship in my High School years and I spent all my social life online in generally adult communities. Yet never was I seriously manipulated, or felt like I could have been seriously manipulated, by the other people there simply on basis of them being older.
Parents can't even control their 15 year old daughters any more than their peers can for Christ's sake. What kind of power does a 50 year old have over a 23 year old on basis of an age gap?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It was the people you were rooting for who killed the vast majority of "poor people"
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 to 122,000. Do the math. The insurgency was so evil that in the place where they de facto won, called the Sunni Triangle, half the insurgents switched sides and joined the US because they were horrified at what they witnessed from their allies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos.
Over the course of a lifetime, however, I have come to realize that while society was right about males, it was wrong about females. Whether spoken or unspoken, most people thought that girls just didn’t need to be raised to control their natures nearly as much as boys did."
Those are the first four paragraphs of the article. It's funny how Dennis Prager is sexist for thinking both genders are fallen in their own way, but when the left says men are uniquely predisposed to evil its called equality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is simply nothing more evil than run of the mill Western leftism. Not Nazism, not a Communism. Nothing. Hitler could kill millions, but he could never murder the human spirit like leftism did. 50 years ago, the average Frenchman lived to 73 and worked 1800 hours a week. Now he lives until 82, 20 years being taken care of by the tax payers, after working 1500 hours a week. Yet is he happier? No, he's more full of rage, bitterness, and self-pity than anytime in a history. We have this sickness in the United States, and its almost as bad, but not quite there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bobgenghiskhan1397 Yes. In order for an employee to hired, they have to generate at least as much revenue for a business as they are paid. You have no idea how much productivity $15 an hour really represents, and how difficult it is for a new business to put an employee in a position where they can be worth that much. Restaurants, as it is, already run razor thin profit margins. If an employee serves one $15 meal every hour, he has not nearly made himself with $15 an hour, because that to make that meal farmers had to farm the food, truckers had to truck the food, a chef had to prepare the food, someone had to extract the natural gas from the Earth to run the stove, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don't you dare call this woke.
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn, the leftist author of the most popular and anti-American textbook in universities today
Up until very recently it was you leftists who were spouting these neo-Confederate talking points. Not because you had any love for the South, but because your blistering hatred of your country refused to allow you to admit the US Army ever fought a noble war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because you're using the literal/classical definition of liberal and conservative, not the modern, political definitions. The Founding Fathers were strong advocates of gun rights, local power, free rather than state owned enterprise, etc. All things which would be considered conservative today.
And in fact with WWII you're not using any definition of liberal or conservative at all. Hitler was against gun rights, wanted government intervention in the economy, and supported abortion as long as it wasn't abortion of healthy, Aryan children (most abortions in the US). Also we all know whose side he'd be on in the Israel/Palestine conflict.
Here's what an actual Neo-Nazi, the chair man of the American Nazi Party in fact, said about the 2008 Presidential election:
"White people are faced with either a negro or a total nutter who happens to have a pale face. Personally I'd prefer the negro. National Socialists are not mindless haters. Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for Judeo-capitalist exploitation, who supports the invasion of America by illegals--basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women--when usually negroes who have 'made it' immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize--that's the kind of negro that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it's good for all racially minded folks. Besides, America cares nothing for the interests of the white American worker, while having a love affair with just about every non-white on planet Earth. It'd be poetic justice to have a non-white as titular chief over this decaying modern Sodom and Gomorrah."
Does that sound like a rightwinger to you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really? So why is that everyone and their dog knows about things like the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, "Native American Genocide", the Crusades, Spanish Conquest and subjugation of Latin America, and the Holocaust, but the Genocide of the Dzunghar, the Arab Slave trade, the Ainu of Japan, Bantu Expansionism, Islamic Conquest, the crimes of Imperial Japan, etc. etc. are far less well known not just in America but the world?
It is has long been deeply ingrained in our culture that slavery, genocide, and imperialism are "white" things. It's where the term "white devil" comes from. It why Nick Cannon said melanin means more compassion. It's what Dave Chappelle joked about in his bit "Could you imagine if people could say whatever they wanted to each other, racially". The only reason many people know better now is thanks to teh internetz and rightwing counter culture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, this is the kind of video leftists used to dismiss as jingoist propaganda. Hence why Howard Zinn said:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
Now Runstedt will accuse me of misrepresenting Zinn's words or taking them out of context but won't provide any evidence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I will say I have a tiny nugget understanding for what those men did and it is a bit less ghoulish than it seems on the surface. I was in a vaguely similar situation with a girl who's life had spiralled into tragedy and I was having kind of an intimate, unofficial, quasi-relationship with. The situation is complicated and not worth elaborating on, but the gist is I was messing around with other girls at the time. We (the tragedy struck one and I) were never officially together, and in fact once after wondering if what I was doing was immoral, I asked her if she saw what we had as a relationship and she said "I don't know", so its a far cry form cheating on a spouse, but I definitely think she would have been highly unhappy to find out I was messing with other women. It wasn't simply that I was a horny pig though, it's that I couldn't have all my heart focused on tragedy. That would have been too draining. They might have had a similar mentality: in order to keep their spirits up, they couldn't be focusing on. Still, like I said, it is a far cry from their situation, because we weren't in an official relationship, much less married.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A white man entered a safe space. A black man said: "Only people of color are allowed here." The white man man stood up and turned around saying: "Listen sir... when I was born, I was pink. When I grew up, I was white. When I'm sick, I'm green. When I go in the sun, I turn red. When I'm cold, I'm blue. When I die, I turn purple. But you sir... When you're born, you're black. When you grow up, you're black. When you're sick, you're black. When you go to the sun, you're black. When you're cold, you're black. When you die, you're black. And you have the nerve to say I'm not a person of color?!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As an atheist I can confidently say Jesus would never a be a socialist. Saying Jesus would be a socialist because he helped the poor is like saying would be an organ thief because they donated their blood. Jesus believed in philanthropy (giving away your money by your own free will) and study after study shows one's philanthropy is inversely proportional their support for socialism. Americans are more charitable than Europeans, and conservatives are more charitable than liberals (by every measure). In the West, socialism means complaining about the 1% in your country, while you are probably in the top 1% of the world economy ($34,000 or more a year) and give absolutely nothing to the 80% of the human population makes 10 dollars or less a day. Socialism is crying big mean Republicans won't let you buy steak and lobster with your food stamps (not a joke, look it up on The Young Turks), while 1/3rd of children in Africa and Asia suffer stunted growth due to malnutrition. Socialism is calling someone greedy for not paying for your $50,000 surgery, while you spent money that could have saved the life of a child in the third world on your new cellphone. Do you think Jesus would embrace such a cowardly, hypocritical, self-centered ideology, that is fueled by envy and ingratitude? I've donated thousands of dollars to charity over the course of my life and the more I donate, the more I hate socialism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If most men never support women, how the hell did women get their rights in the first place? If they had agency to bring it about themselves, that would mean they weren't an oppressed class.
Women's diseases get 2X - 5X more funding than men's diseases while men die five years earlier. 200 girls getting kidnapped by Boko Haram was a global outrage while 10,000 boys kidnapped to become child soldiers for Boko Haram was barely reported, nor were the 100 boys burned alive in their dormitories by Boko Haram not long before that. When a man so much as pushes a woman, every guy in the vicinity mobs him. Women a woman beats up a man, people watch and laugh. When women have to keep it in their pants for the amount of time it takes to save up for a $30 bottle of birth control pills, it's considered a national travesty. But men who don't want to pay child support are just told to keep it in our pants for our entire lives. Conversely when John Andrew Weldon slipped his girlfriend an abortion pill it was called an "unspeakable crime" by a female news reporter, but no one dares even broach the subject of man's right to protect his unborn child. Just watch any "What Would You Do" video where they try an experiment with two different genders: whether its a person collapsing or someone getting their drink spiked, 10X as many people are always there to help the women. We let women fight in the military, but never draft them. In what world do "men almost never support women"?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I see that you are planning to hire someone whose job it will be to prevent 'cultural appropriation.' It occurred to me when I read that, that the last official I know of whose job was to prevent cultural appropriation was Hans Hinkel. So who was he? When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, as you may know, every Jew in any cultural position was fired. My father was a young assistant director at the Berlin City Opera and he and his boss, Dr. Kurt Singer, also a Jew, lost their jobs. My father had the idea of telling the Nazis, 'Okay, you say we're a different culture; well then, you logically need to allow us to have our own cultural institutions.' Out of that came the Jewish Cultural League, which was headed by Dr. Singer, and was able to carry on Jewish cultural life with Jewish artists for Jewish audiences until after the beginning of the war." - Fred Baumann
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thelanktheist2626 Uh, no. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Texas has the 15th highest unemployment and Florida is 23rd. Not only do you not know what you are talking about, you also have no idea what a "rate" is because population size is irrelevant.
Today's economics are tomorrow's history, and who is backing segregation today?
"We at the National Association of Scholars (NAS) recently launched Separate but Equal, Again: Neo-Segregation in American Higher Education, a project examining racial segregation on college campuses such as Columbia University, Yale University, MIT, and others. Surveying 173 schools, we found that 42 percent offer segregated residences, 46 percent offer segregated orientation programs, and 72 percent host segregated graduation ceremonies. We call this ‘neo-segregation’: the voluntary and institutionally sanctioned segregation of minority students in the post–Brown v. Board era."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
But at least you can try, and your imperfect definition will narrow things down. The idea that because you can't provide a perfect definition on your first try, a word can mean anything, is ridiculous. Your argument is basically the same one Matt Besser's character made in Episode 21 of Crossballs, arguing about an environmentalist about what "litter" means:
"What is litter, anyway? If I throw an apple core out the window, is that litter? But it's going to grow an apple tree! What if I throw a live chicken out the window, it's going to walk away, is that litter? Answer the question! What if I throw a raw chicken out the window, it's in the air, and a German Shepherd jumps up and eats it. Am I littering into the dog's mouth or am I feeding the dog? What if I throw a chicken, strapped to a jet pack out the window, it's in the air, does not touch the ground, is that litter? Answer the question! Environmentalists don't want to answer this question!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807. It was the side you were rooting for which committed genocide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not religious. I think there's serious evidence of deism, but find the teaching of any known teaching ridiculous. This is mostly because I think its ridiculous that if God wanted to people to believe and follow His teachings, the best He'd do is write a book that wouldn't even reach the other side of the world for a 1000+ years. But I have given religion a lot of thought, and read some of the Bible, and one thing that's extremely creepy is how Christians cling to this idea Hell is eternal torture, when the New Testament overwhelmingly seems to state there is no such thing: you are either saved and have eternal life, or you get rejected and don't. You soul is simply incinerated and bye bye. John 4:14, John 6:40, John 6:47, Romans 1:17, Romans 5:21, John 11:25, etc. Obviously you can't be tortured for eternity without eternal life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sanitizing America's enemies is leftwing propaganda, not conservative propaganda. Or at least it was until very very recently:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States." - Howard Zinn, A People's History of the United States
"[The modern liberal will] mindlessly accept whatever [...] seeks to tear down what is good [...] and elevate what is evil until everything meets in the middle and there is nothing left to fight about." - Evan Sayet, Regurgitating the Apple: How Modern Liberals Think, March 5 2007
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
The side you were rooting for killed the vast majority of those people and they were trying to stop them.
1
-
Matt Walsh acknowledged some people "need help", but of all the help you can give people, a 15 year paid vacation should be the last on everyone's mind. If you can't work in your old age, that's one thing. If you can but you don't want to, I couldn't care less. In a world where millions of people are screaming "I'm hungry", "I'm sick", "I have nowhere to sleep", "I'm in chronic pain", and "Help, this mad man is going to kill me!" the last person who's going to get my attention is the one saying "Waaah! I'm sick of working!"
It's insane that rightwingers will say "Healthcare is not a human right" and "Those who don't work, won't eat", but then feel a 15 year paid vacation is a human right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@secrets.295 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
*The left*: Let's block highways, burn down low income housing, cause billions in property damage, charge a cop with felony murder for panicked self-defense, dox and try to prosecute people who defend their property from a mob, take six city blocks hostage, harass first responders when someone gets shot in our little paradise, hand out AR-15s like candy to anyone "woke", and openly say we should "burn it all down" (Kim Olson, Chris Palmer, etc.), fire people over the mildest dissent.
