Comments by "sdrc92126" (@sdrc92126) on "Head of Russia's Space Agency Drops Bombshell Claim: Did America Fake the Moon Landing?" video.

It's a religious belief if no amount of evidence can change your mind
10
I remember trying to take photographs of fireworks on a film camera in the 1980's and it never worked, much less stars.
6
If you do not accept the 35,000 photographs as proof, what would you accept as proof?
4
@torylivingston8368 My biggest job when I worked for a NASA subcontractor was working on radiation resilient circuits for the shuttle. Yeah, it's below the va belt, but still elevated radiation. Actually, the most harmful radiation is at lower altitudes. I think it is because scattering and the resutant particals and energies are more damaging. IIRC (probably not, it was 25 years ago) I think that happens around 13miles. Also, as far as electronics goes, older electronics hold up better because of the size of transistors, a single particle can flip a bit on a small gate, but not a large one. Not even addressing the fact that apollo didn't even have electronics as we know it today. Everything was big heavy wires that too a lot of evergy to do anything
3
Start by asking if it is physically possible. If the answer is yes, then you only have to ask why not ? Even motivated high school students can verify that the answer is yes.
2
 @davidaturner I looked at it. Very unconvincing. I have an easy way to convince science and math people that it was fake, but nobody does it
1
@edgewizz862 The difference is that the gravity of Mars is much higher than the moon. It's all exponential, so the size of the rocket +fuel is exponentially larger. It's easy to see if you know the math.
1
@ValMartinIreland And they're penetrating you as you sit there typing.
1
What would you accept as proof. There are over 300,000 apollo 11 photographs according to internet search.
1
Astronauts walked out of the shuttle and were not carried. Two weeks is not long enough for your muscles to decay.
1