Comments by "milcoll73" (@thurin84) on "PragerU"
channel.
-
315
-
207
-
106
-
91
-
51
-
47
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
31
-
23
-
19
-
19
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
i take it english isnt your 1st language?
in·va·sion
inˈvāZHən/
noun
an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
"the Allied invasion of Normandy"
synonyms: occupation, capture, seizure, annexation, annexing, takeover; More
an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
"stadium guards are preparing for another invasion of fans"
synonyms: influx, inundation, flood, rush, torrent, deluge, avalanche, juggernaut
"an invasion of tourists"
an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
"random drug testing of employees is an unwarranted invasion of privacy"
in·cur·sion
inˈkərZHən/
noun
an invasion or attack, especially a sudden or brief one.
"incursions into enemy territory"
synonyms: attack on, assault on, raid on, invasion of, storming of, overrunning of, foray into, blitz on, sortie into, sally into/against, advance on/into, push into, thrust into, infiltration of
"the Confederate incursion into Mexico"
we had troops in korea when it was invaded BY THE NORTH, our troops were welcomed, we did not invade.
utter fabrication. the only country that invaded south korea was north korea. 2 days after the north invaded the UN gave an ultimatum for their withdrawal and when they didnt authorized military action the balance of which was provided by the us.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=15&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhsuzZ7ajUAhXHQSYKHW1YDkQQFghxMA4&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKorean_War&usg=AFQjCNH7EGT2_av94k6O26a9gLPHG0RVMw&sig2=Y3MZd4iKfTj1I-LACeT6VA
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=13&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhsuzZ7ajUAhXHQSYKHW1YDkQQFghkMAw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.history.com%2Fthis-day-in-history%2Ftruman-orders-u-s-forces-to-korea-2&usg=AFQjCNHRKI80PM7MLk9_FMThnhQFE6HxVQ&sig2=a15ODJbr8lZHi0gwmpq0Ag
suggest you start taking your meds and leave the fevered imaginary world your mind has created.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
yes lets look at austrialia. since the gun ban there have been at least 5 mass shootings; Monash University Shooting 21 October 2002 Melbourne, Victoria, 2011 Hectorville siege 29 April 2011, Hectorville, South Australia, Hunt family murders 9 September 2014 Lockhart, New South Wales, Sydney Siege 15 - 16 December 2014 Sydney, NSW, Ingleburn Shooting 7 March 2016 Ingleburn, New South Wales.
and now criminals are manufacturing their own fully automatic firearms.
you were saying?
if thats true then kindly explain japan that has more than twice the suicide rate than the usa despite having a near total ban on guns?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
and yet they still have mass shootings ; Monash University Shooting 21 October 2002 Melbourne, Victoria, 2011 Hectorville siege 29 April 2011, Hectorville, South Australia, Hunt family murders 9 September 2014 Lockhart, New South Wales, Sydney Siege 15 - 16 December 2014 Sydney, NSW, Ingleburn Shooting 7 March 2016 Ingleburn, New South Wales, and now criminals are manufacturing their own fully automatic firearms. then theres this little thing called the 2nd amendment.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
well just to debunk 1 point of your linked video. they state thereve been zero mass shootings since australias gun ban. this is false; Monash University Shooting 21 October 2002 Melbourne, Victoria, 2011 Hectorville siege 29 April 2011, Hectorville, South Australia, Hunt family murders 9 September 2014 Lockhart, New South Wales, Sydney Siege 15 - 16 December 2014 Sydney, NSW, Ingleburn Shooting 7 March 2016 Ingleburn, New South Wales
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
"common sense gun control"= oxymoron.
the austrialian model isnt working in austrialia either; Monash University Shooting 21 October 2002 Melbourne, Victoria, 2011 Hectorville siege 29 April 2011, Hectorville, South Australia, Hunt family murders 9 September 2014 Lockhart, New South Wales, Sydney Siege 15 - 16 December 2014 Sydney, NSW, Ingleburn Shooting 7 March 2016 Ingleburn, New South Wales.
and now criminals there are manufacturing their own fully automatic firearms. but, but MUHH GUNZ BANNZZ!!!