*Also the left*: Why can't we be friends!?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oboexpress5584 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807. The butchers were the people America was there to kill and capture. America is the only nation on Earth that's ever blamed for the crimes of its mortal enemies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tigerfricker69 Laughable? Please, you're insecure because deep down inside you know you're wrong. Why would my comment ever make someone want to commit suicide? Obviously if someone is such a twitchy, neurotic mess in need of endless validation and sycophantry they have a deeper issue going on. Soon you'll say children who are molested are only depressed because they live in a society that tells them adults diddling kids is a bad thing. Actually I've already seen people make this argument.
Children won't realize they're "not trans" if they aren't allowed a natural puberty. How are they supposed? That's not something you just noodle through.
And wow, Christ alive, you are defending transitioning by saying people who kill themselves "aren't really trans?" You can't possibly believe that's a valid argument. You are admitting, thanks to your ideology, people transition who should not transition, and acting like calling them "not really trans" makes it better.
As for my sources?
Ristori J, Steensma TD (2016-01-02). "Gender dysphoria in childhood". International Review of Psychiatry.
Fuss J, Auer MK, Briken P (November 2015). "Gender dysphoria in children and adolescents: a review of recent research". Current Opinion in Psychiatry.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ethically and legally speaking, life ends when brain activity ceases. If someone smashed your head (and therefore brain) to pieces, but somehow kept your body alive, everyone would consider you to be dead even if your body lived on. Imagine in the future, we can do head transplants: someone chops off your head and throws it in wood chipper, then places my head on your body, after which I can use your body just as if it were mine. You're still dead. Just because someone has your body doesn't mean they're you, because you are your brain. Put differently death is when the soul parts from the body, and the brain is the seat of the soul.
So, I think very very early on in development, you can say the embryo is not alive or a person in an ethically meaningful sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1 Ugh, wow. Just wow. Even if what you're saying is true, and you're offering no proof it is, that would still make him anti-slavery. If I'm opposed to abortion not because I care about the unborn but because I worry about the effect it will have on the mothers health, I'm still anti-abortion. Besides, Lee said Blacks were better off under slavery in America than in Africa, but obviously there's a third option there, which is that could be free in America. And again, just because they're quoting Lee doesn't mean they are endorsing what he's saying. The whole series was poorly written like that, where they mixed random facts into the video with actual accomplishments. For example, Thomas Jefferson's video mentioned he liked ballroom dancing and "fathered six enslaved children" (which is not only completely factophobic, because only one of Sally's children was proven to have Jefferson-family DNA and one was proven not to, but also makes no sense to consider an accomplishment from any perspective, even that of an ardent racists who would and did use charges of miscegenation against Jefferson). The whole series was like something written by the interns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
The people who killed the overwhelming majority of Iraqis were the people Americans were there to kill and capture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The "freedom fighters" you were rooting for killed the vast majority of defenseless Iraqis, young men or otherwise. People like these vets were there to stop them.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Anything that makes America look good is not "liberal BS". Here's Howard Zinn, the father of modern college campus leftism and anti-Americanism, on the Civil War:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When Bush was in office, there was none of this far-left vs. "far-right" bullshit, because both those groups were on the same side, both trying to take down America. That's why Hugo Chavez, Rocky Suhayda, Tom Metzger, George Galloway, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and Eric Gleibe all sounded exactly the same. Here are some quotes, guess if they call from far-left or "far-right":
“Not only do I think [an allience] possible, but I think it is vitally necessary and I think it is happening already. It is possible because [our political] movement around the world and the Muslims have the same enemies. Their enemies are the Zionist occupation, American occupation, British occupation of poor countries, mainly Muslim countries. They have the same interest in opposing savage capitalist globalization, which is intent upon homogenizing the entire world, turning us basically into factory chickens which can be force-fed the American diet of everything from food to Coca-Cola to movies and TV culture and whose only role in life is to consume the things produced endlessly by the multinational corporations.”
"Here, I see a white man [John McCain], who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for [...]capitalist exploitation,[...] basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women--when usually [negroes/African Americans] who have 'made it' immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize--that's the kind of [negro/African American] that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it's good for all racially minded folks."
"The corporations are running things now, so it's not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He's a warmonger. He's a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush."
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
Answer key:
George Galloway, Rocky Suhadya, Tom Metzger, Howard Zinn.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
Prager acknowledges the male propensity for violence literally in the first three paragraphs of the essay. You're just upset that, after being told by your party for your entire life that evil is only something men are biologically capable of, Prager dare suggest otherwise.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No matter what the West does, we'll always be in the wrong. We live in a world of absolute moral delusion. If America sides with the revolution, we created chaos and disorder, and we're the bad guys. But we all know we had instead chosen Gaddafi's side under the pretext he was a stablizing force in the Middle East, you'd be chrewing off your own lips to find words hateful enough to throw at us. And then, of course, if we do nothing, they make movies like Hotel Rwanda condemning our cowardice.
Even if the last part wasn't true, you can't have it both ways. You can advocate non-interventionism from a stand point of American self-interest, but you can't logically argue the US is evil for supporting a dictator because he's a tyrant when you'd also argue the US is evil for supporting a rebellion because dictators are a benevolent, stabilizing force.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No one knows the real history of the Iraq War. Here's how things really went down:
1)The US invaded, the overwhelming majority of Iraqis cheered at his downfall (an April 2004 poll showed they believed it was worth it by a margin of about 2 to 1, I'm sure if they poll was taken earlier it would have been even higher)
2)Around 2006, sectarian violence kicked into high gear. Iraqis started mass murdering each other.
3)Instead of turning their guns on the sectarian murderers, Iraqis blamed America like how Batman was blamed for Joker's murders in "The Dark Knight". They figured if America would just go away, so would the terrorists.
4)After about two years of getting slaughtered by their own people, they finally admitted "okay, fine, it's not America killing us, it's Al Qaeda" and many insurgents switched sides to the US in what was called The Anbar Awakening. Peace finally came to Iraq after this.
5) Despite the lessons they learned, they continue to blame America for everything that happen and pretend they never wanted to be liberated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Stop it. There's nothing woke about glorifying America. (4:52) Woke is when The Proud Family reboot claimed Lincoln didn't really care about freeing the slaves. Here's a quote from Howard Zinn, the messiah of anti-Americanism and (arguably) father of modern leftism, which Runstedt1 will baselessly accuse me of taking out of context and misrepresenting:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
There was a time when the Republicans were simply the party of America, and the Democrats were simply the party of Americas enemies. Dennis Prager still remembers those times. Chomsky and Gravel f still remember those times (just listen to Noam Chomsky or the Gravel Institute talk about Ukraine). It's sad you don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is 100% rightwing. Trump has just made us forget what it really means to be conservatives. It used to be people who said the Civil War wasn't about slavery fancied themselves the cynical, red-pilled badasses who were so much smarter than the braindead patriot sheeple. Here's a quote from Howard Zinn, the messiah of modern leftism, on the Civil War, which Runstedt1 baselessly accuses me of taking out of context:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
Then there was the Proud Family's recent episode which said Lincoln didn't care about freeing the slaves.
Or when Amanda Ruffin said white people didn't free the slaves because 700 or 4 million slaves were freed by Harriet Tubman.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
America was founded in colonies where the British had heavily entrenched slavery, but essentially all the Founding Fathers were abolitionists: even, ironically, the ones who owned slaves.
“You know that nobody wishes more ardently to see an abolition not only of the trade but of the condition of slavery: and certainly nobody will be more willing to encounter every sacrifice for that object.” -Thomas Jefferson to Brissot de Warville, February 11, 1788
"[King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither." - Thomas Jefferson, deleted passage from the Declaration of Independence
"I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - George Washington
"Not only do I pray for it, on the score of human dignity, but I can clearly forsee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our union, by consolidating it in a common bond of principle." - George Washington
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
While the results of this war was tragic, it would have gone very differently if the worlds wasn't indulging in an orgy of anti-Americanism at the time. Early in the war, we had the support of the Iraqi people: a Gallup pull in April 2004 showed they believed it was "worth it" to overthrow Saddam by a ratio of more than 2 to 1. However, insurgents in Iraq were wreaking endless senseless violence on the civilian populace as soon as Saddam was toppled, and it reached incredible levels around mid-2006, and this is when pulls show Iraqi public opinion was turning against America. People inside and outside of Iraq blamed America for the crimes of our mortal enemies, which created a perverse incentive and snowball effect. How else do you explain bizarre indiscriminate violence like the July Soccer Bombings, in which terrorists seemed to target no one in particular, just seek to wreak carnage? In a perverse inversion of karma, the more evil our enemies became, the more their jihad against American "occupiers" was supported. It continued on and on until three things happened 1) Muqtada Al-Sadr, the primary warlord of the Shiite insurgency declared a cease first 2) the "Anbar Awakening" happened, when Iraqis finally admitted it was Al Qaeda killing them, and not Americans 3) the troop surge.
What if America, like every other country in the world, was not blamed for the crimes of its enemies? If the world had not given the terrorists this perverse incentive? The war would have turned out very differently, I'm sure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn, the leftist author of the most popular and anti-American textbook in universities today
That's the real Democrat narrative.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The question is not if parents should have paid leave, the question is if businesses should be forced into a one-size fits all model. If something is important to workers, employers have to offer it, or they will be at a serious disadvantage when a competitor does. If the economy worked any other way, we would all be working minimum wage with no benefits. If an employer is not offering parental leave, there must be a damn good reason.
I would never want to work at a job where I would be on call. Does that mean I should cry about the inhumanity of businesses that force their employees to be on call and demand this practice be banned? No, its means I'll get a job where I don't have to be on call, and let people who don't have the same priorities take those jobs.
In some types of jobs, employees are highly interchangeable, so its not a huge deal if someone goes on leave. In others, it can be catastrophic. This is why the US has twice as high a proportion of women in management positions as Europe, because managers are one of those roles where it can be devastating.
Anyone who wants to say some sappy disingenuous bullshit about how I don't have compassion mothers or children or some shit can cram it up your ass. If you liberals actually gave half a fuck about children, why do you support welfare state that let to a 6X increase in single motherhood, while 0% reduction in poverty rate? Your only priority is 'MOAR FREE MONEYZ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
gulp
Even as a conservative, I'm not against "common sense gun control". I mean if the idea is that people's right to arms should not be infringed in anyway, why not let people buy tanks, TOW missles, jets, combat helicopters? Then Bill Gates could make his own army, and military power (which translates into all power) would be in the hands of the wealthy and return to feudalism.The argument against these I hear from people is those are not "arms" because you can't carry them, but that seems like a pretty arbitrary distinction.
I think the Second Amendment should be revamped to use language more akin to the "cruel and unusual punishment" amendment, which allows isn't absolutist but allows the Federal Government to intervene to protect our rights. The idea that if the Second Amendment were to be rewritten or disappear all our gun rights would disappear too is absurd, because the huge majority of Americans still believe in the right to own a gun, just perhaps not the right to purchase two rifles in eight days.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
...and your internet access, and your air conditioning, and your 1000 square foot apartment, and your diet of the 200% the daily recommended amount of protein, and your electricity, and your television, and your computer, and your Netflix subscription, and your car, and your clothing, and your shoes, and your refrigerator, and your microwave oven, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ogionwiz Yes, landing a coin 25 times on heads, and 25 times on tails, doesn't prove anything. But if someone predicts the coin will land on head 41 times and tails 59 times, and is right every single time, you'd be insane to shrug that off, because there was only one way the coins could have landed that would fit their prediction, and countless ways they could have landed that wouldn't.
Similarly, there trillions of trillions of trillions of conceivable ways the Big Bang could have failed to provide a life-sustaining universe, yet somehow it landed on the very narrow set of parameters that could. The argument is not "the universe is the way it is therefore God", but rather "the universe happened upon the one way that could sustain life and not the trillions of trillions of trillions of other ways that couldn't, therefore God."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@corygriffiths4394 Seriously? Wow.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 vs 122,000. The vast majority of the destruction in Iraq was from this "resistance".
1
-
1
-
@nauticawillis2787 White America is literally allowed to have nothing to ourselves, so its only fair you aren't either. Every major sport (except lacrosse) was invented by white people. Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Valentines Day, Mardi Gras, etc. all originate from white people. Yet people like Jackie Robinson, who fought to appropriate our culture against many people's objections, are branded as heroes in the textbooks (which, I should add, are written by white people).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Matt may not have phrased it the best way, he was still young and new to punditry, but there are 7.1 billion people, and deep down every one of them agrees with Matt Walsh. There is nobody, I really mean nobody, who thinks having sex with a teenager that would be "consenual" if not for his/her age, is morally equivalent to sex that is forced. Nobody.
