Comments by "SHROOMY" (@shroomyesc) on "WatchMojo.com"
channel.
-
189
-
189
-
125
-
32
-
31
-
19
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
***** They are in it because they're in the EBU zone. (a broadcasting zone of europe) and so is Jordan, Morocco, Turkey, Palestine, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and georgia, but only the last three plus turkey participate
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Cyclone00X That's not what socialism is. A socialist-capitalist country (like mine, OR LIKE THE USA) works wonders. I personally do not know that much about US politics, but since you already are socialist-capitalist, i think the starting point is instead of spending 60% of your budget on military, make it more like 40%. You'd still have the biggest military and can have a dick size comparing contest with china and russia. Over here, they take into account what you do for work, how much work you do and so forth, before taxing you. That is important. If the rich do lots of work, then they'll get taxed less as they've earned it more, if they do less work and just are interested in the money, they'll get taxed more. I'm not saying this is 100% fair, but it's more fair than a system where everyone pays the same amount of taxes, because that would force the poorer to be even poorer and the richest to stay richer than they need to be. I'm not saying take the money from the rich, i'm saying take the money from the rich who don't deserve it. Some robin hood kinda shit. I mean i'm not that 100% sure what would work best in a country as massive as the US (personally i just think you guys should split up to different countries themselves, such as like California, Texas, North east states, Carolina, etc.) But if i started a country i would make sure that the government also sells products inside the country and all over the world, so instead of taxing the public they'd get the government fund from profits. (However companies would still be taxed)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Junior Okay i get your point now, but i have a different view of the subject. In case you don't remember, the western world only started modernizing after christianity started being less dominant in culture. There was a dark age where there was no development until they separated church and state. However, i would say that islamist countries, only some of them are actually stuck behind, and then the others are quite modern, but due to war etc. look bad. Such prime examples: Lebanon, Morocco, Algeria, etc. The thing is, we can't just dump islam completely as irrelevant to any development, because we do have them to thank for a lot of different mathematical development. As history shows, what brought us good eventually was lack of religion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1