Comments by "TheThirdMan" (@thethirdman225) on "Why denazification failed" video.

@liammeech3702 He’d need a bit more than that for an effective character reference.
2
@battlepassgaming The Soviet Union always saw its Western border as being at the Cursor Line. Modern day nationalists in Russia are of the same opinion.
1
@simongee8928 I would argue that there was very little difference. In a totalitarian society, like Nazi Germany, the leader is a god.
1
@ArmandoBellagio Have a look at the number of major organisations and families who benefited from their association with the Nazis but who even today, have never apologised. Companies like Porsche-Piech, BMW, Volkswagen, Dr Oetker's and several of the banks have never acknowledged that they benefited massively from a kleptocracy..They also benefited from slave labour and appropriation of Jewish businesses. Companies like Krupp, on the other hand, have made a concerted effort and admitted their wrongs.
1
@Depressed_Blackpiller-u There aren’t many of them left.
1
@smugram5937 < Oops! Found the Nazi!
1
YouTube is a private site. They set the rules, exactly as you would if you owned it.
1
@wombatwilly1002 Triggered much?
1
@williamyoung9401 How do you know it wasn’t a decision made by the content creator, independently of YouTube?
1
@endospores The Nazi party actually stopped taking members in 1934 (from memory), following a rush by the public to join. By the time of the moratorium on membership they had a couple of million. No one was ever forced to join.
1
@endospores Nobody was required to become a member of the party. In fact, such was the enthusiasm that in 1934, the party had to declare a moratorium on new memberships. At that stage there were something like two million members. Even major industrialists like Günther Quandt only flirted with party membership but nobody doubted his loyalties (he had been married to the woman who would become Magda Göbbels). It didn’t stop him being the wealthiest person in Germany.
1