Just to show I can prove this, not that I need to:
Sex with an unconscious body is an equal crime to violent rape (some would say lesser but we'll ignore those people for simplicity's sake).
Sex with an 18 year old is not a crime.
A 15 year old boy is much closer in sapience to an 18 year old than an unconscious body.
Even animals, who are dumber than two years olds, are not understood to be abused by being allowed to be sexual active. Yet certainly anyone would argue that an animal who's pinned down and trying to get away while being raped is being abused. So that means even when dealing with a mind as primitive and uniformed as an animal's, "yes" still means something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 vs 122,000. The people you were rooting for did the vast majority of society-crushing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stopHate121 Thank you for being so open minded. Something is turning kids lgbt, because the amount of alphabet soup identification is increasing with each generation. It might be intentional grooming, but the environment kids are brought up is clearly effecting them. However, its worth noting that its an uptick in "trans" and "bi" identification that's driving this increase more than anything.
Also while I don't think people are grooming kids to be gay, I think they are trying to recruit kids into the trans identity. When I was growing up, the gay rights movement was just getting started. The message they also told us was "If you're not absolutely sure you're gay, then don't worry, you're not gay." With the gender identity movement its the polar opposite. They ENCOURAGE people to question their gender identity. Unless, of course, they are trans. Then they must never question their identity.
What society needs is tolerance, but people forget what tolerance actually means. As Mr. Garrison said on South Park is "you tolerate a crying baby on an airplane, it doesn't mean it can't still piss you off."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1 "The corporations are running things now, so it's not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He's a warmonger. He's a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush. Obama, according to his book, Dreams Of My Father, is a racist and I have no problem with black racists. I've got the quote right here: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's white race.' The problem with Obama is he's being dishonest about his racial views. I'd respect him if he'd just come out and say, 'Yeah, I'm a black racist.' I don't hate black people. I just think it's in the best interest of the races to be separated as much as possible. See, I'm a leftist. I'm not a rightist. I hate the transnational corporations far more than any black person." - Tom Metzger
"Obama might be a better candidate for our cause because he's racially conscious. One of our big things in the National Alliance is to raise the racial consciousness of our people. Young whites in universities, they've been stripped of any kind of racial identity. Obama may be a racist in a positive sense for his people--that will awaken a lot of the whites, knock some sense into them. They'll see that non-white Americans are allowed to be proud of who they are, to be racially conscious, to talk about their people or their community without being attacked as being racist. Let's face it, white people aren't going to fight for their causes, for their kind with a white president. I don't think McCain even acknowledges that a white race exists. He's all about granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The fact he wants to keep us in wars in the Middle East for 100 years, that's not a good thing. I give Obama credit, he seems to have stuck to his guns as far as pulling the troops out of Iraq. He's a very intelligent man, an excellent speaker and has charisma. John McCain offers none of that. Perhaps the best thing for the white race is to have a black president. My only problem with Obama is perhaps he's not black enough." -Eric Gliebe
"White people are faced with either a negro or a total nutter who happens to have a pale face. Personally I'd prefer the negro. National Socialists are not mindless haters. Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for Judeo-capitalist exploitation, who supports the invasion of America by illegals--basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women--when usually negroes who have 'made it' immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize--that's the kind of negro that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it's good for all racially minded folks. Besides, America cares nothing for the interests of the white American worker, while having a love affair with just about every non-white on planet Earth. It'd be poetic justice to have a non-white as titular chief over this decaying modern Sodom and Gomorrah." - Rocky Suhayda
It's you who hates Israel, hates trans-national corporations, hates capitalism, and disingenuously throws around the terms like imperialism because you hate America. Yet I'm the one who sounds like the tiki torch wavers? 🙄 9/10 of the sentences above sound like something you would say, if you just switched terms like "negro" with "African American" and "Judeo-capitalism" with "capitalism."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
Those are the first three paragraphs of the article. I'm sure the left loves every word of this (except for the endorsement of marriage), but when Dennis dares suggests that maybe women have their flaws too, he's sexist. Funny how that works.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@riconui5227 Oh please, leftists are always comparing different forms of slavery and painting one as better than the other. That's why you made up the term "chattel slavery", to make other forms of slavery look better by comparison. Here's your buddy Howard Zinn on African slavery vs. American slavery:
"Slavery existed in the African states, and it was sometimes used by Europeans to justify
their own slave trade. But, as Davidson points out, the 'slaves' of Africa were more like the
serfs of Europe —in other words, like most of the population of Europe. It was a harsh
servitude, but but they had rights which slaves brought to America did not have, and they
were 'altogether different from the human cattle of the slave ships and the American
plantations.' In the Ashanti Kingdom of West Africa, one observer noted that 'a slave
might marry; own property; himself own a slave; swear an oath; be a competent witness
and ultimately become heir to his master... An Ashanti slave, nine cases out of ten, possibly
became an adopted member of the family, and in time his descendants so merged and
intermarried with the owner's kinsmen that only a few would know their origin.'"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
🤮 There's no such f***ing thing as a living wage. First off, cost of living doesn't just fall out of the sky. Everything comes down to price of labor. Have you never noticed the places that offer the cheapest goods and services (McDonalds, 7/11, Walmart) also pay the lowest wages, and that the places with the highest wages (Manhattan, Beverly Hills, Silicon Valley) have the highest cost of living?
Second, what is "living" exactly? In 1950 the life expectancy was 65, the average family spent 30% of their income on food, and the median house size was less than half what is today. Yet we say those were "the good old days" when everyone could make ends meet. If $15 became the new minimum wage, there's no way you'd call it a "living wage."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Racism isn't all or nothing. Lincoln himself, a man who devoted his life to abolitionism, still believed the races should be separate. The idea that you are either totally egilitarian or believe in turning people into garden tools is ridiculous.
"There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together on the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position. I have never said any thing to the contrary, but I hold that notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence-the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man. I agree with Judge Douglas that he is not my equal in many respects, certainly not in color-perhaps not in intellectual and moral endowments; but in the right to eat the bread without the leave of any body else which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every other man." -Abraham Lincoln
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
The vast majority of Iraqis were killed by the side you were rooting for, while these soldiers were trying to kill and capture them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It was the side you were rooting for that killed the vast majority of innocent Iraqis, no doubt largely motivated by the fact you'd blame their atrocities on their American enemies:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What a dick bag Micheal Moore is. Assuming by "genocide" he means "conquest" (because no serious authority on colonial history believes the math the United States wiped out the American Indians, that was 99% done by disease), what nation more than 200 years old DOESN'T have this history? What nations didn't engage in conquest, slavery, and enforce women into rigid genders roles? China, Japan, Britain, France, Portugal, Egypt, Brazil, Italy, Mali, etc. all fit this bill.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, kids being taught racial tribalism before their ABCs is so beautiful. The last six Disney female leads have been POCs (Raya, Mei, Mirabel, Moana, Jasmine, Mulan) but if little white girls were rejoicing a princess "looked like them" you'd puke your guts out and use the video to justify CRT. And don't give me that "It's different because they never see themselves represented" crap. A study published by no less than NPR showed African Americans are already over-represented on screen and even when I was growing up we were inundated with black leads in children's TV: That's So Raven, The Famous Jet Jackson, Little Bill, Reading Rainbow, Smart Guy, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Uh, uh
(Holiday season)
Uh, woah
(Run that back, Turbo)
two-tone AP, presidential Rolex
(Florida water) 2019 Richard Millie and a Patek (and a Patek)
(Florida water) real diamonds, carrots in pointers and VVS (VVS)
(Florida water) if you couldn't tell, this a white Cuban link on my chest (hittin' my chest)
yeah, all these flaws, I'ma cop some fuckin' baguettes
(Florida water) ice on my fingers, I'm fingerin', makin' her wet (makin' her wet, yeah)
(Florida water) all my pieces cost figures, I spend me a check (spend me a check)
(Florida water) when your cash clarity, they treat you with respect
(Florida water)
Boogers in the face of the watch like I'm a kid (I'm a kid)
I knew the first chance I got I was gon' go big (gon' go big)
Ice on both my fist, ice on both of my wrist (Florida water)
Top off of the coupe like cup no lids (top off, top off)
Used to run around, had to run to the bank again (bank again)
Lookin' like the money take care of my lady friends (my lady friends)
Shoppin' in London, gettin' chauffeured in a Maybach Benz (Maybach Benz, yeah)
Two, three chains in the back, I call 'em the twins (I call 'em lil twins, woah, Florida Water)
Young Gunna, I got carrots like a rabbit (rabbit)
Milk, blue sky face, yeah, all white Patek (all white Patek)
Cop another one like DJ Khaled (Florida water)
Niggas can't compete, I'm out out they bracket, uh
two-tone AP, presidential Rolex
(Florida water) 2019 Richard Millie and a Patek (and a Patek)
(Florida water) real diamonds, carrots in pointers and VVS
(Florida water) if you couldn't tell, this a white Cuban link on my chest (ooh, Meka)
Too many ones in those
Thumbin' through these racks my system overload
Ain't no stunnin' on me, I went beyond your goals
I'm too OP for this path I chose
Give me that Patek, need that AP, need that zaza
You know I flex, the disrespect, to me that's not down
Artifact on my feet, see the agua
Tesla, Gucci, Cybertruck, I reck that shit, don't give a fuck
Like oh, just put it on my tab
I don't see the prices, throw it in my bag
Always in a foreign when I dash
Clean water VVS diamonds, bust down make it splash like
two-tone AP, presidential Rolex
(Florida water) 2019 Richard Millie and a Patek (and a Patek)
(Florida water) real diamonds, carrots in pointers and VVS (VVS)
(Florida water) if you couldn't tell, this a white Cuban link on my chest (hittin' my chest)
yeah, all these flaws, I'ma cop some fuckin' baguettes
(Florida water) ice on my fingers, I'm fingerin', makin' her wet (makin' her wet, yeah)
(Florida water) all my pieces cost figures, I spend me a check (spend me a check)
(Florida water) when your cash clarity, they treat you with respect
(Florida water)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1 "And on that "states rights" argument, for the record, the Southern states we're ardently pro-states' rights', but, with some glaring exceptions. Notably when Northern states passed laws to help protect runaway slaves, the South wanted the federal government to override those states laws. So, they loved states' rights, as long as they were the right states' rights. The wrong states' rights would be states' wrongs, wrongs which would need to be righted by the right states' rights-- look, to put it really simply, they just wanted to own black people, -and they didn't much care how."
~~ John Oliver
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
🤮
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
The insurgents were the ones wracking up the civilian body count! In fact, in the places where the insurgents defacto won, called The Sunni Triangle, it got so bad that many of them switched sides and started fighting for the US in what was called The Anbar Awakening!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JaneSmith-c3h Oh please. Every society on Earth had a lower life expectancy for men than women, despite the fact that child birth used to be as dangerous as warfare. How does that happen in a world where women suffer for men's benefit? Men had all the power, but also all the responsibility. You got to stay home with the kids while we performed 60+ hours a week of back breaking, monotonous labor. Now women have all the power, but only half the responsibility. For example bringing a child into the world is solely a woman's choice, but her decision will be funded by her partner through child support and/or a state funded by a mostly male tax based. So when a woman makes the unilateral decision to have a child, men will pay for 70% of that child's education. Not to mention programs like Social Security represent a huge net transfer of wealth from men to women, as men pay 70% of taxes but women retire earlier and live five years longer. If women had as much responsibility as they had power, you'd be much more humble.
Second, if men "didn't care" women were suffering, how did women get their rights in the first place? Do you think women won a coup? No, men gave you your rights, and if we chose to we could take them back in a day. We control the military and the police force. But you know we won't, because we're not cruel and heartless like you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The fact you say "even" Prager U shows you don't really understand politics. Dennis Prager is an old school, Reagan Era Republican, what used to be known as "Nazi fascist imperialist Nazi Nazi neocons", not this new wave of Tucker Carlson, Putin-simping alt right who co-opted tin-foil hats and tyrant worshippers from the left. To say the US military could ever be right in any conflict or do anything noble used to be a rightwing position. That's why Steven Crowder made a video praising the US marine in Haiti after the quake even though we had a Democrat President in office at the time while Hollywood's darling Hugo Chavez accused the US of starting the disaster with a sonic weapons test. It's why Noam Chomsky is...well, Noam Chomsky when he's interviewed about Ukraine. It's why The Gravel Institute made a video about Ukraine prior to the invasion that was so horrible even Vaush ripped it apart, and why Howard Zinn said this about the Civil War:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
According to CRT there is no reality:
In Robin DiAngelo's (along with Sensoy, Kendi, etc are movers and shakers in CRT) book "Is Everyone Really Equal?", DiAngelo posited: 1.) "All knowledge is taught from a particular perspective; the power of dominant knowledge depends in large part on its presentation as neutral and universal (Kincheloe, 2008)...*all knowledge* understood by humans is framed by the ideologies, language, beliefs, and and customs of human societies. Even the field of science is subjective” (p. 15).