and the latest cdc study could find no correlation between more guns equating to more gun crime (despite trying very, very hard).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Logan-Eastman ie youre sorry you got caught moving the goalposts. theres a very big difference between sources and primary sources. i have no doubt as to which you originally meant as we both know.
and i provided you with a source. ie a presentor of multiple sources which tend to be more credible for sampling a range of sources. i dont need to google it. i have sources at hand one of which i provided you when challenged to do so. one of which you have yet to provide a reason as to its lack of veracity other then "its a youtube vidoe" as if thats any sort of general disqualifier. as if any of this was in any way unpredictable lol. what? no love for yandex, ccsearch, swissocs, gibiru, onesearch, boardreader,givewater,ekoru,ecosia,info.com,searx???? perhaps you dont know those. oh well. a journalist IS a source. right, but not specifically because 20% of the mail in votes were potentially fraudulent. and 20% is MASSIVE! IT.MOST.CERTAINLY.MASSIVE.EVIDENCE.OF.VOTER.FRAUD.IN.US.ELECTIONS. AS.WELL.AS.BEING.SHADES.OF.THINGS.TO.COME.WITH.EXPANDED.MAIL.IN.VOTING.
as if theres been time for an investigation into it lol. see? there you go moving those darn goalposts again. and now youre moving them to something that is unattainable in regards to the source i provided. im sure thats just a coincidence though. totally.
I.ALREADY.DID.
thats your job. ive satisfied myself as to the veracity of tims reporting via due diligence. its not my job to do YOUR due diligence. that, and you cant lead a biased horse to facts and make them drink of them.
so youre saying that those are the only cases of voter fraud ever? in any cases 1000 is 1000 to many in this day and age.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1239-d4s if they do not have one its their own damn fault as theyre easy to obtain. my legally blind 90 year old grandma managed. maybe if they cant be bothered to acquire one, as easy as it is, maybe they shouldnt vote. yes, you should have to get a picture id to vote to prove you are whom you say you are. its quite easy and a non driver photo id is inexpensive, i believe my grandmothers cost $2.50 at the time. no, saying htey should have a picture id to prove they are whom they say they are to vote is not the lazy argument, making excuse for them not is, and is racist to boot. so yes, if you think minorities are too incompetent to be able to get a photo id as easy as it is, you are indeed racist because you have such low expectations of our fellow americans.
you mean, that is the motivations you project upon republicans to fulfill your confirmation bias. its id requirements that keep our elections as relatively safe as they are. though this does not appear to be the case with the recent mail in balloting as numerous incidents of fraud and bureaucratic incompetence or malfeasance is showing. one entire election in new jersey is having to be redone due to 20% of the ballots being fraudulent or incorrect. 20%!!! id call that pretty massive!!! you are wrong, its kkk DEMOCRATS that used jim crow laws to disenfranchise minorities. i know you all like to project youre illegalities on republicans but this is demonstrably false. voting tests; KKK DEMOCRATS. poll taxes; KKK DEMOCRATS. see a pattern forming? thats a lie. whites are in the majority ergo white have the largest percentage of governmental ids. not that the bearers skin color has anything to do with it. i know you guys like to tie everything to skin color because youre so racist though. yet, your excuses and attitudes say otherwise. otherwise youd stop rationalizing lame, racist excuses for them. how is proving that you say you are whom you say "undemocratic" exactly (this should be interesting). irrelevant as proving you are whom you say you are is non partisan. no. wrong. republicans DO NOT want to disenfranchise any CITIZEN. its not about taking anyones legal right to vote. its about having a secure election. so you can keep your racist projections with your KKK cards. really? is that why so many people are fleeing democrat controlled crapholes for red states? uuummm were not a democray gruberite. we are a constitutional republic. and wanting election integrity is not subverting anything. wanting to cheat election security with fraud is. youre lunatic party isnt even trying to hide it anymore. they never will, because election security will always be a concern. the sooner your lunatic fringe party dissolves the better.
