Comments by "milcoll73" (@thurin84) on "Vox" channel.

  1. 17
  2. 13
  3. 12
  4. 12
  5. 11
  6. 7
  7. 7
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. it IS NOT illegal to own fully automatic firearms in the united states. as long as you pay the tax stamp and comply with all provisions of the 1934 nfa you can own any fully automatic firearm you can afford. the only thing the 1986 law did was ban the manufacture of new fully automatic firearms for the general public. very few fully automatic firearms have a rate of 840rpms. and if you do actually fire that many rounds in a minute youll likely melt your barrel. most are in the 200-600 rpms range. "semiautomatics fire much more quickly than the kinds of firearms that have been around for most american history". bullshit. pepper boxes, volly guns, puckles, kalthoff repeaters, cookson volitional repeaters, belton flintlocks, jennings rifles, and girandoni air rifles, have been around nearly or longer than the usa has. and semiautomatics in the modern sense have been around for 134 years of the 243 years the usa has existed, so wrong again. and how does reducing the 6 seconds it would take a trained user to reload 3 10 round magazines to 2 seconds make a semiautomatic significantly more dangerous? and why 10 rounds specifically? a bump stock does not make a semiautomatic rifle "more deadly". neither does it modify in any way the internal functioning of a rifle. all it does is assist the shoot in more quickly reciprocating the firearm. a practiced shooter can do this with a belt loop or even just their finger. it also MASSIVELY degrades accuracy as the entire firearm is in motion making impossibly to aim accurately. the truth is, the las vegas shooter using a bump stock very possibly SAVED LIVES, over the shooter engaging in rapid, aimed shots at specific targets.
    3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. your initial fallacy is assuming the center has remained static instead of being inexorably dragged (kicking and screaming) to the left. and what does your zero line represent as a benchmark anyway? ssssooooooooooooo why isnt the "party switch" reflected in your little graphy waphy? 1:20 aaaahhhhhh the old "appeal to authority" fallacy. predictable. 1:33 what were you debating, houseplants? what bargaining with republicans did the democrats engage in with your sides flagship legislation OWEbama care (chirp, chirp [crickets chirping])? in what way did they work together with the republicans (chirp, chirp [more crickets chirping]). how is a party not in power trying to win back the presidency (or house. or senate) in any way extreme? and wouldnt that make the democrats trying to win back the house, or senate at this very moment extreme? (chirp, chirp [overworked crickets diligently chirping]) 5:03 you mean congress tried to operate within its constitutionally defined purview. got it! 5:38 well, at least they didnt WEAPONIZE FAKE RAPE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST AN INNOCENT MAN. just sayin. speaking of abnormal behavior. is writing off a significant part of the populations as "deplorable" (presumably candidates for hillarys "fun adult reeducation camps) normal behavior? (chirp, chirp [wearing crickets wishing there were the sound of a human voice answering difficult questions to fill the void chirping flaggingly]) 8:12 so youre using democrats, visibly, unabashedly, majorly breaking politics as evidence that the republicans broke politics?!??!?!?!??!?! rrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhhhhhhttttttttttt........ 8:58 oohhhhh i get it!!! this whole video is a prefabricated rationalization when democrats start going batcrap crazy and breaking politics even more!!! got it!!! 9:21 you mean like blatantly violating a non disclosure act about secret information by copying it to an unsecured, home brew server in someones bathroom with the the head of the fbi saying you were negligently wreckless and getting off SCOTT FREE?!?!?!?!? like that? ssssooooooo where are the "journalists" (presstitutes) being brutally honest about whats happening to the democratic party (chiraaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrggggggggggg [dead crickets])? the most ironic thing about this video is your cherry picked fake "authority" calling out the lamestream media for not calling out corruption (clinton foundation, uranium one, etc, etc, etc anyone?).
    1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1