2.) "Our analysis of social justice is based on a school of thought know as Critical Theory. Critical Theory refers to a body of scholarship that examines how society works, and is a tradition that emerged in the early part of the 20th century from a group of scholars at the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany [taught there by Marxists]” (p. 25)
3.) "One of the key contributions of critical theorists concerns the production of knowledge…. These scholars argue that a key element of social injustice involves the claim that particular knowledge is objective, neutral, and universal. An approach based on critical theory calls into question the idea that objectivity is desirable or even possible. The term used to describe this way of thinking about knowledge is that knowledge is socially constructed." (p. 29).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think even after explaining this you'll understand, nor do I think I have the temperament to walk you (or anyone) through it. I expect you'll misunderstand what I say in some really irritating way, then get showered in upvotes for your logical fallacy. I have a short temper and this is why I tend to avoid deep, philosphical discussions, but I will try.
Let's start simple. What is consciousness? It's the thing that feels, that experiences qualia. It is not your intelligence, or memories, all those things come and go from stimulating your consciousness. It is a stage on which qualia dance, so to speak.
Nothing is just created or destroyed. Things don't just pop in and out of existence. If they do, their odds of existing right now would be infinitely small. We shouldn't imagine consciousnesses, these qualia receptacles, are any different.
Yet somehow, your consciousness is matched to a body, to a brain, because life was created in the universe. If there are a billion trillion other universes, that would make, you would be a billion trillions times more unmatched consciousnesses. So if you there are countless "failed" universes, the question then arises why were you (your consciousness, not you defined as your personality, memories, etc.) lucky enough to be in the successful one?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's hard to explain, but I will try:
Imagine you sell apples. Every week you get a shipment of 100 apples. For simplicity's sake, imagine no one buys more than one apple each. You try to set your price so exactly 100 people will think "Hey, that's an okay price for an apple, I'll make that purchase!" No more, so you don't waste apples, no less, so you don't lose money.
Now imagine suddenly everyone has more money. More people now feel they can spend it on your apples, so you have 200 people willing to buy your apples. What do you do, if you can't increase production? You set your price higher, so only 100 people will be willing to buy apples, just like the old days. If you don't do this, you'll lose money, and half the people willing to pay the price will simply find nothing left on your shelves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This used to rile up liberals because their hatred of America trumped their hatred of the South, and they didn't want to believe the US army could ever be behind a noble cause. Hence why Howard Zinn said:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, whatever Communists believe is always wrong.
Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States.
Oh wait, that entire second paragraph I wrote was lifted straight from The People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn. How does it feel to know you just creamed your pants to the words of a Marxist?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What? If more money is in circulation, it means money has less value, so how's that a good thing? If you have more money but it has less value, that cancels itself out so its neither good nor bad.
Also, if a higher percentage of your income goes to "basic necessities" than it used, why is the ownership of luxury items, or what would we have called luxury items a few decades, increasing? Why do more people own TVs, air-conditioning, videogame consoles, microwave ovens, computers, etc than did 20 years ago? Why did the average family spend 30% of their income on food in 1950, where was today is about 8%?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You say this while you are spouting talking about the evils of capitalism and "American imperialism" that has been used to kill millions.
Anti-Americanism is the biggest killer of the 21st century. Look at Iraq. After the US toppled Saddam in 2003, the Kurds cooperated with Americans, the Sunni Arabs did not, and the Shia Arabs fell somewhere in between. Iraqi Kurdistan became peaceful and prosperous, and Sunni areas became a a living hell. Not because Americans were killing people but because "nationalist insurgents" invited in jihadist assholes to fight coalition forces and because it was pretty damn hard for the Americans, Iraqi military, and Iraqi police to keep order when they were getting blown up and shot at, not to mention the fact that the terrorists knew all their atrocities would be pinned on the American invaders, they had a perverse incentive to attack Iraqis indiscriminately (the July soccer bombings are a prime example). When Sunni Arabs finally admitted it was Al Qaeda and friends killing them, and not Americans, it was called "The Anbar Awakening" and anti-Iraqi terrorism dropped about 80%.
Somalia had an opportunity to remove their tyrants from power, but they decided to fight Americans instead.
Etc. etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blackknightjack3850 Nirvana fallacy.
"According to the Havana Times, many elderly Cubans may sleep on public benches or practice 'couch surfing' by living with friends as overcrowding makes their own family unable to care for them. The exact percentage of homeless elderly is unknown but social workers are aware of the underreported issue as noted in the Havana Times. Although the elderly may have an official address, the quality of life is reminiscent of homelessness.
Experts have determined that the capital of Havana needs 300,000 housing units in order to meet demand. Thus, with Cuba experiencing an average rate of 4.1 people per living space continues to reinforce the trend of overcrowding. Therefore, official homelessness rates may be low in Cuba, but the quality of Cuban housing can often be below ideal living standards and is often unsafe.
On top of overcrowding, weather-related issues such as hurricanes and tropical storms have also degraded the current housing stock. Weather-related issues cause consistent destruction and inhibit the ability to make repairs, often exposing wiring, poor insulation and leaking rooftops. An official report stated that seven out of 10 homes need repair, with 7% of all houses being unhabitable."
- The Borgen Project
Also, if matching homeless people to homes was so easy, why the hell would we need to ditch our entire economic system to do it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807
Remember these numbers before you start writhing in your anti-American euphoria.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
L You're right, you don't get paid for working harder in capitalism, you get paid for ADDING VALUE to the economy. Under Communism they'd have warehouses full of toilet paper that no one needed while grocery store shelves were empty, because people were paid for producing unneeded toilet paper just the same as farming desperately needed food.
Jeff Bezos made his money starting an online book store called Cadebera. He then sacrificed this money repeatedly (investment) to help build things like factories that workers could make a living from, which added up to billions. Those workers could have been self-employed or worked at co-ops but they decided to work for businesses he had invested in so they didn't have to sacrifice their own money buying or building their work place.
Automation DOES free the working class. When products are cheaper to make, cost cut is passed down to consumers. Why do you think rice is cheaper than crab, are people who sell crab just greedier!? No, its because you have to pay people more to catch crab than farm race (the latter of which is largely automated today).
Without capitalists, we would have jobs, we just wouldn't be nearly as prosperous. You are free to be self-employed, or start a co-op, or live in the woods and hunt for your food. Capitalists offer you a better alternative, you take it, and whine. Offering someone an opportunity to be more prosperous is not slavery.
Etc. Unlike you I'm not paying off Google so I'm not going to risk this comment getting blocked for being too long.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Even you don't know what you mean by "commits genocide". The vast majority of innocents in Iraq were killed by "Freedom Fighters" you were rooting for, and they were no doubt largely motivated by the fact they knew you'd blame their American enemies for their crimes, turning every atrocity into a propaganda victory.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Most admired Queen,
The love I bear my God, my King and country, hath so oft emboldened me in the worst of extreme dangers, that now honesty doth constrain me to presume thus far beyond myself, to present your Majesty this short discourse: if ingratitude be a deadly poison to all honest virtues, I must be guilty of that crime if I should omit any means to be thankful.
So it is, that some ten years ago being in Virginia, and taken prisoner by the power of Powhatan their chief King, I received from this great Salvage exceeding great courtesy, especially from his son Nantaquaus, the most manliest, comeliest, boldest spirit, I ever saw in a Salvage, and his sister Pocahontas, the Kings most dear and well-beloved daughter, being but a child of twelve or thirteen years of age, whose compassionate pitiful heart, of my desperate estate, gave me much cause to respect her: I being the first Christian this proud King and his grim attendants ever saw: and thus enthralled in their barbarous power, I cannot say I felt the least occasion of want that was in the power of those my mortal foes to prevent, notwithstanding all their threats. After some six weeks fatting amongst those Salvage courtiers, at the minute of my execution, she hazarded the beating out of her own brains to save mine; and not only that, but so prevailed with her father, that I was safely conducted to Jamestown: where I found about eight and thirty miserable poor and sick creatures, to keep possession of all those large territories of Virginia; such was the weakness of this poor commonwealth, as had the salvages not fed us, we directly had starved. And this relief, most gracious Queen, was commonly brought us by this Lady Pocahontas.
Notwithstanding all these passages, when inconstant fortune turned our peace to war, this tender virgin would still not spare to dare to visit us, and by her our jars have been oft appeased, and our wants still supplied; were it the policy of her father thus to employ her, or the ordinance of God thus to make her his instrument, or her extraordinary affection to our nation, I know not: but of this I am sure; when her father with the utmost of his policy and power, sought to surprise me, having but eighteen with me, the dark night could not affright her from coming through the irksome woods, and with watered eyes gave me intelligence, with her best advice to escape his fury; which had he known, he had surely slain her.
Jamestown with her wild train she as freely frequented, as her fathers habitation; and during the time of two or three years, she next under God, was still the instrument to preserve this colony from death, famine and utter confusion; which if in those times, had once been dissolved, Virginia might have lain as it was at our first arrival to this day.
Since then, this business having been turned and varied by many accidents from that I left it at: it is most certain, after a long and troublesome war after my departure, betwixt her father and our colony; all which time she was not heard of.
About two years after she herself was taken prisoner, being so detained near two years longer, the colony by that means was relieved, peace concluded; and at last rejecting her barbarous condition, she was married to an English Gentleman, with whom at this present she is in England; the first Christian ever of that Nation, the first Virginian ever spoke English, or had a child in marriage by an Englishman: a matter surely, if my meaning be truly considered and well understood, worthy a Princes understanding.
Thus, most gracious Lady, I have related to your Majesty, what at your best leisure our approved Histories will account you at large, and done in the time of your Majesty's life; and however this might be presented you from a more worthy pen, it cannot from a more honest heart, as yet I never begged anything of the state, or any: and it is my want of ability and her exceeding desert; your birth, means, and authority; her birth, virtue, want and simplicity, doth make me thus bold, humbly to beseech your Majesty to take this knowledge of her, though it be from one so unworthy to be the reporter, as myself, her husbands estate not being able to make her fit to attend your Majesty. * The most and least I can do, is to tell you this, because none so oft hath tried it as myself, and the rather being of so great a spirit, however her stature: if she should not be well received, seeing this Kingdom may rightly have a Kingdom by her means; her present love to us and Christianity might turn to such scorn and fury, as to divert all this good to the worst of evil; whereas finding so great a Queen should do her some honor more than she can imagine, for being so kind to your servants and subjects, would so ravish her with content, as endear her dearest blood to effect that, your Majesty and all the Kings honest subjects most earnestly desire. *
And so I humbly kiss your gracious hands,
Captain John Smith, 1616
tl;dr version:
I just found out Pocahontas captured. We owe her a lot, so please treat her right, your majesty. - John "Rapist Colonizer" Smith
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrGB-me8ws Thank you, I appreciate your intellectual honesty and diplomatic demeanor. However, the 1619 Project is not the only thing that's being taught in K-12. I think the big problem with the 1619 Project is not that it teaches black people's contributions, creations, and influences: Prager University is full of videos on people like Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington. The problem is it makes mean-spirited and highly factophobic claims like the American Revolution was fought because the Founding Fathers were afraid the British were going to abolish slavery. Every famous founding father, even the ones who owned slaves, spoke out against slavery, which makes absolutely no sense if the war was about maintaining slavery. You'd see the exact opposite.
“You know that nobody wishes more ardently to see an abolition not only of the trade but of the condition of slavery: and certainly nobody will be more willing to encounter every sacrifice for that object.” -Thomas Jefferson
"[King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither." - Thomas Jefferson
"I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of slavery." - George Washington
"Not only do I pray for it, on the score of human dignity, but I can clearly forsee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our union, by consolidating it in a common bond of principle." - George Washington
"I am the master of slaves of my own purchase. I am drawn along by the general inconvenience of living here without them. I will not, I cannot justify it." - Patrick Henry
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sixstanger00
"This is - in every respect - a right-wing attempt to force the working class into staying in the mines for as long as humanly possible. The rich don't want to get their lily white hands dirty, and they're terrified of a shrinking workforce"
Your conception of the rich is as imaginary as fairies living in castles in the sky. Stop making everything about this mythical race called "the rich". As I've said a hundred times here, even liquidating every penny of assets from every billionaire in France would not pay for a single year of pensions for all of France's citizens. And you could only do that once.
