Comments by "sdrc92126" (@sdrc92126) on "Climate \"Science\" | Dr. Richard Lindzen | EP 320" video.

  1. Wow, this guy is my new hero! I have bs in physics and applied math and Lindzen perfectly summarizes my views, much better than I have ever been ableto explain to people. I've never played around with climate modeling other than college (Lorenz and chaos/bifurcation), but have worked with aerodynamists from NASA and am well aware of the issues Lindzen adresses. Major props to Peterson for at least appearing to understand what the real problems that Lindzen brings up. These are some of the things even people in the field don't quite grasp. Most impressive. 👏
    160
  2.  @michaelbabbitt3837  I'm just not interested in climate or pro or anti extiction hysteria. I suspect there are dozens, perhaps thousands of researchers in other fields that I have not heard of. I don't think I could name 6 (pro and anti combined) if I tried.
    3
  3. @@nickshannon7442 I learned on my internship that science doesn't prove anything. It offers evidence for and against a theory.
    3
  4.  rogerjamespaul5528  I didn't read, but the major impacts of fossil fuels are being done by China. so did ExxonMobil predict China?
    3
  5. Corn, most crops, grow in climate as different as >20C. Northern MI and Southern AZ. No climate change short of an Ice Age will turn one into the other.
    2
  6. I'm not a psychologist, but I read an article 10 For-Sure Signs You're In A Cult and so much around the scence of climate (and more recently the thing) seems to meet many of those requirements. I think it would be interesting for Dr Peterson to maybe talk about cults and (psuedo)science. From my understanding this was integral to what happened in Germany around the begining of the twentieth century. Maybe any relation to Blavatsky.
    1
  7.  @le13579  Maybe, I try not to follow political stuff. I'd just come across that list searching for something else and it seemed to fit so perfectly. I'm not a psychologist and it could be completely bogus. That's why I think someone more qualified should address it.
    1