Comments by "" (@ronjon7942) on "Wendover Productions" channel.

  1. 6
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. Wait wait, the pic at 2:26 is misleading, as this waste is secondary waste; higher volume, radically lower toxicity with half lifes measured in hundreds of years that contains low level radiation 2:27 items such as gloves, suits, containers, and so on - similar, if not identical to, the low level radiation detritus from imaging devices used within hospitals. The high level radiation stuff is the burnt fuel residuals, currently stored on site at the nuclear power facilities - the volume of ALL high level radioactive waste created by ALL the nuclear reactors in ALL the world could fit inside a room in a house - bedroom, bathroom, living room, I'm not sure. Also, current generation reactors are only able to use 10% of the fissile matter, leaving a lot of that small amount of volume that fits into a room, with potential to be reused. And a lot, if not most, of 4th gen reactors are to use the current waste as fuel, and to burn nearly all, if not 100%, of that waste as fuel, creating a small amount of waste with half lifes of around 300 years. That picture is is pretty misleading - at the very least, some context of the volume of the low level waste portrayed in the photograph should be explained. There's a pretty significant story behind it, and it is not unfavorable to nuclear. Even if we didn't reuse the high level waste, there will be so little of it especially when compared to the waste from burning petroleum, I do not believe it's an insurmountable problem - certainly not one to stopmusing nuclear over. The comparison of waste amounts isn't laughable, of course, but it is surreal.
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1