"This is an ass-backwards way of looking at this policy. You are demanding a percentage of people don't die at a certain age so your system will work.
Nature doesn't give a fuck what you want to be the case. People who reach 65 and become deathly ill can't then lay on their death bed and say, 'Well shit...I can't die for at least another 13 years, otherwise the Social Security system won't work right.'"
Jesus Herbert Walker Christ, what? I can't even begin to wrap my head around what you're saying here. People who become deathly ill will die and therefore not be burdening the Social Security System. So again...what? That comment doesn't make a lick of sense.
"Since they were old enough to work, they paid into the system under the pretense that once they reach 65, they would get that money back. "
No. If you were working from 20 - 65 and retire this year, during the period where you were paying into the system, the average person might have lived 10 years before retiring. Due to advances in technology, you will likely live 20. So you paid for 10 years, got 20. Where does the expenses for the additional 10 come from.
"Now you're sitting there advocating for literal THEFT. You are saying that the 5 years worth of retirement between 65-70? They just lost that money. The average annual SS benefit is around $29,800."
Oh right, because you leftists totally wouldn't know anything about that. Except that that sort of theft is the entire point of every social program . Why do you support things like universal medicaid, welfare, if not because it allows people who've contributed little or nothing into the system to still take just as much out of it as the doctors, lawyers etc. who paid for 90% of these programs but will probably never use it? Why would ANY social program exist on the premise "give the government $10, get $10 back". That makes no sense.
NOW you suddenly care about the injustice about people not getting back what they paid into the system? When that's been the very essence of leftwing economics from day one?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"yeah, the reason is "capitalism... In a capitalist economy, profit and the bottom line is everything, so you look to spend as little as possible, including the wages you pay employees."
And you keep your prices as low as possible, so employee salaries effect prices. A typical big business runs a profit margin of less than 5%.
"Economic value and human value are 2 separate things and in our market, people are judged and rewarded with material well-being base solely off of their economic value, and that is just one of the many inherent, systemic flaws with the current market system."
What the hell is the alternative? It's literally impossible to pay someone more than their market value, because you'd be paying them more money than they bring to your business. You'd go into red ink.
"Even if you're talking about a single person in a one bedroom apt. they're still going to pay $1000 or more a month, just for rent, phone, cable, electric and food."
$1000 a month is $12,000 a year. That means if you made $23,500 a year, after those basics, you'd still have just same amount left over. Further, I'm almost certain you don't have to pay anything in taxes if you make $40,000 a year or less.
"The market is what we make it, so if we choose to let it continue operating as it currently is, with all of it's flaws and shortcomings and archaic, draconian laws, where everything is about profit and profit is everything, then that is a failure on our part - on humans part, and not the outcome of what the market dictates or as you put it, "subject to market forces."
As I said, there is no alternative. A business cannot pay out more money than it takes in, and most big businesses make very slim profit margins. Profit is just a socialist scape goat.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@screenarts That nonsense about wages not increasing with productivity is just that: nonsense. Yes, workers are more productive than they were 50 years ago, but guess what? They also have more purchasing power. That's why in the US, for instance, the median house size has doubled in that time. So, in effect, their wages have risen.
Yes, capital without labor doesn't exist. Which is why the vast majority of the revenue a business makes does go back to the workers. A typical Fortune 500 business runs a profit margin of about 10%. Walmart runs a profit margin of 1.1%. No one, literally no one, denies workers have a right to some of the wealth the business generates. What you want is for workers to have the right to all the wealth a business generates, even though they weren't willing to pay the start up costs (buying the equipment, the building, etc.). You think the rich should just fork over $200,000 to build a McDonalds out of the goodness of their hearts, and get nothing in return.
If you really don't like "capitalists" so much, start a co-op. But you won't. Because you love the convenience they provide for you, you just can't stand the thought they demand anything in return.
By the way, it's not only the rich who live off of corporate profits. If you have a 401K, you do too. Most people benefiting from corporate profits are average Joes.
And for Pete's sake, do you think everyone making over $150,000 a year is a business owner? That's like 5% of the country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
While it may be true slavery was less brutal in Sub-Saharan Africa, it certainly wasn't in North Africa:
"Here I met with many sea commanders, and among others Captain Cuttle, and Curtis, and Mootham, and I, went to the Fleece Tavern to drink; and there we spent till four o’clock, telling stories of Algiers, and the manner of the life of slaves there! And truly Captn. Mootham and Mr. Dawes (who have been both slaves there) did make me fully acquainted with their condition there: as, how they eat nothing but bread and water. At their redemption they pay so much for the water they drink at the public fountaynes, during their being slaves. How they are beat upon the soles of their feet and bellies at the liberty of their padron. How they are all, at night, called into their master’s Bagnard; and there they lie." -Samuel Pepys
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Abubakrov1 The overwhelming majority of those civilians were killed by the people US forces were trying to kill and capture:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 vs 122,000
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tobak952 The fact that there's some gray area doesn't invalidate his definition of "woman." You're arguing against it the same way Matt Besser's satire character argued against the concept of litter in Episode 21 of Crossballs.
"My problem is with litter. What is litter, anyway? Let's say I throw an apple core out the window, is that litter? But it's going to grow an apple tree! Let me ask you this, what if I throw a live chicken out the window; it's going to walk away. Is that litter? What if I throw a row chicken out the window, it's in the air, a German Shepherd jumps up, grabs it and eats it. Am I littering into the dog's mouth, or am I feeding the dog? Answer the question, environmentalists don't want to answer this question! I throw a chicken, strapped to a jetpack, out the window, it flies up in the air, does not touch the ground, is it litter?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tobak952 Even if what you say is true, you can't have it both ways. If womanhood is totally subjective, you can't force people to accept trans-women are women, it would be up to everyone to decide. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, they say. That doesn't mean I'm entitled to win Ms. America just by identifying as the most beautiful woman in the country.
Also, and I can't believe I'm actually having this conversation, why is it litter throw an apple core out the window, but if an apple falls from an actual apple tree in the same spot, that's fine and dandy? Why is your apple trash, but not the apple that came from the tree that already resided there. And why is a chicken in a jetpack not litter? When garbage blows in the air, does it stop being litter until it hits the ground? What's so special about the ground? Isn't trash blowing around in the air more disruptive? Etc. You sound really disingenuous by acting like these questions have obvious answers, especially when it seems to me you chose the wrong ones.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The "freedom fighters" you were rooting for a killed a the vast majority of those Iraqis. Bush was trying to stop them while you were telling him to hand Iraq over to them:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hhifix It used to be the left claiming the Civil War was not about slavery. Not because they had the slightest love of the Confederacy and the South, but because they wanted to rob Lincoln and the US Army of the same glory this video is trying to bestow upon them (4:56). Here's a quote from The People's History of The United States by Howard Zinn which Runstedt1 will claim I am misrepresenting or taking out of context even though he has no evidence of either of those things:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
1
-
1
-
@Ben00000 Most on the left will call sweatshop labor slavery, presumably because its poorly paid. Of course this makes slavery an arbitrary concept, because wealth is relative and for most of human history the common person earned about a dollar a day in today's money.
The truth is slavery is coerced labor, ie "work for me or I'll hurt you." Nothing more, nothing less. If someone is paying you a million dollars a year, but says they'll murder you if you leave the job, that's slavery. If someone is paying you $1 a day to work for them, that's not slavery, because they're not hurting you in anyway, just not helping you as much as you'd like. If you think that sounds cold, consider that those vile, greedy corporations are doing more for the starving children in the world than you are.
Imagine if Oliver Twist comes to your door begging for food, you laugh and slam the door in his face, and then judge the person who gives him half a loaf of bread for sweeping their chimney.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1 If a feudal lord declares hunting on his land "poaching" and then forces the peasants to work for their food, yes, that's coercion, because he's the reason they're hungry in the first place. But in situations where the employer didn't cause their hunger, is labor still coercion? If so, how is all labor not coercion? "Work for me or you won't be able to afford food" is what the poorest of the poor have to deal with, but "Work for me or you won't be able to buy a Lamborgini" is what the rich have to deal with. Now granted, food is a necessity, and a Lamborgini is not, but that's irrelevant in the question of coercion because if I say "work for me or I'll take a baseball bat to your nice new car", that's still coercion.
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1
"If a factory manager or owner disappears the workers can just go on and work. You never heard of Co-ops?"
Exactly. You can work at a co-op, whether the factory is there or not. So how does having the factory present hurt you in any way?
"throw upon themselves (the slaves) the responsibility of their own subsistence"
People have to work no matter what system you have, food, medical care, etc. doesn't fall out of the sky. Again, as you said, people can start co-ops if they want to get away from these "masters". They chose not to, because they want their evil "masters" to pay for the building they work in and the machine they use to produce their goods and services, and then cry he wants something in return.
These "masters" never took anything from you. You can go back to making money to same way your ancestors did, you just choose not to. You're just crying that they put another option on the table.
It's funny how you keep going back and forth. You hate capitalism and talk like Karl Marx and yet when the Neo-Confederates talk about how the Confederacy wasn't so bad because it was sparing slaves the horrors of Northern capitalism, you start talking like Milton Friedman.
I live in Austin Texas. Minimum wage here is $7.25. Yet even McDonalds pays $13.00. People don't get "the coarest necessities of life" in return for labor. We live in a world where the most poorly paid laborer can afford a loaf of bread with less than 20 minutes of work for heaven's sake. That's a prosperity beyond the wildest dreams of our feudal ancestors.
1
-
1
-
@Rundstedt1 Again, if you think a worker controlled, investor free environment is better, you're free to start a co-op.
And no, craftsmen didn't used to make a lot of money. They made plenty of money relative to their neighbors, but their purchasing power was far far lower than the average worker today or even 100 years ago.
Show me your sources for this height dip. Anyway, yes, early capitalism was rough, but arguably it was not even capitalism before anti-Trust Laws. By the dictionary definition, it fits, but Adam Smith, who's often considered the father of capitalism, spoke about the need for competition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For decades we've been promoting racial solidarity among black people (and every other non-white ethnicity): BET, special clubs in colleges for students of different races, the New York Times "Of Color" Gift Guide. This kind of racial solidarity amongst white people is considered a hideous abomination, but when conservatives like myself called out the double standard, no one listened. Then segregation became more intense, with segregated graduations, dormitories, etc. Some people listened to us when we called this out, but most people just smiled, nodded, and let it happen. Now we've got segregated elementary schools. What did you expect?
The left needs to make up their mind. Do you believe race is a deep, spiritual part of one's identity that should be bonded over, or a superficial characteristic like eye-color that should not divide us. They've been trying to have it both ways for too long.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Anyone who's old enough to remember what politics were like during the Bush administration knows how indistinguishable they are.
"The corporations are running things now, so it's not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He's a warmonger. He's a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush." - Kurt Vonnegat
"I give Obama credit, he seems to have stuck to his guns as far as pulling the troops out of Iraq. He's a very intelligent man, an excellent speaker and has charisma. John McCain offers none of that." - Michael Moore
"Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for [...]capitalist exploitation[...] basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush." - Noam Chomsky
Actually I lied, those were from Tom Metzger, Eric Gliebe, and Rocky Suhadya respectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Beardman29 Hundreds of thousands of people? Give me a break. The Trail of Tears, the worst incident of violence against the NAs, killed 3,000 people.
You're right, we have been fed lies and supression of truth. We've been told our forefathers murdered an entire race just to sate their unique, Caucasoid predisposition to evil when in reality 90% of the North American aboriginals were dead before America was even a country (due to European disease). We've been told our ancestors just sailed over to Africa and plucked people from the continent like dandelions, when in reality they were buying into a robust slave trade that already existed on the continent. The Barbary Pirates, who are the reason the US Marine Corp exists, are completely absent from the cirruculum. In short we're taught white people, and only white people, are born with evil DNA. The left wants to further entrench this and call it "progress."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Seriously people, just WHO is our enemy? The unemployed left-wing 25-year-old holding up a sign, OR the judeo-capitalist banksters who swindled the American taxpayers out of A TRILLION dollars in the “bailout” scam AND continue to oppress the White Working Class?!? Even Adolf Hitler’s NSDAP had to vote with open communists on some issues to achieve their goals. WE need to utilize and support every movement of dissent against this evil American empire, regardless of which end of the political spectrum it originates from." - Rocky Sudahayda
"The corporations are running things now, so it's not going to make much difference who's in there, but McCain would be much worse. He's a warmonger. He's a scary, scary person--more dangerous than Bush." - Tom Metzger
"The fact he wants to keep us in wars in the Middle East for 100 years, that's not a good thing. I give Obama credit, he seems to have stuck to his guns as far as pulling the troops out of Iraq. He's a very intelligent man, an excellent speaker and has charisma. John McCain offers none of that." - Eric Gleibe
"Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for [...]capitalist exploitation, [...] basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush." - Rocky Sudahayda
As a Republican I can't wait until Trump leaves office, so the Neo-Confederates and Neo-Nazis can stop polluting our party and go back where they belong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, we let them vote so they could make their own law and order. Crying that someone is forcing their lifestyle on you by giving you democracy is like crying someone is forcing their diet on you by giving a choice of what to have for lunch.
