Comments by "milcoll73" (@thurin84) on "TimeGhost History" channel.

  1. 27
  2. 19
  3. 14
  4. 12
  5. 11
  6. 9
  7. 9
  8. 9
  9. 8
  10. 8
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 6
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103.  @TimeGhost  its not an appearance. something like 90+% of journalist (in the usa) identify as democrat. im not counting biased news as fake news. im counting false, misleading, or "news" skewed to support a particular false narrative as fake news. yes this comes from both sides, but, as one side has the preponderance of traditional news sources, one side engages in it with more regularity. or fact check at all, as with many people today. in fact many people read no farther than the headline. well, 2 litmus tests for "good looking proof". does it seem to be good to be true and does it immediately seem to confirm your own biases. if so, suspect it immediately. second, always check out who owns the site on which youre receiving this news. and who owns that company, and who controls or founded said company. if its a well known person of a particular party, chances are theres bias especially if the 1st litmus test is true. which is why you question that which does doubly as much as you do other possibilities. i do not know as id call it particular clever as itll surely bite them in the ass (such as has happened with your mh370 story or the recent covington catholic student story) when the facts come out. and theyll surely come out. way too many eyeballs are scouring the internet, and the world really for, such incidents for it not to. its not the same world where despots could keep the masses ignorant and uninformed. i never said it was only a left (or right for that matter) issue. i simply pointed to the fact that one side controls the preponderance of traditional outlets ergo, they engage in it more often. if you think otherwise, its either because thats your side, or you havent looked into it. oh to be sure, but what special interest groups control the outlets? the covington student story absolutely was a left/right situation. the left thought they had something to smear trump with and ran with it without bothering with ANY fact checking.
    1
  104.  @TimeGhost  im actually surprised you perceived much of any right at all, as most feedback (admittedly very anecdotal) suggests europeans seeing only the leftist narrative. no, i dont mean bias, that can easily be accounted for as long as you know which direction of said bias. no actually it doesnt. that i think is from only seeing the side thats being presented by the mainstream media. if you look at what was initially being claimed, and watch the video of what actually happened, there is no interpretation. what was being claimed is 180 degrees from what actually happened. a narrative was crafted to smear our president (because the kids were wearing maga hats) which was not only false, but actually ignored actual transgressions of those that initiated it (the black hebrew isrealites) and whose account was being presented (nathan phillips). this was done, and fact checking ignored, because it helped advance the narrative that the media wished to portray. ie things were crafted ignoring what really happened (video of which was available as soon as what was aired) and the exact opposite was reported. thats not bias, thats flat out deception. much like no one disputes that mh17 was shot down, but a narrative was crafted to protect whom actually did so. actually as soon as as i saw the fabricated photo of the su-25 frogfoot that russia claimed to have shot the airliner down. i knew russia was lying. the su-25 is a ground attack aircraft and doesn not operate at the altitude commercial airliners fly. well as i said, i believe the 2 come together in that the false is being reported as true to support a particular narrative. oh, to be sure. all one has to do is look at the origins of the spanish american war to know this. well the volume of the onslaught is new. but also the ability at one fingertips to sort through it as well. well, human perception being what it is, weve always lived in such a world to some extent. well, cross checking sources bias in both directions and sampling many other sources can counteract this. in fact, i would say it rather takes some effort to willingly remain in ones bubble. very true as ive encountered myself from time to time. i myself just present the facts as i myself know them an encourage the recipient to research it themselves, and move on. well, not amongst anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty. for the others, theres only so much you can do. it may be post fact for them, but not for me.
    1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1