1
-
@1239-d4s you misspelled "it is very apparent i am unable to refute your argument." no, you didnt blatantly say it, but it is clearly evident via your "argument". what other reason is there then? why statistically? and every time ive seen minorities interviewed about the matter they indicated no issues getting ids and were incensed to think anyone would think them unable. yeah, i know. its because you dont understand how and you dont want me to embarrass you and point out what an infinitesimal (sound it out, and google it if you need to)percentage we are speaking of. as i said, i believe my grandmas no driver photo id was about $2.50. so the low income excuse doesnt cut it. well, at least i know how to spell "you" and use it in a sentence. just sayin. once again if you think minorities are too incompetent to be able to acquire a phot id YOU ARE RACIST because you have such low expectations of our fellow americans. yes, they should. you need to be able to prove you are whom you say you are when carrying out such an important civic duty as voting. the fact that you dont says how ok you are with cheating. and we all know why. because democrats cant win election without cheating. pretending a rationalization for not giving an argument is not an argument. ill be happy to repeat that over and over again until you comprehend it.
and there you go playing semantic word games. no. there was no mythical "party switch" that is a lie. if its true it should be easy for you to provide an advertisement of a democrat party plank that the switchers brought with them and republicized as a republican party plank. ill wait (chirp, chirp[eternally conservative crickets chirping]). nope. they are not. they are still the conservative party that they were when they were formed in the decade before the civil war (you know, the war democrats cause when they got made we were going to take their slaves away). yes, that would be a nonsensical argument. as nonsensical as the mythical "party switch" lol. im not the racist saying minorities are too incompetent to acquire a voter id or obsessing about skin color statistics my racist friend. just sayin. once again ill say it since you seem slow. WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY GRUBERITE. WE ARE NOW, AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. GO BACK AND RETAKE A CIVICS CLASS. AND TRY NOT BEING STONED THIS TIME. no. you see im not a racist who thinks minorities are too incompetent to get a voter id nor obsessing about skin color statistics. there is someone in this conversation that is though. and thats you my racist friend. so where did i ever say that? its just that the dems have made an artform out of it whereas the republicans are rank amateurs. you mean the leftist propaganda trying to project their racist past onto others? yeah, i skipped that propaganda. i studied real history. you should try it.
actually it does. election integrity in no way subverts anything. in fact, quite the opposite. once again, go look whos fleeing what states to where lol. never mind, youll learn after the census when representational apportionment looses blue states legislative representatives. cant wait to sample you alls tears of unfathomable sadness lol. in what way? be specific (this should be interesting [btw still waiting on your mental gymnastics explaining what other reason then incompetence for your "argument" that voter id laws "disenfranchise" minority voters]) citizens absolutely should have a voice in the policies of our great nation. 100% ie" i have no counter to your argument."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
tell that to the 500,000-3,000,000 americans who defend themselves with a gun every year. according to the cdc.
also tell that to the criminals in australia, brazil, canada, isreal, mexico, and the uk that simply set up their own illicit firearms factories and crank out their own fully finished, fully functional, fully automatic firearms. they didnt seem to get the memo.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@handhelder823 but do you hear about the between 500,000-3,000,000 (according to the cdc) american who defend themselves with a firearm per year? have you heard of elisja dicken who, with only his handgun, stopped a shooter in an indiana mall in only 30 seconds at 40 yards with an amazing 8 out of 10 shots hitting? or the lady in west virginia with a handgun that stopped a shooter with an ar-15 before he could kill anyone? or any of the other similar such incidents? do you hear that these incidents happen almost exclusively in gun free zones in democrat controlled urban areas, often with strict gun control? have you heard that if we remove (i wish) chicago, detroit, washington dc, st louis, and phillidelphia from the accounting the us murder rate falls to 189 out of 193? all these cities have 2 things in common; democrat controlled and strict gun control.
1
-
@handhelder823 no, the issue is gun control obviously doesnt work. if gun control works so well, why are there any?
how are you going to accomplish that. in australia, beazil, canada, isreal, mexico, and the uk (and doubtless many others, but these i have examples for) after strict gun bans, criminals set up their own illicit firearms factories and cranked out their own fully, finished, fully functional, fully automatic firearms, essentially making them better armed than before the bans. so how are you going to stop that? hell, look at what happened to shinzo abe. japans got a near total prohibition on private firearms ownership. so the assassin just cobbled together his own.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1