When the war began, Iraqis believed overthrowing Saddam was worth by a margin of 2 to 1 (src: Gallup April 2004 poll), and only 17% approved of attacks on coalition forces (src: Gallup April 2004 poll), and most Iraqis wanted the US to stay until elections were established (src: Global Policy June 2004 survey). It wasn't until 2006, when sectarian violence started kicking into high gear that Iraqis changed their tune. They mass murdered each other, blamed Americans, and pretended they never wanted to be liberated. Of course, blaming America could only get them so far, and after two years of terrible violence they finally admitted it was the likes of Al Qaeda in Iraq killing them, not Americans, and half of the insurgents switched sides in an event called the Anbar Awakening, which, in addition to Shi'ite insurgent warlord's cease fire, FINALLY brought peace to Iraq and caused Iraqi deaths to fall by 80%.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ms. Speak Tha Truth Christ alive, so you want me to answer why blacks, in general, are more likely to end up in poverty than whites, but I can't tell what blacks, in general, go through more often relative to whites because that's stereotyping?
Also, no, we don't want equity in social media. We want a free and fair market place of ideas, which is the antithesis of equity because equity is the equality of results, and a marketplace has competition that results in winners and losers, where as equity is based on pre-ordained conclusions.
Black Americans were screwed over historically but that doesn't explain the fact that their poverty hasn't budged since 1970. The Berlin Wall fell in 1990 and yet despite that East Germany was living in crushing poverty up until that point, it caught up to West Germany economically almost immediately. History doesn't make sense to explain black poverty, nor does racism because obviously America has become less racist over the past 50 years. Tell me, what has been increasing over the same 50 year period that could offset the benefits of decreasing racism? It's fatherlessness and the cultural degeneracy caused by the welfare state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
The people who really committed genocide in Iraq are absolutely overjoyed that you blame their American enemies for their atrocities. Actually, that was the point from the beginning, why insurgents wrought so much senseless violence in Iraq.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I won't deny that a lot of this sounds like delusional mental gymnastics, but I also kind of vaguely get what they're saying. It's vaguely intuitive. For example, as someone who's learning coding, I don't think you could really learn coding if you always had a teacher standing over your shoulder, always answering your questions.
But then my mind rebounds and I think "Well, why do we need to understand God if God is all powerful? We don't need our own understanding because it would cost nothing for God to make us fully dependent."
But then I think about what I they said about freedom. You can't be free and totally dependent. God wants us to make our own decisions.
But then I think "Why would God want us to make our own decisions if His judgement is perfect?"
Meh, whatever. I need to stop thinking and get some sleep.
God's silence is the biggest reason for I don't subscribe to any religion. I think Deism is pretty plausible, but the Christian preception of God as an omni-present, all powerful, loving, caring deity is a lot harder to swallow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is parents raising their kids to be racial tribalists and only able to identify with someone who looks like them. Don't give me that "They never see themselves on screen" crap. A study authored by no less than NPR showed African Americans area already over-represented in the media and even when I was growing up I was inundated with black leads in children's entertainment (The Proud Family, Little Bill, The Famous Jet Jackson, That's So Raven, Smart Guy, Keenan and Kell, etc.)
If little white girls rejoiced seeing a princess who looked like them because the last 6 Disney leads (Mei, Mulan, Moana, Raya, Jasmine, and Mirabel) have been POCs those videos would be used to justify teaching CRT to preschoolers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mohammedriadh4990 "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
13,807 vs 122,000
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because only Americans are blamed for the crimes of our mortal enemies
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Chomsky said slavery made America a super-power. That statement makes no sense if you remember slavery existed all over the world (if slavery made super-powers, Brazil would be the world super-power). Also, that means Chomsky is the one who's saying "look at all the great things slavery built." Most conservatives recognize slavery doesn't build nearly as much wealth as freedom, hence why the South was historically much poorer than the North. How do you get things so backwards here?
Also, in fact, there was no genocide of First Nation people, unless you're using the ultra-liberal definition of genocide that's become fashionable in the last five years (ie the Chinese are committing genocide against the Uyghurs, the Russians are committing genocide against the Ukranians). There was mass murder of Native people, but no one calls 9/11 genocide. 90% of the Indians were killed by disease before America was even a country. Genocide used to mean extermination or attempted extermination of an entire ethnic group, which never happened here. Not against American Indians as a whole, anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I see that you are planning to hire someone whose job it will be to prevent 'cultural appropriation.' It occurred to me when I read that, that the last official I know of whose job was to prevent cultural appropriation was Hans Hinkel. So who was he? When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, as you may know, every Jew in any cultural position was fired. My father was a young assistant director at the Berlin City Opera and he and his boss, Dr. Kurt Singer, also a Jew, lost their jobs. My father had the idea of telling the Nazis, 'Okay, you say we're a different culture; well then, you logically need to allow us to have our own cultural institutions.' Out of that came the Jewish Cultural League, which was headed by Dr. Singer, and was able to carry on Jewish cultural life with Jewish artists for Jewish audiences until after the beginning of the war." - Fred Baumann
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You need to study human history. You have absorbed the utopian non-sense this video is talking about. Yes, America did horrible things, but human history was, up until a little more than a century ago, unimaginably savage all over the globe. The Mfecane, the Rape of Nanking, the reign of King Leopold, the Genocide of the Dzunghar, the Arab slave trade, Comancheria, all taint human history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prager's stance on free stuff is so close to why I loath people like AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Bernie Sanders. If you make $32,000 a year, you are, measured in Purchasing Power Parity, in the top 1% of the world economy. Bernie wants you believe if you making more money than 99% of the world, you are still barely above the point where you'd be so poorly off that you'd gain the right to put a gun to someone's head to demand more. How can anyone be grateful when they hold that belief!? If filling people who have it better than 99% of the planet with self-pity, rage, and envy isn't evil, nothing is evil. You can't believe you have only slightly more than you are entitled to, only what you are entitled to, or less than you are entitled to, and feel grateful. All the oceans of privilege we have not just over the rest of the planet, but over our ancestors, is all worth nothing thanks to people like him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Justice for all, except David Dorn, David Patrick Underwood, Atalia Marie-Kelly, Jose Guitierez, Victor Cazares Jr., Francisco Montiel, Chris Batey, Tony Timpa, Joseph Hutcheson, Thomas Kelly, Daniel Shaver, Andrew Thomas, Dennis Tuttle, Rhogen Nicholas, Ariel Roman, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay a few thoughts on this, without evening watching the video because I don't have the temper:
1) The fact we concern ourselves with "age gaps" at all in a relationship as a matter of ability to consent is insane. There is no where else in the law we EVEN CONSIDER this type of thinking. If you team up with someone to rob a bank at 16, does your accountability for the crime change based on the age of your partner? Don't give me that "power imbalance" nonsense. Parents can't even control their 15 year old daughter more than her peers can, so why should a 30 year old be able to mind-control a 17 year old?
2) With the way society is going, you'll be able to run for President at 18 but not stay home without a baby sitter at 17. What the hell do people think happens on your 18th birthday that turns you from a toddler to Confucius overnight? If you can go to war, vote for the most powerful man in the world, and take out a $200,000 loan at 18, shouldn't you be able to chose who to sleep with a bit earlier?
3) Do people HONESTLY think 18 is a natural, non-arbitrary cut off for adulthood? No society in the entire world had a cut off for adulthood for all of human history that high until the industrial age. And why would it? Almost everyone is fertile, has a sex drive, has secondary sex characteristic, and has reached their adult height before 18. So why do we treat this age with such sick, superstitious, religious reverse?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is not about attacking South, it's about defending America and its icons. If we buy the Neo-Confederate narrative, Lincoln was a Nazi imperialist who invaded the South over molasses or something. It would be nice if both sides could be the good guys in the Civil War, but that's just now how the world works. Lincoln needs to be defended just like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc. It used to be the radical, America-hating, left who tried to water down the image of The Great Emancipator and his Union soldiers:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States." - Howard Zinn, A People's History of America
Siding with Howard Zinn dishonors the memory of all Americans, Northern and Southern.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andreascasablancas3574 Slaves worked 6 days a week from dawn to dusk, wore rags, ate cold bacon, had a life expectancy of 35, and were packed 20 in a cabin. They didn't have electricity, cable TV, microwaves and ovens, running water, air conditioning, etc. like the typical "poor" American has. Regardless, even free people back then shared about half those maladies I listed, and slavery has nothing to do with your conditions: many house slaves lived better than many free people, but they were still slaves because they were coerced into their jobs, they did not chose them freely over alternatives they perceived as inferior. Sally Hemmings had her own room while Abraham Lincoln's entire family lived in a log cabin, that doesn't mean Abraham was a slave and Sally was free.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tbrown7274 Then how is it white people's historical wrongs are known all over the world while most people, yourself included, are evidently ignorant about things like the Mfecane, the Genocide of the Dzunghar, Ghengis Khan, the Assyrian Empire, the Arab slave trade, the Ottoman Empire, the Japanese Ainu, etc.
No one screams the sins of their ancestors sin from the rooftops like white people do, and in a perverse inversion of karma our honesty leads people to believe we are born with evil DNA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Like no evidence to go along that. Not gunna compare it to other countries just gonna say that out of your ass."
It should be self-evident. Korea, Vietnam, Panama, The First Gulf War, the Second Gulf War, Grenada, the Afghan War... Of course those wars weren't solely motivated by the liberty of others, but the US could have simply installed a pro-American strongman/puppet in Iraq or Afghanistan or Panama or Grenada, but instead we let people elect their own governments, even when it was a serious detriment to our own interest. And while South Vietnam and Kuwait were not democracies, they were still much more free than the powers trying to take them over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, it's feminists fault the Men's Rights Movement became associated with misogyny and far-right politics. Why? Because no one paid any attention to them until they did. The MRM has been around since the 1970s, but only gained attention when it started using vicious, incendiary rhetoric, courtesy of Paul Elam who was fully aware of his strategy. Second, all people trying to silence the movement have been on the left, even though many if not most prominent MRAs are former feminists. You pushed the MRM away from the left.
"STEM fields have a dearth of female engineers. There are gender gaps in many fields."
There you go, he talks about men's issues and you shift it to women. Lack of women in STEM is already treated like the crisis of the century. Lack of men in HEAL is seen as completely fine.
"In most cases its far worse for women than it is for men, as the average salary for women across the board is lower on average."
The pay gap only applies to married women. First off, it shouldn't matter because if you're married you have a joint account. Second, its about women's choices, unless you think women are somehow forced into the homemaker role, even though women have more power in a marriage since men are more afraid of family courts (as demonstrated by the fact that women initiate 70% of divorce) and its women who select husbands based on their earnings.
"But there's also the possibility that these gender gaps may never completely disappear largely due to cultural norms. Women are still largely considered caregivers. Its not always true but that cultural norm does affect the decisions of many men and women."
There you go. And the same women who cry about these cultural norms refuse to get with a guy who makes less than them.
"Statements like this can be very misleading. It may be that women are just getting more representation in these fields as well. Meaning that that's potentially evidence that the gender gap is in fact closing in those fields."
How is the gender gap closing if these are fields that women already dominate?
"This again is not a bad thing. In fact this statement is purely fear mongering. "
You haven't seen the mountains of research that shows kids do worse in single parent households?
1
-
@whoknows-i8x "Some people would call this karma. I call it entropy. The reason why taking the breaks off women's opportunity produced these results is because women were oppressed for thousands of years. For thousands of years there are stronger selective pressures imposed on women and they had to develop faster in order to survive a world that wouldn't accept them."
