Comments by "TheThirdMan" (@thethirdman225) on "Naval Tactics in the Age of Sail (1650-1815)" video.
-
4
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremypnet I get how it works but that's always going to be the case. The difference here was that ,because they attempted to split the fleet, the two columns were crossing the French/Spanish bows, which were generally less vulnerable than their stern galleries. So yeah, I get your point. The British were generally better sailors, if only because they spent more time at sea. A lot more, in fact. Ships like Victory were actually more trouble than they were worth in a lot of ways: too much windage. poor ratio of sail area to tonnage, slow, unmanoeuvrable and not good in a poor sea. Third raters - around 75-80 guns were a lot more use.
So, in fact, I'm really not surprised that Nelson was under fire for so long before he could return fire. I'm also surmising that this was the reason behind the popularity of bow carronades...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1