Comments by "Elizabeth Anthony" (@elizabethanthony3916) on "5MinuteSchool" channel.

  1. 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  2. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  3. There's only one, the depraved death cult
    1
  4. ​ @produg1 I expect they will, since they let off a child molester off because he didn't know there was an age limit! This is where Arabic signs are required, so they have no excuse, not our railway stations ! 🤬
    1
  5. 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  6. It is, it's happening all over the British isles, it's a scandal how the indigenous are being treated 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  7. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  8. In numbers ! 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  9. The taxpayer
    1
  10. ​@graemebuchanOf1919 Of course you don't, wouldn't fit the narrative, Here in England I know at least ten Muslims that drink, do drugs and eat pork, while still " celebrating " Eid and Ramadan
    1
  11. ​ @britishtechguru 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  12. ​ @englishboy993 What law has he broken ? And does it equate to child rapists and murderers, whose details are withheld and protected ?
    1
  13. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  14. Meat offered to a false god is reason enough to ban it in a Christian country
    1
  15. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  16. ​ @drd6416 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  17. It will be the usual " mental issues ", too much interbreeding
    1
  18. ​@adenwellsmith6908 😂👏👏👏👏
    1
  19. ​ @borishelmut1819 🤡
    1
  20. Amen 🙏
    1
  21. Amen 🙏
    1
  22. ​ @karenturner8739 Amen 🙏
    1
  23. This just goes to show that the hush hush approach to naming a certain violent demographic is not about preserving community peace or easing racial tensions, or the authorities would have withheld this mans identity too. The police have just put a target on this mans back, not only his but his family's too, I wonder who ordered that ? Very odd that burning a plagiarised,depraved book will get you full public disclosure before a court case that doesnt seem to prejudice the case if youre indigenous, but if youre one of the " uninvited " child murderers, with numerous eye witnesses nothing is disclosed to protect the integrity of the case ! Something certainly stinks here, I cant believe its just that the government want to protect these violent criminals " for the sake of diversity" because the British on the whole tend to be less violent and more civilised than the "protected", so are they just embarressed and covering up these things because their experiment has failed abysmally and caused great harm that they would like us to ignore ? This bears a lot more scrutiny, who instructed the police to be so unusually forth coming with this particular accused's details when child murderers details are withheld in case it prejudices their case ? Very fishy all round.
    1
  24. 😂👏👏👏👏
    1
  25. ​ @Raven44453 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  26. 👍👏👏👏👏👏❤️🤍💙
    1
  27. ​ @southface6684 woke is what is allowing this invasion of europe
    1
  28. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  29. People will soon need to police their own streets to protect their women and children and now young men ! Street justice
    1
  30. Amen 🙏🇬🇧
    1
  31. Too much interbreeding.
    1
  32. Amen 🙏 🇬🇧💕
    1
  33. We need a government who will weed out all this corruption ! Drain the swamp !
    1
  34. It is, it's encouraged in their unholy book, along with murder
    1
  35. And crime ! 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  36. They lie too, it's called taquiyya, gives them carte blanche for depraved behaviour.
    1
  37. 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  38. Spot on 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  39. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  40. 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  41. ​ @nuncaolvidare4895 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  42. 👍👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  43. It is not cowardice, it's self preservation. The woman keeps one hand in her pocket, she could have a knife or other weapon and she was trying to provoke a reaction. It looks like she wanted them to react violently so that she could attack them. The girls know they can't depend on the police to protect them and that they would have been portrayed as the bad ones. It's very easy for people to say it's cowardice, especially Americans since they are allowed to be armed and defend themselves,but the British are not. According self defence laws here, you cannot claim self defence, if you strike first. That's why this woman just bullies them, but does not attack the girls physically, she wants to provoke them into doing something that will get them in trouble or so she can claim self defence to the cops if it escalates. No mental health issue here, just a continuation of the kind of crap people had to put up with during the Burn Loot Murder " mostly peaceful " riots. The girls did the right thing to protect themselves from a violent attack, or trouble from the police, who no doubt would have sided with the bully.
    1
  44. Yes, especially Jerusalem
    1
  45. 😁👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧🇮🇱
    1
  46. In Britain if you strike someone first you cannot claim self defence. The bully is trying to provoke them, but has not physically threatened or laid hands them, the police would have sided with the bully and the girls would have been arrested for assault. In Britain it is only considered to be self defence if you are struck first and retaliate in kind. That's why I don't believe there's mental issues here, but malevolent intent by the bully, she knows the law and tried to get them to hit first. She also keeps one hand hidden and could have a weapon that she planned to use if they did get physical with her, probably so she could claim self defence and get away with it. It's not cowardice, when you can't depend on the police to defend you, it's pure self preservation.
    1
  47. Amen 🙏
    1
  48. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧💕☘️
    1
  49. 👍👏👏👏👏👏🇬🇧
    1
  50. Yep, because that would be " racist " according to Starmer even if they were diddling little kids, more vigilantes please
    1