Wow, you really want to talk about evo-psych? First off, if we lived in a world that treated women harsher, why did women evolve lesser bone density, weaker muscle mass, smaller stature, all the things you'd expect when you AREN'T forced to deal with the harshness of the world. And why did women outlive and thus outnumber men in every society ever studied in history? Women even evolved a greater ability to cry (yes, you can look that up). Why would women evolve to be criers if the world didn't care about their pain more than men's?
Genetic studies show we are descended from twice as many women as men. That means essentially that men had to impress women to pass down their genes, where as women just needed to exist to pass down theirs.
This also shows why a society, even if its male dominated, would favor women. Men had to gain women's favor to pass on their genes. The opposite is not true, or at least not nearly to the same extent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I consider myself pro-life, but I don't quite buy the "life begins at conception" argument. Technically, it's true, if you're referring to the way a plant or bacterium is alive, but that's not what matters ethically. How do we define death? Well I'm sure up until 100 years ago, everyone would have said "when the soul leaves the body". And what's the seat of the soul? The brain. If someone blew your head off, but kept the rest of your body running with some kind of machine, no one would consider you alive in an ethically meaningful sense.
It seems more logical that life begins at brain development, but that happens within the first few weeks, and contrary to popular belief, there is no particular part of the brain dedicated to "consciousness". So in effect this would still make 99% of abortions illegal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Highwynd Really, you're a vet? So you've slept on a cot in a tent in the middle of the desert with 100 other men eating MREs and yet you think a "destitute life" is living in a 1000 square foot, air-conditioned, water-tight apartment with internet access, cable TV, a refrigerator, stove, and micro-wave? I find that hard to believe.
The upper class should do more to help the poor. But guess what? We are the upper class, bub. If you make $34,000 or more a year, measured in Purchasing Power Parity, you are in the top 1% of the world economy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fox2000xx "In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists." - John Slobeda, Iraq Body Count
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
In other words 7/8 of the civilians that died in Iraq were killed by the people George Galloway was probably rooting for, no doubt in large part because they knew their atrocities would be blamed on their Western enemies by people like him. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which seemed to target no one in particular and were just to "get attention."
People like Galloway created the perverse incentive for terrorists that led to so much bloodshed in Iraq.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@abstract5249 Dude, colleges had lower thresholds for admitting students based on color. It's not a theory you could get admitted with a lower SAT score if you were Black, it was a fact. Here's a better question, why would you assume the Black applicant is doing better in research, projects, career activity, community involvement, etc? You have no data either way, so by default a rational person would assume he's doing the same, and yet he's being let in with a lesser SAT score.
The fact is research shows boys will get graded 3 points lower for an identical assignment if it has a female name. So if boys GPA is .3 lower than girls on average, we know they are actually performing exactly up to par with the girls.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jane Casillas That's a relatively recent thing. Besides, your struggles to afford your lifestyle largely depends on what life style you expected in the first place. For example, if I lease $1100 a month apartment, because I expect I'll be making $40,000 a year soon, and end up only making $30,000, I may struggle. But if I had anticipated I'd be making $30,000, I would have bought a cheaper apartment. Take this to an extreme and even someone making $100,000 a year can struggle to make ends meet, if they bought a pent-house in Manhattan. It doesn't mean $100,000 is poor.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@briancordero7674 "At the office all the morning. At noon to the Exchange to meet Mr. Warren the timber merchant, but could not meet with him. Here I met with many sea commanders, and among others Captain Cuttle, and Curtis, and Mootham, and I, went to the Fleece Tavern to drink; and there we spent till four o’clock, telling stories of Algiers, and the manner of the life of slaves there! And truly Captn. Mootham and Mr. Dawes (who have been both slaves there) did make me fully acquainted with their condition there: as, how they eat nothing but bread and water. At their redemption they pay so much for the water they drink at the public fountaynes, during their being slaves. How they are beat upon the soles of their feet and bellies at the liberty of their padron. How they are all, at night, called into their master’s Bagnard; and there they lie. How the poorest men do use their slaves best. How some rogues do live well, if they do invent to bring their masters in so much a week by their industry or theft; and then they are put to no other work at all. And theft there is counted no great crime at all." - Sameul Pepys
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maryeverett2266 We have no reason to assume those measurements could be something else, but also no reason to assume they couldn't. If you meet those two assumptions in the middle, which is the only fair thing to do, since there's no more proof of one assumption than the other, you get a universe that's 50% fined tuned as this video states. That's still a hell of a lot of fine tuning.
You always have "nothing to compare it to" when dealing with probabilities, because no two settings for a potential occurrence will be exactly the same. For example, what are the odds of a meteor hitting the Earth on July 25th, 2027, right in the middle of Chicago? You can say "very low, because it hasn't happened during the last 10,000 days in recorded history", but no other day has been July 25th, 2027.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People who hate whites: America has no right to exist, you stole the land from the natives. I'm going to ignore the aboriginal Tiawanese, Ainu, Celts, Sami, Khoasians, Dzunghar, Algonquin, Pygmys...
People who hate Jews: Isreal has no right to exist, you stole the land from the natives. I'm going to ignore the aboriginal Tiawanese, Ainu, Celts, Sami, Khoasians, Dzunghar, Algonquin, Pygmys...
There are only two schools of thought in the word: intellectual honesty and willful blindness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh right, this is hateful, but the not the "Kill All Men" hashtag.
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
As usual, the left's definition of hate is someone on the right stating we're all human, and all fall short of the grace of God, where as you live for the beliefs all evil comes from European DNA or the Y chromosome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Putting aside the fact that you're a troll:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States." - Howard Zinn, the epitome of libtard and propagandist
When you cream your pants at a Howard Zinn quote, who has truly gone woke?
Amber Ruffin said white people did not free black people from slavery just a week ago. Watch her bit "Black People Freed Black People, Get It Right History". This Prager U video is deeply problematic to the leftist world view, but for now they're too busy trying to stick a thumb in the eye of Southerners to care.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"I wish for everyone to be rich, but when the average person in the 1% has 12500% more total net worth than the average American, that's stupid.
Please don't tell me they worked 12500% harder than the average American."
Networth is not income. If I get $100 and spend it on a bike, I'll have more networth than if I get $10,000 and spend it all on a month long vacation in Disney World. Second, they aren't living 12500% better than the average America either. Third, a functioning economy does not reward hard work, it rewards value. If I work hard to plan to dig holes in my backyard that benefit no one, I don't deserve anything in return for that.
"They should pitch in a reasonable percentage of their income, i.e. after making 1.000.000$ in a year they pay .50$ for every 1$ they make. This way millions of Americans can be helped out of poverty.
This isn't "unfair", this is reasonable. There probably isn't a single millionaire reading this, but there are people in poverty reading this. Teaching wealthy creates financial freedom for the poor, and only decreases the financial freedom of the rich by a little, little bit."
It is NEVER that simple. If good intentions equal good results, and we have the right to take other people's money for our own benefit, we might as well go outright Communist. Higher taxes DOES NOT translate into higher revenue. Taxing the rich is putting a price on entering a certain income bracket. The higher that price, the less people will try to enter. Just like a store raising its prices won't necessarily increase its profits, a country raising taxes on the rich won't necessarily raise. The rich shoulder a higher shelter of the nation's tax burden now than they did before Reagan's tax cuts.
"Giving money to the poor doesn't remove their incentive to work. Taking money from the rich doesn't remove their incentive to work either."
Then why the hell do the rich get paid their generous salaries in the first place? People pay others for no other reason than to give them incentive to work for them. The people who pay the rich are no more eager to part with their money than you, or I. Businesses pay CEOs millions of dollars because they think that's what they need to do to motivate them to keep their jobs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
More quotes from edweek dot org:
"For Black and Brown children in the United States, a major part of their schooling experience is associated with White female teachers who have no understanding of their culture. That was certainly my experience. My K-12 schooling was filled with White teachers who, at their core, were good people but unknowingly were murdering my spirit with their lack of knowledge, care, and love of my culture. "
"Future [white] teachers should be required to take classes such as African studies, African-American studies, Latinx studies, Caribbean studies, Chicana/o studies, Asian and Southeast Asian studies, and Native American studies.
There also needs to be a push to recruit future teachers of color as early as high school, pay for their college education, and mentor them when they enter the classroom. Research consistently shows that teachers of color have higher expectations of students of color, which leads to more students of color referred to gifted programs. Moreover, having a teacher of color helps students confront issues of racism."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The US didn't destroy Iraq, people like you did. According to Iraq Body Count, about 88% of civilians killed in Iraq were killed by "insurgents, militia, and terrorists." By blaming America for the atrocities of people our troops were there to kill and capture, you created a perverse incentive and a self-perpetuating snowball effect. Insurgent factions committed so much senseless violence in large part because they knew people like you would blame their Western enemies, and make their atrocities propaganda victories. How else do you explain such bizarre events as the July Soccer Bombings, which by the media's own admission seem to target no particular group and were just to "get attention"?
Terrorists would blow up Iraqi civilians. Iraqis would blame America, take up arms against Americans and the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police, which of course made it more difficult for these groups to do their job. Then terrorists would blow up more people. The cycle would repeat ad infinitum. The cycle of violence only stopped during the Anbar Awakening, when the Iraqi people finally admitted who was really killing them and started fighting the likes of Al Qaeda instead of just blaming Americans for all the death and destruction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because you blame us for the atrocities of the people we were there to kill and capture.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
You don't have to blame Saddam for the crimes of his mortal enemies to make him a butcher.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That makes sense because it doesn't produce perverse incentives.
Socialism based on the principle of helping people be more productive (roads and schools) can improve economic output, but most socialism today is based on the simple premise of "waaah, you have more money than me and I want it to so give it to me your you heartless monster." That kind of thinking only ends up with doom for everyone.
Imagine this. You live in a small country where 50 people are doctors and make 400,000 a year each. You want to raise 5 million for the poor, so you tax them 100,000 each. That works at first. But then fewer people want to be doctors, so ten years later there are 40 people who are doctors making 300,000 each after taxes. You need the same money, but now you have to increase taxes to about $125,000 per doctor. That works for a little while, but then even fewer people want to be doctors, so ten years later you have 35 doctors, and you have to raise taxes again. Etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Matt makes a powerful case, but there's something to be said for the other side. Indians getting incorporated into Western society was a good thing, yes, but it wasn't always that simple. For example, the Trail of Tears didn't spread Western civilization to the First Nations, it really was a case of simple land theft, in defiance of the Supreme Court no less. Infact many of those displaced were from the Five Civilized Tribes, whom had already accepted the American way of life. Indians in South America lived as slaves on Haciendas. Many times it was not incorporation, but simply subjugation and displacement. And the reservation system of today still causes terrible poverty and a lot of sticky ethical issues (though the reason the system even exists is largely couched in paternalistic, PC bullshit).
Columbus is a tough one, because he was tremendous asshole, and in the age of discovery I think its very likely if he weren't born, another European would have had the idea for the voyage soon after. Maybe I'm wrong, but a lot of its seems to be a question of "does the man make history, or does history make the man."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If people could understand how wealth relative was and how nonsensical terms like "living wage" are, the Democrat Party would disappear overnight. In 1950, the supposed good old days when everyone could make a living wage, the life expectancy was 65, the median house size was 1000 square feet, the average family spent 30% of their income on food, the average worker worked 10 more hours per week, and the chances of owning anything from a television to refrigerator was drastically smaller. Oh and the poverty rate was 22%. But we call those "the good old days" when everyone could make ends meet.
Instead progressivism puts us in an endless cycle of greed, rage, envy, and pessimism, at a time when the average person literally lives better than a king.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"When I was in college, I read a book by George Gilder, one of the wisest thinkers of the last half-century, titled “Naked Nomads,” which had a deep impact on me. It was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them. For example, Gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men.
While there was no danger—I would say no chance—that I would commit a violent crime (though I was, at the time, single), this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage.
I also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do. If it doesn’t, the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc. Therefore, raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos."
Those are the first three paragraphs of the article. I doubt you found anything objectionable. But God forbid we shatter the leftist view that evil is an exclusively male domain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
This IS rightwing "propaganda." The idea the America can ever be beautiful or noble in some way , or any way better than its enemies, is inherently rightwing:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States."
-Howard Zinn, the leftist author of the most popular and anti-American textbook in universities today
Does that sound anything remotely like the message of this video? Does that sound anything remotely like -0:26 - 0:31, or 3:50 - 5:28.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DFrost-ip2lk No. Of the six Founding Fathers Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Samuel Adams, only two were slave holders: Jefferson and Washington. Washington was wishy-washy on slavery but expressed abolitionist opinions in private and ended up freeing his slaves on his death bed. Jefferson didn't give up his slaves because he was in debt but he fought slavery vigorously during his political career, including making Virginia the first state in the union to ban importation of slaves.
The rest were unabashedly AGAINST slavery, at least by 1776. Benjamin Franklin passed around a petition to ban slavery, Thomas Paine blasted it as the equivalent to murder, and Alexander Hamilton...well, there's a play about him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CartoonCastro "did the iraqi millitas do those things? No they didn'"
Are you freaking kidding me!?
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists." - John Slobeda, Iraq Body Count
They were responsible for about 88% of civilian casualties. You would horrifically slander your greatest ally without even taking to thirty seconds to learn something about this war?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lol think you're so macho, but when women tell you its wrong for a male to sleep with an underage girls, because of some vague, abstract, nebulous shit about "grooming" and "trauma" and "realizing they were abused" you don't really understand, you just go along with it, right?
The truth is, yes, the boys probably won't be "traumatized", but my friend stole a case of his dad's beer and got drunk with his brother in the alley at ten years old. As far as I know he had a great time. Does that mean the drinking age should be 10? Hell no. Adults are doing a horrible job handling sexual liberation and we shouldn't export it to minors.
Besides, hypersexuality is a real issue that can arise from hebophilia. I had a friend who got laid on his eighth grade summer vacation by a High School freshman girl. His mom never knew, of course, but it he became so adamant in his search for more poon she had to transfer him to a private, all-boys school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807. Never forget these numbers. Insurgents wreaked so much senseless violence in Iraq largely because they knew people like the ones in the comments here would blame every death on their American enemies. Every murder they committed became a propaganda victory. How else do you explain such bizarre, senseless violence like the July Soccer Bombings, which seem to target no one in particular and were just to "get attention."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prager U is old fashion conservativism, which existed as a vanguard against the ruthless and indiscriminate anti-Americanism of the old fashion left. Admitting America could ever be right about anything used to be a conservative idea. That's why Steven Crowder made a video praising the marines in Haiti even though a Democrat was in office while Hugo Chavez was accusing the US of starting the Earthquake with a sonic weapon.
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States." - Howard Zinn, the father of modern college campus leftism and the messiah of anti-Americanism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"At the office all the morning. At noon to the Exchange to meet Mr. Warren the timber merchant, but could not meet with him. Here I met with many sea commanders, and among others Captain Cuttle, and Curtis, and Mootham, and I, went to the Fleece Tavern to drink; and there we spent till four o’clock, telling stories of Algiers, and the manner of the life of slaves there! And truly Captn. Mootham and Mr. Dawes (who have been both slaves there) did make me fully acquainted with their condition there: as, how they eat nothing but bread and water. At their redemption they pay so much for the water they drink at the public fountaynes, during their being slaves. How they are beat upon the soles of their feet and bellies at the liberty of their padron. How they are all, at night, called into their master’s Bagnard; and there they lie." - Samuel Pepys
It's such a perverse inversion of karma how the West's willingness to own up to our bad behavior has convinced the world we are uniquely evil.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because we're the only country on Earth that gets blamed for the crimes of our mortal enemies.
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
In other words, 7/8 Iraqi civilians were killed by the people the USA was there to kill and capture.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Most of all its politicians with filthy, diseased, maggot ridden hearts filling them with ingratitude and bitterness for personal gain. You see it in this very comment section, people crying about how bad they have it, pining for "the good old days" of the 1950s, even though in 1950 the life expectancy was 65, the median house size was less than half what it is today, the poverty rate was 25%, the average family spent 30% of their income on food, the average full time worker worked 50 hours a week, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kingbaldwiniv5409
Douglas: Yes, here you find men who hurra for Lincoln, and say he is right when he discards all distinction between races, or when he declares that he discards the doctrine that there is such a thing as a superior and inferior race; and Abolitionists are required and expected to vote for Mr. Lincoln because he goes for the equality of races, holding that in the Declaration of Independence the white man and negro were declared equal, and endowed by divine law with equality. And down south with the old line Whigs, with the Kentuckians, the Virginians, and the Tennesseeans, he tells you that there is a physical difference between the races, making the one superior, the other inferior, and he is in favor of maintaining the superiority of the white race over the negro
Lincoln: I have never said any thing to the contrary, but I hold that notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence-the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man. I agree with Judge Douglas that he is not my equal in many respects, certainly not in color-perhaps not in intellectual and moral endowments; but in the right to eat the bread without the leave of any body else which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every other man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
122,000 vs 13,807
In otherwords your heroes killed the overwhelming majority of civvies in Iraq.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Most admired Queen,
The love I bear my God, my King and country, hath so oft emboldened me in the worst of extreme dangers, that now honesty doth constrain me to presume thus far beyond myself, to present your Majesty this short discourse: if ingratitude be a deadly poison to all honest virtues, I must be guilty of that crime if I should omit any means to be thankful.
So it is, that some ten years ago being in Virginia, and taken prisoner by the power of Powhatan their chief King, I received from this great Salvage exceeding great courtesy, especially from his son Nantaquaus, the most manliest, comeliest, boldest spirit, I ever saw in a Salvage, and his sister Pocahontas, the Kings most dear and well-beloved daughter, being but a child of twelve or thirteen years of age, whose compassionate pitiful heart, of my desperate estate, gave me much cause to respect her: I being the first Christian this proud King and his grim attendants ever saw: and thus enthralled in their barbarous power, I cannot say I felt the least occasion of want that was in the power of those my mortal foes to prevent, notwithstanding all their threats. After some six weeks fatting amongst those Salvage courtiers, at the minute of my execution, she hazarded the beating out of her own brains to save mine; and not only that, but so prevailed with her father, that I was safely conducted to Jamestown: where I found about eight and thirty miserable poor and sick creatures, to keep possession of all those large territories of Virginia; such was the weakness of this poor commonwealth, as had the salvages not fed us, we directly had starved. And this relief, most gracious Queen, was commonly brought us by this Lady Pocahontas.
Notwithstanding all these passages, when inconstant fortune turned our peace to war, this tender virgin would still not spare to dare to visit us, and by her our jars have been oft appeased, and our wants still supplied; were it the policy of her father thus to employ her, or the ordinance of God thus to make her his instrument, or her extraordinary affection to our nation, I know not: but of this I am sure; when her father with the utmost of his policy and power, sought to surprise me, having but eighteen with me, the dark night could not affright her from coming through the irksome woods, and with watered eyes gave me intelligence, with her best advice to escape his fury; which had he known, he had surely slain her.
Jamestown with her wild train she as freely frequented, as her fathers habitation; and during the time of two or three years, she next under God, was still the instrument to preserve this colony from death, famine and utter confusion; which if in those times, had once been dissolved, Virginia might have lain as it was at our first arrival to this day.
Since then, this business having been turned and varied by many accidents from that I left it at: it is most certain, after a long and troublesome war after my departure, betwixt her father and our colony; all which time she was not heard of.
About two years after she herself was taken prisoner, being so detained near two years longer, the colony by that means was relieved, peace concluded; and at last rejecting her barbarous condition, she was married to an English Gentleman, with whom at this present she is in England; the first Christian ever of that Nation, the first Virginian ever spoke English, or had a child in marriage by an Englishman: a matter surely, if my meaning be truly considered and well understood, worthy a Princes understanding.
Thus, most gracious Lady, I have related to your Majesty, what at your best leisure our approved Histories will account you at large, and done in the time of your Majesty's life; and however this might be presented you from a more worthy pen, it cannot from a more honest heart, as yet I never begged anything of the state, or any: and it is my want of ability and her exceeding desert; your birth, means, and authority; her birth, virtue, want and simplicity, doth make me thus bold, humbly to beseech your Majesty to take this knowledge of her, though it be from one so unworthy to be the reporter, as myself, her husbands estate not being able to make her fit to attend your Majesty. The most and least I can do, is to tell you this, because none so oft hath tried it as myself, and the rather being of so great a spirit, however her stature: if she should not be well received, seeing this Kingdom may rightly have a Kingdom by her means; her present love to us and Christianity might turn to such scorn and fury, as to divert all this good to the worst of evil; whereas finding so great a Queen should do her some honor more than she can imagine, for being so kind to your servants and subjects, would so ravish her with content, as endear her dearest blood to effect that, your Majesty and all the Kings honest subjects most earnestly desire.
And so I humbly kiss your gracious hands,
Captain John Smith, 1616
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"The Left’s flirtation with Islamists is particularly bizarre. Unlike Communist tyrannies, which at least paid lip service to the ideals of social justice and equality, the jihadists in word and deed continually displayed their contempt for feminism, human rights, cosmopolitan tolerance, and democratic freedom—everything the Left claims to stand for. Yet American feminists, who can become enraged over a single masculine pronoun, find all sorts of rationalizations for gender apartheid, honor killings, genital mutilations, wife-beating, polygamy, and other medieval sexist abuses sanctioned by Islam, Glazov shows. Duke professor Miriam Cooke, for example, asserts, “What is driving Islamist men is globalization,” and she praises female suicide bombers for manifesting “agency” against colonial powers. In response to the high incidence of Muslims raping Norwegian women, Professor Unni Wikan of the University of Oslo recommends that Norwegian women wear a veil. And Nation columnist Naomi Klein calls on leftists to join in solidarity with Muqtada al-Sadr, the Iraqi Shiite who has fomented violence against the American military and fellow Iraqis. The only villain in the leftist melodrama remains the capitalist, colonialist, imperialist, Christian West. Hence the surreal sight of American feminists marching against the Iraq War and George W. Bush, though the hated president had freed more women than all the activists and women’s studies professors combined." - Bruce Thorton
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Milimeteypetey I never said acknowledging or believing in white privilege means you believe white people are evil, my point the random acts of spite the left inflicts on white people have nothing to do with "white privilege" no matter what they say.
Does anyone truly believe things like the UC Berkley POC house, or constantly swapping white roles in Hollywood for black actors (despite the fact that no less than NPR showed black people are already disproportionately represented on screen, composing 14% of the population but 18% of screen time) are about "white privilege" at all? They don't give a crap about privilege, just about punishing white people for being born white. The disabled are disadvantaged in society, but you won't see Mace Windu swapped for a black guy in a wheelchair in the next Star Wars. And would that be any less ridiculous than a black Anne Boleyn or a Latin Snow-White (and yes, they did both of those)?
There are a million ways you can be privileged in the world, but "white privilege" is treated in a way every other form of privilege simply isn't, which shows its not about privilege at all. You don't see, for instance, healthy people being told they can't shave their heads because they are privileged and its offensive to cancer patients, the way white people are told they can't wear "Black" hairstyles.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Remember, it was the far left who used to make all the arguments we're seeing from Neo-Confederates on this page:
"Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States. The slave interests opposed all that; they saw Lincoln and the Republicans as making continuation of their pleasant and prosperous way of life impossible in the future." - Howard Zinn
Don't let the Marxists get their filthy taint on the cause of humanity and the image of America. And don't let the Neo-Confederates get their filthy taint on our beautiful party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@symbiotezilla12345 If we lived in an alternate reality, where we stayed out of the countries at the top and intervened in the ones in the bottom, there's no doubt in my mind you'd be saying exactly the inverse. You can't hear the screams of people who died from wars we didn't wage, you can't see the dead children we didn't kill, so its so easy for you to say we should have gone to those places.
How does it not occur to people how surreal, dystopian, and Orwellian it is that the US is so vilified for going into Iraq and Afghanistan? Saddam Hussein was the Kim Jung Un of his time, a leader considered by 90% of the planet to be unambiguously evil. The Taliban was...well, pretty much the same thing. If we can become hated for toppling them, there's no way I'll believe Rwanda, Syria, etc. couldn't have produced similar outcomes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It was the side that you were rooting for who did the vast majority of the slaughtering:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because only the West is blamed for the crimes of its mortal enemies:
"In total, over 150,000 people have been killed and 80 percent of them – more than 122,000 – were civilians, said the IBC. [...] According to a 2010 assessment by John Sloboda, director of Iraq Body Count, U.S. and Coalition forces had killed at least 22,668 insurgents as well as 13,807 civilians in the Iraq War, with the rest of the civilians killed by insurgents, militias, or terrorists."
1
-
1
-
1
-
Unpaid domestic labor:
Husband makes $100,000, put its in a joint account wife can draw from at any time.
Paid domestic labor:
Husband makes $100,000, puts $50,000 in their joint account, then gives $50,000 to his wife who, in the spirit of equality, puts $50,000 in their joint account too?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1